"Will this file note that the two boys "pointed pencils at each other and made shooting noises?" Or will it state something to the effect that the boys broke the school's policy on violence and threatening behavior? My guess is the latter, which will allow anyone perusing the record to imagine the worst."
That's not an ad-hom, that's just an accurate description.
Ad-hom: out_of_the_blue is a (f.ex) vegan, and vegans know nothing about copyright!
Not ad-hom: out_of_the_blue's comments are completely idiotic and deluded, and show that he's a troll or insane, and demonstrate that he knows nothing about copyright.
What is this? An empty comment? It's a giant white rectangle! You haven't showed me any of Mike's positions! No links or anything, not even your name! Ack, it's a blank name! You don't exist, this comment never happened.
They should make their own list, call it the 707 list or whatever, "list of douchebag countries that have stupid lists used to manipulate other countries on behest of their corporate overlords." Make it one country long, and write "United States of America" on it.
Oh, so all this is about out_of_the_blue complaining that some aren't quick to stereotype others. This explains a lot. He can't accept that a blogger somewhere says "this rich guy is bad, that rich guy is bad", no, he won't shut up until it's "the Rich(TM) are bad! all of them! blarghablargha!"
1. Give employer password to Facebook.
2. Post instructions for bomb making in wall
3. Accuse employer of tampering with user's wall, and terrorist activities.
4. Fun!
out_of_the_blue already admitted that he never reads any replies or responds to them, so it makes sense that he asked Mike but then didn't bother with reading any answer.
If you don't want to depend on an employer, you can be self-employed or become an employer yourself.
The latter two probably need more than skills, they need connections and/or capital. And even then, you can't have employers without employees, so for each employer, we probably would have at least 5 or so people that are employees.
I mean, it's not like every person that has had a criminal record can found his own company or do freelance work. I mean, if that's possible, then in theory every person in the world could be self-employed... but on average, they won't.
So you end up with a "caste" of permanently unemployed people anyway if something isn't fixed.
Re: OOTB
omg teh editior
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Wow, so every heteroSEXUAL couple is in a loveless relationship just for the sex? Who'd have known!
Re: Re: Re: Re: How is it different?
Just wanted to add, this may not go well, what with having contracts with the actors and the cable companies and so on.
Re: Re: Re: How is it different?
You mean that if not enough people pay, a new episode of Game of Thrones won't be made?
Well, if they really need the "kickstart" YouTube money, sure, why wouldn't it work?
They'd have to cancel the show on TV and Cable and everywhere else too, however, if they don't reach the KickstarTube funding goal.
Re: libertarian deception
Haha. Racist spam.
Go back to Stormfront, bot.
Re: Re: Re:
From the article:
"Will this file note that the two boys "pointed pencils at each other and made shooting noises?" Or will it state something to the effect that the boys broke the school's policy on violence and threatening behavior? My guess is the latter, which will allow anyone perusing the record to imagine the worst."
Re: Re: Nothing to disagree with here! -- Because nothing here.
That's not an ad-hom, that's just an accurate description.
Ad-hom: out_of_the_blue is a (f.ex) vegan, and vegans know nothing about copyright!
Not ad-hom: out_of_the_blue's comments are completely idiotic and deluded, and show that he's a troll or insane, and demonstrate that he knows nothing about copyright.
Re: Re: Nothing to disagree with here! -- Because nothing here.
*channeling out_of_the_blue*
What is this? An empty comment? It's a giant white rectangle! You haven't showed me any of Mike's positions! No links or anything, not even your name! Ack, it's a blank name! You don't exist, this comment never happened.
Everyone here is k-ra-zy!
*channeling finished*
Re: Will Wright
Agreed. Will Wright exists.
(untitled comment)
They should make their own list, call it the 707 list or whatever, "list of douchebag countries that have stupid lists used to manipulate other countries on behest of their corporate overlords." Make it one country long, and write "United States of America" on it.
Re: Mike continually surprised that Rich corporatists are bad.
"can't or won't generalize"
Oh, so all this is about out_of_the_blue complaining that some aren't quick to stereotype others. This explains a lot. He can't accept that a blogger somewhere says "this rich guy is bad, that rich guy is bad", no, he won't shut up until it's "the Rich(TM) are bad! all of them! blarghablargha!"
Re: Re:
omg atheists are the evulz
Re: Also in the document
It's Got What Plants Crave!
(untitled comment)
"Columbine turned trench coat ownership and Marilyn Manson fandom into signs of impending, shotgun-toting DOOM"
I think DOOM is a pretty cool guy. Eh kills zombeis and doesnt afraid of anything.
Re: Actually this could be good for employees!
1. Give employer password to Facebook.
2. Post instructions for bomb making in wall
3. Accuse employer of tampering with user's wall, and terrorist activities.
4. Fun!
Re: Jaron Lanier: Why people should pay more attention to me and not Web 2.0
Will the monks teach me to fus ro dah?
Re: Re: Re:
So you only debate him if he's nice to you.
Kudos, now you understand how it works.
Re: Re: But MANY people ARE thriving in the current "permissions culture".
out_of_the_blue already admitted that he never reads any replies or responds to them, so it makes sense that he asked Mike but then didn't bother with reading any answer.
Re: The real issue is employer dependence.
If you don't want to depend on an employer, you can be self-employed or become an employer yourself.
The latter two probably need more than skills, they need connections and/or capital. And even then, you can't have employers without employees, so for each employer, we probably would have at least 5 or so people that are employees.
I mean, it's not like every person that has had a criminal record can found his own company or do freelance work. I mean, if that's possible, then in theory every person in the world could be self-employed... but on average, they won't.
So you end up with a "caste" of permanently unemployed people anyway if something isn't fixed.
Re:
That's easy. They pay the fine. And if they don't, they get assets seized.