Why let EvilPirateMonkey@gmail.com have all the fun and glory? You too can get included in Jacques Nazaire's next wacky court filing just by dashing off a hastily composed missive.
Here's all you need to do:
1) Think up crazy or insulting or even completely factual stuff.
2) Email it off to Jacques Nazaire.
3) Sit back and bask in the resulting fame.
Just think about it! You could be the very next winner* like EvilPirateMonkey@gmail.com in the hilarious Prenda Circus of Copyright Litigation Shame!
(*Contest not legal in Rhode Island and Cochise County, Az.)
A matching receiver typically comes with the transmitter. Once again, both for less than $100. You could attach a USB Video capture dongle to the receiver and record some of his flight video on a notebook PC, then loop it back to him via your more powerful transmitter. This would likely confuse him enough to end the flight quickly in a crash. But work fast, his flight will typically last only 8 to 12 minutes.
A blast of water is nice but could prompt this very rude hobbyist to get angry and take a swing at you.
Being a FPV(First Person Video) MULTICOPTER (Not DRONE, please!) hobbyist and pilot myself I can tell you that while the control signals from the transmitter are fairly secure 2.4 gigahertz band frequency hopping transmissions, the video transmissions from the copter to the Pilot's video goggles are simple FM (Frequency modulation) signals and are subject to jamming with a stronger signal. I can also tell you that the video is either on the 900mhz band or the 5.8 gigahertz band and more likely the latter.
The next time he shows up, send someone else down to ask interested party questions to get more technical information about his video link frequency. Then buy a 600mW transmitter you need. It will cost under $100. Buy a "board camera" too for $30. Install this setup near a window with the camera focused on a small sign that sends a "very special message" to your pest hobbyist.
Personally, I'd like to apologize to everyone about this guy. Virtually all of us FPV guys are just out having fun flying our model aircraft and are not interested in invading anyone's privacy. Please don't lump us in with this jerk.
"Obscenity", without being rooted in an actual crime involving a victim, such as genuine photographic child pornography, is nothing more than an idea or expression that may make someone "emotionally uncomfortable".
Criminal law has no business wading into the wildly subjective world of feelings.
Google may not be doing the mining for the feds, but if I were the NSA, I'd have taps on all of Google's fiber and reading every last damned query.
This is NO different than feeding telephonic audio streams to farms of supercomputers and listening for threshold keywords which would then get the call popped onto the stack for a wetware analyst to listen to it.
"So I am not sure what the right answer is here. Yes NASCAR did abuse the DMCA notice, however should there be a way for them to delay the posting of such videos out of respect for the injured and their families?"
Precisely measured and stated, how does "respect for the injured and their families", a small number of people, outweigh the rights of the copyright holder to share his/her work detailing the reality of an important news event with millions and millions of others who have a legitimate right to know about what happened?
And while we're at it, what other ways would you prefer that we all self-censor ourselves?
Good point, but that point is based entirely on the -assumption- that the data being transferred is actually being written to a file. It is a trivial matter to write a program that transfers Torrent or other P-2-P sourced data and simply dumps the incoming memory buffers as the data is received.
Computer technology is Hyperpolymorphic. Anything -IS- possible and -MUST- be taken into consideration. You must -NOT- assume anything is happening until you can prove it authoritatively.
...The Judge forgot something just a substantial as his "RULE 1."
RULE 4. BEFORE SUING A DEFENDANT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, YOU MUST PROVE THAT THE FILE DATA TRANSFERRED WAS ACTUALLY USED TO CREATE A FILE COPY OF THE COPYRIGHTED WORK ON THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER. IF THE DATA TRANSFERRED IS NOT ASSEMBLED INTO A FILE ON THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER, THEN NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OCCURRED.
Short of Gulags and Death Camps, I cannot think of a more compelling example trait that transitions a Government from "By the People, for the People" to an outright Tyranny.
Think about what this means for our futures, and the futures of our children.
The Woz is right.
.
This is not my America either.
As a conservative, I loathe The Patriot Act. Not only for what it has done to my Country, but also for the absolute lie of the name itself.
It should have been called The Tyranny Act.
.
Re: Galaxy Zoo
.
I will not rest until there is a class of galaxies known as DoggiePooSwirls.
.
Re: What happens when the musical chairs stop?
.
Next we'll be told that it's not Alan Cooper or Salt Marsh, but one Mobius Stripp.
.
Re: don't forget
.
From the "About Us" page: (Dated 4/20/2013!)
"As for his health, Brett's condition is stable (i.e. good), and is looking forward to hanging with all of his friends down in Grenada."
Brett, buddy. You are sooooo busted.
.
Announcing the next EXHIBIT B contest!!!
.
Hi there Boys and Girls!
Why let EvilPirateMonkey@gmail.com have all the fun and glory? You too can get included in Jacques Nazaire's next wacky court filing just by dashing off a hastily composed missive.
Here's all you need to do:
1) Think up crazy or insulting or even completely factual stuff.
2) Email it off to Jacques Nazaire.
3) Sit back and bask in the resulting fame.
Just think about it! You could be the very next winner* like EvilPirateMonkey@gmail.com in the hilarious Prenda Circus of Copyright Litigation Shame!
(*Contest not legal in Rhode Island and Cochise County, Az.)
.
Re: Re: Water Blasts are nice, but...
.
A matching receiver typically comes with the transmitter. Once again, both for less than $100. You could attach a USB Video capture dongle to the receiver and record some of his flight video on a notebook PC, then loop it back to him via your more powerful transmitter. This would likely confuse him enough to end the flight quickly in a crash. But work fast, his flight will typically last only 8 to 12 minutes.
.
Water Blasts are nice, but...
.
A blast of water is nice but could prompt this very rude hobbyist to get angry and take a swing at you.
Being a FPV(First Person Video) MULTICOPTER (Not DRONE, please!) hobbyist and pilot myself I can tell you that while the control signals from the transmitter are fairly secure 2.4 gigahertz band frequency hopping transmissions, the video transmissions from the copter to the Pilot's video goggles are simple FM (Frequency modulation) signals and are subject to jamming with a stronger signal. I can also tell you that the video is either on the 900mhz band or the 5.8 gigahertz band and more likely the latter.
The next time he shows up, send someone else down to ask interested party questions to get more technical information about his video link frequency. Then buy a 600mW transmitter you need. It will cost under $100. Buy a "board camera" too for $30. Install this setup near a window with the camera focused on a small sign that sends a "very special message" to your pest hobbyist.
Personally, I'd like to apologize to everyone about this guy. Virtually all of us FPV guys are just out having fun flying our model aircraft and are not interested in invading anyone's privacy. Please don't lump us in with this jerk.
.
Re:
.
So far, so good.
But hey, keep asking a million times a day over the next few thousand years.
We'll be here.
.
Re:
.
"Obscenity", without being rooted in an actual crime involving a victim, such as genuine photographic child pornography, is nothing more than an idea or expression that may make someone "emotionally uncomfortable".
Criminal law has no business wading into the wildly subjective world of feelings.
.
Re: Re: Re: So, anyone who still believes that "1984" is fiction?
.
OOTB may not be too far off the mark here.
Google may not be doing the mining for the feds, but if I were the NSA, I'd have taps on all of Google's fiber and reading every last damned query.
This is NO different than feeding telephonic audio streams to farms of supercomputers and listening for threshold keywords which would then get the call popped onto the stack for a wetware analyst to listen to it.
.
Wow!
.
...That there is some serious Communist crazy-talk!
.
Re: Or better yet, THE NAMING RIGHTS TO LAWS.
.
And in a somber, yet forceful voice the Judge said,
"Mr. John Doe, please rise.
You are hereby charged with 4 counts of the RALSTON PURINA Animal Neglect Act. How do you plead?"
.
Re: Another Avenue
.
"So I am not sure what the right answer is here. Yes NASCAR did abuse the DMCA notice, however should there be a way for them to delay the posting of such videos out of respect for the injured and their families?"
Precisely measured and stated, how does "respect for the injured and their families", a small number of people, outweigh the rights of the copyright holder to share his/her work detailing the reality of an important news event with millions and millions of others who have a legitimate right to know about what happened?
And while we're at it, what other ways would you prefer that we all self-censor ourselves?
.
Re: Re: Nice, But...
.
Good point, but that point is based entirely on the -assumption- that the data being transferred is actually being written to a file. It is a trivial matter to write a program that transfers Torrent or other P-2-P sourced data and simply dumps the incoming memory buffers as the data is received.
Computer technology is Hyperpolymorphic. Anything -IS- possible and -MUST- be taken into consideration. You must -NOT- assume anything is happening until you can prove it authoritatively.
.
Nice, But...
.
...The Judge forgot something just a substantial as his "RULE 1."
RULE 4. BEFORE SUING A DEFENDANT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, YOU MUST PROVE THAT THE FILE DATA TRANSFERRED WAS ACTUALLY USED TO CREATE A FILE COPY OF THE COPYRIGHTED WORK ON THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER. IF THE DATA TRANSFERRED IS NOT ASSEMBLED INTO A FILE ON THE DEFENDANT'S COMPUTER, THEN NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OCCURRED.
.
End of an Unwritten Epic Poem...
.
...
...
...
...
And such was the warning of Farhad Manjoo,
"They did it to Swartz, and they'll do it to you."
.
I am excited...
.
Today, I am excited and proud to be a Netflix customer.
Just a little more of this stuff and participation from other networks and I will DUMP DirecTV like an ugly, smelly prom date.
.
Hmmmm....
.
Looks like a recipe for disappointment.
.
Richard Marx?? Never heard of him.
.
But now I have and what I know boils down to this:
"Richard Marx is thin-skinned petulant ass looking for a fight."
Has this piqued my interest?
Not one damned bit.
Rot in obscurity Mr. Marx, rot in obscurity.
.
Sad, really.
.
Secret Laws.
Short of Gulags and Death Camps, I cannot think of a more compelling example trait that transitions a Government from "By the People, for the People" to an outright Tyranny.
Think about what this means for our futures, and the futures of our children.
.