<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;xkcd&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:50:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Humble eBook Bundle Passes $600k, Adds Five Awesome Webcomic Books</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121016/08073820716/humble-ebook-bundle-passes-600k-adds-five-awesome-webcomic-books.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121016/08073820716/humble-ebook-bundle-passes-600k-adds-five-awesome-webcomic-books.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ One of the general rules for successful marketing is to under promise and over deliver, and the guys at Humble Bundle seem to keep doing that.  While they've become famous for showing how cool bundles of digital products on a limited-time "pay what you want" basis can be a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120531/16214619156/latest-humble-bundle-pay-what-you-want-indie-games-raises-1-million-five-hours.shtml">massive success</a>, they keep doing really interesting things to tweak those experiments to show how you can "under promise and over deliver" in a way that encourages people to (happily) pay more and get more than they expect.  From the beginning, they've used the charitable component (you can designate whatever portion of what you pay to go to charity) to get people to pay more -- something <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/entrepreneurs/articles/20100716/17423610253.shtml">studies</a> have shown works well to get people to pay higher amounts.  They've also offered special products if you pay above the average price, which encourages people to both buy earlier, when the price may be lower, and to pay more, to get over the average to get the "special" extras.  Finally, they consistently add <i>awesome</i> new products later on, while the Bundle is still going -- adding those extras automatically to everyone who already bought (encouraging people to buy early) or making them available to new buyers who pay above the average (again, pushing the amount people want to pay higher).
<br /><br />
This round is no exception.  After raising over $500,000 for the first round <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121009/00380820655/humble-bundle-launches-its-first-ebook-bundle-books-neil-gaiman-cory-doctorow-john-scalzi-more.shtml" target="_blank">of (great) books, mostly from sci-fi authors</a>, they've now <a href="http://www.humblebundle.com/" target="_blank">added a pretty awesome "webcomic bundle"</a> to the batch:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/NqQgE"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/NqQgE.png" width=560 /></a>
</center>
For everyone who's already ordered, or anyone new who pays over the existing average price, they now <i>also</i> get:
<ul>
<li><i>xkcd: volume 0</i> by Randall Munroe
</li><li><i>Penny Arcade Volume 1: Attack of the Bacon Robots</i> by Jerry Holkins and Mike Krahulik
</li><li><i>Penny Arcade Volume 2: Epic Legends of the Magic Sword Kings</i> by Jerry Holkins and Mike Krahulik
</li><li><i>Save Yourself, Mammal!: A Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal Collection</i> by Zach Weiner
</li><li><i>The Most Dangerous Game: A Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal Collection</i> by Zach Weiner
</li></ul>
Of course, these are basically <i>the</i> three biggest names in webcomics, especially among the geekset who is probably already quite into Humble Bundle.  It's yet another case of over delivering in a fun and exciting way.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121016/08073820716/humble-ebook-bundle-passes-600k-adds-five-awesome-webcomic-books.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121016/08073820716/humble-ebook-bundle-passes-600k-adds-five-awesome-webcomic-books.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121016/08073820716/humble-ebook-bundle-passes-600k-adds-five-awesome-webcomic-books.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>under-promise-and-over-deliver</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121016/08073820716</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Jun 2012 03:03:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Study Claims Old People Select Stronger Passwords Than Teens</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/13425419174/study-claims-old-people-select-stronger-passwords-than-teens.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/13425419174/study-claims-old-people-select-stronger-passwords-than-teens.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've all seen tons of reports on how bad people are at choosing <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120208/03295517697/syrian-presidents-email-hacked-his-password-was-12345.shtml">secure passwords</a>, but it's not too surprising to find out that different demographic segments are better or worse than others at having secure passwords.  Though, it may be a bit surprising to find out that a new study suggests that <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21871-over55s-pick-passwords-twice-as-secure-as-teenagers.html" target="_blank">those over 55 pick passwords that are twice as secure as teenagers</a>:
<br /><br />
This was based on research on the hashed versions of 70 million Yahoo users, in which a Cambridge research tried to determine the strength of all of the passwords, and see how different groups did.   Some of the other findings:
<blockquote><i>
People with a credit card stored on their account do little to increase their security other than avoiding very weak passwords such as "123456". Unsurprisingly, people who change their password from time to time tend to select the strongest ones.
</i></blockquote>
In terms of more specifics:
<blockquote><i>
Password strength is measured in bits, where cracking one bit is equivalent to the chance of correctly calling a fair coin toss, and each additional bit doubles the password's strength. On average, Bonneau found that user-chosen passwords offer less than 10 bits of security against online attacks, meaning it would only take around 1000 attempts to try every possible password, and around 20 bits of security against offline attacks.
<br /><br />
That's surprising, because even a randomly chosen six-character password composed of digits and upper and lower case letters should offer 32 bits of security. Bonneau says the discrepancy is due to people picking much easier passwords than those theoretically allowed. He suggests assigning people randomly chosen nine-digit numbers instead, which would offer 30 bits of security against every type of attack &#8211; a 1000-fold increase in security on average. "I think it's reasonable to expect people to have the capacity to remember that, because they do it for phone numbers," he says.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, this reminds me (like so much does) of an <a href="http://xkcd.com/936/" target="_blank">xkcd comic</a> on how we've all been trained into selecting weak passwords that are hard to remember, on the false belief that they're strong.
<center>
<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/password_strength.png" title="To anyone who understands information theory and security and is in an infuriating argument with someone who does not (possibly involving mixed case), I sincerely apologize." width=560/>
</center><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/13425419174/study-claims-old-people-select-stronger-passwords-than-teens.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/13425419174/study-claims-old-people-select-stronger-passwords-than-teens.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/13425419174/study-claims-old-people-select-stronger-passwords-than-teens.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>maybe-they-just-follow-instructions-better?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120601/13425419174</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Personal Analytics.. On The Rise?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100329/1007038762/dailydirt-personal-analytics-rise.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100329/1007038762/dailydirt-personal-analytics-rise.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've talked about <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/22571812174/dailydirt-measuring-every-moment-our-lives.shtml">lifelogging</a> a bit before, where people record nearly every moment of their lives (and make it public somehow). Ignoring Facebook statuses from people's running shoes is just the beginning. Here are a few more examples.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/03/the-personal-analytics-of-my-life/" href="http://bit.ly/y8OthW">Stephen Wolfram posted an analysis of his emails/keystrokes/phonecalls for the past decade or so.</a> If he ever publishes the raw data, it'll be pretty simple to figure out all of his passwords. [<a href="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/03/the-personal-analytics-of-my-life/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://xkcd.com/907/" href="http://bit.ly/wRGc4P">XKCD covers lifeloggers with a nice comic that summarizes a typical technogeek dad.</a> "<i>I'm glad I'm not the clueless person I was 5 years ago, but now I don't want to get any older.</i>" [<a href="http://xkcd.com/907/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://flowingdata.com/2009/10/15/one-life-one-stacked-area-chart/" href="http://bit.ly/wSn1BL">Ben Fogarty plotted his life in a stacked area chart from age 0 to 32.</a> It's a cool chart, but the area under "listening" as an activity makes it look like he went deaf at age 27. [<a href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/10/15/one-life-one-stacked-area-chart/">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To find some more bizarre/crazy stuff, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:426" href="http://bit.ly/rghIeN">check out some things that other StumbleUpon users have found.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:426">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100329/1007038762/dailydirt-personal-analytics-rise.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100329/1007038762/dailydirt-personal-analytics-rise.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100329/1007038762/dailydirt-personal-analytics-rise.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100329/1007038762</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:10:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>The Scale Of Money</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11281716863/scale-money.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11281716863/scale-money.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ No one I know puts "scale" into perspective better than Randall Munroe at xkcd.  If you haven't seen the latest, you should take the time to dive into what may be his largest image ever (and he's known for creating large images) dealing with <a href="http://xkcd.com/980/" target="_blank"><i>money</i></a>.  I warn you, though, it may suck up a lot of time as you go through it:
<center>
<a http://xkcd.com/980/huge/#x=-9308&#038;y=-4612&#038;z=5" target="_blank"><img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/money.png" width=560 title="There, I showed you it." alt="Money"/></a>
</center>
While he's offering a <a href="http://store.xkcd.com/xkcd/#MoneyPoster" target="_blank">poster</a> of it for sale (along with some of his other "giant" images), I'm not sure even a poster does something like this justice, which is why he's also offering it as a "custom-printed four-poster tile pack. It comes as four individual 36"x24" posters which can be tiled on the wall, for a six-foot-wide mural view of the chart, allowing you to clearly read even the finest details."  I may have to put that on my holiday wishlist.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11281716863/scale-money.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11281716863/scale-money.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11281716863/scale-money.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>spend-a-few-hours</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111121/11281716863</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:07:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The Giving Tree... In The Age Of DRM</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22171016085/giving-tree-age-drm.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22171016085/giving-tree-age-drm.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It appears that xkcd has decided to do a <a href="http://xkcd.com/956/" target="_blank">modern update</a> on the Shel Silverstein classic, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Giving_Tree" target="_blank"><i>The Giving Tree</i></a>, in the age of DRM:
<center>
<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/sharing.png" title="In the new edition of The Giving Tree, the tree uses social tools to share with its friend all the best places to buy things." alt="Sharing" width=560 /><br />
</center>
While this may just be a little comic joke, the larger point is worth highlighting.  In the age of DRM, things that might have been considered normal "sharing" in the past are no longer allowed, despite being easier than ever in reality.  That should trouble people.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22171016085/giving-tree-age-drm.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22171016085/giving-tree-age-drm.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110925/22171016085/giving-tree-age-drm.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well,-that-was-quick</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110925/22171016085</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Don't Just Give People Numbers... Draw Charts?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110204/11534212964/dailydirt-dont-just-give-people-numbers-draw-charts.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110204/11534212964/dailydirt-dont-just-give-people-numbers-draw-charts.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A number is often meaningless without a unit attached to it, but sometimes a unit is useless if it's an unfamiliar one.  Given all the reporting on  the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, a few helpful folks have created some charts to better explain what the radiation dosages mean.  These graphs aren't perfect, but they attempt to put some uncommon figures into context.  If you don't know what a sievert is, check out these charts.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://xkcd.com/radiation/" href="http://bit.ly/gkDRwG">XKCD has a chart that illustrates radiation dosages to help folks understand what the sievert unit means.</a> No stick figures were harmed in the production of this chart. (Also, feel free to copy and distribute it because it's public domain material.) [<a href="http://xkcd.com/radiation/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/" href="http://bit.ly/gM4SCg">A slightly more colorful chart of what a sievert unit means is available for purchase -- with all the money going to help with the disaster relief effort.</a> The logarithmic scale on this one is kind of easy to miss on this chart, though... [<a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.visualizing.org/sites/default/files/images/nuclear-radiation-chart.jpg" href="http://bit.ly/fR6XDV">Here's a chart that's a bit more complicated to read, but it also incorporates exposure time.</a> Unfortunately, Roy G Biv is apparently not helpful for determining the order of severity. [<a href="http://www.visualizing.org/sites/default/files/images/nuclear-radiation-chart.jpg">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/02/world/asia/assessing-the-radiation-danger.html?" href="http://nyti.ms/hIQA22">The New York Times published a nice table explaining how far the effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster have spread.</a> For the radiation detected near British Columbia, <i>"a person would have to drink 3 million glasses of water at one time to reach a problematic dose in the thyroid."</i> [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/02/world/asia/assessing-the-radiation-danger.html?">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To find more stuff on research &#038; research tools, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:485" href="http://bit.ly/h7DUyL">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:485">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul>

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110204/11534212964/dailydirt-dont-just-give-people-numbers-draw-charts.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110204/11534212964/dailydirt-dont-just-give-people-numbers-draw-charts.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110204/11534212964/dailydirt-dont-just-give-people-numbers-draw-charts.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110204/11534212964</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:56:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Could Doonesbury Learn Anything From XKCD?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091005/1146406427.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091005/1146406427.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Via <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&#038;aid=171191">Poynter Online</a>, there's a recent interview with Doonesbury creator Garry Trudeau where he <a href="http://www.news-record.com/content/2009/10/01/article/a_few_words_with_garry_trudeau">talks about his post-newspaper media plans</a> and what he sees as his future options while newspapers face significant declines in their circulation numbers. 

</p><blockquote style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 40px; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-style: none; padding: 0px"><p><em>  &quot;Doonesbury&quot; has been on the Web for 15 years, and the site actually makes a little money -- unheard-of for media sites. But it's not really a plan, just a presence. I don't believe there's anything I can do personally to prepare for a post-newspaper future, other than hope that the large media companies will come to their senses and form a gated Web collective along the lines of cable TV. They need to form a news utility, financed by subscription or micropayments because going it alone has been disastrous for all of them.</em></p></blockquote>

Trudeau continues on, saying that he believes that e-readers are promising because so many people are happy to pay for iPhone apps and Kindle content.  He also says that his livelihood doesn't seem to be threatened in the short-term because only "big newspapers" with loads of debt are really going under -- and most small newspapers are still getting by and can support his line of work for the foreseeable future.  But, essentially, Trudeau sounds like he's given up on his own plans for making Doonesbury into a business outside of syndication.  (Or he's being much too modest about the "little money" he earns from his website, and he doesn't want to offend his current newspaper benefactors.)  In any case, he seems to envision a giant news consortium that will be able to retain subscribers due to a form of monopoly advantage.  And if that's really the future of journalism, that doesn't sound too promising.
<br /><br />
Additionally, though, Trudeau asserts that the "Web is a lost cause" because everyone thinks content on the web should be free.  But that statement directly <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/09/what-newspaper-cartoonists-can-learn-from-web-comics273.html">contradicts the work of online cartoonists</a> such as Randall Munroe and his <a href="http://xkcd.com/">xkcd</a> webcomic (which just happens to be one of my <a href="http://twitter.com/Cwfrtb/status/3985831954">favorite</a> examples of a "free" online comic strip).  Munroe has a significant following for xkcd and has proven that "free" can be a sustainable way to promote and publish his work.  So can we help enlighten Trudeau?  Munroe sells prints, t-shirts, a <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml">book</a>, and even <a href="http://asmarterplanet.com/blog/2009/06/building-a-smarter-planet-for-squirrels.html/comment-page-1">sponsored comics</a>.  Is there a path to becoming the "Trent Reznor of webcomics" for Trudeau?  Or is there something unique about Doonesbury that makes it impossible for it to take advantage of "free" distribution?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091005/1146406427.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091005/1146406427.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091005/1146406427.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>help,-I'm-trapped-in-a-newspaper-factory-with-no-business-model</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091005/1146406427</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:59:33 PDT</pubDate>
<title>From Infinite To Scarce: xkcd Goes The Book Route</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A bunch of folks have been sending in the NY Times story about how the online comic xkcd <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/business/media/20link.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all" target="_new">is going to be putting out a book</a>, and that it's being done avoiding the traditional book publishing process.  There are some key quotes in there, including: 
<blockquote><i>
In fact, the xkcd story previews the much more likely future of books in which they are prized as artifacts, not as mechanisms for delivering written material to readers. This is print book as vinyl record -- admired for its look and feel, its cover art, and relative permanence -- but not so much for convenience.
</i></blockquote>
And then there's the more important point about Randall Munroe not worrying about copying of the content -- and instead focusing on the other direction:
<blockquote><i>
Publishing a book is an extension of the selling of items like T-shirts and posters, which pays the bills, he said, to a "free culture" mind-set about the cartoons themselves. "We have been encouraging people to share things, saying that it is a good business decision," he said....
<br /><br />
One trick in transferring the material from online to print has been how to recreate the "title text" that comments on the strip when your cursor hovers over it.
<br /><br />
"It's not supposed to be a punch line, but hopefully if you didn't laugh, you'll laugh at this," he said. The title text will appear where the tiny copyright notice would appear on a traditional strip.
<br /><br />
Does that mean that the book won't carry a traditional copyright and instead take its lead from the online comic strip itself, which Mr. Munroe licenses under Creative Commons, allowing noncommercial re-use as long as credit is given?
<br /><br />
"To anyone who wants to photocopy, bind, and give a copy of the book to their loved one -- more power to them," he said. "He/She will likely be disappointed that you're so cheap, though."
</i></blockquote>
It's been clear from pretty much the beginning that Munroe understands that getting more widely known is a lot more important than worrying about "piracy," and it's great to see him take that attitude even further.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090420/1454574583.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>the-way-things-work-these-days</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090420/1454574583</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:25:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>xkcd Uses Clickthrough EULAs To Eternal Advantage</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/1249482768.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/1249482768.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ And here's a little Friday afternoon fun for you.  The latest xkcd comic takes on the issue of <a href="http://xkcd.com/501/" target="_new">automatic end user license agreements</a> that seem so common these days:
<center>
<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/faust_20.png" title="The only blood these contracts are signed in is from me cutting my hand trying to open the goddamn CD case." alt="Faust 2.0" />
</center>
If they're going to be allowed, you might as well use them to your advantage.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/1249482768.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/1249482768.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/1249482768.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well,-there-we-go</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081107/1249482768</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:52:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>xkcd Speaks Truth To DRM: You're A Criminal Either Way</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081013/1517002532.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081013/1517002532.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ People sure do love <a href="http://xkcd.com">xkcd</a>.  I saw the latest comic last night, thinking it was amusing, but I've never been this deluged with submissions from people saying that we absolutely need to post it here.  Either way, it does make the universal point about <a href="http://xkcd.com/488/" target="_new">why you shouldn't buy anything that includes DRM</a>.  Since any change to the DRM (such as <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080929/0004132388.shtml">shutting down DRM servers</a>) means you'll probably need to break the law to actually keep using the content you thought you "bought," at some point, people realize they're going to be considered a criminal either way and just vote to pirate stuff in the first place:
<center>
<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/steal_this_comic.png" title="I spent more time trying to get an audible.com audio book playing than it took to listen to the book.  I have lost every other piece of DRM-locked music I have paid for." alt="Steal This Comic" width=450 />
</center><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081013/1517002532.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081013/1517002532.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081013/1517002532.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>and-so-it-goes</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081013/1517002532</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:31:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>YouTube Taking Feature Advice From XKCD</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081009/0147542502.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081009/0147542502.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While any open online forum has its share of trolls and poorly written comments, YouTube is infamous for having a quality level below pretty much everywhere else.  The (absolutely worth reading) online comic strip, <a href="http://xkcd.com" target="_new">xkcd</a> ran a strip recently joking about one possible "cure" for this: having a virus written that would <a href="http://xkcd.com/481/" target="_new">read a YouTuber's comment outloud</a> before requesting final approval to post it.  The idea was that any sane person would recognize how idiotic their comments sounded:
<center><img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/listen_to_yourself.png" title="Man, I just wanted to know how babby was formed." alt="Listen to Yourself" width=500 /></center>
Apparently, the folks at YouTube/Google thought it was such a good idea that <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/YouTube_Commenters_Hear_Their_Own_Gibberish" target="_new">they've actually created just such a button</a>.  Of course, those who need to use it most probably won't do so.  At least with the xkcd version, the virus forced people to listen to their comments.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081009/0147542502.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081009/0147542502.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081009/0147542502.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ok,-that's-just-awesome</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081009/0147542502</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>