Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:37:40 PST Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101124/01404512003/judge-says-no-fair-use-jailbreaking-xboxes-law-doesnt-care-if-jailbreaking-iphones-is-legal.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101124/01404512003/judge-says-no-fair-use-jailbreaking-xboxes-law-doesnt-care-if-jailbreaking-iphones-is-legal.shtml get you three years in jail. That was to point out just how silly it was that the DMCA does not allow fair use when it comes to its anti-circumvention rules. This has long been a huge problem (and a potential Constitutional problem) for the way the DMCA is constructed. The only exceptions are manually chosen every few years by the Librarian of Congress (who recently granted the ok for modding your phone a few months back, but wasn't even asked about game consoles). Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the judge in the case has said that this does not matter and fair use cannot apply. Again, this isn't a surprise but it does highlight how ridiculous the DMCA is.

It would seem that this case could become a rather useful one in testing the constitutionality of the DMCA's anti-circumvention rules and the lack of fair use exceptions. It's hard to think of a situation that seems more unreasonable than saying that you can jailbreak consumer electronics device 1 "because of the Librarian of Congress said so," but you cannot jailbreak consumer electronics device 2 "because the Librarian of Congress did not say so." That hardly seems like a situation that copyright law should ever allow, as it presents an undue penalty on certain new technologies.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> this-is-a-problem http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101124/01404512003