<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;x-prize&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Sep 2007 03:46:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Prize Insurance Puts A Price On Conventional Wisdom</title>
<dc:creator>Joseph Weisenthal</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070830/074450.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070830/074450.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Since the first <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20041004/0850233.shtml">X-Prize competition</a>, we've seen more and more interest in this model as a way to spur innovation.  However, there are still a lot of questions about the competition model, in terms of efficacy and utility for private industry.  While businesses are <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070216/075237.shtml">interested in the concept</a>, the exact model remains unclear.  Economist Alex Tarbarrok relates an interesting point about how the X-Prize was funded.  Apparently, the group behind it didn't actually raise the prize money, but rather <a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/08/funding-the-x-p.html">it bought an insurance contract</a> that would pay off in the event that someone actually won.  And who wrote the insurance contract?  None other than the established experts in the field: Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas.  It just so happened that these companies thought the prospect of a successful launch was basically nil, so they gave the organization a very generous price on this insurance contract.  The fact that the prize was ultimately claimed is a good indication that even the established leaders in a field don't always have the best grasp of what advances are just around the corner.  It also suggests a possible business model, whereby middlemen attempt to arbitrage the disparity between what the establishment deems possible and what individual inventors think they can accomplish.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070830/074450.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070830/074450.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070830/074450.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>what-a-deal</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20070830/074450</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>