<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;vulnerability&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:28:30 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Company Thanks Guy Who Alerted Them To Big Security Flaw By Sending The Cops... And The Bill</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111015/20563516374/company-thanks-guy-who-alerted-them-to-big-security-flaw-sending-cops-bill.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111015/20563516374/company-thanks-guy-who-alerted-them-to-big-security-flaw-sending-cops-bill.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've seen before that organizations don't seem to react well to outside security folks pointing out vulnerabilities in their systems.  They very often take a "blame the messenger" approach -- as if pointing out a flaw suddenly makes that flaw come into existence.  But one company seems to be taking it to another level.  <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=jdoe668">That Anonymous Coward</a> points us to a story in which a security professional found a <i>big</i> and ridiculously obvious bug in the website of an Australian investment fund, First State Superannuation.  Apparently you could see other people's accounts by merely changing the account numbers in the URL.  Increase the number by one, and see the next user in line.  This is the kind of extraordinarily basic mistake that I thought had been eradicated a decade ago.  Apparently not.
<br /><br />
But the company that runs the fund, Pillar, went quite crazy about this.  While the company did fix the security hole, it also <a href="http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/276678,researcher-discloses-vulnerability-to-firm-gets-police-visit.aspx" target="_blank">sent the police to interrogate</a> the security researcher, Patrick Webster.  Pillar also <a href="http://media.risky.biz/fssletter.pdf" target="_blank">sent a letter to customers</a> (pdf) in which it suggests that Webster <i>created</i> this massive security flaw, rather than their own dreadful programming:
<blockquote><i>
It has come to our attention that a member of First State Super, who has online access to their account, devised a way to view an image of your statement.
</i></blockquote>
And then, to add insult to injury, Pillar sent Webster a letter <a href="http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/276780,security-researcher-threatened-with-vulnerability-repair-bill.aspx" target="_blank">saying he broke the law, they were closing his account, and may seek money from him to fix the vulnerability</a>:
<blockquote><i>
Whilst you have indicated that your actions were motivated by an attempt to show that it is possible for a wrongdoer to obtain unauthorised access to Pillar's systems, you actions may themselves be considered a breach of section 308H of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and section 478.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).  You should be aware that due to the serious nature of your actions, this matter has been reported to the NSW Police.
<br /><br />
Further, as a member of the Fund, your online access is subject to the terms and conditions of use which are outlined on the Fund's website.  Your unauthorised access also constitutes a breach of those terms and has caused the Trustee to expend member funds in dealing with this matter.  <b>Please note the Trustee has the right to seek recovery from you for the costs incurred in accordance with those terms.</b>
<br /><br />
[....]
<br /><br />
In addition, the Trustee reserves its rights to require you to allow it's (sic) IT personnel to examine your computer during business hours to verify that all data and records on your computer have been destroyed or deleted.
<br /><br />
In the meantime, the Trustee has suspended your online access to the Member Section of the Fund's website.
</i></blockquote>
Yup.  Help Pillar out, uncover a basic programming/security mistake that puts the info of tons of people at risk, and get punished.    Pillar apparently prefers to have people never report any problems they find with its system at all, keep its head in the sand, and instead allow malicious hackers to run wild through a totally insecure system.  Brilliant work.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111015/20563516374/company-thanks-guy-who-alerted-them-to-big-security-flaw-sending-cops-bill.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111015/20563516374/company-thanks-guy-who-alerted-them-to-big-security-flaw-sending-cops-bill.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111015/20563516374/company-thanks-guy-who-alerted-them-to-big-security-flaw-sending-cops-bill.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>this-is-why-white-hats-go-black</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111015/20563516374</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 11:19:32 PDT</pubDate>
<title>School Laptop Spying Program Has A 'Hacker-Friendly' Security Vulneratibility</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100521/0403309523.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100521/0403309523.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It always happens.  A technology used for spying on people always opens up security vulnerabilities. Sony's "rootkit" DRM had huge <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051101/1514209_F.shtml">security vulnerabilities</a> that let people do bad things to your computer.  And now comes the news that the LANrev system used by the Lower Merion School District to secretly <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100504/1656459301.shtml">photograph students at home</a> also just happened to have <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/05/lanrev?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A wired%2Findex %28Wired%3A Index 3 %28Top Stories 2%29%29" target="_blank">a big security vulnerability</a> that, in theory, made it possible for others to spy on children without them knowing it as well:
<blockquote><i>
The LANrev program contains a vulnerability that would allow someone using the same network as one of the students to install malware on the laptop that could remotely control the computer. An intruder would be able to steal data from the computer or control the laptop webcam to snap surreptitious pictures....
<br /><br />
The vulnerability in the LANrev system lies in the symmetric-key encryption it uses for authentication between the client and the server, and isn’t related to the optional Theft Track feature. Therefore, even computers that are not using the theft feature are potentially vulnerable.
<br /><br />
The authentication key is stored in the client-side and server software and is fairly easy to decipher, says Frank Heidt, president and CEO of Leviathan. It took Leviathan just a few hours to determine that it’s a stanza from a German poem. The key is the same for every computer using LANrev.
<br /><br />
The LANrev client software on a computer is configured to contact a server every minute or so to check in and see if the server has any commands for it. Knowing what the key is would let an attacker who has installed a sniffer on the network intercept that ping and masquerade as the server in communication back to the laptop. It requires the attacker to be on the same network as the target machine -- for example, on a wireless network at the school or anywhere else that offers free Wi-Fi the student might use.
</i></blockquote>
To be fair, there's no evidence that anyone used this hack outside of the researchers who have discovered it, but it still raises more questions about the wisdom of using such software, especially on laptops used by kids.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100521/0403309523.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100521/0403309523.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100521/0403309523.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but,-of-course-it-does</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100521/0403309523</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:01:08 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Non-Existent Domain Hijacking Not Just Annoying, But A Security Threat</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080421/015522900.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080421/015522900.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in 2003, there was a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030918/2257251.shtml">huge mess</a> over VeriSign's plan to create "SiteFinder," which effectively hijacked "page not found" messages online and inserted advertising instead.  This also broke a bunch of online services that relied on accurate page not found messages.  Eventually, VeriSign backed down, but over the last couple of years, ISPs have been starting to do the same thing on their own at a slightly different level in the process.  However, some security researchers have demonstrated just how dangerous this can be, by using Earthlink's set up <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/isps-error-page.html" target="_new">to show how it can be used by phishers to make pages look like they're really on someone else's domain</a>.  This particular hole has been patched, but it does demonstrate some of the unintended problems of hijacking a widely accepted standard behavior on the internet for the ISP's own purposes.  The ISPs (including Earthlink in this case) always claim that they put up these ad pages as a "customer service" or to "improve their experience," but that's simply untrue.  Such pages don't help matters.  If a page can't be found, the user should be told that the page can't be found.  They can do a search on a search engine themselves to find the proper page.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080421/015522900.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080421/015522900.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080421/015522900.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>please-stop</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080421/015522900</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>