<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;viruses&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Zombies!</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091114/0221096928/dailydirt-zombies.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091114/0221096928/dailydirt-zombies.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There are plenty of zombie movies where viruses decimate the human population with diseases that turn infected hosts into crazy, blood-thirsty undead bodies. Biotech research reports (and maybe even <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110519/02073714336/well-done-cdc-warns-zombie-apocalypse.shtml">the CDC</a>!) make some of the premises for these zombie movies sound plausible, but mother nature itself has created a few zombie phenomena as well. Here are just some examples.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.economist.com/node/16271339 " href="http://econ.st/nYYYrG"><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> infects rodents, cats.. and people -- possibly causing weird behaviors and strange culture quirks.</a> The Happening has already happened, sort of. [<a href="http://www.economist.com/node/16271339 ">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fungus-makes-zombie-ants&#038;print=true" href="http://bit.ly/rquHKB">Fungus-controlled ants are compelled by their mold-masters to die in nice neighborhoods for spores to thrive.</a> These ants are programmed to die on north-facing plant leaves, roughly 25 centimeters off the ground, in an area with 94-95% humidity and a temperature between 20-30 Celsius. [<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fungus-makes-zombie-ants&#038;print=true">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071129/full/news.2007.312.html" href="http://bit.ly/ndJKxm">A wasp's venom can turn a cockroach into a "dog on a leash."</a> The wasp ends up laying eggs in the belly of its cockroach-pet -- and the wasp young eat their way out. [<a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071129/full/news.2007.312.html">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.damninteresting.com/mind-controlling-wasps-and-zombie-spiders" href="http://bit.ly/qP1Bi2">Another kind of wasp lays its eggs in an orb spider, and the larvae control the spider to build a special web for them.</a> Is there a Spiderman villan based on this wasp? [<a href="http://www.damninteresting.com/mind-controlling-wasps-and-zombie-spiders">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting biological curiosities, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:46" href="http://bit.ly/fPAS5B">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:46">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091114/0221096928/dailydirt-zombies.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091114/0221096928/dailydirt-zombies.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091114/0221096928/dailydirt-zombies.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091114/0221096928</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Feb 2011 03:31:01 PST</pubDate>
<title>One Of The Earliest Computer Viruses Was Really DRM Gone Wrong</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110127/23533212868/one-earliest-computer-viruses-was-really-drm-gone-wrong.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110127/23533212868/one-earliest-computer-viruses-was-really-drm-gone-wrong.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Author William Gibson has a nice little opinion piece claiming that we've now <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/opinion/27Gibson.html?hp" target="_blank">hit the 25th anniversary of "digital vandalism" in the form of computer viruses</a>.  I'm pretty sure he's wrong about that, as just a few years back there were all those news reports about how Rich Skrenta (who later went on to found the Open Directory Project, Topix and Blekko) created the <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/SciTech/20070831/virus_prank_070831/" target="_blank">first widespread computer virus</a> in Elk Cloner back in 1982.  That said, Elk Cloner was more of a prank.  The virus Gibson is talking about was more malicious, in that it locked up files.  So, if Gibson's point is that this was the first malicious virus, perhaps that's more accurate (though, I would imagine there are some other claims to the throne).
<br /><br />
Still, what may be most interesting is that the virus that Gibson discusses was really based on an early attempt at DRM:
<blockquote><i>
IN January 1986, Basit and Amjad Alvi, sibling programmers living near the main train station in Lahore, Pakistan, wrote a piece of code to safeguard the latest version of their heart-monitoring software from piracy. They called it Brain, and it was basically a wheel-clamp for PCs. Computers that ran their program, plus this new bit of code, would stop working after a year, though they cheerfully provided three telephone numbers, against the day. If you were a legitimate user, and could prove it, they'd unlock you.
<br /><br />
But in the way of all emergent technologies, something entirely unintended happened. The Alvis' wheel-clamp was soon copied by a certain stripe of computer hobbyist, who began to distribute it, concealed within various digital documents that people might be expected to want to open. 
</i></blockquote>
Gibson talks about his own surprise that it was hobbyists who really drove digital vandalism (and to some extent, still do).  What I find even more interesting is how early on DRM was already over-aggressive and getting in the way of legitimate uses.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110127/23533212868/one-earliest-computer-viruses-was-really-drm-gone-wrong.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110127/23533212868/one-earliest-computer-viruses-was-really-drm-gone-wrong.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110127/23533212868/one-earliest-computer-viruses-was-really-drm-gone-wrong.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>no-surprise-there</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110127/23533212868</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:12:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Computer Techs Turn Normal Virus Removal Into Multi-Million Dollar Scam</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/01222611790/computer-techs-turn-normal-virus-removal-into-multi-million-dollar-scam.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/01222611790/computer-techs-turn-normal-virus-removal-into-multi-million-dollar-scam.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Lots of people suspect that the various companies out there who promise to clean viruses off your computer are a bit of a scam -- and, apparently, in at least one case, it turned out to be a huge scam.  Apparently a guy working for one of those companies, Vickram Bedi, realized that Roger Davidson, who brought in his laptop to have it cleaned of a virus, was a wealthy composer (and heir to a fortune).  So, rather than clean up the virus, Bedi and his girlfriend, Helga Invarsdottir, worked out <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703957804575602993406810012.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">a scam that bilked Davidson of somewhere between $6 and $20 million</a>.
<blockquote><i>
When asked to remove the virus from the laptop, Mr. Bedi allegedly told Mr. Davidson that his computer had in fact been attacked with a virus so virulent that it also damaged Datalink's computers, according to prosecutors.
<br><br>
Mr. Bedi told Mr. Davidson that he had tracked the source of the virus to a remote village in Honduras and that Mr. Bedi's uncle, purportedly an officer in the Indian military, had traveled there in a military aircraft and retrieved the suspicious hard drive, prosecutors said.
<br><br>
In addition, Mr. Bedi told the victim that his uncle had uncovered an assassination plot against Mr. Davidson by Polish priests tied to Opus Dei, according to prosecutors....
<br><br>
In addition to the thousands of dollars charged to secure Mr. Davidson's computer, Mr. Bedi and Ms. Invarsdottir allegedly charged thousands more to provide 24-hour covert protection for Mr. Davidson and his family.
<br><br>
Harrison Police Chief Anthony Marraccini said the couple charged Mr. Davidson about $160,000 every month for bogus security and other services. At the time of their arrest, Ms. Invarsdottir had $1.6 million in a bank account and Mr. Bedi had $6 million in a separate account, Mr. Marraccini said. Those accounts have been frozen and computers and business documents were seized by police, Mr. Marraccini said.
</i></blockquote>
According to the article, this scam only came to light after law enforcement was investigating Bedi and Invarsdottir for <i>another</i> scam, suggesting that this may have been an even bigger scam, with more targets.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/01222611790/computer-techs-turn-normal-virus-removal-into-multi-million-dollar-scam.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/01222611790/computer-techs-turn-normal-virus-removal-into-multi-million-dollar-scam.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/01222611790/computer-techs-turn-normal-virus-removal-into-multi-million-dollar-scam.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>opus-dei-has-infected-your-computer</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101110/01222611790</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:03:38 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Captain Cyborg Has A Virus-Infected Sidekick... But Nothing Can Stop A PR Campaign</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1800199593.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1800199593.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ About a decade ago, if you followed the technology space, you might recall a series of articles about a professor at the University of Reading, named Kevin Warwick, who made himself famous by implanting a computer chip in his arm, declaring himself an expert in "cybernetics" and figuring out ways to get way <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/search.php?cx=partner-pub-4050006937094082%3Acx0qff-dnm1&#038;cof=FORID%3A9&#038;ie=ISO-8859-1&#038;q=Kevin+Warwick">too much press</a> for nothing special.  The Register, amusingly, dubbed him "Captain Cyborg" and regularly mocked his various exploits.  We haven't heard much about Warwick in a while, but when I saw a bunch of folks chatting about a BBC article concerning <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10158517.stm" target="_blank">the "first human infected with computer virus,"</a> I was immediately reminded of Warwick.  Reading through the article, it was no surprise to find out that this "experiment" is actually being conducted by a colleague of Warwick's, Mark Gasson -- who according to Warwick's own <a href="http://www.kevinwarwick.com/" target="_blank">bio</a> lead the research group that Warwick works in.
<br /><br />
The story is -- as with all captain cyborg stories -- a lot less than the headline suggests.  Gasson wasn't "infected with a computer virus."  He took a chip that had a computer virus and stuck it in his arm, just like Warwick has done n the past.  The parallels to an actual virus are minimal, and the usefulness for anything is even less than that.  Gasson presents this as useful for considering the implications for implanted technology such as pacemakers, but that's nothing new.  People have talked about potential technology issues from the wireless interface to pacemakers for years.  Doing some sort of publicity stunt with an implanted computer chip doesn't further that discussion along.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1800199593.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1800199593.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1800199593.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>virus-infected?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100526/1800199593</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:25:07 PST</pubDate>
<title>Unpatched, Virus-Infected Windows To Blame For Grounded French Fighter Pilots And Halt To Traffic Arrests In Houston</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Reader Calvin sends in two separate stories of government institutions who apparently failed to patch their Windows machines to protect against the Conficker virus -- despite the patch being available for many months.  First, Houston police have <a href="http://www.khou.com/news/local/stories/khou090206_mh_court_system_down.2580b43d.html" target="_new">stopped arresting people with outstanding traffic warrants</a> and shut down the municipal court system for a few days to try to deal with their computer systems being overrun by the virus.  Then, across the Atlantic, the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/4547649/French-fighter-planes-grounded-by-computer-virus.html" target="_new">French Navy is dealing with a similar problem</a>, forcing them to ground many of their fighter planes.  Some naval staff were told not to turn on their computers at all, as apparently the Navy's internal computer network has been hit by the virus as well.  Apparently, now might be a good time to run some traffic lights in Houston or invade France (kidding, kidding...).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090208/1333453687.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>gov't-security</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090208/1333453687</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:16:28 PDT</pubDate>
<title>More Scammers Using Bogus Copyright Infringement Accusations To Get Their Way</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0228332196.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0228332196.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last Friday, we noted that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080904/1523372171.shtml">scammers</a> were picking up the success the entertainment industry was having with "pre-settlement" letters to accused file sharers, and using a similar tactic with phone calls, demanding money to avoid getting sued.  We noted that it was only a matter of time until those scammers moved to email as well -- and, of course, it's already happened.  TorrentFreak is reporting on how scammers are <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-scam-emails-bittorrent-users-080907/" target="_new">sending threatening letters pretending to be from MediaDefender</a>, one of the firms who provides questionable evidence to the recording industry for its lawsuits.  These emails include an attachment, which the email says is more data on what the recipient is accused of sharing on various sites -- but which is actually a virus.  So it's not quite to the level of extorting money directly yet -- but that's likely only a matter of time, if it's not happening already.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0228332196.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0228332196.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0228332196.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>it's-just-too-easy</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080908/0228332196</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:48:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Viruses... In... Spaaaaaaaaace</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080827/0732392112.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080827/0732392112.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ NASA is admitting that laptop brought to the international space station in July <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7583805.stm" target="_new">apparently contained a virus designed to swipe user passwords</a>, though they're not sure how it happened.  The computers don't control anything mission critical, but are used by astronauts to send email and to track their nutritional programs.  The computers were never connected to the internet, so NASA is guessing that an astronaut had an infected USB key or something that resulted in the virus getting onto the computer.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080827/0732392112.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080827/0732392112.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080827/0732392112.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>for-you-muppet-fans</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080827/0732392112</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:28:03 PDT</pubDate>
<title>College Classes On Malware Writing Still Piss Off Anti-Virus Firms</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080803/1834441874.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080803/1834441874.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Over five years ago, we wrote about a college that was starting to offer a new computer science class in <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030527/2012238.shtml">writing computer viruses</a>.  And, of course, various anti-virus companies went ballistic, claiming how dangerous it was.  Yet, as we pointed out at the time, anti-virus companies don't have the greatest track record in actually stopping viruses -- so it seemed only reasonable to teach people to better "think like the enemy."  Anyway, it appears not much has changed.  Theodp writes in to let us know about an article in Newsweek about a very similar course being taught at Sonoma State University by George Ledin, where <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/150465" target="_new">students are tasked with creating their own malware</a>.
<br /><br />
Once again, various security companies are condemning the technique, even sinking so low as to compare Ledin to A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani scientist who sold nuclear technology to North Korea.  They even insist they won't hire his students -- which seems particularly short-sighted.  As Ledin points out, it appears that this is really more about the security companies wanting to keep the world more scared than they need to be of malware, so as to pretend that they're the only ones who can solve the "problem" -- when the truth is they're not very effective at it.  He complains that anti-virus firms keep their code secret (thank you, DMCA).  He points out that if they were willing to open it up, and let lots of folks work on improving it, it would get much, much better.  All he's trying to do is help more people understand the enemy without first having to work at one of those companies that's been so ineffective in stopping malware -- in the hopes that maybe some of his students can actually come up with a better soltuion.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080803/1834441874.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080803/1834441874.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080803/1834441874.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>security-through-obscurity</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080803/1834441874</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:35:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>More Patent Battles Making Your Computer Less Secure</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080521/1341321193.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080521/1341321193.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last year, we pointed to some <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071226/011015.shtml">patent battles</a> among security software companies, noting how the end result would undoubtedly be less secure computers.  As these security firms argued over who thought up an idea "first" and who owed who what amounts of money, you can rest assured that those <i>exploiting</i> the security holes couldn't care any less about who came up with what exploit first.  In the constant battle between security firms and malicious hackers, distracting the security firms and having resources devoted to arguing over patents (and paying each other royalties) seems designed to just make it that much easier for malicious hackers to stay that much further ahead, while making it more and more difficult for any security firm to actually provide anything close to comprehensive security.  And, it's only going to get worse.  <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/21/1410204&#038;from=rss">Slashdot</a> points us to an article about <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/05/microsoft_paten.html" target="_new">Microsoft's rather broad patent on proactive virus protection</a>, despite the fact that others had proactive virus protection products on the market well before Microsoft filed for the patent.  While Microsoft isn't yet doing anything with the patent, the fact that it got it now means that others have to be extra careful in tiptoeing around proactive virus protection -- and that's only going to make virus makers happy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080521/1341321193.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080521/1341321193.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080521/1341321193.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ain't-patents-great?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080521/1341321193</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:45:40 PST</pubDate>
<title>Japanese Officials Use Copyright Law To Arrest Computer Virus Writer</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080124/18210266.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080124/18210266.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Over in Japan, a 24-year-old grad student was <a href="http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/426031" target="_new">arrested this week for writing a computer virus</a>.  There's just one problem.  There's apparently no law in Japan against writing viruses.  So, instead, officials had to twist copyright law to use it to arrest the guy.  That was possible because the virus itself used popular animation clips as a means of getting people to click on it.  Those animation clips violated copyrights.  Now, it's nice to see officials cracking down on virus writers, but it's a shame for them to twist copyright law for that purpose.  If the problem is that the law doesn't make virus writing illegal, then change the law.  Using copyright law for other purposes starts you down a pretty slippery slope.  Yes, it's true that the guy was also violating copyrights, but it seems pretty clear from the report that the reason officials went after him was because of the virus. <b>Update</b>: It turns out this story is even more bizarre.  TorrentFreak reports that three people were arrested, and the virus itself threatened to kill people for <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/virus-creator-threatened-080124/">using file sharing systems</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080124/18210266.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080124/18210266.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080124/18210266.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>misuses-of-copyright</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080124/18210266</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:35:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Latest Antivirus Error: McAfee Blocks A Bunch Of Popular Sites As Risky</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080103/151314.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080103/151314.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A little over a week after Kaspersky's anti-virus software declared Windows Explorer was a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml">virus</a>, it appears that McAfee has had its own mistake, as an anti-virus update from the company <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/01/03/mcafee_blacklists_chunk_of_web/1">started warning people to stay away from a bunch of popular sites</a>, including ESPN, Friendster and Ars Technica.  McAfee later admitted that it was a mistake on its end, but it seems that we're seeing these kinds of false positives on a fairly frequent basis these days.  It's yet another sign that things need to change in how security software works -- but instead of real advances, it still seems like firms are bogged down with things like pointless <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071226/011015.shtml">patent battles</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080103/151314.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080103/151314.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080103/151314.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>sorry-about-that</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080103/151314</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:14:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Kaspersky Decides Windows Explorer Is A Virus</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ You can already hear the Apple and Linux fans snickering about this one, but security software firm Kaspersky accidentally <a href="http://www.news.com/Kaspersky-inadvertently-quarantines-Windows-Explorer/2100-1002_3-6223836.html?part=rss&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20&#038;subj=news">classified Windows Explorer as a virus to be quarantined</a> earlier this week.  Explorer.exe, of course, is pretty crucial for doing just about anything in Windows, so it probably didn't go over so well with the folks impacted by it.  Amusingly, as the article notes, Kaspersky made fun of Microsoft earlier this year when Microsoft's own anti-virus offering quarantined or deleted Microsoft Outlook files.  And, of course, last year we also had a story about how Kaspersky's software <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060222/0224241.shtml">flagged</a> Microsoft's own anti-virus software as a virus as well.  In other words... these anti-virus programs still have some kinks to work out.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071221/093555.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-everyone-would-disagree</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20071221/093555</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>