<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;vietnam&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:34:54 PST</pubDate>
<title>China Tries To Bolster Claim To Disputed Pacific Islands By Upgrading Mobile Coverage There</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130108/07354721604/china-tries-to-bolster-claim-to-disputed-pacific-islands-upgrading-mobile-coverage-there.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130108/07354721604/china-tries-to-bolster-claim-to-disputed-pacific-islands-upgrading-mobile-coverage-there.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spratly_Islands">Spratly Islands</a> are some 750 reefs, atolls and islands in the South China Sea that are claimed variously by Brunei, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.  That's largely because of the rich fishing grounds that surround them, and the possibility of significant oil and gas reserves nearby.
</p><p>
In order to reinforce those claims, most of the countries listed above have stationed a few military personnel on a few of the larger islands.  Recently, <a href="http://www.techinasia.com/vietnamese-complain-as-chinese-3g-disputed-spratly-islands/">China has come up with a novel way of bolstering its position</a>:

<i><blockquote>In the ongoing dispute over the Spratly Islands claimed by China and Vietnam, the latest development is that China is opening up 3G services on the islands, not only to Chinese soldiers but also for the country's fishermen.</blockquote></i>

As the Tech In Asia article quoted above explains:

<i><blockquote>Chinese soldiers and fishermen will now be able to text message, call, and chat online with family back home over the new 3G network. This upgrade to 3G from regular cellular coverage (started in 2011) and the recent 3G network in the disputed Paracel Islands in July 2012 signals a more permanent Chinese presence on the rocky outposts.</blockquote></i>

What's interesting here is how this tighter integration with the domestic network is used symbolically to underline that the various islands are -- in China's view -- part of its territory.  It can be thought of as the 21st-century equivalent of building roads in the Roman Empire, or laying down railway tracks in the American West.
</p><p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a></p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130108/07354721604/china-tries-to-bolster-claim-to-disputed-pacific-islands-upgrading-mobile-coverage-there.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130108/07354721604/china-tries-to-bolster-claim-to-disputed-pacific-islands-upgrading-mobile-coverage-there.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130108/07354721604/china-tries-to-bolster-claim-to-disputed-pacific-islands-upgrading-mobile-coverage-there.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>new-railways</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130108/07354721604</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Nov 2012 03:17:37 PST</pubDate>
<title>Ridiculous: Vietnam Sentences Musicians To Jail For Songs That Protest Government Actions</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121102/18123420925/ridiculous-vietnam-sentences-musicians-to-jail-songs-that-protest-government-actions.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121102/18123420925/ridiculous-vietnam-sentences-musicians-to-jail-songs-that-protest-government-actions.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We talk a lot about the importance of free speech here in the US, and worry tremendously about any efforts to chip away at such free speech rights.  Even as we worry about how free speech issues are dealt with at home, we're very aware that most other countries have significantly less respect for basic free expression concepts.  It's somewhat horrifying to learn that last week, a court in Vietnam <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/vietnam-sentences-2-musicians-to-prison-terms-on-propaganda-charges/" target="_blank">sentenced two Vietnamese musicians to years in prison</a> for writing, recording and posting online some "protest" songs:
<blockquote><i>
Both were accused of posting songs on a Web site of Patriotic Youth, a opposition group based overseas. Mr. Tri, 34, who uses the stage name Viet Khang, has criticized the government in his songs for not taking a harder line against China in territorial disputes. A video for his song, "Viet Nam Toi Dau" ("Where Is My Vietnam?"), has become <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KEPmduvlAg">a YouTube hit</a>, with 700,000 views. Mr. Binh, 37, recorded the song "Courage in the Prison" ("Nguc Toi Hien Ngang") in support of an imprisoned blogger, Nguyen Van Hai. The song urges people to mount nonviolent protests.
</i></blockquote>
And we're not just talking about a few weeks in prison, either.  Tri got four years and Binh got six years.  Binh's situation is especially ridiculous since his song is about an equally ridiculous prison sentence for a blogger.  Basic political dissent is important to any free society, and to completely lock people up over some rather straightforward protest songs (that don't advocate violence or anything like that) is really quite horrifying.  The US, thankfully, has condemned these sentences, but this is an issue that more people need to know about and speak out about.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121102/18123420925/ridiculous-vietnam-sentences-musicians-to-jail-songs-that-protest-government-actions.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121102/18123420925/ridiculous-vietnam-sentences-musicians-to-jail-songs-that-protest-government-actions.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121102/18123420925/ridiculous-vietnam-sentences-musicians-to-jail-songs-that-protest-government-actions.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>freedom-isn't-free</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121102/18123420925</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: In Money, We Trust (Sometimes)</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Money is an interesting concept. Government institutions create a supply of money and try to control the value of it within some acceptable ranges. But when the value of money goes out of control, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plano_Real">solutions</a> for getting it stabilized seem a bit illogical. Still, if you can get enough people to switch their faith from one money to another, it seems to work. Here are a few more stories on the topic of money and currency. 
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/11/10/142217235/leaving-the-euro-is-hard-to-do" href="http://n.pr/w8Kuxf">It's intriguingly difficult for any country that currently uses the euro to try to stop using it and switch to some other form of currency.</a> So difficult, in fact, there's a $400,000 prize for anyone who can figure out a process that would actually work and not create monetary chaos. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/11/10/142217235/leaving-the-euro-is-hard-to-do">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576542851688284590.html" href="http://on.wsj.com/yhkUOk">Some Brazilians are using locally-printed currencies instead of its national reais -- such as the capivari, which is just one of the 63 local kinds of money.</a> The capivari is a printed bill (with a picture of a rodent on it!), equal in value to the reai, but retailers give customers discounts for using capivaris (making these local bills into fancy coupons, essentially). [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576542851688284590.html">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency" href="http://bit.ly/wy24wM">Last year, the IMF's Dominique Strauss-Kahn proposed an alternative to the dollar in central banks' foreign currency reserves.</a> A system of special drawing rights (SDRs) for central banks would be priced according to international trade instead of any single nation's currency. (It's not an entirely new idea, but it's never caught on.) [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/01/03/vietnamese-use-dollar-at-their-peril/#axzz1iQfxQoLT" href="http://on.ft.com/A5sxbt">In Vietnam, there's a penalty for posting prices in dollars instead of the local currency.</a> The local currency suffers from high inflation rates, so they might want to look into Brazil's monetary history for some lessons.... [<a href="http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/01/03/vietnamese-use-dollar-at-their-peril/#axzz1iQfxQoLT">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more stuff on economics, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137" href="http://bit.ly/mPvUHR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

As always, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101102/10463011687</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:55:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Vietnam Continues Online Censorship; Outlaws 'Subversive' Blogs; Puts Liability On ISPs</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/0022473216.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/0022473216.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Vietnam has a long history of online censorship and suppression of dissent.  Back in 2002, a law was put in place requiring <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20021014/1526250.shtml">registration</a> with the government before creating a website, and soon after that there were reports of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20021023/0144218.shtml">arrests</a> of people for putting "questionable" material online.  Given that, it's hardly surprising to find out that the country has now <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUKTRE4BN0E020081224?rpc=401&#038;" target="_new">officially banned "subversive" blogs</a>.  Of course, I'm sure the definition of subversive is left open to whoever is enforcing the law.  But what's really bad about this law, is that it puts the liability on internet service providers -- saying that they'll be held responsible for any subversive blogs that are hosted by them.  It's not entirely clear how this will impact foreign blog hosting companies, but it can't be a good thing.  Apparently, the Vietnamese government is specifically planning to talk to Yahoo and Google to get them to "cooperate" in "creating the best and healthiest environment for bloggers."  There's been plenty of controversy for both Yahoo and Google for how they've dealt with government censorship in China, so the last thing they need is another such controversy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/0022473216.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/0022473216.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081224/0022473216.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>define-subversive</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081224/0022473216</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:28:48 PST</pubDate>
<title>How Pursuing Software Piracy Hurts Proprietary Software Firms</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071228/161917.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071228/161917.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While organizations like the BSA and the SIIA play <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071219/170618.shtml">silly games</a> and announce <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070515/110016.shtml">bogus numbers</a> about the "costs" of software piracy, it's nice to see the whole thing beginning to backfire.  We've already pointed to the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071126/024312.shtml">backlash</a> against the BSA for its activities, and now we're seeing how these kinds of crackdowns are doing exactly the opposite of what BSA/SIIA members would want: they're looking for open source alternatives.  Following the ongoing "international crackdown" on software piracy, it appears that the Vietnamese government is the latest to <a href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Vietnam-Chooses-Open-Source-to-Offset-Piracy-60971.html">start promoting open source alternatives</a>.  Of course, for proprietary software makers, this should be seen as worse than piracy.  After all, as Microsoft and others have <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070312/165448.shtml">long admitted</a>, you're much better off if someone is using an unauthorized version of your software, than if they're using the competition (especially if that competition is free).  If they're using an unauthorized version of your software, then at least there's a chance that they'll either buy it at a later date or convince others to buy it.  However, by putting such a big effort into cracking down on software piracy, all the industry has done is highlight why people are better off going with free alternatives.  This is a key point we've tried to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml">highlight</a> in the past.  The issue isn't piracy at all, but the fact that the competition will eventually learn to embrace "free."  Focusing on "piracy" only helps accelerate that process.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071228/161917.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071228/161917.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071228/161917.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>highlights-the-alternatives</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20071228/161917</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>