<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;tor&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 05:04:40 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Police In Japan Are Asking ISPs To Start Blocking Tor</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/17210122754/police-japan-want-isps-to-block-tor.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/17210122754/police-japan-want-isps-to-block-tor.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The National Police Agency in Japan is apparently asking ISPs in that country <a href="http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20130418p2a00m0na013000c.html" target="_blank">to "voluntarily" block the use of Tor</a>, the well-known and widely used system for anonymously surfing the internet.
<blockquote><i>
An expert panel to the NPA, which was looking into measures to combat crimes abusing the Tor system, compiled a report on April 18 stating that blocking online communications at the discretion of site administrators will be effective in preventing such crimes. Based on the recommendation, the NPA will urge the Internet provider industry and other entities to make voluntary efforts to that effect.
</i></blockquote>
This is an extreme and dangerous overreaction.  Yes, some people abuse the anonymity of Tor to do illegal things.  Just as some people abuse the anonymity of cash to do bad things.  But we don't then outlaw cash because of this.  There are many, many reasons why people have good reason to seek out an anonymizing tool like Tor to protect their identity.  What if they're whistle blowing on organized crime or corruption (say) in the police force?  As for the fear that it's being used for criminal activity, that doesn't mean that police cannot identify them through other means.  We've seen time and time again people leave digital tracks in other ways when they're committing crimes.  Yes, it makes life more difficult for police, and it means they have to do actual detective work, but that's what their job is.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/17210122754/police-japan-want-isps-to-block-tor.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/17210122754/police-japan-want-isps-to-block-tor.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/17210122754/police-japan-want-isps-to-block-tor.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>really-now?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130418/17210122754</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:40:54 PST</pubDate>
<title>Tor Exit Node Operator Charged With Distributing Child Porn</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/07495221185/tor-exit-node-operator-charged-with-distributing-child-porn.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/07495221185/tor-exit-node-operator-charged-with-distributing-child-porn.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Not this again.  Last year, we wrote about how Austrian police had <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml">seized</a> computers from a tor exit node, showing little comprehension of how tor worked, and why the operator of the node was not responsible for the content accessed.  We wondered how difficult it would be to teach law enforcement how tor worked.  Apparently, those in Austria still need more help, as it's being reported that another Austrian tor exit node operator <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/tor-operator-charged-for-child-porn-transmitted-over-his-servers/" target="_blank">has been charged with child porn distribution</a>.  The guy, William Weber, has a <a href="http://raided4tor.cryto.net/" target="_blank">blog post with some photos</a>.
<blockquote><i>
Seven LKA officers, two police offers, and a court-appointed expert witness started a search of the flat, without respecting my privacy or property whatsoever. Paper documents in a cupboard were read, and no care was taken of my cat (who I was allowed to lock into another room later). My storage cubes (HP MicroServers) were confiscated without any regard for the hardware &#8211; the power cords were simply ripped out / hard shutdown, instead of properly shutting them down by the operating system. My main PC was shut down normally, as far as i could determine. After finishing the search in my living room, they continued in my bedroom, where they confiscated my legal firearms, as well as my cable TV receiver, and my Xbox 360. Despite my statement that all firearms and ammunition were legally owned and registered, having passed all background checks, this was doubted by one of the LKA officers due to the caliber.
</i></blockquote>
He indicates later that there was at least some knowledge of tor, so hopefully this gets sorted out:
<blockquote><i>
After this, I had them show me the offending IP address, which I identified as belonging to me in the specified timeframe. I explained that this was a TOR exit node under my control at this time. I attempted to explain what TOR is, and they appeared to be familiar with it, as the atmosphere suddenly became more friendly. They probably understood that it was very unlikely they had a child pornographer sitting in their office.
<br /><br />
Some questions about my motives followed, which I attempted to answer &#8211; but this seemingly failed. I could not make them understand why I would &#8220;waste&#8221; resources and bandwidth (translating into money) to run a TOR node. I informed them that I was already contacted by the Polish police in May about this IP, regarding hacking attempts originating from it. Back then I had already explained to Polish police that this was a TOR exit node, and that no logfiles were held. After the report of hacking attempts, I shut down the TOR node on this server, but apparently this was too late and they were investigating (and/or wiretapping) already.
</i></blockquote>
Obviously, there are reasons to investigate possible child porn distribution, but it still seems ridiculous that law enforcement still seems skeptical of tor exit nodes and assumes that they must be used for nefarious intent.  This isn't the first time of course.  Last year, here in the US, ICE <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml">seized</a> a tor exit node as well.  While it eventually returned the equipment, it warned the guy that "this could happen again."  And, of course, just this week, we wrote about a German case where a court actually held someone <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml">responsible</a> for the transmission of encrypted traffic on a tor-like system.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/07495221185/tor-exit-node-operator-charged-with-distributing-child-porn.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/07495221185/tor-exit-node-operator-charged-with-distributing-child-porn.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121130/07495221185/tor-exit-node-operator-charged-with-distributing-child-porn.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>clueless-police</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121130/07495221185</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:56:42 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Navigating The Deep, Dark Web</title>
<dc:creator>Cole Stryker</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121030/01363220883/navigating-deep-dark-web.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121030/01363220883/navigating-deep-dark-web.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <i>We recently ran an excerpt from Cole Stryker's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1590209745">Hacking the Future</a> about the importance of anonymity.  Here's the second excerpt from this book, our latest book club selection.  This time it's about navigating parts of the web that not everyone knows about... We'll be hosting a chat with Stryker in the near future, to be announced soon.</i>
<br /><br />
I first heard whispers of the deep Web on 4chan. It was often positioned by active users as a place where even the most hardened /b/tard (a nickname for heavy users who hang out on 4chan's "random" board a lot) can find things to shock the system. The deep Web is depicted there as the submerged portion of an iceberg. The Web that we know is the tip, and the massive portion underwater is the deep Web. 
<br /><br />
"I've just come back from the deep Web," they say, "and look what I found." They share ghastly images and stories, perpetuating the legend of this vast underbelly among underbellies. In these conversations I was led to believe that the deep Web&#8212;also called the invisible Web, the darknet, undernet, and several other sinister-sounding names&#8212;was home to the sort of content that would get you thrown in jail if it were ever traced back to you. This is true, to an extent, but technically the deep Web comprises anything that isn't crawlable by major search engines like Google. This can mean dynamic URLs that have a long string of parameters that might confuse spiders (the software that "crawls" Web sites to index them for search). Any content that's behind a pay wall or other password authentication is technically included in the deep Web. This would include your e-mail or a pay-to-view newspaper Web site. Any content that lies behind a form, like a survey or poll, often can't be crawled. Some sites purposefully exclude spiders using robots.txt, a file that tells spiders to steer clear of certain Web pages for various legitimate, legal reasons. Pages that are made up of flash content obviously can't be crawled because there's no raw text on the page. So to say that the deep Web is the seedy back alley of the Internet is not entirely accurate. 
<br /><br />
However, there are parts of the deep Web, accessible only with the use of certain anonymizing software, where baddies sometimes hang out. The deep Web is rife with readily available child pornography, terrorist rhetoric, drug and sex trade&#8212;all manner of taboo and hateful communication. 
<br /><br />
One such piece of anonymizing software is called the Onion Router, or Tor, briefly mentioned earlier. Tor reroutes communications coming from your computer around the world across a distributed network of volunteer-run nodes that make up the Tor Network. Tor passes users' traffic through three servers before sending it along to its destination. The network was originally sponsored by the U.S. Office of Naval Research to help military agents abroad bypass firewalls and other "censorware" in countries like China. For this reason, some speculate that the service is routinely monitored by the U.S. government and cannot be trusted. 
<br /><br />
Technically, Tor is not an anonymizing service so much as an obfuscating one. Tor alone can't keep anyone anonymous; it's merely one item in the smart anon's tool belt. Tor works to anonymize your Internet connection, but can also be applied to specific programs. The most popular program used in tandem with Tor is the Internet browser. The Tor team has built a Firefox extension that applies several "onion-like" layers of obfuscation to data communicated through Firefox. Because Tor routes your traffic around the world, it's not very fast. The more people volunteer to contribute their machines as nodes, the faster Tor will get. 
<br /><br />
I thought I'd check it out for myself. I downloaded the Tor software, ran the executable file, and installed the software. When I ran the program, within seconds a browser window opened saying, "Congratulations. Your browser is configured to use Tor. Please refer to the Tor Web site for further information about using Tor safely. You are now free to browse the Internet anonymously." I typed in a URL I found on 4chan for an underground deep Web portal called Hidden Wiki, waited about thirty seconds (an eternity in the era of Wideband and FIOS), and a blank page popped up, reading "Looking for Hidden Wiki?" The last two words were blue, indicating a hyperlink, so I clicked it, and up popped a page that looked just like Wikipedia. A sidebar listed the categories that are available to browse: blogs, books, political advocacy, but also drugs and underage erotica. I clicked on a link called "Killer for Hire." 
<br /><br />
This can't possibly be for real, can it? 
<blockquote><i>
You can call me Slate. All you need to know is that I am well trained and can perform what you need done. I do not need to know your situation with the hit and prefer not to. I&#8217;m hired when you want to make sure that the hit doesn&#8217;t get traced back to you.
<ul>
<li>Minimum age for hit is 18.
</li><li>I do not care of the gender of the hit.
</li><li>I do not kill pregnant women.
</li><li>I do not torture the target.
</li><li>If hit is a political figure, or is in law enforcement (judges, policemen) there will be an additional fee.
</li><li>For an additional fee, I can set it up as a &#8220;suicide&#8221; or an &#8220;accident&#8221;
</li><li>Hit will take place within 4 weeks.
</li><li>Hits outside of the continental US will require an additional 2 weeks of logistics and $5000 in travel fees.
</li><li>Once the hit has been made I will message you with a picture or a video and the remaining balance must be paid in full. 
</li></ul>
</i></blockquote>
A second hit-man site sounds like a Hollywood Russian mafioso wrote it. "It is mutual interest to make everything anonymously," he warns, insisting, "it is not a joke." He gives careful instructions on how to pay through Bitcoins (more on this soon) and reiterates the need for total anonymity on both sides of the transaction. "I don't know you and you don't know me." 
If these sites are jokes, they are convincingly conceived. Moving on from the hit men, there are firearm salesmen, hackers for hire ("destroy your enemies!"), an extensive list of Bitcoin traders, illegal gambling sites, white supremacist blogs, whistle-blowing blogs, new world order conspiracy chat rooms, transnational activists, Anonymous operation forums, hacker/phreaker communities, and porn. Oh, the porn. Genital mutilation, necrophilia, zoophilia, watersports, etc. Anything you can imagine is at your fingertips. Which brings us to child pornography. I don't have the guts or inclination to click through to any of these sites, but they're there. And according to people hanging out on 4chan, the stuff available from the Hidden Wiki is only a shallow fraction of what's out there were one prone to dig deeper. 
 <br /><br />
Perhaps the most notorious site available through Tor is the Silk Road, a black market where users can find 340 different illegal drugs: weed, cocaine, heroin&#8212;a digital bazaar of pills, tabs, and powders. If I wanted, I could easily order up a smorgasbord of illicit substances and have it delivered within a few days. You have to pay a Bitcoin just to browse the site&#8212;its inaccessibility keeps out most looky-loos. The site doesn't have everything, of course. You won't find any chemicals that are easily weaponized. Sellers promote their wares through a reputation system that isn't much different from the one popularized by eBay. The site only accepts Bitcoins, which, along with mandatory Tor usage, help to ensure the anonymity of buyers and sellers. The Silk Road is one of many hubs for black-market drug trade on the deep Web. It's difficult to tell if the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) is going to crack down on this sort of thing, or if we're peering into the future. Anonymizing applications and efforts to pierce such software seem to be progressing apace.
<br /><br />
Freenet is another piece of software used to mask identity online. It's been downloaded over 2 million times. Freenet's creator, Ian Clarke, is concerned about the freedom to communicate. He grew up in the south of Ireland in the &#8216;80s in a family of Protestants, whom he says are fastidious about staying out of Irish politics. From a young age he was interested in understanding people who held different views. 
<blockquote><i>
I remember reading [Sinn FÃƒÆ&rsquo;Ã‚Â©in' leader] Gerry Adams's autobiography at a time when most people considered him a terrorist. I can remember that if he was interviewed on TV they had to use an actor to do a voiceover, because it was illegal to broadcast his actual voice. It wasn't that I agreed with Gerry Adams' beliefs or actions, but I did feel that it was far more productive to understand where people are coming from, to try to step into their shoes, rather than simply demonizing them, which was official government policy at that time. It left me with a strong sense of the futility of censorship, and the value of free communication.
</i></blockquote>
My experience with Freenet's "Linkageddon," one of several directories, is similar to that of Tor's Hidden Wiki. Some of it is innocuous (Bob Chapman's Financial Analysis), some of it funny (Anti&#8211;Harry Potter fundamentalists), and some of it horrific (ubiquitous underage porn). Everything looks like an old Geocities page. 
<br /><br />
Clarke describes Freenet like a decentralized postal system, where people carry each other's mail. For instance, you need to get a letter to your friend Bob in Boston, and your friend Diane is going to Boston for a business trip. You give Diane your letter and have her hand off the letter to James, who happens to live in Bob's neighborhood. The system is decentralized and doesn't rely on any one person more than the others. If Bob can't deliver your letter, you might ask Cheryl, who will be passing through Boston as well. The advantages to this system are such that James doesn't have to know who's sending the letter, and there's no central postal hub that can restrict the delivery of mail through censorship or incapacity. According to research by Freedom House, Freenet is one of the most popular anonymity systems used in China. This was no accident. Clarke says that he intended for the software to be used by activists.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121030/01363220883/navigating-deep-dark-web.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121030/01363220883/navigating-deep-dark-web.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121030/01363220883/navigating-deep-dark-web.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>dig-in</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121030/01363220883</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:01:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Silk Road: Illicit Goods Plus Anonymity Equals... A Fairly Small Business</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120901/23103320254/silk-road-illicit-goods-plus-anonymity-equals-fairly-small-business.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120901/23103320254/silk-road-illicit-goods-plus-anonymity-equals-fairly-small-business.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The anonymous marketplace Silk Road got some attention about a year ago when Gawker did a big <a href="http://gawker.com/5805928/the-underground-website-where-you-can-buy-any-drug-imaginable" target="_blank">expose on the site</a>, which can only be accessed via the TOR network, and which requires Bitcoin for all purchases.  That bit of publicity also resulted in Senator Chuck Schumer <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110605/22322814558/senator-schumer-says-bitcoin-is-money-laundering.shtml">demanding</a> something be done about the site, while also suggesting that Bitcoin itself was a form of money laundering.  While there are a bunch of similar sites, the "publicity" has established Silk Road as the most well known such site.
<br /><br />
Nicolas Christin, from Carnegie Mellon, recently released a fascinating research paper <a href="http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/nicolasc/publications/TR-CMU-CyLab-12-018.pdf" target="_blank">analyzing the Silk Road marketplace</a>.  Christin also <a href="http://surprisinglyfree.com/2012/08/28/nicolas-christin/" target="_blank">recently appeared on Jerry Brito's <i>Surprisingly Free</i> podcast</a>, which is where I first heard about the report.
<br /><br />
There are a bunch of interesting things in the report itself, but a few key points that seemed especially interesting.  The market is surprisingly stable.  You might think with a very (but certainly not totally) anonymous marketplace, that seems to focus mostly on illegal products, using a really volatile currency, that the market itself would be pretty volatile as well.  But the data does not suggest that at all.  Also, you might expect a number of scammers to use the site, but (like plenty of regular online marketplaces), Silk Road has a rating system, and the research found that there was tremendous customer satisfaction:
<blockquote><i>
On a site like Silk Road, where, as shown above, most of the goods sold are illicit, one would expect a certain amount of deception to occur. Indeed, a buyer choosing, for instance, to purchase heroin from an anonymous seller would have very little recourse if the goods promised are not delivered. Surprisingly, though, most transactions on Silk Road seem to generate excellent feedback from buyers. Table 3 provides a breakdown of the feedback ratings from 187,825 feedback instances we collected. 97.8% of feedback posted was positive (4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 5). In contrast, only 1.4% of feedback was negative (1 or 2 on the same scale).
</i></blockquote>
Also, it will come as little to no surprise that the vast majority of products for sale are not what most people would consider legal.  Drugs seem to represent an overwhelming percentage of items for sale, though there are also things like "books" for sale.
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/lqLdN"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/lqLdN.png" /></a>
</center>
Finally, it doesn't appear that the "business" is really <i>that</i> big.  For all the talk and publicity around it, you might think it was a decently sized operation, but there's little to support that.  When Christin began his research back in November last year, there were only 220 sellers.  By the time he finished in July, it was 564.  So the number is growing, but it's still not a huge number.  Christin also made some reasonable assumptions and estimates to suggest that approximately $1.9 million worth of transactions happened on Silk Road in a month.  Translating the commissions, he believes that the site's operators likely brought in approximately $143,000 per month in commissions.  At first glance that may sound like a lot but, assuming rather significant costs to operating and maintaining the site while keeping everything as secret as possible, there really isn't that much left for "staff," though no one has any idea how big a "team" there is involved in the operation.  It's possible it's just one person, of course, in which case, the money is probably pretty good (and growing).
<br /><br />
The report also notes various ways that such a site might be disrupted... and you have to imagine that law enforcement has been working on doing exactly that.  It won't surprise me at all to find out that the operators of the site eventually do get tracked down, but I doubt that will stop these kinds of marketplaces from existing.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120901/23103320254/silk-road-illicit-goods-plus-anonymity-equals-fairly-small-business.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120901/23103320254/silk-road-illicit-goods-plus-anonymity-equals-fairly-small-business.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120901/23103320254/silk-road-illicit-goods-plus-anonymity-equals-fairly-small-business.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-the-customers-are-happy</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120901/23103320254</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>ICE Screws Up, Seizes Tor Exit Node; Vows Not to Learn From Its Mistake</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Given the various domain seizures and other efforts by ICE to act as Hollywood's personal police force, it long ago became clear that they're not particularly technically competent.  As if to demonstrate how technically illiterate they are, ICE recently <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-alone-dont-identify-criminals" target="_blank">seized six computer hard drives from the home of Nolan King</a> as part of a criminal investigation.  ICE's evidence in getting a warrant?  Solely an IP address.  Yet, as the EFF notes in the link above, if ICE were even mildly technically competent, it would have been able to tell before it seized the machines that King was running a Tor exit node, and thus was not the person connected to the IP (nor could he say who was).
<br /><br />
We've seen this before.  Earlier this year we wrote about law enforcement in Europe being <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml">equally confused</a> by a Tor exit node.
<br /><br />
Of course, some people will claim that this is "the price you pay" for running a Tor exit node.  In fact, after the EFF gave ICE agents basic remedial training in how the internet works, it returned King's hard drives, but told him "this could happen again."  Sure, it could.  But it shouldn't.  The fact that law enforcement is clueless over the fact that an IP address is not a unique identifier, and yet seems to rely on it as if it does, shouldn't place more of a burden on users.  It should indicate that law enforcement should be required to do more than simply identify an IP address.
<blockquote><i>
<p> An IP address alone is not probable cause that a person has committed a crime.  Furthermore, search warrants executed solely on the basis of IP addresses have a significant likelihood of wasting officers' time and resources rather than producing helpful leads. </p>
<p>In the case of Tor, the police can avoid mistakenly pursuing exit relay operators by checking the IP addresses that emerge in their investigations against <a href="https://metrics.torproject.org/data.html#exitlist">publicly available lists</a> of exit relays published on the Tor Project's web site. The <a href="https://metrics.torproject.org/exonerator.html">ExoneraTor</a> is another tool that allows anyone to quickly and easily see whether a Tor exit relay was likely to have been running at a particular IP address during a given date and time. The Tor Project can also help law enforcement agencies set up their own systems to query IP addresses easily. These simple checks will help officers concentrate their investigative resources on tracking down those actually committing crimes and ensure that they don't execute search warrants at innocent people's homes. </p>
</i></blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/13360915683/ice-screws-up-seizes-tor-exit-node-vows-not-to-learn-its-mistake.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>these-people-protect-us?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110825/13360915683</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:47:48 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Austrian Police Seize Computers From Tor Exit Node</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Javier points us to the news that the police in Austria have <a href="https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2011-May/020490.html" target="_blank">seized a bunch of computer equipment</a> from the home of someone running a tor exit node. The email is not entirely clear, but it sounds like someone used tor -- via that exit node -- to access a porn site.  Seeing as the equipment was seized, I'm assuming that this wasn't just a standard porn site.  It seems like this is a risk that many people running tor exit nodes may face -- but the big question is how difficult is it to explain to the police what tor is, what an exit node is, why such things are perfectly legal, and why this means they're looking in the wrong place?  Or will law enforcement just avoid all these details and assume that running a tor exit node is proof of guilt?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22003714465/austrian-police-seize-computers-tor-exit-node.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>how-long-will-this-take-to-explain</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110530/22003714465</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>