<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;thedirty.com&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:55:06 PDT</pubDate>
<title>When Suing A Website For Libel, It Helps To Actually Sue The Right One</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/18025610848.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/18025610848.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last week, a story caught my eye, about a website being <a href="http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20100826/NEWS010704/308260041/Bengals-cheerleader-wins-libel-suit" target="_blank">ordered to pay $11 million</a> for failing to respond to a lawsuit claiming libel.  The story caught my attention for a few reasons: first, I'm always interested in libel lawsuits involving blogs and second... the name of the site that was sued was TheDirt.com, which... er... seemed close enough to Techdirt.com that I had to pause for a second and make sure it wasn't us.  Anyway, after all that, it didn't seem like the ruling was interesting enough for a post... until some other details came out.
<br /><br />
The lawsuit itself came from a Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader/high school English teacher named Sarah Jones, who was upset that the site in question apparently posted a picture of her and reported that she had an affair with a player and had contracted two venereal diseases.  Assuming there's no truth to the rumors, it sounded like a straightforward libel case -- though from all the reporting, it's not clear if the site owners themselves wrote the content, or if it was written by a user -- in which case the site might have Section 230 protections (potentially depending on how involved they were in encouraging such content).
<br /><br />
So why is the case suddenly interesting?  Well, perhaps because it now appears that Ms. Jones' lawyers <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41505.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">sued the wrong company</a>.  Oops.  The lawsuit was filed against Los Angeles-based Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, which runs the website TheDirt.com.  Problem is that the site that contained the content in question was TheDirt<b>y</b>.com, and that's run by a Scottsdale-based company called Dirty World LLC who had no indication that there was a lawsuit going on at all.  Oops indeed.  At least no one sued us.
<br /><br />
Amusingly, the folks at TheDirt.com are amusingly asking if <a href="http://www.thedirt.com/2010/08/11-million-dollar-judgement-vs-thedirt-com-for-stds/" target="_blank">they should sue for libel</a> right back, considering all the press coverage claiming (falsely) that they had libeled Ms. Jones.  Oh, and as for TheDirty.com, it's <a href="http://thedirty.com/2010/08/nik-has-the-ap-apologized-to-you-yet/" target="_blank">also asking the AP for an apology</a> for <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/2010/08/27/1408747/northern-ky-teacher-wins-11-million.html" target="_blank">falsely reporting</a> that it had lost the lawsuit when it hadn't even been served.  Quite a dirty mess.   Separately, I have to imagine that Jones' lawyer, Eric Deters, now regrets his statement to the AP:
<blockquote><i>
"If they would have just taken it down, this all would have been over," Deters said. "They just kind of mocked the whole court system." 
</i></blockquote>
Might have helped if you sued the right company.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/18025610848.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/18025610848.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/18025610848.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>thedirt-vs.-thedirty</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100831/18025610848</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>