<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;taxi&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:37:14 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Massachusetts Realizes That Maybe GPS Isn't Too Newfangled After All; Reverses Order &#038; Allows Uber</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120815/15565520065/massachusetts-realizes-that-maybe-gps-isnt-too-newfangled-after-all-reverses-order-allows-uber.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120815/15565520065/massachusetts-realizes-that-maybe-gps-isnt-too-newfangled-after-all-reverses-order-allows-uber.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Well, that was fast.  It seems that Uber, the innovative new transportation offering, keeps running into local regulatory problems... but as soon as the public gets wind of these, the local governments back down.  Last month, it was DC <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120710/09531219647/dc-dumps-bill-to-force-uber-into-high-prices-complains-that-bill-was-to-help-uber.shtml">backing down</a> on a bill that would <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120709/22540419635/dc-seeks-to-legalize-uber-forcing-it-to-be-way-more-expensive-than-cabs.shtml">artificially inflate</a> Uber's prices.  And now, it's Massachusetts.  Yesterday, we noted that the <strike>Luddite Council</strike> "Sealer of Weights &#038; Measures" had ruled that Uber had to shut down in Boston and Cambridge because <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/14441720049/boston-shuts-down-uber-because-massachusetts-doesnt-approve-gps.shtml">of these newfangled "GPS"</a> things (and it didn't even know what GPS stood for).
<br /><br />
And... just like that, the "Division of Standards" has <a href="http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/docs/dos/massachusetts-gives-green-light-for-uber-technologies.pdf" target="_blank">issued a "modified hearing decision"</a> on the matter, in which it realizes that perhaps GPS isn't such a crazy, awful, dangerous technology after all.  Apparently after re-examining "relevant amendments to Handbook 44 by NIST and NCWM" (National Institute of Standards &#038; Technology and the National Conference on Weights and Measures), they've decided that Uber can continue to operate, granted "provisional" approval, which is "pending the outcome of the NIST study and/or the establishment of any standards for the use of such systems."
<br /><br />
In other words, crisis averted for now, but wouldn't it be better for local regulatory agencies to think these things through a bit more in the future rather than defaulting to banning any new and innovative offerings?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120815/15565520065/massachusetts-realizes-that-maybe-gps-isnt-too-newfangled-after-all-reverses-order-allows-uber.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120815/15565520065/massachusetts-realizes-that-maybe-gps-isnt-too-newfangled-after-all-reverses-order-allows-uber.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120815/15565520065/massachusetts-realizes-that-maybe-gps-isnt-too-newfangled-after-all-reverses-order-allows-uber.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>uber-onward</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120815/15565520065</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:40:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Taxi Owner Copies Innovative Business Model Of Free Shuttles He Just Forced To Shut Down</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090825/0453005994.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090825/0453005994.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this year, we wrote about how some of the taxi companies in Tampa, Florida were <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090625/0207255356.shtml">upset</a> about free competition.  Some smart business folks had setup local transportation options, that subsisted on advertising and tips, rather than fares, and thus were able to avoid having to buy a (sold out) taxi cab license.  But, of course, the existing cabbies freaked out and complained, and convinced the city council to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1814005872.shtml">declare</a> that the free cabs had to buy licenses as well... while conveniently noting that none are available.  Basically, the cab drivers got the city council to drive this competition out of town.
<br /><br />
But, now there's a bit of a twist.  A bunch of folks have sent in the news that one of the guys who pushed the city council the hardest has now suddenly <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/transportation/article1030038.ece" target="_new">set up his own free shuttle offering in place of the competition that was run out of town</a>.  He makes no qualms about the fact that he's copying the idea of the shuttles he just knocked out of business, saying they had a good idea -- he just didn't like the fact that they didn't have to buy a taxi license.  Neat trick, huh?  Get the government to drive your competitors out of town, and then copy their best ideas.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090825/0453005994.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090825/0453005994.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090825/0453005994.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>regulatory-capture</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090825/0453005994</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:50:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Taxi Driver Does Pay What You Want... And It Works</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We recently wrote about <i>successful</i> taxi cab operators offering <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090625/0207255356.shtml">free service</a> in Tampa, Florida (pissing off existing cab companies), and it appears that the idea is spreading somewhat.  Matt Cruse alerts us to a story in Essex, Vermont, involving a guy offering <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1120ap_us_odd_recession_taxi.html?source=mypi" target="_new">"pay what you want" taxi rides</a>, and finding that people are always willing to pay a reasonable rate.  Now, I'll admit that I'm not a huge fan of "pay what you want" models, which seem more like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080522/1545021204.shtml">give it away and pray</a>, rather than having a real business model worked out (which makes me wonder if it's sustainable long term).  But, in the meantime, it's certainly yet another example that "free," can be a useful tool as a part of a business model.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>funny-that...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090804/0146015764</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>