<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;storyboarding&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Opening Up Your Entire Writing Process Isn't Such A Ridiculous Idea</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0411062206.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0411062206.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last week, when we wrote about how author Stephenie Meyer seemed to be <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080901/1701422140.shtml">overreacting</a> to the leak of her latest manuscript, one of our regular critical commenters (an IP lawyer, who fully supports the IP system) posted a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20080901/1701422140#c21">mocking comment</a> pretending to mimic us by saying that maybe she should have opened up her whole writing process and put it up as a wiki.  Of course, we never suggested any such thing, we merely pointed out that once the reality of the leak had happened, there were good and bad ways to react to it, and she chose a bad way, that punished her biggest fans.
<br /><br />
However, it's worth noting that the more wide open process of creativity isn't necessarily worth mocking either.  In fact, <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html">Boing Boing</a> points out that Wired Magazine has <a href="http://blog.wired.com/storyboard/" target="_new">opened up its storyboarding process</a> for a feature for the next issue, so that people can follow the process of building the story.  The mocking commenter-type folks would insist that this would somehow hurt the magazine and the writer by somehow "revealing" the process too soon, but the reality is that it's likely to help build more interest in the story by better connecting with fans who will feel a bigger connection to the story by seeing the whole process, rather than just the finished product.
<br /><br />
Of course, this isn't to say that everyone has to embrace such an open process, but that it's not such a ridiculous process, no matter how much it may offend the sensibilities (or billing ability) of an IP attorney.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0411062206.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0411062206.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080908/0411062206.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-that-everyone-has-to-do-it...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080908/0411062206</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>