<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;simulation&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Simulations For Living On Mars</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100914/12125011005/dailydirt-simulations-living-mars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100914/12125011005/dailydirt-simulations-living-mars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Manned missions to Mars aren't going to happen for decades (if ever?), but in the mean time, we have awesome robots roaming the surface of Mars for us. We also have some simulations of living on Mars -- like the <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Mars500/SEMGSIUTLKG_0.html">Mars500</a> project -- and the unforgettable original Total Recall movie. Here are just a few more Martian simulations if you need some help escaping from the realities of Earth. 

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exploration/First-Neighborhood-on-Mars-162925956.html?" href="http://bit.ly/MMmvAx">Will Wright, the creator of SimCity, has imagined what the first Mars settlement might look like in 2047.</a> A Martian town with a population of 8,000 inhabitants sounds somewhat unlikely in less than 50 years, but it might happen someday. [<a href="http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exploration/First-Neighborhood-on-Mars-162925956.html?">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003734.html" href="http://bit.ly/OKGlwr">An open source Mars Simulator built in Java has been around since 1998.</a> SimMars was never commercially released, so this <a href="http://mars-sim.sourceforge.net/">open source project</a> was the only game in town -- until the <a href="http://www.moddb.com/mods/simmars">mod</a> for SimCity 4. [<a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003734.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://fmars.marssociety.org/home/about" href="http://bit.ly/QdUm50">FMARS is a simulated Mars habitat project, located near an impact crater on Devon Island.</a> The Flashline Mars Arctic Research Station was created by the non-profit Mars Society in 2000 -- and it would be cool if they rented it out on AirBnB... [<a href="http://fmars.marssociety.org/home/about">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100914/12125011005/dailydirt-simulations-living-mars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100914/12125011005/dailydirt-simulations-living-mars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100914/12125011005/dailydirt-simulations-living-mars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100914/12125011005</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:01:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>What If You Could Recreate Live Performances By Dead Artists On A Computer?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/2311376864.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/2311376864.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Via <a href="http://twitter.com/Shocklee/status/5564012868">Shocklee</a> comes this story of a company that claims to have created software that can <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/29222/zenph-re-performance-captures-musical-dna" target="_blank">recreate live performances by famous musicians</a> (even dead ones).  Basically, the software learns (or so its creators claim) exactly how certain musicians played, and then can mimic that style exactly.  Here's how Pocket Lint describes it:
<blockquote><i>
Zenph Studio's approach is to work out how the musician and the instrument acts and responds, then get a computer to play that track again as a real-time, real-life performance, which in turn can be recorded using modern techniques. The new track isn't a re-mastering, but a re-performance, as if the musician was actually playing it even though the artist may or may not be dead.
<br /><br />
The technology works by ascertaining how an artist strikes a note and then recreating that note again. For the piano, the company takes into account everything from how an artist strikes a note to their hand movement, how they play when tired (yes, it can recreate fatigue) and even, as for the case of Jerry Lee Lewis, how they play with their feet. For the guitar there is even more to take into account, like pad placement, fingernails, and bending of the strings, the list goes on.
<br /><br />
The result is that songs recorded 100 years ago can and will be able to be re-recorded with modern recording equipment, allowing old songs to be revitalised and enjoyed once more "in surround sound or headphone listening".
</i></blockquote>
And, of course, the technology goes well beyond just remastering.  In theory, you could create entirely new recordings by long-dead artists, matching their exact styles.  As the article suggests, you could toss John Lennon into a Rolling Stones song.
<br /><br />
Of course, if this sounds sorta familiar, that's because we were just talking about the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/1005266855.shtml">legal mess</a> associated with Bluebeat.com's claims that the music it offers from its site for sale are not the original works by bands like the Beatles, but <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091105/1642426817.shtml">an entirely new recording</a> through a "psycho-acoustic simulation."
<br /><br />
So, now, take this software that supposedly can perfectly mimic a certain musician's playing, and have it record a song.  Say it's a new song.  Who owns the copyright?  What if it's adding John Lennon to a Rolling Stone's song?  Who owns the copyright?  What if it's an old song, updated in some slight way?  Who owns the copyright?  What if it's just the same song but "remastered"?  Who owns the copyright?  The legal questions raised by this kind of software are going to keep copyright lawyers busy for a long, long time.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/2311376864.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/2311376864.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091109/2311376864.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>helloooooo-copyright-fight</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091109/2311376864</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>