<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;shareholders&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:05:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Some Dell Shareholders Don't Know Much About This Leveraged Buyout, But They Know They Don't Like It</title>
<dc:creator>Dealbreaker</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130207/14434421912/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-leveraged-buyout-they-know-they-dont-like-it.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130207/14434421912/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-leveraged-buyout-they-know-they-dont-like-it.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <div style="text-align:center;padding:7px 7px 3px 7px;margin:0 0 7px 15px;border:2px solid #bbb;float:right;line-height:1.2;">
<i style="font-weight:bold;color:#666;font-size:90%;">Cross-posted from</i><br />
<a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2013/02/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-lbo-but-they-know-they-dont-like-it/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/vrrj9mY.png" width="120" title="Dealbreaker" style="margin:0;" alt="Dealbreaker" /></a>
</div>

The Dell deal documents <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/0001193125-13-041273-index.htm">are out</a> and they are short of juicy details; we'll have to wait for the proxy for details on things like just how much of a discount Michael Dell is taking on his shares or what exactly the <a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2013/02/microsoft-will-take-a-low-interest-rate-on-its-dell-debt-to-demonstrate-its-emotional-commitment/">terms of Microsoft's loan</a> are. There is, though, the information that that loan will take the form of $2 billion of subordinated debt, and that the total cash equity investments from Silver Lake, Michael Dell and MSD will total $2.25bn. This seems pretty sensible; Microsoft is effectively writing half of the equity check, though for a fixed-but-subordinated return, plus emotional benefits or what have you. And if <a href="http://www.pehub.com/185217/what-dell-deal-means-pe/">you're worried</a> about how easily debt markets will swallow some $3.25bn of bonds, $5.5bn of Term B/C, and billions of assorted other secured financing,<sup><a name="call01" href="#fn01">1</a></sup> which with $4bn of existing bonds brings Dell to around <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2013/02/05/dell-aims-for-double-b-rating-leverage-less-than-4x-ebitda/">4x total leverage</a>, making $2 billion &#8211; almost half a turn &#8211; of the debt subordinated, long-term, and emotionally committed can&#8217;t hurt.
<p>But for most of the fun stuff we&#8217;ll have to look forward to the proxy. And that isn't good enough for some people. <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Securities/News/2013/02_-_February/Dell_investor_sues_to_block_founder_s_leveraged_buyout/">Reuters reports</a> that the first shareholder lawsuit over the deal has already been filed, one day after announcement, which I assume means it was in the works before the deal was announced. This sort of amazed me: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>Some shareholders said they were angered by the lack of specifics about the deal, making it hard for them to determine if the price was fair. The company, which declined to comment on the lawsuit, had said the board had conducted an extensive review of its strategic options before agreeing to the buyout.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>I would characterize myself as mildly saddened by the lack of specifics, but that's why I will <i>wait until the proxy is out and then read the specifics</i>. You know there's a whole section of the proxy explaining why the bankers thought the deal was fair, right?<sup><a name="call02" href="#fn02">2</a></sup></p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing new here &#8211; as Reuters notes, "Almost every merger worth more $100 million prompts a shareholder lawsuit" -- but the speed continues to amaze. And it's becoming ever more a fact of life:</p>
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/o5rLdZs"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/o5rLdZs.png" width=560 /></a>
</center>
<p>That&#8217;s from <a href="http://www.cornerstone.com/files/News/9e101f01-847a-47ff-a62d-b23e3d019cca/Presentation/NewsAttachment/5d699795-5f25-4864-8e7f-b656446965b5/Cornerstone_Research_Shareholder_MandA_Litigation_03_2012.pdf">this depressing report</a>, which also has a sad-comical list of 16 deals each with 15 or more lawsuits filed. (The tech industry averages 4.9 suits, so, y'know, look out for 3.9 more.)</p>
<p>You can sympathize a little. Management buyouts are <i>of course</i> all about <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/reasons-to-be-suspicious-of-management-led-buyouts/">bottom-ticking the stock price</a>; management would be pretty dumb if they took the company private at its all-time high. Dell's various <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513038969/0001193125-13-038969-index.htm">stakeholder communications</a> -- all to the tune of "this will is the start of a whole new chapter for Dell, in which everything will remain exactly the same" -- make that pretty clear: the deal has little to do with operational changes and much to do with the fact that Michael Dell thinks that (1) Dell and (2) debt are both <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/02/capital-markets">cheap right now</a>. </p>
<p>But that's kind of the market, and the fact of life is that if shareholders think that $13.65 is too cheap for their shares, they can always vote the deal down. By all accounts this deal was <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-06/dell-s-mr-denali-talks-said-to-break-up-a-few-times-over-price.html">pretty fully negotiated</a>, so it seems unlikely that the lawsuit will reveal that Dell and Silver Lake would have coughed up an extra $1 a share if the board had just asked more aggressively. And it's no secret that Michael Dell thinks that his company is worth more than $13.65. Even if that hasn't been specifically disclosed yet.</p>
<p>Dell <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/d480506d8k.htm">8-K</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/d480506dex21.htm">Merger Agreement</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826083/000119312513041273/d480506dex101.htm">Voting Agreement</a> [EDGAR]<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2013/02/06/dell-buyout-broken-down-silver-lake-puts-in-1-4-billion/?mod=WSJBlog">Dell Buyout Broken Down: Silver Lake Puts in $1.4 Billion</a> [Deal Journal]<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2013/02/05/dell-aims-for-double-b-rating-leverage-less-than-4x-ebitda/">Dell Aims for Double-B Rating, Leverage Less Than 4x Ebitda</a> [Deal Journal]<br />
<a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Securities/News/2013/02_-_February/Dell_investor_sues_to_block_founder_s_leveraged_buyout/">Dell investor sues to block founder&#8217;s leveraged buyout</a> [Reuters]<br />
<a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/reasons-to-be-suspicious-of-management-led-buyouts/">Reasons to Be Suspicious of Buyouts Led by Management</a> [DealBook]<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-06/dell-s-mr-denali-talks-said-to-break-up-a-few-times-over-price.html">Dell&#8217;s Talks Said to Break Up a Few Times Over Pricing</a> [Bloomberg]</p>
<p><small><a name="fn01" href="#call01">1.</a> <i>From the 8-K:</i></small></p>
<blockquote><p><small>Each of Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Credit Suisse AG and Royal Bank of Canada and, in some cases, certain of their affiliates (collectively, the &#8220;Lenders&#8221;) have committed to provide debt financing for the transaction, consisting of a $4 billion senior secured term loan B facility, a $1.5 billion senior secured term loan C facility, a $2 billion ABL facility, senior secured interim loan facilities consisting of a $2 billion first lien bridge loan facility and a $1.25 billion second lien bridge loan facility (or, alternatively, senior secured first lien and second lien fixed rate notes that would be issued in a high-yield offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933), a $1.9 billion term commercial receivables financing facility and a $1.1 billion revolving consumer receivables financing facility, each on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in a commitment letter dated as of February 5, 2013 (the "Debt Commitment Letter"). </small></p></blockquote>
<p><small><a name="fn02" href="#call02">2.</a> <i>The answer is always along the lines of "because you paid us to think that," but still.</i></small></p>
<b>Other posts from <a href="http://dealbreaker.com/" target="_blank">Dealbreaker</a>:</b>
<ul><li><a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2013/02/bofa-to-spend-mortgage-savings-telling-everyone-how-not-horrible-it-is/" target="_blank">BofA To Spend Mortgage Savings Telling Everyone How Not-Horrible It Is</a>
</li><li><a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2013/02/david-einhorn-wants-apple-shareholders-to-vote-on-voting-on-issuing-preferred-stock/" target="_blank">David Einhorn Wants Apple Shareholders To Vote On Voting On Issuing Preferred Stock</a>
</li><li><a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2013/02/microsoft-will-take-a-low-interest-rate-on-its-dell-debt-to-demonstrate-its-emotional-commitment/" target="_blank">Microsoft Will Take A Low Interest Rate On Its Dell Debt To Demonstrate Its Emotional Commitment</a>
</li></ul><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130207/14434421912/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-leveraged-buyout-they-know-they-dont-like-it.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130207/14434421912/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-leveraged-buyout-they-know-they-dont-like-it.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130207/14434421912/some-dell-shareholders-dont-know-much-about-this-leveraged-buyout-they-know-they-dont-like-it.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>no-need-for-details,-just-be-angry</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130207/14434421912</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:16:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Judge Decides That Grand Theft Auto's Hot Coffee Mod Didn't Deceive Shareholders</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080417/164451878.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080417/164451878.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Hidden "<a href="http://www.eeggs.com/">easter eggs</a>" are quite common.  These are little things hidden within software, often for the amusement of the programmers.  In video games, it's often fun to try to find these hidden parts.  It's really kind of a tradition for some.  However, folks who didn't quite understand this <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050720/1524243_F.shtml">freaked out</a> a few years back, when the "Hot Coffee" mod/hidden content was revealed within the game <i>Grand Theft Auto</i>.  This was a special modification to the game that would unlock a hidden part of the game allowing players to (gasp!) participate in consensual intercourse.  It was such a big deal that various Senators proposed laws to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070214/161353.shtml">prevent</a> such a thing from ever happening again.  And, there was even a class action for all those people <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/142233113.shtml">"damaged"</a> by this mod.  And, because no moral outrage directed at companies is complete without a shareholder class action lawsuit, there was one of those as well -- accusing the company of somehow "misleading shareholders" with Hot Coffee.  Luckily a judge has realized how ridiculous this is and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-taketwo-lawsuit.html?_r=1&#038;ex=1366171200&#038;en=67152de65e89d1d2&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;oref=slogin" target="_new">has dismissed that particular claim</a> in the shareholder lawsuit.  Phew.  Now software developers will be able to keep adding easter eggs and hidden content without a special explanation for all shareholders.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080417/164451878.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080417/164451878.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080417/164451878.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>easter-eggs-remain-legal</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080417/164451878</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>