<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;routers&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Mar 2013 09:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Crowdfunding Picks: Throw Trucks With Your Mind &#038; Other Cool Control Interfaces</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130301/01541322166/crowdfunding-picks-throw-trucks-with-your-mind-other-cool-control-interfaces.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130301/01541322166/crowdfunding-picks-throw-trucks-with-your-mind-other-cool-control-interfaces.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For many, many years, we've talked about all kinds of business models, including ideas (and early attempts) at crowdfunding before "crowdfunding' was a word.  Obviously, over the past couple years, Kickstarter has become "a thing," along with a number of other platforms, like IndieGogo, PledgeMusic and many more.  On a nearly daily basis, we get pitches from people running cool crowdfunding projects, but we rarely write about them.  Mostly, I've tried to only write about campaigns where there was something new or instructive about <i>the way the crowdfunding was being done</i> -- rather than the specific product itself.  And yet, we keep seeing all sorts of cool products showing up that aren't necessarily doing anything unique or innovative on the business model side, but are simply unique, innovative and awesome <i>all by themselves</i>.  For a few months now, we've been discussing internally the idea of a weekly series of something like "the five best crowdfunding projects of the week," but just never got around to doing it.  This week, however, we came across three separate projects, all so awesome that they needed to be shared.  Hopefully, we'll be making this into a weekly feature, so enjoy.
<br /><br />
<i>We're still debating (and debating and debating) what to call this new section and when to post it.  This week, we're going with "Crowdfunding Picks" and trying Saturday morning.  But we think there must be a better name than that -- and that the name doesn't necessarily have to be about "crowdfunding," but could just be about awesome innovation or cool projects or... something.  So if you've got any ideas, please leave them in the comments.</i>

<ol>
<li> First up is a game by Lat Ware, called <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1544851629/throw-trucks-with-your-mind" target="_blank"><i>Throw Trucks With Your Mind!</i></a>  And, yes, the name is quite descriptive (Lat jokes that we should imagine a world in which <strike><i>Call of Duty</i></strike> <i>Gears of War</i> is called "Hide Behind Chest High Walls," since he appears to prefer games to be named after their key concept).  Lat was able to stop by our offices yesterday and let me try it out, and the game delivers what it promises.  I did, in fact, get to throw some trucks with my mind, and it's pretty awesome.  
<center>
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1544851629/throw-trucks-with-your-mind/widget/video.html" frameborder="0"> </iframe>
</center>
Lat has hooked up an off the shelf <a href="http://www.neurosky.com/Products/MindWave.aspx" target="_blank">NeuroSky EEG device</a> (which you can buy for about $80) to the game he's developing, and there are different actions that you can perform in the game based on how <i>focused</i> you are and how <i>calm</i> you are -- the two things measured by the NeuroSky.  Moving around and selecting what telekinetic power you have is done via the keyboard.  But staring at a truck and launching it at your enemy to crush them is an amazingly satisfying experience.  You can also do other things like lifting, pulling, super jumping and "slow falling."  As a fun test, Lat effectively has you jump off a cliff, and you fall slower if you remain calm, but if you get excited you fall faster and die.  It's an interesting mental battle to try to keep yourself calm just as you start to fall faster and faster off a cliff.
<br /><br />
I've read some of the discussions online about TTWYM elsewhere, and some were concerned about how much fun the gameplay could really be, and let me just say that there shouldn't be any concern.  After I tested it out for a bit, I called in someone else who works here, and we got to throw trucks at each other with our minds for a while, with the person more focused and more calm person winning.  It's an interesting mental battle of wills when you're trying to kill your colleague by being the most calm.  The game itself can handle up to 32 people at once, either over a LAN or the internet.
<br /><br />
The game itself is just the very rough pre-alpha version, built on the Unreal Development Kit.  But the goal of the Kickstarter project is to bring in a team of kick ass video game artists to turn it into a very different visual experience that's much more whimsical and fun (there's some mockup art on the Kickstarter page).  You can buy the NeuroSky device independently or one of the tiers includes one, but you do need it to play the game -- which may limit the number of folks who can play it early on.  As of right now, the game is about half funded (to the $40,000 Lat is seeking), but it's definitely one of those things that feels like it's from the future, and gets you thinking about all the cool stuff that's going to be possible before very long, even if this example just involves using your mind to fling giant trucks at your friends.
<center>
<iframe frameborder="0" height="380" src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1544851629/throw-trucks-with-your-mind/widget/card.html" width="220"></iframe>
</center>
<br /><br />
</li><li>Okay, move past that ability to throw trucks with your mind, and start thinking about controlling your computer with simple gestures, and then check out the <a href="https://getmyo.com/" target="_blank">MYO</a> device, which has been generating a ton of attention mainly due to its <a href="http://youtu.be/oWu9TFJjHaM" target="_blank">amazing video</a> highlighting how a simple arm band can create all sorts of useful gesture controls.
<center>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/oWu9TFJjHaM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</center>
For about a year, there's been a lot of buzz about Leap Motion's cool <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5987240/this-sick-3d-gesture-control-hardware-will-only-cost-80">gesture control</a> device, but the MYO may be equally as intriguing, supposedly recognizing different muscle movements in your arm to allow you to do things very easily.  Since it's a wrist band, it can hook up to desktop machines, but also mobile phones or (eventually) something like Google Glass.  The possibilities are pretty limitless.
<br /><br />
When I first saw the video, one of the first things I said to someone was that I was amazed MYO hadn't gone the Kickstarter route, as it just has the <i>feel</i> of a Kickstarter project.  However, they apparently decided to go it alone, and it's working.  The MYO website lets people pre-order the device for $149 and, within a few days, they claim to have received <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/28/myo-armband-pre-orders/" target="_blank">over 10,000 orders</a>, or $1.5 million.  Not bad.
<br /><br />
With both of these first two items, there are quite reasonable questions that can be raised about execution.  Cool demos are one thing.  Consumer-ready production is a different sort of challenge.  I'm very hopeful that these two companies will succeed, but even if they end up not making it, just the fact that these kinds of offerings are being designed and built (by smaller teams, rather than giant multinationals) is really quite encouraging.  We're about to enter a very interesting era concerning just how we control the electronic devices around us.  The Microsoft Kinect and the Nintendo Wii were just the warmup round.  A ton of innovation is about to appear in this space.
<br /><br />
</li><li>Finally, after those first two items that feel totally revolutionary, this last one might even feel a bit mundane (perhaps I should have put it first on the list!).  But, it certainly caught my attention as soon as I saw it:  It's the <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2037429657/almond-80211ac-touchscreen-wifi-router-smart-home" target="_blank">Almond+ Touchscreen WiFi Router / Smart home Hub</a> from Securifi.  Check out the video first:
<center>
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2037429657/almond-80211ac-touchscreen-wifi-router-smart-home/widget/video.html" frameborder="0"> </iframe>
</center>
Almond already has a quite successful (and hugely popular) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0087NZ31S/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B0087NZ31S&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=techdirtcom-20">touchscreen wireless router</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=techdirtcom-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0087NZ31S" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, but this takes it up a notch by also adding in a smart home hub, and making the whole thing beautiful.
<br /><br />
This caught my attention for a couple reasons -- one practical and one inspirational.  First, on the practical side, I'd actually just been exploring some of the latest in home automation.  My house has an electronic door lock with a punch-button code, courtesy of its previous owner, and it's really handy, but a little simplistic and clunky.  It can only store two codes, and we're constantly replacing the batteries.  So I recently went looking around to see if the technology had advanced much in the past few years and, lo and behold, it appears that there are a growing number of "smart home" door locks that look similar but have a bunch of other cool features, such as the ability to receive email or text alerts when someone opens your door, or (much more useful) the ability to "schedule" codes to give people limited access, even from far away.  But, for that to work, you need both the new door lock and a Z-Wave controller, which adds up in price.  However, the Almond+ (beyond looking awesome) includes both a WiFi router <i>and</i> both Z-Wave and ZigBee support.  And all that for less than the cost of just about any Z-Wave hub on its own.  Just the Z-Wave part of this makes it really tempting for anyone interested in exploring the home automation field.
<br /><br />
The second reason it caught my attention was that it got me rethinking the home router a bit.  My current WiFi router is shoved in a closet, where it belongs, because it's an ugly box with blinking LEDs.  But the Securifi guys have turned the home router into something that <i>looks really good</i> and is the kind of thing that people would be proud to display out in the open.  As we move towards a world where we have increasingly connected systems and devices, it strikes me as an interesting idea to actually make the central router/hub devices <i>look good</i> from a design standpoint -- because historically that's almost never been a part of the goal.  As such, it makes me wonder how we'd treat our devices differently when we're not ashamed of them, but happy to display them.
<br /><br />
The Almond+ has already far surpassed its goal on Kickstarter, but still seems to be going strong.
<center>
<iframe frameborder="0" height="380" src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2037429657/almond-80211ac-touchscreen-wifi-router-smart-home/widget/card.html" width="220"></iframe>
</center>
</li></ol>
And, that's the kickoff of our exploration of some cool crowdfunded projects that popped onto our radar screen this week.  Let us know if you like this concept or how we might change and improve it (and what to call it), and hopefully we'll start making it a regular thing.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130301/01541322166/crowdfunding-picks-throw-trucks-with-your-mind-other-cool-control-interfaces.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130301/01541322166/crowdfunding-picks-throw-trucks-with-your-mind-other-cool-control-interfaces.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130301/01541322166/crowdfunding-picks-throw-trucks-with-your-mind-other-cool-control-interfaces.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>thinking-forward</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130301/01541322166</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:26:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Anatomy Of A Boondoggle: How The US Broadband Plan Led To WV Buying $20,000 Routers For A One Room Library</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130225/18080522110/anatomy-boondoggle-how-us-broadband-plan-led-to-wv-buying-20000-routers-one-room-library.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130225/18080522110/anatomy-boondoggle-how-us-broadband-plan-led-to-wv-buying-20000-routers-one-room-library.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in 2009, we warned people that the President's mega-hyped "broadband plan" really just looked like a massive <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090112/0146393361.shtml">gift</a> to large incumbent providers, who were about to get an influx of taxpayer money, which would translate into next to nothing in terms of actual broadband deployments.  Indeed, we've seen an awful lot of waste happening under the program, which is finally starting to come to light.  Recently, the NY Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/technology/waste-is-seen-in-program-to-give-internet-access-to-rural-us.html?ref=business&#038;_r=2&#038;" target="_blank">profiled widespread waste</a> in the program, suggesting that hundreds of millions of dollars are either being wasted or are part of various boondoggles to squeeze cash out of governments:
<blockquote><i>
Nationally, $594 million in spending has been temporarily or permanently halted, 14 percent of the overall program, and the Commerce Department's inspector general has raised questions about the program's ability to adequately monitor spending of the more than 230 grants.
</i></blockquote>
Perhaps nowhere are the details more apparent than in West Virginia.  Ars Technica <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/why-a-one-room-west-virginia-library-runs-a-20000-cisco-router/" target="_blank">summarizes</a> a recent <a href="http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Joint/PERD/perdrep/BTOP_2_2013.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> that is incredibly damning.  The smoking gun?  A $20,000 router installed in a one-room library the size of an ordinary trailer.  But that's hardly the worst of it.  At least that $20,000 router is being used (even if it's under-utilized).
<br /><br />
Part of the reason for buying that router, rather than a cheapo one that would have sufficed, was that it would enable other services, including things like VoIP.  The state bought 77 of them.  Turns out that 75 are just sitting around collecting dust.  And none of them can use the VoIP system they need.
<blockquote><i>
Ironically, the routers can't even be used for VoIP in some key cases. The state police already have a VoIP-based phone system, but the new 3945 series routers did not come with "the appropriate Cisco VoIP modules" to work with the system. The state now has to spend another $84,768 to purchase those modules; without them, the state police can't use the routers, only two of which are actually installed and operating. (For those keeping score at home, this means that 75 $20,000 routers are depreciating in a state police warehouse somewhere in West Virginia.)
</i></blockquote>
There's a lot of finger-pointing going on, but when it comes down to it, this is not at all surprising.  Throwing billions of dollars into the broadband space with little reasoning or oversight <i>always</i> leads to questionable behavior.  So why do we keep doing it?  Are there ways the government could spend on infrastructure and have it be powerful.  Sure, but the Broadband Plan clearly was not it.  And we're only learning about the abuse and waste now, after the money's been spent.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130225/18080522110/anatomy-boondoggle-how-us-broadband-plan-led-to-wv-buying-20000-routers-one-room-library.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130225/18080522110/anatomy-boondoggle-how-us-broadband-plan-led-to-wv-buying-20000-routers-one-room-library.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130225/18080522110/anatomy-boondoggle-how-us-broadband-plan-led-to-wv-buying-20000-routers-one-room-library.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>scam-scam-scam-scam</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130225/18080522110</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Paper Suggests Letting The Government Use Your Router In An Emergency</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120827/13155920171/paper-suggests-letting-government-use-your-router-emergency.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120827/13155920171/paper-suggests-letting-government-use-your-router-emergency.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Jon Brodkin, over at Ars Technica, has an interesting discussion about a paper from some researchers suggesting that we could <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/would-you-give-the-government-remote-control-over-your-router/" target="_blank">augment first responder communications efforts by letting them make use of the public's WiFi routers</a>.  Basically, if I understand <a href="http://www.inderscience.com/dev/search/index.php?action=record&#038;rec_id=48489" target="_blank">the proposal correctly</a>, if turned on, it would make use of your router to try to form an ad hoc mesh network with other, similar routers in the area that, in theory would only be used by those public safety first responders.  It's no secret that there are efforts underway to make sure that emergency personnel have better access to communications spectrum, and this is, at the very least, a creative way of attacking the problem.
<br /><br />
The theory is that this doesn't impinge on anyone's security, because it would effectively carve out a separate service on the router, not unlike home WiFi routers that offer up different logins for residents and "guests."  Of course, theory and reality aren't always one and the same, and Brodkin reached out to Bruce Schneier who raised his concerns:
<blockquote><i>
&#8220;The problems are the same,&#8221; Schneier told Ars. &#8220;Once you build such a system, you have to build the security to ensure that only the good guys use it. And that's not an easy task. It is far more secure not to have the capabilities in the first place.&#8221;
</i></blockquote>
That said, if such a system were purely voluntary, and individuals were able to offer up such connectivity for first responders (or even for anyone else), would that necessarily be so bad?  I've been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070221/082707.shtml">skeptical</a> in the past of attempts to create truly comprehensive mesh networks building on people's home WiFi routers, and there hasn't been much success there.  But, perhaps there's something interesting in special use cases, such as one involving first responders.  I agree with Schneier that there could be some risks, but I'm not sure how they would be much different than running a basic guest access WiFi network that doesn't involve a password.  As long as <i>you're</i> not using that network for sensitive and unencrypted info, it seems like a similar level of risk.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120827/13155920171/paper-suggests-letting-government-use-your-router-emergency.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120827/13155920171/paper-suggests-letting-government-use-your-router-emergency.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120827/13155920171/paper-suggests-letting-government-use-your-router-emergency.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-as-crazy-as-it-sounds</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120827/13155920171</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:51:04 PDT</pubDate>
<title>You Don't Own What You Buy, Part 15,332: Cisco Forces Questionable New Firmware On Routers</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120629/15451719541/you-dont-own-what-you-buy-part-15332-cisco-forces-questionable-new-firmware-routers.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120629/15451719541/you-dont-own-what-you-buy-part-15332-cisco-forces-questionable-new-firmware-routers.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ One of the things that we keep learning in a connected, digital age, is that what you think you "bought" you often don't really own.  Companies who sell you products seem to feel a certain freedom to unilaterally change the terms of your purchase, after the fact.  I'm reminded of Sony <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100331/0128358800.shtml">removing key features</a> on the PS3, though there are plenty of other examples.  A new one is the story of Cisco, <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cisco-Pushes-New-Cloud-Firmware-Without-Customer-Approval-120161" target="_blank">pushing out a firmware update to routers without customer approval</a> and (even worse) having that firmware update block people from logging in directly to their own routers.  Apparently, if you don't like it... er... too bad.
<blockquote><i>
Cisco has started automatically pushing the company's new "<a href="http://home.cisco.com/en-us/cloud">Cloud Connect</a>" firmware update to consumer routers -- without customer approval. Annoyed users note that the update won't let consumers directly log into their routers anymore -- they have to <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/vptu9/linksys_just_pushed_and_installed_without_my/c56w7gz">register for a new Cloud Connect account</a>. The only way to revert to directly accessing the device you paid for? You have to unplug it from the Internet.
</i></blockquote>
Oh, and registering for such an account means you <b><i>have</i></b> to agree to give up your data so that Cisco can sell it.  As per the <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/siteassets/legal/connect_cloud_supp.html" target="_blank">terms</a>:
<blockquote><i>
...we may keep track of certain information related to your use of the Service, including but not limited to the status and health of your network and networked products; which apps relating to the Service you are using; which features you are using within the Service infrastructure; network traffic (e.g., megabytes per hour); Internet history; how frequently you encounter errors on the Service system and other related information ("Other Information"). We use this Other Information to help us quickly and efficiently respond to inquiries and requests, and to enhance or administer our overall Service for our customers. <br /><br />
We may also use this Other Information for traffic analysis (for example, determining when the most customers are using the Service) and to determine which features within the Service are most or least effective or useful to you. In addition, we may periodically transmit system information to our servers in order to optimize your overall experience with the Service. <u>We may share aggregated and anonymous user experience information with service providers, contractors or other third parties...</u>
</i></blockquote>
Seems like a good way to drive people into buying routers from other companies.  I can see how a "cloud service" could have value, but it should be presented to users as a choice, where the actual benefit to them (if there is one) is clearly presented. Instead, this rollout seems designed solely to benefit Cisco and its partners, rather than the people who bought (or so they thought) their routers.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120629/15451719541/you-dont-own-what-you-buy-part-15332-cisco-forces-questionable-new-firmware-routers.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120629/15451719541/you-dont-own-what-you-buy-part-15332-cisco-forces-questionable-new-firmware-routers.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120629/15451719541/you-dont-own-what-you-buy-part-15332-cisco-forces-questionable-new-firmware-routers.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-cool</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120629/15451719541</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:38:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Should We Be Concerned That The Military Will Use Counterfeit Routers Bought Off eBay?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080513/0246581098.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080513/0246581098.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There was a story last week that got a lot of press about how the FBI discovered that the military was using a ton of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/technology/09cisco.html?partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all">counterfeit technology equipment</a>, including thousands of fake Cisco routers.  Dan Wallach has an excellent writeup looking at <a href="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1289" target="_new">the security implications of what happened</a>.  From the description, it certainly doesn't sound like any of the equipment was found to include any kind of questionable technology for spying, but the point is that it would have been easy enough if someone had wanted to do so.  Basically, the background is that while the government only buys equipment from approved vendors, those vendors can subcontract out the actual tech purchases to anyone.  That leads to situations where (no joke) one subcontractor purchased a bunch of fake routers off of eBay and then resold them to the government via an authorized vendor.  Or, try to follow the details of the case of the US Navy contracting with Lockheed Martin for equipment.  Lockheed outsourced the deal to an unauthorized Cisco reseller as a subcontractor.  That subcontractor turned to its own subcontractor who (yup, you guessed it) hired another subcontractor who shipped the equipment straight to the Navy.  If you lost count, that's five layers deep, with most of those layers having no real oversight on what they did.  You would think the government (and especially the military) would be a bit more careful in where it sourced its products from, but it certainly doesn't seem as though that's the case at all.  Given all that, it's almost difficult to believe that compromised equipment <i>hasn't</i> been sold to the government at some point.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080513/0246581098.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080513/0246581098.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080513/0246581098.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>it's-not-pretty</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080513/0246581098</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>