<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;realtime&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:21:56 PST</pubDate>
<title>To Avoid Controversy, 'Realtime' Microblogging In China Now Delayed By 7 Days</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/06232621497/to-avoid-controversy-realtime-microblogging-china-now-delayed-7-days.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/06232621497/to-avoid-controversy-realtime-microblogging-china-now-delayed-7-days.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Despite increasing competition around the world, China remains the leader when it comes to finding ways to censor the online world.  A few months ago, the site Tech in Asia listed no less than eight ways in which users of Sina Weibo, China's hugely-popular homegrown microblog service, can be <a href="http://www.techinasia.com/sina-weibo-deleted-banned-blocked/">penalized for "inappropriate" tweets</a>.  Now it seems <a href="http://www.techinasia.com/sina-weibo-delays-sensitive-political-terms/">it has come up with a ninth</a>:

<i><blockquote>Users of Sina Weibo that mention things somewhat more controversial than cats or food might find their posts being delayed -- by seven whole days. The Twitter-like Sina Weibo is supposed to be a real-time social platform, but that no longer applies to posts that mention 'sensitive' terms such as the names of China's top leaders.</blockquote></i>

That's a worrying escalation, since it makes tweeting even uncontroversial stuff about contemporary politics, say, pretty pointless: who wants to read what somebody thought a week ago?  If the Chinese authorities decided to increase their control of online postings even more, an obvious way would be to encourage <i>all</i> user-generated services to adopt this system.  Pity that would pretty much be the death of real-time social media in China.
</p><p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a></p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/06232621497/to-avoid-controversy-realtime-microblogging-china-now-delayed-7-days.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/06232621497/to-avoid-controversy-realtime-microblogging-china-now-delayed-7-days.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/06232621497/to-avoid-controversy-realtime-microblogging-china-now-delayed-7-days.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-so-realtime</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121227/06232621497</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>