<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;podcasts&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Apr 2013 07:57:11 PDT</pubDate>
<title>UK Music Licensing Agency Says You Can't Use Its Music In Your Podcast Without First Purchasing A License It Doesn't Even Offer</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/03505922530/another-podcast-forced-offline-due-to-lack-non-existant-licenses.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/03505922530/another-podcast-forced-offline-due-to-lack-non-existant-licenses.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The nightmarishly intertwining world of music licensing is a popular topic here, especially considering the past outlandish actions of various performance rights agencies. On top of this, there's the multitude of <i>different</i> licenses, each one applying <i>specifically</i> to certain formats or outlets. If it's streaming on Youtube, it needs x license and y license. If it's streaming at Spotify, it needs x license and <i>z</i> license. If it's a radio station simulcast at the station's website, license x, y <i>and</i> z are needed, along with license <i>aa</i>. And so on.
<br /><br />
Podcasters in the UK are running into licensing problems when attempting to clear music for their broadcasts, as <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?company=ppl" target="_blank">PPL</a> (who covers performance rights for recorded music, like SoundExchange in the US) is causing problems.  PPL has a  <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12124316405/hardware-store-that-doesnt-play-any-music-has-to-fight-off-collection-society-demanding-license-fee.shtml" target="_blank">history</a> of questionable over enforcement, and they just can't let up, apparently. Phil Satterly sends in this rather sad story of a long-running Progressive Rock podcast (DRRP Radio) <a href="http://www.dprp.net/wp/?p=8923" target="_blank">that is going "off the air" thanks to PPL's thoroughly impossible demands</a>.
<blockquote>
<i>Launched 18 months ago, we've produced 83 shows that have been downloaded over 30,000 times. We've covered bands from every type of prog. We've done special features on independent labels and festivals plus interviews with the likes of Clive Nolan, Steven Wilson, Gazpacho, Steve Hogarth, Riverside, Sean Filkins, Mystery and Godsticks. We have regular listeners from as far away as New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, Cuba and The Shetland Isles!</i>
<br /><br />
<i>Unfortunately three weeks ago our service provider stopped enabling downloads of the shows. The move followed pressure from the PPL &ndash; the organisation in the UK which provides broadcast licences for the recording copyright holder (i.e. record companies).</i></blockquote>
PPL is doing what collective rights organizations do best: shut down as many artistic outlets as possible. The organization is looking for a payout, but can't even be bothered to let people pay them, as Andy Read (one of the podcast hosts) points out.
<blockquote>
<i>Music licensing is a complex issue and it took quite some find to find a way to legally do DPRP Radio in the first place. We have a broadcast licence, we have a streaming licence and we have a podcast licence for the PRS &ndash; the body representing the songwriters. We do not have a podcast licence for the PPL who are now threatening legal action against podcast providers. <b>We would happily buy a podcast licence from them&hellip; but they do not offer one!</b></i></blockquote>
DRRP isn't the only podcast being asked to do the impossible by PPL. <a href="http://ukfolkmusic.co.uk/magazine/podcasting-perils/" target="_blank">The UK Folk Music podcast host quotes the PPL website's wording</a> on the broadcast licensing it <i>does</i> offer.
<blockquote>
<i>As a broadcaster you would have to obtain permission from potentially thousands of record companies before being able to play the recorded music &ndash; a PPL licence gives you this permission and allows you to play virtually all recorded music readily available in the UK simply, quickly and legally. PPL then passes these licence fees, less our running costs, onto the performers and rights holders, similar to royalties.</i></blockquote>
Handy, I guess, except that PPL does not offer a license <i>specifically</i> for podcasting. Podcasters need a very limited license if using PPL's music because the podcasts are able to be downloaded and stored. This distinguishes them (and moves them into another area of copyright protection) from radio broadcasts or other streaming services whose offerings are transient. (Not that these <i>can't</i> be "trapped/downloaded." Anyone remember cassette tapes? Yeah, same thing. Only with software.)
<br /><br />
PPL's lack of a podcasting license punts the ball back to podcasters and other music bloggers. If they can't get a blanket license, they'll have to do it the hard way: "<i>obtain permission from potentially thousands of record companies before being able to play the recorded music</i>."
<br /><br />
Obviously, this is an impossibility. And for those of you saying clever stuff like "just use original music by artists not represented by this agency?" Well, you obviously haven't been paying attention. Rights groups like PPL and PRS will still try to collect from you. In their minds, <i>no one</i> plays music <i>anywhere</i> (not even in their <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12124316405/hardware-store-that-doesnt-play-any-music-has-to-fight-off-collection-society-demanding-license-fee.shtml" target="_blank">hardware store</a>/ <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100319/1105388633.shtml" target="_blank">hotel room</a>) without playing a bunch of their stuff. It's a self-serving distortion of reality.
<br /><br />
And for those hoping the artists that split from PPL to form their own rights group (EOS) will result in a brighter, smoother future for all concerned? You can pretty much kiss that rosy picture goodbye. EOS has already attempted to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130102/16241921552/welsh-radio-station-forced-to-play-classical-music-english-songs-after-royalty-talks-stall.shtml" target="_blank">shutter a few radio stations</a>. The end result is another venue for artist exposure being shut down by the "white knights" of the artistic community. These agencies don't <i>really</i> care about the artists on their roster. They just want to find a way to insert themselves, hands out, between the artists and their supporters.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/03505922530/another-podcast-forced-offline-due-to-lack-non-existant-licenses.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/03505922530/another-podcast-forced-offline-due-to-lack-non-existant-licenses.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/03505922530/another-podcast-forced-offline-due-to-lack-non-existant-licenses.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>pretty-much-like-the-movie-'Brazil,'-only-with-stylish-electronics</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130401/03505922530</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:11:05 PDT</pubDate>
<title>'Looper' Director Offers Downloadable 'In-Theater' Commentary Track</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121008/16551020648/looper-director-offers-downloadable-in-theater-commentary-track.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121008/16551020648/looper-director-offers-downloadable-in-theater-commentary-track.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As home theater systems advance in quality, many people are wondering why anyone would bother <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110702/00271714940/theater-owners-still-oblivious-to-fact-that-they-can-compete-with-home-viewing.shtml" target="_blank">heading to the theater</a> at all. Theater owners are aware of this issue and many have been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/03045714039/not-every-theater-owner-fears-competing-with-your-home-theater-system.shtml" target="_blank">improving the quality</a> of the "theater experience" by offering larger, comfier seats and moving beyond snack bar staples into craft beers and brick oven pizzas.<br />
<br />
There&#39;s still the undeniable draw of being the "first" to see a new film, showing up at a midnight showing or on opening day. There&#39;s also somewhat of a communal experience that can&#39;t be easily duplicated at home, unless your living room has seating for a couple hundred friends.<br />
<br />
Rian Johnson, the director of the recently released "Looper," is offering a rather unusual incentive for repeat theatrical viewing: <a href="http://loopermovie.tumblr.com/post/32950683762/our-in-theater-commentary-track-is-up-i-recorded" target="_blank">a downloadable commentary track to enjoy along with the 2nd-X viewing(s) of his latest film</a>.
<blockquote>
<i>I recorded a commentary track to be downloaded, put on an ipod and listened to in the theater as you&rsquo;re watching Looper. This is an odd thing I tried with Bloom, and have gotten a few requests for it again, so here it is. It is totally different from the commentary track that will be on the Blu/DVD, a bit more technical and detailed. Needless to say, this is NOT to be listened to on a first viewing, or before you&rsquo;ve seen the film. Also, please work it so that a glowing screening is never out of your pocket during the movie.</i></blockquote>
This is a great way to connect with fans <i>and</i> get them to shell out for first run tickets multiple times. Johnson is a cinema fanatic <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/09/26/looper-rian-johnson-film-crit-hulk/" target="_blank">who&#39;s managed to turn his love of the silver screen</a> into a career making movies that appeal to other movie buffs. This move makes perfect sense. After a viewing or two of "Looper," any true cinema freak would love to run through another viewing while having every aspect of the film broken down by someone as deeply in love with the art form as he or she is.
<br /><br />
Plus, as Johnson mentioned, this isn&#39;t simply version 0.9 of the DVD commentary, but a more technical and detailed breakdown of the film. "Totally different." He&#39;s obviously got more knowledge, information and energy than he knows what to do with, considering he&#39;s done this before. This offering will put the director and fan together for a film-length geekout. This connection puts them back into the theater (selling scarcity) and primes them for the eventual DVD/Blu-ray release (another scarcity). Throwing thoughtful freebies to your fans tends to make them happier to open their wallets later.
<br /><br />
[Quick postscript: It should be noted that Johnson&#39;s "in-theater" commentary track isn&#39;t without precedent. As Mike pointed out to me while I was putting this post together, film buff/maverick/motormouth Kevin Smith&nbsp;<i>attempted</i> to do this <b><i>back in 2006</i></b>, during the theatrical run of "Clerks 2." Unfortunately, theater owners felt <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/45343/Whatever-happened-to-the-Kevin-Smith-Clerks-2-commentary-download" target="_blank">this would be a&nbsp;<i>bad</i> thing and threatened to pull the film if the promotion continued</a>:
<blockquote>
<i>Turns out that exhibitors (folks that own the theaters) weren&#39;t too keen on the idea of people showing up to the movies with iPods. They felt it was going to be too distracting (or something) for other people in the theater who weren&#39;t wearing iPods for the show - like the commentary-listeners would be laughing when nobody else was laughing, and that&#39;d create some kind of problem. Based on that, they suggested that if Weinstein Co. went through with the commentary track promotion, they&#39;d start pulling the flick from screens. So the commentary track promotion has been tabled until we&#39;re at a very low theater count.</i>
</blockquote>
No rumbling from theater owners on Johnson&#39;s actions has been detected yet, but one wonders why exhibitors would be so willing to sacrifice repeat viewings in order to protect single viewings from possible offense. If this had been promoted rather than buried, who knows how many films would have experienced a boost in box office sales thanks to a multi-viewing incentive.]<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121008/16551020648/looper-director-offers-downloadable-in-theater-commentary-track.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121008/16551020648/looper-director-offers-downloadable-in-theater-commentary-track.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121008/16551020648/looper-director-offers-downloadable-in-theater-commentary-track.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>connecting-with-fans-via-mp3-mindmeld</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121008/16551020648</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:25:58 PDT</pubDate>
<title>ESPN Affiliate Delays Podcasts; Announcer Rips Into His Bosses For Cluelessness</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/01561716230/espn-delays-podcasts-announcer-rips-into-his-bosses-cluelessness.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/01561716230/espn-delays-podcasts-announcer-rips-into-his-bosses-cluelessness.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Ah, the shortsightedness of old school entertainment companies knows no bounds apparently.  The latest is <strike>Disney-owned ESPN</strike> ESPN 980, a local radio station that uses the ESPN name, who seems to think, foolishly, that making it <i>more difficult</i> for fans to listen to its radio programming will somehow be better for them.  The details are that ESPN 980 used to release podcasts for its shows, making listening convenient for people who either wanted to time delay their listening, or who couldn't listen on a radio very easily.  But, because ESPN 980 execs only focus on <i>radio ratings</i> as the key metric, they made the shortsighted calculation that they should make it <i>harder</i> to listen to the podcasts, in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/tony-kornheiser-on-espn-980s-podcast-policy/2011/10/04/gIQAnL1TLL_blog.html" target="_blank">misguided hope that it might drive more listeners to the radio version</a>.  The execs there claim that this is how it needs to "protect its ratings."  Of course, that's ridiculous.  If people can't listen the way they want to, <i>they'll listen to something else</i>.  ESPN 980 is deluding itself if it thinks that people will still bend to ESPN 980 rather than expecting ESPN 980 to bend to them.
<br /><br />
Not surprisingly, the on air talent seems to get this a lot more than the folks making the decisions.  While the station insisted that star radio host Tony Kornheiser "understands" why ESPN 980 is doing this, and isn't upset about it, listeners to Kornheiser's show apparently sensed his views were a bit different.  As noted by Dan Steinberg:
<blockquote><i>
&ldquo;The policy is gonna kill the show,&rdquo; [Kornheiser] said, with typical subtlety and restraint. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s simply going to kill the show....That is the problem. You&rsquo;re listening to this a day late. That&rsquo;s the solution around here, the solution to getting more people listening live. And by the way, there&rsquo;s a great glee with which I am told that my ratings are bad. There&rsquo;s a great glee. The people around here seem to think that this is charming, and that if I only did what they wanted, everything would be right in the world.
<br /><br />
&ldquo;But it doesn&rsquo;t work that way. It doesn&rsquo;t work that way, because of the way audio is delivered to America. It&rsquo;s delivered on demand. And if when you demand it you can&rsquo;t get it, you&rsquo;re not going to listen to it.
<br /><br />
&ldquo;Here&rsquo;s what&rsquo;s going to happen in the next five or 10 years, boys and girls. There&rsquo;s not gonna be football on television any more. It&rsquo;s all gonna be in your computer. That&rsquo;s the way it&rsquo;s gonna work. It&rsquo;ll be brought to you by people like Google, brought to you by people who are search engine people, and I know nothing about this. There&rsquo;s no way to make any money any more doing it the old way. The old way is not just old, much like me &mdash; it is dead.
<br /><br />
&ldquo;That&rsquo;s the old way. People don&rsquo;t want that any more. They&rsquo;re not going to sit around and wait for things....The people who run radio stations, they&rsquo;re apparently not adapting to the new culture and don&rsquo;t truly understand how it works and what people want&hellip; Management believes differently than I believe. I still do the show. I&rsquo;m not running away from the show. I just wish it were more accessible, quicker, to more people.&rdquo;
</i></blockquote>
He seems to get it a lot more than the people who are paid to get it.
<br /><br />
<b>Update</b>: Aha.  Turns out that this was the local station, ESPN 980 -- who merely licenses the ESPN name -- who made this decision.  And, it appears that ESPN itself makes it easier to get access to the show.  Blame goes to the local radio station.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/01561716230/espn-delays-podcasts-announcer-rips-into-his-bosses-cluelessness.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/01561716230/espn-delays-podcasts-announcer-rips-into-his-bosses-cluelessness.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111006/01561716230/espn-delays-podcasts-announcer-rips-into-his-bosses-cluelessness.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>so-shortsighted</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111006/01561716230</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:07:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Kevin Smith Shows The Importance Of Building A Brand As A Part Of CwF+RtB</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110720/13060415176/kevin-smith-shows-importance-building-brand-as-part-cwfrtb.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110720/13060415176/kevin-smith-shows-importance-building-brand-as-part-cwfrtb.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For quite some time, we've used Kevin Smith as an interesting example of someone who seems to really grasp the whole <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091119/1634117011.shtml">CwF+RtB</a> (Connect with Fans + Reason to Buy) concept that we focus on in explaining how to create success models (not just "business" models) these days.  And while some may tire of hearing about the same person over and over again, as with Trent Reznor, Smith seems to keep doing more and more interesting experiments that really fit in with the general concept, and from which there's plenty to learn.
<br /><br />
From early on Smith has <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090621/2050255304.shtml">embraced</a> his fans, like very few others out there.  He had set up a very active message board well over a decade ago, and has always been incredibly open with his fans.  Of course, it's not just about talking to your fans, but doing interesting things with them (and, at the same time, opening up opportunities for those fans to support you in a variety of ways -- not just monetarily).  We've talked about how he's branched out way beyond being a "filmmaker" to being an overall entertainer with <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100903/04294010890/kevin-smith-once-again-demonstrates-how-connecting-with-fans-leads-to-something-special-and-profitable.shtml">a bunch of podcasts</a> that presented lots of opportunities to practice CwF+RtB, called the Smodcast Network.  A few months ago, he took it even further by starting his own internet radio, called Smodcast Internet Radio -- or SIR.
<br /><br />
And, the latest is that he's teamed up with Topspin -- a company we've obviously <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/search.php?cx=partner-pub-4050006937094082%3Acx0qff-dnm1&#038;cof=FORID%3A9&#038;ie=ISO-8859-1&#038;q=topspin">talked about a lot</a>, though mostly in the music space -- and <a href="http://www.topspinmedia.com/2011/07/direct-to-fan-goes-next-level-with-kevin-smith" target="_blank">totally relaunched his site</a> that shows off a variety of CwF+RtB elements.  You can see the whole thing at <a href="http://smodcast.com/" target="_blank">Smodcast.com</a>.  There's a <a href="http://smodcast.com/faq/?showRegister=1" target="_blank">premium "subscription" offering</a> that provides additional benefits for true fans, though all the basic content is still available for free.  There are ways to get tickets to live shows and other events.  There's greater interaction on the website, allowing greater connections both between Smith and the various other folks involved with Smodcast/SIR, as well as between community members themselves.  Separately, it also does a nice job showing off the fact that Topspin's platform works for way more than just music.
<br /><br />
But I think one of the really key points is brought out in a blog post about this by Bob Moczydlowsky (bobmoz, to most folks) at Topspin about this offering:
<blockquote><i>
But look past the offers and focus on the strategy: This site is more than podcasts and a fan club. Notice the brand name atop it all: SModCo. This is step one of a filmmaker-comedian-podcaster-talk-radio-host getting his house in order for the new day rising. Notice Kevin&rsquo;s Twitter following. Look at the footer on the site.
</i></blockquote>
I think this is an important point that often gets lost in all of these discussions.  We've talked about the importance of actually understanding the <i>deeper strategies</i> rather than just focusing on the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110125/15591312819/cargo-cults-kevin-smith-difference-between-connecting-going-through-motions.shtml">superficial cargo cult side of things</a>.  People who brush aside Smith's efforts as "it's just a podcast" or "he's just sitting around and talking" are missing the larger picture.  They're seeing the surface, but missing the depth.  This isn't just a guy talking.  There's a larger strategy (one that is improvisational, but coming together nicely) here, and it's built around a brand -- a brand that is 100% focused on connecting with fans while still giving them plenty of reasons to support him.  As Smith is fond of saying, this is about being where the puck is going to be, not where it's been.  If you're not paying attention (or if you don't think this is a big deal), you're missing something big.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110720/13060415176/kevin-smith-shows-importance-building-brand-as-part-cwfrtb.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110720/13060415176/kevin-smith-shows-importance-building-brand-as-part-cwfrtb.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110720/13060415176/kevin-smith-shows-importance-building-brand-as-part-cwfrtb.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>smoderrific</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110720/13060415176</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:21:28 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Singer At New Media Conference Turns Off Audience Member Cameras</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1201302046.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1201302046.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ You would think that someone who had "embraced" new media would understand the value of viral content, but that's not always the case.  <a href="http://www.deliberatenoise.com">Derek Coward</a> writes in to let us know of a bizarre incident involving a cover song singer who goes by the name Richard Cheese, who apparently sings "cheesy" loungey versions of hard rock songs.  There's a podcast called <a href="http://www.coverville.com/">Coverville</a> that (not surprisingly) focuses on cover versions of songs.  For his 500th episode, the host, Brian Ibbott, put together a concert at a new media trade show.  He found some musicians who specifically allow their music to be used in podcasts without royalties (i.e., those who recognize the value of free promotion) and had them play a concert -- and Cheese was one of the headliners.
<br /><br />
At a new media trade show full of podcasters and bloggers, one thing you should expect is that they'll have cameras, and they'll be taking photos and video.  That's what they do.  But, apparently this upset Cheese greatly, and he started <a href="http://www.geeknewscentral.com/archives/008190.html" target="_new">walking around, grabbing people's cameras and turning them off</a>.  He later spit on someone who continued to film his concert, and yelled at the guy to turn his camera off.  Considering that this guy's entire act is based on building on the works of others, and he understands the promotional benefits of having his music in podcasts, it does seem rather odd that he would be so upset about some folks videotaping him that he would then take their cameras, turn them off and even spit on people.  Compare this to the other musician (who actually does write his own music) we mentioned recently who was taking fan made videos of his performances and stitching them together into a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080819/0148352023.shtml">virtual concert</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1201302046.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1201302046.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1201302046.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>new-media,-huh?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080820/1201302046</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:27:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>For Your Listening Pleasure... Techdirt On The Air</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/015815.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/015815.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Every so often we get people saying that the folks here at Techdirt should do a podcast, and we occasionally toy around with the idea, but for the most part it just takes too much time, so we leave it to those who are much more inclined to podcast.  However, the folks behind two of the better tech-related podcasts both asked me to stop by as a guest this past week, so I wanted to point them out.
<ul>
<li> Leo Laporte was kind enough to ask me to take part in the <a href="http://www.twit.tv/112">latest episode of his massively popular "This Week in Tech" podcast</a> along with professional curmudgeon John C. Dvorak and the ever insightful and entertaining Wil Harris.  The TWiT experience was quite a bit of fun... though AT&#038;T decided to cut off my DSL as Leo was introducing me.  I heard the "and for the first ti..." part of Leo's introduction and then suddenly I had no internet connection.  Luckily I was reconnected with varying quality after about five minutes.  As you would expect from TWiT, the discussions range across a number of tech related stories, including quite a few found right here on Techdirt.</li>
<li> I may <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070911/194749.shtml">not agree</a> with Adam Thierer about wireless piggybacking and metering broadband, but he was still nice enough to invite me to <a href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042791.php">participate in the Technology Liberation Front's latest podcast on the topic</a> along with TLF regulars Tim Lee, James Gattuso and guest Ben Worthen from the Wall Street Journal.  It turned into a lively discussion on the topic -- though I'm still curious about which industries that use metering are really that innovative.</li>
</ul>
So if you have some time to spare and enjoy listening to a bunch of tech geeks and wonks chatter on, take a listen.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/015815.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/015815.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/015815.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>podcasting</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20070914/015815</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>