<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;planet&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Diamonds, Diamonds Everywhere</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101004/02180911273/dailydirt-diamonds-diamonds-everywhere.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101004/02180911273/dailydirt-diamonds-diamonds-everywhere.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Creating artificial diamonds could lead to some really interesting semiconductor materials -- or even some insanely hard touchscreen displays (no more scratches!). Fortunately, synthesizing diamond-like materials is getting cheaper and easier, but at the same time, we've also discovered significantly large diamond deposits. But will diamonds still be included in engagement rings when the market prices plummet? <a href="http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/9511/binczewski-9511.html">Aluminum</a> used to be the most expensive metal in the world... but it's no longer as highly regarded as it once was. Here are just a few links on one of our favorite allotropes of carbon.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases/nanodiamonds_cut_through/" href="http://bit.ly/QR2Hk7">Forget OxiClean. The "power of diamonds" can help clean away tough stains in every laundry load.</a> Nanodiamond particles in laundry detergents can dislodge dirt from fabrics without using hot water -- saving energy and adding some <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnaLRbbc-54">sparkle</a>.  [<a href="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases/nanodiamonds_cut_through/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/russia-reveals-large-deposit-o.html" href="http://bit.ly/QR2Vb4">There's a recently de-classified deposit of impact diamonds in Russia -- and it's so big that it's estimated that this resource could serve the world's diamond needs for 3,000 years.</a> These impact diamonds are twice as hard as traditional gemstones because they're formed when a carbon-rich meteor collides with the earth and the resulting explosion creates this unique material. [<a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/russia-reveals-large-deposit-o.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/us-planet-diamond-idUSTRE77O69A20110825" href="http://reut.rs/Qt4dqo">Diamonds aren't as rare as most people think they are -- if you're willing (or able) to travel a few thousand light years, you can find a whole planet made of diamond.</a> A carbon-rich planet that is probably crystalline (and hence diamond-like) orbits the pulsar J1719-1438, and it's the most dense planet seen so far. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/us-planet-diamond-idUSTRE77O69A20110825">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101004/02180911273/dailydirt-diamonds-diamonds-everywhere.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101004/02180911273/dailydirt-diamonds-diamonds-everywhere.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101004/02180911273/dailydirt-diamonds-diamonds-everywhere.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101004/02180911273</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Distant Discoveries</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100822/22562010720/dailydirt-distant-discoveries.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100822/22562010720/dailydirt-distant-discoveries.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Astronomers are constantly discovering new phenomena (or really, really old stuff, depending on how you look at it) all the time.  There is simply a lot of stuff in the universe and we're not going to ever finish looking at all of it.  A sizable chunk of the cosmos isn't even observable to us.  But it's still fascinating to try to catalog everything out there.  Here are just a few discoveries keeping astronomers busy these days.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-2/" href="http://bit.ly/icC965">A tiny blob of light named UDFj-39546284 is tentatively dubbed the most distant galaxy seen so far.</a>  The James Webb Telescope will confirm the classification, and until then there's a 20%(!) chance that this thing isn't a galaxy at all. [<a href="http://www.calacademy.org/sciencetoday/most-distant-galaxy-2/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/nasa-kepler-finds-family-habitable-earth-size" href="http://bit.ly/hPMX0J">The Kepler telescope has found 54 planets in a "habitable zone" around their respective stars -- and 5 of those are approximately Earth-sized.</a>  There are plenty more to find still, too. [<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/nasa-kepler-finds-family-habitable-earth-size">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26333/" href="http://bit.ly/gqYqY8">According to statistical analysis, the cosmos is at least 250 times bigger than what we can see.</a>  So you can't believe everything you see.. and there's lies, damn lies and statistics to back that up. [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26333/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Astrology-is-a-science-Bombay-HC/articleshow/7418795.cms" href="http://bit.ly/fZFO2d">In a not-so-distant court, astrology has been re-affirmed as a "trusted science" in India.</a>  Apparently, India's Supreme Court had already ruled astrology as a science in 2004. [<a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Astrology-is-a-science-Bombay-HC/articleshow/7418795.cms">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more astronomy-related links, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:34" href="http://bit.ly/fqJBEv">check out what's floating around in StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:34">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100822/22562010720/dailydirt-distant-discoveries.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100822/22562010720/dailydirt-distant-discoveries.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100822/22562010720/dailydirt-distant-discoveries.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100822/22562010720</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Astronomy Makes Astrology Kinda Complicated</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110111/11284312603/dailydirt-astronomy-makes-astrology-kinda-complicated.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110111/11284312603/dailydirt-astronomy-makes-astrology-kinda-complicated.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The universe is filled with some weird stuff, and astronomers are always looking out to find new, unexplained phenomena. If our lives were really governed by the motions of distant stars, there'd be a <i>looot</i> of movements to take into account....  Still, there are plenty of folks who are wondering what their new astrology sign might mean.  But however the stars move, astrologers probably enjoy all these new astronomical discoveries, if only because it makes their jobs more interesting.  So, here are a few cool observations.

<blockquote>
<li> <a title="http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1102" href="http://bit.ly/h7YHMl">The Hubble is looking at a green gas cloud called Hanny&rsquo;s Voorwerp.</a>  The object was discovered in 2007 by Dutch schoolteacher, Hanny van Arkel.  [<a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1102">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110110/full/469143a.html" href="http://bit.ly/gnmzEE">The Kepler telescope found a solid planet about 40% bigger than Earth.</a>  That planet is more than a bit too hot for our biology, but there are at least a few hundred more planets in Kepler's sights. [<a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110110/full/469143a.html">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/photogalleries/101221-mars-pits-pictures-photos-science-nasa-space-caves/" href="http://bit.ly/dNXIEx">Mars might have giant caves!</a>  Or at least, it has big dark craters of some kind. [<a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/photogalleries/101221-mars-pits-pictures-photos-science-nasa-space-caves/">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://www.pbs.org/deepspace/timeline/" href="http://bit.ly/efq5GG">Here's a "mysteries of space" timeline.</a>  Seriously not drawn to scale... especially a googol years in the future. [<a href="http://www.pbs.org/deepspace/timeline/">url</a>]
</li> 
</blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110111/11284312603/dailydirt-astronomy-makes-astrology-kinda-complicated.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110111/11284312603/dailydirt-astronomy-makes-astrology-kinda-complicated.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110111/11284312603/dailydirt-astronomy-makes-astrology-kinda-complicated.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110111/11284312603</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>