<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;pimps&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:33:04 PST</pubDate>
<title>Copyright Expansion Through Misinformation Has Gone On A Long Time... And It Involved Pimps &#038; Ferrets</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101015/03064511444/copyright-expansion-through-misinformation-has-gone-on-a-long-time-and-it-involved-pimps-ferrets.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101015/03064511444/copyright-expansion-through-misinformation-has-gone-on-a-long-time-and-it-involved-pimps-ferrets.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Nearly three years ago, we <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071230/233138.shtml">mentioned</a> a dissertation by Eric Anderson, called "Pimps and Ferrets: Copyright and Culture in the United States," which looked at copyright in the US from 1831 to 1891 -- a little-studied period of time when it comes to copyright issues.  There's plenty of coverage of everything from about 1900 onwards, starting with the debate around the 1909 Act.  There's also a fair bit of research about the founding fathers initial intent with copyright.  But not much attention has been paid to that in-between time.
<br /><br />
Anyway, <a href="http://copyfight.corante.com/archives/2010/10/14/pimps_and_ferrets_and_us_copyright.php?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Copyfight+%28Copyfight%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Alan Wexellat</a> points us to the news that Anderson has now redone the paper as a book, and has <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/PimpsAndFerretsCopyrightAndCultureInTheUnitedStates1831-1891" target="_blank">released <i>Pimps and Ferrets: Copyright and Culture in the United States</i> under a Creative Commons license</a>.  He's using a non-commercial license, which we just discussed has some problems, but it really is a tremendously worthwhile read.  It basically shows that, as we see today, many people don't really understand the purpose and intent behind copyright -- and that includes some of the folks in charge of making the law.  That allowed some special interests to co-opt the process and expand copyright to their own benefit.  Sound familiar?  Well,  history seems to repeat itself...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101015/03064511444/copyright-expansion-through-misinformation-has-gone-on-a-long-time-and-it-involved-pimps-ferrets.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101015/03064511444/copyright-expansion-through-misinformation-has-gone-on-a-long-time-and-it-involved-pimps-ferrets.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101015/03064511444/copyright-expansion-through-misinformation-has-gone-on-a-long-time-and-it-involved-pimps-ferrets.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>pimps-and-ferrets-and-copyright,-oh-my</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101015/03064511444</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>