Techdirt. Stories filed under "parlophone" Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us Techdirt. Stories filed under "parlophone"http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Tue, 2 Oct 2012 05:13:38 PDT Big Name Musicians Threaten To Strike Over Parlophone Sell-Off After Discovering They're 'Just Assets' Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121001/13123820559/big-name-musicians-threaten-to-strike-over-parlophone-sell-off-after-discovering-theyre-just-assets.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121001/13123820559/big-name-musicians-threaten-to-strike-over-parlophone-sell-off-after-discovering-theyre-just-assets.shtml threatening to "strike" and withhold new albums if they're not happy with how the sale of the label Parlophone goes down. As you may recall, with Universal Music getting approval to buy EMI, it has to sell off Parlophone, the iconic label that's home to a bunch of well known artists. And while Hypebot's title says that they're striking over the sale of EMI to UMG, that doesn't appear to be the case at all. The concern has to do solely with the sale of Parlophone:

Many of the label’s artists are unhappy being viewed merely as “assets” or “pawns” in a game that is set to be in the best interest for the powers that be. To protest this move, the rockers of Blur have joined forces with a number of Parlophone label-mates to collectively lobby potential bidders for the company and calling on them to place the interests of artists first, as reported by The Independent. If the musicians don’t find the new Parlophone owners to their liking, they could withhold all future releases and effectively go on "strike". 

"Artists are the only people currently being left out of the conversation, which is unfortunate,” said Blur drummer Dave Rowntree to The Independent. “If the staff at the label are unhappy with the new arrangements they are free to leave, but the artists are not."

I'm sympathetic to the artists here, because it almost certainly does suck for them... but I'm not quite sure what they're expecting here. For the labels, they are an asset and have always been just that. That's why they signed a contract in the first place. If they didn't like it, they shouldn't have signed a contract. Threatening to void the contract because they don't like some completely unrelated piece of business doesn't seem like a particularly reasonable response.

To be honest, it seems like in selling off Parlophone, the label might actually wind up somewhere more progressive and open to a future that embraces what technology allows, rather than holds it back. Perhaps the artists shouldn't make a big stink until they see what results. But, either way, if this was such a big concern, why didn't they write into their contracts that the deals were null & void should the label be sold?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> should-have-read-that-contract http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121001/13123820559