<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;olympics&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:28:46 PST</pubDate>
<title>The International Olympic Committee Has Already Staked A Trademark Claim On The Number '2014'</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130115/13593121691/international-olympic-committee-has-already-staked-trademark-claim-number-2014.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130115/13593121691/international-olympic-committee-has-already-staked-trademark-claim-number-2014.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Man, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) sure loves its trademarks. Many, many, many, many, many, many, many cases of the IOC&#39;s fierce brand protection <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=olympics" target="_blank">have been detailed here</a>, including <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080818/1248442014.shtml" target="_blank">taping over non-sponsor logos</a> and seeking the power to enter homes to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091023/0449066652.shtml" target="_blank">remove "unapproved signage."</a>&nbsp;This has also rubbed off on a few Olympians, triggering trademark office filings to protect <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml" target="_blank">made-up words</a> stolen from middling hip hop artists and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml" target="_blank">self-given nicknames</a>.<br />
<br />
Via the IPKat we learn that <a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2013/01/something-to-look-forward-to-er-20131.html" target="_blank">the IOC has already locked down next year in preparation for the Winter Olympics</a>. No, seriously. A trademark on the number "2014," which non-coincidentally happens to be a (lesser) Olympic year, has been granted by the UK's Intellectual Property Office.
<blockquote>
<i>The IPKat's attention has been drawn to <a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/tm/t-os/t-find/t-find-number?detailsrequested=C&trademark=E3307444" target="_blank">Community Trade Mark E3307444</a>. The mark in question consists of the number "2014", which no-one would ever imagine to be the appellation by which next year might just be known. Applied for in 2003 and registered in 2005, this mark is owned by none other than the Comit&eacute; International Olympique of Ch&acirc;teau de Vidy, Lausanne.</i></blockquote>
So, with the kind of efficiency you only find in the most brutal of trademark bullies, the IOC has trademarked a number many people were planning to use starting next January, nine years in advance. And the IOC isn't leaving anything to chance. It has staked a claim on all 45 of the possible registration classes, including (but good god, certainly not limited to) chemicals, pharmaceuticals, metals/alloys, machines, tools, scientific equipment, surgical instruments, lighting, heating, vehicles, firearms, musical instruments, furniture, ropes, tarps, string, textiles, toys, coffee, fresh fruits and vegetables, beer, other alcoholic beverages, tobacco, insurance, conferences and seminars, design and development of computer programs, restaurant services, asbestos and security.<br />
<br />
Anything and everything possibly covered by a registered trademark has been nailed down by the Committee, making it very possible that anyone using the number "2014" in the year 2014 might find themselves dealing with the IOC's trademark cops. IPKat suggests a workaround:
<blockquote>
<i>The IPKat doesn't feel he can safely use 2014 in the course of trade, so he has decided to call it "2013+1". Merpel isn't sure that this will work. The first three digits of 2014 also begin "2013" and, as is well known in decisions of the General Court and the Boards of Appeal of OHIM, consumers are likely to pay more attention to the beginning of a mark than to its end unless there's a good reason why they won't &hellip;</i></blockquote>
Does this mean that the IOC now has the power to go after anyone in an industry simply for using "2014?" Probably not, but the IOC certainly hasn't shown any willingness to curtail its overreach either. So it will probably be a mixture of the standard IOC branding aggressiveness coupled with a few instances of IOC branding WTF-ness, much of which we'll probably see covered here.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130115/13593121691/international-olympic-committee-has-already-staked-trademark-claim-number-2014.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130115/13593121691/international-olympic-committee-has-already-staked-trademark-claim-number-2014.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130115/13593121691/international-olympic-committee-has-already-staked-trademark-claim-number-2014.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>2015-still-entertaining-offers...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130115/13593121691</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:10:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Another Olympian Lines Up At The Trademark Office: Ryan Lochte Files Trademark App For 'Jeah'</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/08/20/49441.htm" target="_blank">Olympic swimmer Ryan Lochte has decided that a word like "Jeah" is better off attached to</a> "swim goggles, sunglasses, workout videos, gift cards, jewelry, mugs, etc." rather than being allowed to peacefully live out its brief existence as something that will never,&nbsp;<i>ever</i> make us forget the actual comic genius that was Sean Penn&#39;s portrayal of Jeff Spicoli in <i>Fast Times at Ridgemont High</i>.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
Here&#39;s video almost explaining what "Jeah" means.<br />
&nbsp;
<center>
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/w6par1NTH5g" width="420"></iframe></center>
<p>
<b>je&bull;ah</b> (<i>Adjective</i>)<br />
<br />
1. Everything or almost everything<br />
2. Happy<br />
3. (To have a) good swim<br />
4. Good<br />
5. Good
<br /><br />
[<strike>Possibly</strike> quite definitely derived from exclamation ("<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chea" target="_blank">Chea!</a>") popularized by <a href="http://www.complex.com/sports/2012/08/ryan-lochte-is-trying-to-trademark-one-of-young-jeezys-ad-libs" target="_blank">recording artist Jay Wayne Jenkins</a> ("Young Jeezy").]&nbsp;<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120220/03241617809/jeremy-lin-joins-linsanity-trademark-scrum-files-his-own-application.shtml" target="_blank">Linsanity</a>.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120626/23325219499/sports-stars-rushing-to-trademark-office-fear-brow-thats-clown-question-bro.shtml" target="_blank">Fear the Brow</a>. Clown question, bro. <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml" target="_blank">Fierce five.</a> Jeah. All coming soon to an article of clothing hopefully nowhere near you.<br />
<br />
Here&#39;s the trademark application in all its four-letter glory.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120820/15185920103/another-olympian-lines-up-trademark-office-ryan-lochte-files-trademark-app-jeah.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>i-don't-want-to-live-in-this-IP-regime-anymore</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120820/15185920103</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:45:51 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympic Buzzkills Take Down Viewer Commentary</title>
<dc:creator>Zachary Knight</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/06443120035/olympic-buzzkills-take-down-viewer-commentary.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/06443120035/olympic-buzzkills-take-down-viewer-commentary.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We are all very much aware that it is an Olympic tradition to make sure that no one <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml">enjoys watching</a> the games. The IOC and its sponsors take additional steps to avoid commentary that is not completely controlled by them, even if its own commentary is <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml">completely ignorant</a>. With that in mind, it shouldn&#39;t come as any surprise to hear that the IOC has taken it upon itself to seek and destroy any viewer sourced commentary that brings laughter and greater exposure to the Olympic games.<br />
<br />
This is where one amatuer commentator, Francis Higgins, finds himself. Francis had taken the time to watch the Olympic Radial event and provide a play by play commentary of his own as he tried to make sense of it all. His commentary is pretty funny and introduced me to a sport that I did not know existed. Apparently that is not something that the IOC wants anyone to experience. It has decided to <a href="http://www.wired.com/playbook/2012/08/ioc-sinks-boats/" target="_blank">takedown the video in an effort to kill everyone&#39;s buzz</a>.<br />
<br />
Of course this being the internet where nothing ever disappears, the video has made it back online in various places. You can watch it embedded here.
<center>
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0" height="436" id="flashObj" width="404"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1777230862001&#038;playerID=1813626064&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAF1BIQQ~,g5cZB_aGkYZXG-DCZXT7a-c4jcGaSdDQ&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=1777230862001&#038;playerID=1813626064&#038;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAF1BIQQ~,g5cZB_aGkYZXG-DCZXT7a-c4jcGaSdDQ&#038;domain=embed&#038;dynamicStreaming=true" height="436" name="flashObj" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" seamlesstabbing="false" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" swliveconnect="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="404"></embed></object></center>
<p>
<br />
No one really understands the state of mind behind those sending the takedown. This video is actually bringing in new viewers and interest in an event that doesn&#39;t get as much attention as events like Gymnastics, Soccer (Football for those outside the US) and Dressage. But, since it isn&#39;t "official" commentary it simply can&#39;t be allowed. Or it could just be that the IOC has no sense of humor and felt humiliated and/or offended that someone would have anything but the nicest flattery to say about one of its events.&nbsp;<br />
<br />
Either way, the fact remains that such remixing and satire is a very powerful tool in promoting the original product. Francis&#39;s video had received 500,000 views prior to being taken down. That is a lot of people who may have not known about the Radial event. If the IOC really wanted to spread the message of the Olympics and bring in new viewers, this is the type of video that would accomplish that goal. Sadly, I don&#39;t see it changing its policies anytime soon.
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/06443120035/olympic-buzzkills-take-down-viewer-commentary.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/06443120035/olympic-buzzkills-take-down-viewer-commentary.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/06443120035/olympic-buzzkills-take-down-viewer-commentary.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>you-will-not-have-fun-at-the-olympics</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120814/06443120035</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:04:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>US Women's Gymnastics Team Decides Self-Chosen Nickname 'Fierce Five' Needs Trademark Protection</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Is anyone else out there excited to hear about athletes <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120813/07425420005/honey-badger-dont-care-unless-youre-cheering-college-player-with-that-nickname.shtml" target="_blank">trademarking nicknames</a>? Anyone? Or is it just another one of those things that seems to go hand-in-hand with buying defensive patents by the bucket-load and fending off onerous members of artists' estates? These <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120327/14074118261/trademarking-trayvon-martin-sad-statement-our-times.shtml" target="_blank">IP land grabs</a> seem to be a sign of the times, a brave new world of preemptive protectionism that leads people to believe that they have to quickly lock down everything pertaining to them, even if it's a spur of the moment nickname handed out by an enthusiastic sportscaster.<br />
<br />
From the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120215/01523817765/linsanity-trademark-office.shtml" target="_blank">(L)insanity</a> of last year to the trademarked unibrow of a few months ago, athletes are seemingly becoming their own marketing force, rushing off to the trademark office in order to nail down rights to anything <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120626/23325219499/sports-stars-rushing-to-trademark-office-fear-brow-thats-clown-question-bro.shtml" target="_blank">remotely catchy/marketable</a>. The latest trademark grab comes on the heels of the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-13/-fierce-five-gymnasts-face-hurdle-in-landing-nickname-trademark.html" target="_blank">Greatest Trademark Show on Earth, the 2012 Olympics</a>.&nbsp;
<blockquote>
<i>USA Gymnastics is preparing a trademark filing for the term &ldquo;Fierce Five,&rdquo; which was attached to the gold medal-winning women&rsquo;s gymnastics team at the London Olympics, spokeswoman Luan Peszek said in an e-mail.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Peszek has said the team, including Gabby Douglas, the first black gymnast to win the all-around, preferred Fierce Five to Fab Five.</i></blockquote>
Good thing, too. The article points out that, preference or no, Fab Five is already taken, <a href="http://www.trademarkia.com/fab-five-85122505.html" target="_blank">secured by Jalen Rose</a> a mere <i>19 years</i> after University of Michigan's 1991 draft class was given that nickname. I'm not sure what the opportunities are to capitalize on a catch phrase two decades down the road, but if any exist, it's probably in the "undergarments" and "pajamas" field.<br />
<br />
The road to "Fierce Five" isn't entirely bump-free, however. Someone has beaten the Olympic medalists to the Trademark Office:
<blockquote>
<i>A California man, Paolo Mazza, filed for a &ldquo;Fierce Five&rdquo; trademark on Aug. 8, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website. No attorney was listed on the filing, which provided only a post-office box in Millbrae, California, as an address. There is no telephone listing available.*</i></blockquote>
*(There is. You just have to <a href="http://tdr.uspto.gov/search.action?sn=85546891#" target="_blank">dig a little deeper</a>.)<br />
<br />
Mazza is no stranger to the trademark field, <a href="http://www.trademarkia.com/linsational-85546891.html" target="_blank">having filed one for the phrase "Lin-sational"</a> back in February. Wisely deciding to avoid the rush on the more popular phrase "Lin-sanity," Mazza instead attempted to nail down his uncontested phrase only to find it very much contested by the USPTO, which has asked him to provide proof that Jeremy Lin is totally cool with this (orig. wording slightly paraphrased). No doubt Mazza will find himself 0-for-2 in the near future, <strike>as no one is allowed to fuck with any Olympics-related IP</strike> as it's likely the USPTO will view <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&#038;state=4002:2iaurl.2.1" target="_blank">this new attempt</a> as just another trademark squat, something that is becoming somewhat of a "trademark" for Paola Mazza.<br />
<br />
So, it's a little bit of everything that's ridiculous about IP "ownership." Sportscasters use the term "Fab Five" to refer to a gymnastics team, which it can freely do as long as it doesn't slap the phrase on some pajamas, thus violating Jalen Rose's 20-years-from-the-point-of-impact trademark, which has recently been extended. The gymnastics team grants itself its own nickname, the "Fierce Five," and rushes to the USPTO to find itself second in line behind another person who thought he might capitalize on something somehow by swiftly locking the phrase down. (The whole "choose your own nickname" part of this seems a bit disingenuous. I mean, I'd like to be known as "The Impossibly Photogenic Writer" but it's more likely I'll be known as "Pirate Mike's B-Lister," among other things. Just like you don't get to choose your family members or parole officers, <i>you just don't get to choose your own nickname</i>.)&nbsp;<br />
<br />
If the granting of trademark protection is supposed to protect consumers from bad actors and allow enforcement by the rights holders to prevent dilution, how does jumping all over a catch-phrase do any of the above? Are consumers really going to be "damaged" if they purchase a counterfeit "Furious Five" unitard? Are we really in need of a bunch of catch-phrases with a (TM) attached in order to dispel the confused haze that surely must surround us at all times? Would it be a lost opportunity if a mildly viral quote went unregistered?&nbsp;<br />
<br />
I would think that a key move towards cutting down abuse of this system (trademark trolling/trademark bullying) would be to trim down on the number of, for lack of a better term, "frivolous" filings. I realize the USPTO isn't in any position to try to gauge the level of post-championship, post-interview, post-viral quote atmosphere in which the application was filed (especially months down the road when it gets reviewed), but as it stands now, the system does absolutely nothing to discourage these sorts of actions -- either the quick-fire trademark squatting or the equally-fast attempts to monetize fleeting moments.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120814/17364420053/us-womens-gymnastics-team-decides-self-chosen-nickname-fierce-five-needs-trademark-protection.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>because,-these-days,-NOT-filing-is-never-an-option</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120814/17364420053</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:38:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Now NBC Execs Are Just Trolling: Claim They Regret Not Tape Delaying More Of The Olympics</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ By far, the biggest complaint heard about Olympics coverage by NBC in the US was about just how <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml">stupidly annoying</a> the tape delay was.  The excuses they gave <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml">didn't</a> make any sense, but NBC still insists that it was the right thing to do.  Hell, they're now arguing <a href="http://m.adage.com/article?articleSection=media&#038;articleSectionName=Media&#038;articleid=http%3A%2F%2Fadage.com%2Fmedia%2Farticle%3Farticle_id%3D236674" target="_blank">that perhaps they should have done <i>even more tape delay</i></a>, because the ratings were so good.
<blockquote><i>
Though NBC drew criticism for not airing more of the games live, showcasing taped events in prime time "undeniably" helped ratings, NBC Sports Chairman Mark Lazarus said. He said he wondered if NBC should have tape-delayed more events, such as the U.S. men's gold-medal basketball game and the men's tennis finals between Andy Murray and Roger Federer, which were live.
<br /><br />
"It's undeniable we hurt our ratings by doing that," Mr. Lazarus said in a phone interview. "We have to balance what we're trying to do for viewers across the country and our business model."
</i></blockquote>
Of course, all of that assumes something that isn't necessarily true: that the high ratings were due to the tape delays.  One could just as easily claim that if they hadn't tape delayed key events, that they would have received <i>even more viewers</i>.  There's no reason that they couldn't <i>both</i> display stuff live <i>and</i> then rebroadcast the key events in prime time, and satisfy both audiences.  But, that kind of thinking doesn't work inside NBC Universal, where the default mindset seems to be "gee, how can we 'exclude' people?"
<br /><br />
Either way, the fact that they now regret not tape delaying more content shows the de facto position of NBC Universal -- and it's not about how to best serve their users.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>are-they-serious?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120815/02032320059</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:24:53 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Even The Sex At The Olympics Is Sponsored</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120808/05195419960/olympic-sex-sponsorship-athletes-get-trouble-using-non-sponsor-condoms.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120808/05195419960/olympic-sex-sponsorship-athletes-get-trouble-using-non-sponsor-condoms.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've had plenty of stories about the insane lengths the Olympics goes to in order to block out any appearance of a non-sponsor brand, including <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080818/1248442014.shtml">taping over</a> the brands of non-sponsors on bathroom fixtures and urinals.  And, apparently, the Olympics obsession with deleting all non-sponsorship brands <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/08/you-cant-hand-out-unauthorized-condoms-in-the-olympic-village/260817/" target="_blank">extends almost to the point of contact when athletes decide to get down and dirty with each other</a>.
<br /><br />
Every couple years, when the Olympics roll around, there are stories <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/20/what-goes-on-behind-closed-doors-after-the-events-are-over.html" target="_blank">like this one</a>, about the volume of sexual activity in the Olympic Village among the athletes.  And, if we go by condom count, the volume keeps on growing:
<blockquote><i>
At the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, the Australian organizing committee distributed 45,000 free condoms in the village. Eight years later in Beijing, 70,000 condoms&#8212;labeled with the phrase &#8216;Faster, Higher, Stronger&#8217;&#8212;were exhausted and 20,000 more were ordered. This year in London, the Olympic organizing committee is providing 150,000, using special dispensers which contain a message promoting sexual health. Averaged among 10,490 athletes, that&#8217;s enough condoms for every athlete to have sex 15 times over the Olympics&#8217; three weeks
</i></blockquote>
And, of course, the Olympics found a sponsor to pay up for the privilege of being where the rubber meets the... well, you know.  Durex is the official condom of the games.  But... uh oh, call in the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml">brand police</a>!  BMX cyclist Caroline Buchanan <a href="https://twitter.com/CBuchanan68/status/231726715817299968" target="_blank">tweeted a photo</a> of free condoms available in the Olympic Village which (*gasp*!) <i>were not made by Durex</i>!
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/aQZ4f"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/aQZ4f.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
And, indeed, the response from the Olympics was swift, as they <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/aug/07/london-2012-condoms-olympic-village?CMP=twt_gu" target="_blank">began an investigation</a> into this illicit behavior, because just think of all the problems if these athletes had sex with a <i>non-sponsored condom</i>!  That cannot be allowed at all.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120808/05195419960/olympic-sex-sponsorship-athletes-get-trouble-using-non-sponsor-condoms.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120808/05195419960/olympic-sex-sponsorship-athletes-get-trouble-using-non-sponsor-condoms.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120808/05195419960/olympic-sex-sponsorship-athletes-get-trouble-using-non-sponsor-condoms.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>don't-f**k-without-the-official-olympic-rubber</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120808/05195419960</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: More Olympic Trivia</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100907/23180510930/dailydirt-more-olympic-trivia.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100907/23180510930/dailydirt-more-olympic-trivia.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The technology used behind the scenes at the Olympics is getting better all the time. It's not an easy task to measure people moving with extreme accuracy, but it can be done. There are some other tasks that aren't so easy to do as well, and the judges are relying on robots and lasers to get these jobs done. Here are just a few examples of more technology creeping into the games.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-speed-of-sound-is-too-slow-for-olympic-athletes/260413/" href="http://bit.ly/Pq0bLQ">The speed of sound is apparently too slow for the Olympics now, so the starting pistols have been replaced by electronic beeps.</a> Perhaps there shouldn't be a starting pistol at all, and the judges should simply measure when the athletes start and finish? [<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-speed-of-sound-is-too-slow-for-olympic-athletes/260413/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/25/robot-cameras-to-be-used-for-olympic-footage/" href="http://bit.ly/NNI7kd">Robotic cameras are catching more action at the Olympics.</a> Not too surprising that cameramen can't run alongside Olympic athletes and keep up.... [<a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/25/robot-cameras-to-be-used-for-olympic-footage/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/modern_pentathlon/8936619.stm" href="http://bbc.in/MmASQK">The modern pentathlon is using laser pistols instead of real guns this year.</a> No sound effects like "pew pew pew!" will be tolerated from the audience. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/modern_pentathlon/8936619.stm">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/30/science/la-sci-olympics-gender-20120730" href="http://lat.ms/MTGJNf">While the testing for performance enhancing drugs has generated some controversy, the testing of athlete gender seems a bit trickier to handle.</a> Does a person with XXY compete in the male or female events? [<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/30/science/la-sci-olympics-gender-20120730">url</a>]</li>

</ul>




If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100907/23180510930/dailydirt-more-olympic-trivia.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100907/23180510930/dailydirt-more-olympic-trivia.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100907/23180510930/dailydirt-more-olympic-trivia.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100907/23180510930</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:38:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Avoiding Olympic Spoilers: A Guide</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120801/06140219905/avoiding-olympic-spoilers-guide.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120801/06140219905/avoiding-olympic-spoilers-guide.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As the Olympic Games rage on and an entire world full of people watch on to remind themselves that they should have paid better attention in their high school geography classes (stop lying: you couldn&#39;t pick out Angola on a map either), the old-world thinking of the various Olypmic committees and new media has delivered a giant trauma to fans: spoilers. See, as Olympic broadcast partners have spent so much time dilligently ensuring that every fan&#39;s <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml">viewing experience</a> sucks like a whorish Hoover vacuum, they appear to have missed out on the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml">invention of the internet</a>. So by the time weekday prime time broadcasts are airing Asian badminton players <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/01/sport/olympics-badminton-scandal/index.html?hpt=isp_c2">possibly throwing their match</a> to get a better tournement seeding, we&#39;ve already read all about it on the internet, Twitter, or else overheard friends/family/coworkers discussing the results. And since NBC and the IOC don&#39;t seem to want to... you know... live in today-land, you may be looking for a way to make your daily life spoiler-free.<br />
<br />
Fortunately Justin Peters, editor of the Columbia Journalism Review, has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/31/living/oly-avoid-olympics-spoilers/index.html?hpt=hp_t1">penned an ignorance guide</a> for CNN to help us all out. As you might expect, his satircal list of ten tips is dominated by various flavors of avoid-technology ice cream:
<blockquote>
<i>"Your smartphone is your enemy during these next two weeks. If you carry it around, you will be tempted to check the Internet, and you risk receiving spoiler-laden text messages from your gymnastics-loving friends. Switch to an older phone for the duration of the Olympics, preferably one that is decades old, is shaped like a brick and has a wan green display that can handle neither text messages nor the Internet."</i></blockquote>
Seems reasonable.&nbsp;But there&#39;s more along the same lines:
<blockquote>
<i>"You can probably divide your Facebook friends into "people who are likely to follow the Olympics" and "people who are not." Hide all status updates from the Olympics-following friends. This should leave you with a Facebook feed composed entirely of elderly relatives, local merchants and new mothers posting photographs of their children. Abandon Twitter entirely, or, at the very least, unfollow everyone except Jose Canseco."</i></blockquote>
You get the idea. Unfortunately, the internet isn&#39;t the only place where you can overhear heated discussions about whether the United States or China has asserted itself as a world power by winning doubles rowing competitions. But Peters can help there, too:<blockquote>
<i>"Practice walking with your fingers in your ears while shouting "I can&#39;t hear you! I can&#39;t hear you!"</i></blockquote>
And:
<blockquote>
<i>"You know where nobody&#39;s talking about the Olympics? In the forest. Take these next two weeks as an opportunity to go back to nature. Pitch a tent in the woods, and commune with the stars and the seedlings. Bring a battery-powered television that gets only three channels, and fire it up every night around 7. You&#39;ll be able to watch the key moments of the Games in peace and quiet. And, despite what you&#39;ve heard, it is quite unlikely that you&#39;ll be eaten by a bear."</i></blockquote>
Peters offers even more tips for insulating the rest of your life to guard against Olympic spoilers. On the other hand, NBC and the Olympic Committee could also realize that this internet thing might just not be a fad and take their cue from the NCAA&#39;s Basketball Tournement and show the damned games so people can watch whenever they want.&nbsp;<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120801/06140219905/avoiding-olympic-spoilers-guide.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120801/06140219905/avoiding-olympic-spoilers-guide.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120801/06140219905/avoiding-olympic-spoilers-guide.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>just-kill-the-internet</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120801/06140219905</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:23:17 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympics Shuts Down Non-Commercial Online Service That Helped People Get Tickets</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120802/16543519919/olympics-shuts-down-non-commercial-online-service-that-helped-people-get-tickets.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120802/16543519919/olympics-shuts-down-non-commercial-online-service-that-helped-people-get-tickets.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Another day, another story of Olympics insanity.  Apparently the website for the London Olympics has a really awful interface that highlights tickets that are available.  So, some enterprising coders quickly hacked together a better system, called <a href="http://www.2012ticketalert.com/" target="_blank">2012TicketAlert</a> that would help alert people when new tickets were available.  It was just a typical internet case study: some people saw a system that wasn't very good, and they built a better interface.  Welcome to the internet.
<br /><br />
Ah, but this is the Olympics, and the Olympics just doesn't <i>do</i> things like that.  So, they shut the site down:
<blockquote><i>
It seems someone at LOCOG has taken exception to our idea (or the publicity it is getting) and instead of reaching out to us or addressing the lack of a notification system, they have simply blocked our access to their server. This means we are unable to check or post any new ticket alerts. 
</i></blockquote>
Welcome to the Olympics, where if you don't pay the Olympics, you better not do anything to help make the Olympics a better experience.
<br /><br />
And it's important to note that they weren't making money off of this.  They were just helping to alert people to ticket availability and then driving them to the official Olympics site.  They just hacked together a notification system. 
<br /><br />
Sometimes I wonder if the Olympics just <i>wants</i> to piss off everyone.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120802/16543519919/olympics-shuts-down-non-commercial-online-service-that-helped-people-get-tickets.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120802/16543519919/olympics-shuts-down-non-commercial-online-service-that-helped-people-get-tickets.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120802/16543519919/olympics-shuts-down-non-commercial-online-service-that-helped-people-get-tickets.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>olympic-failures</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120802/16543519919</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:52:25 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Google Doodles Obvious Nod To...Some Games...Or Something...</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/07013919879/google-doodles-obvious-nod-tosome-gamesor-something.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/07013919879/google-doodles-obvious-nod-tosome-gamesor-something.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Google users have long noticed the search page&#39;s "<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20020304/0055229.shtml">doodles</a>", where Google redesigns their logo as an homage to something having to do with that day&#39;s history (Yes! I managed to link to a Techdirt story from two-thousand-and-freaking-two! Beat that, other Techdirt writers!). Often times these are nods to the birthdays of famous or important artists, scientists, or other historical figures and holidays. And if you have spent the past week or so living on Earth and aren&#39;t a rock, you can probably guess what these past days&#39; doodles have been about.<br />
<br />
But, as reader Jason writes in to note, the big Goog is apparently chilly on actually, you know, mentioning what the drawings are for when you roll over the image:
<blockquote>
<i>"The image url reference[d] the "opening ceremony" of something. <a href="https://www.google.com/logos/2012/opening_ceremony-2012-hp.jpg">But the tooltip for the image</a>, which any seasoned Google user knows will tell you what&#39;s up with the logo that day, simply reads, "Hooray for sports!"</i></blockquote>
<br />
The two theories Jason came up with are that the search giant is afraid to even mention the sporting event in question for fear of reprisal by the committee that oversees said sporting event, or it&#39;s a sly poke in the eye at their overly aggressive sue-happy nature. Lord knows if the-games-that-shall-not-be-named are willing to go after <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml">gyro shops</a>, a more prominent target like Google would seem to be a no-brainer. Now, it would seem to me that a prominent page like Google&#39;s home search page featuring the Olym...games-that-shall-not-be-named would be a great source of publicity for the sporting event, but thanks to the chilling effect created through lawsuit happy committees, that publicity is lost.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/07013919879/google-doodles-obvious-nod-tosome-gamesor-something.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/07013919879/google-doodles-obvious-nod-tosome-gamesor-something.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/07013919879/google-doodles-obvious-nod-tosome-gamesor-something.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>no-names-for-games</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120730/07013919879</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Olympic Trivia</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/03313210783/dailydirt-olympic-trivia.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/03313210783/dailydirt-olympic-trivia.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Just in case you haven't gotten enough information on the Olympics, there are a ton of stories digging up random trivia about the games. (Or maybe you think everyone should be more interested in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-kessler/why-you-should-be-more-interested-in-mars-than-the-olympics_b_1712462.html">a robot on Mars</a>.) But if you're looking for some bits of Olympic trivia, here are just a few examples.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/05/21/2012-olympic-profile-hiroshi-hoketsu/" href="http://on.wsj.com/N9hqk3">The oldest athlete at the 2012 Olympics is Hiroshi Hoketsu at age 71.</a> He competes as an equestrian rider, but isn't the oldest Olympian ever. Oscar Swahn from Sweden won a medal in shooting at the 1920 games at the age of 72. [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/05/21/2012-olympic-profile-hiroshi-hoketsu/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.nbcolympics.com/wicu/news-blogs/2012/history-of-badminton.html" href="http://bit.ly/QNrr8V">The shuttlecocks in Badminton can reach speeds of over 300 miles per hour.</a> Strangely, the best shuttlecocks are made from goose feathers -- plucked only from the <i>left wing</i> of the bird, for no particular good reason. [<a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/wicu/news-blogs/2012/history-of-badminton.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://articles.cnn.com/2012-07-23/africa/world_africa_olympic-south-sudan-runner_1_south-sudan-s-sudan-forces-sudan-last-year" href="http://bit.ly/NfPSK0">Guor Marial competes in the Olympics ... as an independent (representing no country).</a> Wouldn't it be interesting if all the athletes were given the option to compete without representing a nation? Marial's unique status comes from being a South Sudan native, but not wanting to represent the nation that killed his family. [<a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2012-07-23/africa/world_africa_olympic-south-sudan-runner_1_south-sudan-s-sudan-forces-sudan-last-year">url</a>]</li>

</ul>



If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/03313210783/dailydirt-olympic-trivia.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/03313210783/dailydirt-olympic-trivia.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100826/03313210783/dailydirt-olympic-trivia.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100826/03313210783</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:39:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Twitter Finally Reinstates Journalist's Twitter Account, But Questions Raised Over Its Actions</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11213719896/twitter-finally-reinstates-journalists-twitter-account-questions-raised-over-its-actions.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11213719896/twitter-finally-reinstates-journalists-twitter-account-questions-raised-over-its-actions.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Yesterday, we wrote about Twitter <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120730/11282819883/biggest-critic-nbcs-awful-olympic-coverage-has-twitter-account-suspended-tweeting-nbc-execs-email.shtml">suspending</a> the account of Guy Adams, an LA-based journalist for the UK-based Independent paper.  Just a little while ago, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/nbcfail-twitter-reinstates-guy-adams-suspended-account-but-still-wont-explain-how-he-broke-privacy-policy-by-complaining-about-nbcs-london-2012-olympic-coverage-7994705.html" target="_blank">the account was turned back on</a>, and Twitter has now <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2012/07/our-approach-to-trust-safety-and.html" target="_blank">published a statement</a> about the incident.
<br /><br />
Adams had been highly critical of NBC Universal's coverage of the Olympics, and at one point tweeted out the corporate email address of NBC's Olympics boss, Gary Zenkel.  As many people have noted, that information was hardly private, as NBC Universal follows a standard format for emails (firstname.lastname@nbcuni.com).  Furthermore, Zenkel's email address was already <a href="http://www.fidei.org/2011/06/boycott-nbc-removed-under-god-from.html" target="_blank">easy to find</a> online.  Making this a lot more complicated is the fact that NBC Universal and Twitter have a business partnership over Olympics coverage.
<br /><br />
After the initial story came out, in which it was confirmed that Twitter suspended the account over the publishing the email address, NBC Universal put out a <a href="http://www.twitlonger.com/show/ijkaqa" target="_blank">statement</a>, claiming that it had filed the complaint.  Making things more complicated, however, is the news that <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9440137/London-Olympics-2012-Twitter-alerted-NBC-to-British-journalists-critical-tweets.html" target="_blank">Twitter apparently alerted NBC Universal to the tweets in the first place</a>. Twitter's statement puts a lot of focus on the fact that it is not their policy to proactively monitor tweets, and then admits they violated that policy in this case:
<blockquote><em>The Trust and Safety team does not actively monitor users&#8217; content. In all cases, whether the user is the head of a major corporation, a celebrity, or a regular user, we require a report to be filed at our abusive users webform. Not only do we need a report, but we need a report from the person whose private information has been posted, or someone who is able to legally act on their behalf. We do not proactively report or remove private information on behalf of other users, no matter who they are.  
<br /><br />
That said, we want to apologize for the part of this story that we did mess up. The team working closely with NBC around our Olympics partnership did proactively identify a Tweet that was in violation of the Twitter Rules and encouraged them to file a support ticket with our Trust and Safety team to report the violation, as has now been reported publicly. Our Trust and Safety team did not know that part of the story and acted on the report as they would any other.</em></blockquote>
While it's good to see Twitter taking responsibility here, a lot of damage has already been done in the aftermath of the incident.  Before this statement, Twitter remained quiet for some time, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/twitter-refuse-to-speak-to-the-independents-guy-adams-after-suspending-his-account-following-his-criticism-of-nbcs-london-2012-olympic-coverage-7994705.html" target="_blank">refusing to respond to Guy Adams' attempts to talk</a>.  This sparked criticism of both Twitter and NBC Universal.  The criticism against NBC isn't a huge surprise, but what grew more rapidly was the anger towards Twitter. Reports are highlighting the <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/media-lab/social-media/183480/guy-adams-suspension-punctuates-twitter-censorship-evolution/" target="_blank">seeming hypocrisy</a> of a company that has stood strong on free speech and access to communications grounds for years, including its famous <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2011/01/tweets-must-flow.html" target="_blank">"The Tweets Must Flow"</a> post from a couple years ago.
<br /><br />
That same article notes other prominent cases of Twitter users tweeting out much more "private" info, such as Spike Lee <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/03/spike-lee-incorrectly-tweets-address-of-george-zimmerman/" target="_blank">tweeting out someone's home address</a>, incorrectly believing it was the address of George Zimmerman (the guy who shot Trayvon Martin).  Similarly, Justin Bieber <a href="http://gawker.com/5613398/justin-bieber-tweets-enemys-phone-number-to-45-million-followers" target="_blank">tweeted out some teenager's phone number</a> to all of his followers.    Others have pointed out how MIA <a href="http://jezebel.com/5548216/mia-takes-on-lady-gaga-the-media-google-and-the-cia" target="_blank">tweeted out a journalist's phone number</a>.  None of these involved accounts being shut down.
<br /><br />
On top of all of this, the situation has made people <i>much more aware</i> that they're <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelhumphrey/2012/07/31/twitter-guy-adams-and-the-cost-of-being-a-user/" target="_blank">at the whims of Twitter</a> as a platform provider.  And unlike systems where you have full control over your data and what you do with it, online services can simply cut you off.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11213719896/twitter-finally-reinstates-journalists-twitter-account-questions-raised-over-its-actions.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11213719896/twitter-finally-reinstates-journalists-twitter-account-questions-raised-over-its-actions.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11213719896/twitter-finally-reinstates-journalists-twitter-account-questions-raised-over-its-actions.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>failures</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120731/11213719896</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Analyzing The Olympics</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100825/11210610774/dailydirt-analyzing-olympics.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100825/11210610774/dailydirt-analyzing-olympics.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Despite the ridiculous <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml">restrictions</a> on watching the Olympics, there are still plenty of statistics about various events for data nerds to collect and crunch that might provide some useful insights. By studying athletic performance over time, we can tell when technologies like fancy swimsuits are giving too much of an advantage or when a change in training and technique have made vast improvements. Here are just a few projects that are diving deep into Olympic data.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2012/07/26/olympic-medal-table-predictions-london-2012/" href="http://on.ft.com/QnncpY">Various economic figures can be used to try to predict how many medals each country will earn in 2012.</a> The USA is expected to get somewhere between 99 and 113 medals, and China is predicted to come in second place with 67-98 medals. [<a href="http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2012/07/26/olympic-medal-table-predictions-london-2012/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/20/london-eye-twitter-sentiment" href="http://bit.ly/MbUt5O">The London Eye will be lit up like a mood ring during the Olympics, based on Tweets and a bit of sentimental analysis to gauge positive and negative commentary of the Games.</a> The analysis is sponsored by an energy company, so it'll be watching for words like "Olympics", "London 2012" and the hashtag #energy2012. [<a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/20/london-eye-twitter-sentiment">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-07/what-science-says-you-should-be-watching-2012-summer-olympics" href="http://bit.ly/MbUp6g">Researchers from the Center for Sports Engineering Research at Sheffield Hallam University in the UK will be studying the 2012 games to look for significant changes in athletic performance.</a> They've developed a "performance improvement index" to quantify things like: how sprinters are running faster than ever before or that javelin throwers are in a performance plateau. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-07/what-science-says-you-should-be-watching-2012-summer-olympics">url</a>]</li>

</ul>



If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100825/11210610774/dailydirt-analyzing-olympics.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100825/11210610774/dailydirt-analyzing-olympics.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100825/11210610774/dailydirt-analyzing-olympics.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100825/11210610774</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:40:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>NBC: We Have No Clue Who Tim Berners-Lee Is, But Without Our Commentary, You Wouldn't Understand The Olympics</title>
<dc:creator>Tim Cushing</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Oh, NBC. You&#39;ve locked down the Olympics and made some <strike>serious</strike> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml" target="_blank">half-assed efforts</a> towards providing extensive coverage that takes advantage of the always-connected world and yet... you just can&#39;t help stepping in it on opening night.
<br /><br />
First of all, seriously? Tape delay to the West Coast? You lock down coverage in order to take advantage of prime time and try to pass it off as some sort of "value added" service. Pay no mind to all the twittering and live blogging willing to fill in the gaps, while you do some sort of production magic behind the scenes. Live events don&#39;t need windows and real life shouldn&#39;t need **spoiler** warnings.<br /><br />
Even worse is the fact that the opening ceremonies weren&#39;t even streamed live on the internet, where time and distance aren&#39;t factors. And you know it, too, because your official Twitter accounts were posting updates live, giving Americans the dusty old feeling that they&#39;re listening to a local broadcaster read off the ticker feed from a title match. So close, but so far.
<br /><br />
But us poor internet denizens.<a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120727/after-a-delay-opening-ceremonies-finally-hit-the-west-coast/" target="_blank"> If we weren&#39;t so damn stupid, we could be trusted with a live feed</a>. NBC&#39;s official statement:
<blockquote>
<i>"They [the opening ceremonies] are complex entertainment spectacles that do not translate well online because they require context, which our award-winning production team will provide for the large primetime audiences that gather together to watch them."</i>
</blockquote>
Translation: our advertisers have paid us a literal shit-tonne of money to have a large primetime audience delivered to them, so fold your hands in your lap and stare blankly at your television until the broadcast begins.
<br /><br />
I&#39;m no social media maven but I&#39;m pretty sure the internet does just fine adding "context" and is perfectly capable of "watching stuff" as it happens.  For example, they seem perfectly find adding context to the fact that your hosts <i>suck</i>, as aptly pointed out via this <a href="http://storify.com/jilliancyork/shut-up-matt-lauer" target="_blank">collection of tweets</a> asking Matt Lauer to shut up.
<br /><br />
 And what the hell is this about "expertise?" <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120727/nbcs-today-show-has-been-ignorant-about-tech-since-long-before-the-olympics/" target="_blank">Did you even hear your own anchors</a>?
<blockquote>
<i>As the London Olympic games honored World Wide Web creator Tim Berners-Lee, NBC hosts Meredith Viera and Matt Lauer admitted &mdash; almost bragged &mdash; that they didn&rsquo;t know who he was.</i>
<br /><br />
<i>It&rsquo;s a shame, because it took attention away from a pretty cool tribute to the history of tech and the way it has transformed modern life and communications. Text messages, status updates, photo sharing and smartphones all played a part.</i>
<br /><br />
<i>Indeed, every seat had an LED panel to create a stadium-wide megadisplay.</i>
<br /><br />
<i>&ldquo;One more thing I don&rsquo;t understand,&rdquo; Viera added.</i>
<br /><br />
<i>Evidently someone handed them a memo, because Viera was able to correctly identify Berners-Lee several minutes later, as he typed out a message (on a NeXT cube) that was shown on that oh-so-confusing LED screen</i>.
</blockquote>
[There&#39;s <a href="http://ethanklapper.tumblr.com/post/28164455886/meredith-vieira-doesnt-know-who-tim-berners-lee" target="_blank">video here</a> of the ignorance if you&#39;re so inclined. Obviously, NBC would rather you not relive this moment over and over so it&#39;s tucked away in someone&#39;s Tumblr and not embeddable.]
<br /><br />
The inventor of the world wide web, Tim Berners-Lee, without whom a lot of this stuff you&#39;re botching wouldn&#39;t even be possible, makes an appearance and your talking heads act almost triumphant they&#39;ve never heard of him. What the hell? Was <a href="http://jezebel.com/5921011/write-something-nice-aaron-sorkin-tells-internet-girl-reporter" target="_blank">Aaron Sorkin</a> writing the cue cards?
<br /><br />
There&#39;s "seizing the moment" and then there&#39;s "closing your eyes and sticking one arm out," hoping the moment trips over you on its way to the goal line. You&#39;re the placekickers of "complex entertainment spectacles."
<br /><br />
On the bright side, I would imagine there&#39;s nowhere to go but up from the Opening Ceremonies. But I&#39;m sure you&#39;ve still got a few gaffes up your sleeve, especially if you stick with your "adding context with ignorant commentary" plan.&nbsp;
<br /><br />
[Oh, never mind. <a href="https://twitter.com/VivianSchiller/status/229382360368562176" target="_blank">It&#39;s happened already</a>.]
<br />
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet tw-align-center"><p>+1 @<a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanwald">jonathanwald</a> the medal for most Olympic whining goes to everyone complaining about what happens every 4 yrs, tape delay @<a href="https://twitter.com/brianstelter">brianstelter</a></p>&mdash; Vivian Schiller (@VivianSchiller) <a href="https://twitter.com/VivianSchiller/status/229382360368562176" data-datetime="2012-07-29T01:06:31+00:00">July 29, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Wow. It&#39;s a shame that NBC has the financial ability to outbid anyone who could actually handle an Olympics broadcast competently.&nbsp;<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120729/16554119869/nbc-we-have-no-clue-who-tim-berners-lee-is-without-our-commentary-you-wouldnt-understand-olympics.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>brought-to-you-in-full-color-tape-delay!</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120729/16554119869</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:57:44 PDT</pubDate>
<title>It's An Olympics Tradition: How Difficult Can NBC Universal Make It To Enjoy The Olympics?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Is it really that time again?  When NBC screws up its coverage of the Olympics by showing people what <i>it</i> thinks they want to see, rather than what they actually want to see?  Every two years, the Olympics does two appallingly annoying things: makes it <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090414/1107344506.shtml">difficult</a> to watch the Olympics online... and refuses to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1511548205.shtml">show it live</a> on TV.  In the 20th century view of NBC execs like Rick Cotton, the only thing that matters is prime time television.  So they hold off and focus everything around that prime time slot... effectively pissing off everyone else.  As <a href="https://twitter.com/erickschonfeld/statuses/228970084478107651" target="_blank">Erick Schoenfeld noted</a>: "The only Olympics tweets I've seen all day are from people pissed that NBC is not broadcasting the opening ceremony live."
<br /><br />
Hell, even when they go on Twitter the Olympics can't do things right.  There was a lot of buzz around the fact that NBC and Twitter teamed up to <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/07/27/twit-olympics/#s:olympics-twitter-1" target="_blank">create an "Olympics" hub</a>.  Great (though some people are <a href="https://twitter.com/digiphile/statuses/228961860593020928" target="_blank">pointing out</a> that NBC's own Twitter feed is now tweeting stories that it refuses to broadcast live).  However, as Canada-based reporter Mathew Ingram <a href="https://twitter.com/mathewi/statuses/228954600957419520" target="_blank">discovered</a> in trying to look up the Olympics Twitter hub, thanks to NBC Universal restrictions, Twitter is <b>geoblocking</b> access.  To check it out, I visited the Olympics hub site from the US and saw this:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/35yqp"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/35yqp.png" width=400 /></a>
</center>
And, then, through the magic of the internet, "transported" myself (or, at least my connection) to Toronto, where I reloaded the page... and saw this:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/HsvnN"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/HsvnN.png" width=400 /></a>
</center>
In the end, I'm not really sure it makes a huge difference.  To be honest, I'm not sure I quite understand the point of the Olympics "hub" on Twitter, but it's yet another way in which NBC Universal seems focused on <i>restricting</i> access, rather than <i>enabling</i> access.  It's 20th century thinking for a company that is in desperate need of 21st century leadership.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120727/15210819860/its-olympics-tradition-how-difficult-can-nbc-universal-make-it-to-enjoy-olympics.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>yet-again</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120727/15210819860</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:04:36 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Obama And Romney Each Have An Ad Disappear As The Olympics Gets Snippy About Anyone Referencing The Olympics</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/19381119849/obama-romney-each-have-ad-disappear-as-olympics-gets-snippy-about-anyone-referencing-olympics.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/19381119849/obama-romney-each-have-ad-disappear-as-olympics-gets-snippy-about-anyone-referencing-olympics.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While we've had plenty of stories about the Olympics being overly aggressive in over protecting its (loosely defined) intellectual property rights, it appears that it's now also targeting both major parties' presidential campaigns.  Both Obama and Romney apparently launched commercials recently with "Olympic Themes."  The Olympics then called out the Obama Super PAC campaign for supposedly <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/olympic-ad-pro-obama-super-pac-removed-over-164329325.html" target="_blank">infringing on its copyright</a>.  The International Olympic Committee (IOC) claims that it does not allow footage to be used for political purposes, though I do wonder how it deals with cases of fair use (which this may or may not be).  Either way, soon after that a Romney ad that also had an Olympics theme (both ads used footage of Romney in his role as CEO of the Olympic Organizing Committee for the Salt Lake City Olympics a decade ago) <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/romney-ad-olympic-footage-dark-youtube/story?id=16865726#.UBHvKLRfHuy" target="_blank">went offline as well</a>.
<br /><br />
One would hope that -- yet again -- these stories get the campaigns interested in the ways in which copyright law can restrict certain forms of speech.  No matter who you support for President, the idea that neither major candidate can reference the Olympics seems absurd.  Yes, the Olympics doesn't want to be associated with politics (for obvious reasons), but that's a moral rights issue, and in the US, such moral rights don't apply to (most) forms of copyright (and definitely don't apply in this case).  What's left, then, is that the two campaigns are limited in their ability to express themselves freely.  That seems like a serious issue, but one which it's likely the two campaigns will mostly (unfortunately) ignore.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/19381119849/obama-romney-each-have-ad-disappear-as-olympics-gets-snippy-about-anyone-referencing-olympics.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/19381119849/obama-romney-each-have-ad-disappear-as-olympics-gets-snippy-about-anyone-referencing-olympics.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/19381119849/obama-romney-each-have-ad-disappear-as-olympics-gets-snippy-about-anyone-referencing-olympics.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>non-political-because-politics-don't-pay</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120726/19381119849</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:36:40 PDT</pubDate>
<title>If You Go To The Olympics, You Can Bring Your iPhone Or Android Phone... But You Better Not Tether</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120725/04282819826/if-you-go-to-olympics-you-can-bring-your-iphone-android-phone-you-better-not-tether.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120725/04282819826/if-you-go-to-olympics-you-can-bring-your-iphone-android-phone-you-better-not-tether.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Among the latest bizarre limitations that the Olympics puts on people is a <a href="https://www.pcworld.com/article/259784/wifi_and_3g_hubs_banned_from_olympics.html" target="_blank">ban on any sort of private WiFi network via your mobile connection</a>.  That is, you're not allowed to tether your phone, turn it into a WiFi hotspot or use a device like a MiFi to create the same effect:
<blockquote><i>
A first for any Olympic Games is the ban on personal or private wireless access points and 3G hubs, which are not allowed at London Olympics events and venues.
<br /><br />
iPhones, iPads, and Android phones and tablets are permitted inside venues, but must not be used as wireless access points to connect multiple devices.
</i></blockquote>
It's possible (or perhaps likely) that this is done to help local mobile operators from having their networks overburdened, but, really, you'd think that the mobile operators would be out in droves with those "cells on wheels" (COW) vehicles that provide significantly more cellular power at high traffic events.  Still, I'm curious as to how anyone enforces such a ban.  It's pretty easy to hide a MiFi.  And turning your phone into a hotspot and slipping it back into a pocket would make it almost impossible to detect.  The whole ban just seems pointless.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120725/04282819826/if-you-go-to-olympics-you-can-bring-your-iphone-android-phone-you-better-not-tether.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120725/04282819826/if-you-go-to-olympics-you-can-bring-your-iphone-android-phone-you-better-not-tether.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120725/04282819826/if-you-go-to-olympics-you-can-bring-your-iphone-android-phone-you-better-not-tether.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>wireless-police?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120725/04282819826</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympics Crack Down On Anyone Mentioning Them Without Paying... As White House Tells Everyone To Set Up Olympics Parties</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120719/03392819758/olympics-crack-down-anyone-mentioning-them-without-paying-as-white-house-tells-everyone-to-set-up-olympics-parties.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120719/03392819758/olympics-crack-down-anyone-mentioning-them-without-paying-as-white-house-tells-everyone-to-set-up-olympics-parties.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've covered for years how overly aggressive the Olympics are in protecting their "IP" -- to the point that they often get special laws passed that grant them extra IP rights, which they use to block pretty much anyone who hasn't paid from using the word "Olympics" at all, or even having a non-sponsoring brand shown anywhere (yes, even if that means taping over the brand on toilet fixtures in bathrooms around the Olympic grounds).  Hell, we just reported on the Olympics going after a 30-year-old restaurant named <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml">Olympic Gyros</a>.
<br /><br />
So it struck me as somewhat surprising to get an email from the White House, saying that I should <a href="http://www.meetup.com/lets-move" target="_blank">create my own (or join in an existing) "Olympic Fun Day Meetup."</a>
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/haaHb"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/haaHb.png" width=560 /></a>
</center>
Of course, as a participating country, I'm sure that the Olympics grants the US government wider leverage in using its name, but if anyone else in the country suggested something as crazy as creating a special "meet up" around the Olympics, how quickly do you think the Olympics would send in the lawyers to demand a takedown?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120719/03392819758/olympics-crack-down-anyone-mentioning-them-without-paying-as-white-house-tells-everyone-to-set-up-olympics-parties.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120719/03392819758/olympics-crack-down-anyone-mentioning-them-without-paying-as-white-house-tells-everyone-to-set-up-olympics-parties.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120719/03392819758/olympics-crack-down-anyone-mentioning-them-without-paying-as-white-house-tells-everyone-to-set-up-olympics-parties.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ip-violations-galore!</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120719/03392819758</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 05:10:42 PDT</pubDate>
<title>US Olympic Committee Forces 30 Year Old Philidelphia Gyro Restaraunt To Change Its Name</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Ah, the Olympics. The spirit of cooperation. Of athletic competition. Of the essence of global feel-good-ness, where all the Olympic committees of the world come together to put on a spectacle made of the most brilliant athletes in the world. 
<br /><br />
Oh, and they also like to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml">stifle links</a> to critical pieces (do we have your attention, boys?), by banning their fans from <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/07562718563/london-2012-olympics-win-gold-medal-cluelessness-banning-video-photo-uploads-to-social-media-during-games.shtml">sharing</a> their experiences via social media, and threatening ICANN for <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101130/02420512052/olympics-continues-threatening-icann-because-it-wont-block-all-olympics-related-terms.shtml">refusing to block</a> Olympic-related terms. And, now, Steve M shares a story from the Philadelphia Daily News about how the <a href="http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-12/news/32633390_1_usoc-lunch-counter-olympic-sports">United States Olympic Committee has won a 30 year battle</a> they didn't know they were fighting with a gyro shop.
<blockquote>
<i>"Three decades after it burst from the starting block, the Greek eatery Olympic Gyro has received a cease-and-desist email from the USOC, the nonprofit corporation responsible for training and funding U.S. teams. The June 7 notice demanded deletion of the word "Olympic" from the food shop's title, claiming copyright of the word under a 1978 law."</i>
</blockquote>
This legislative insanity, which I assume is entitled "The USOC Can Do Whatever It Wants Because Olympics Act Of 1978", basically grants the USOC sole usership of the word "Olympic" in the United States, amongst other travesties. They issued a heartfelt email in response to this issue:
<blockquote>
<i>"The USOC communications department declined to discuss the matter with the Daily News. But in its email, the organization emphasized the need to "protect the rights of companies who financially support the U.S. Olympic Team," such as McDonald's and Coca-Cola."</i>
</blockquote>
Yup, the USOC asserted that it needs to protect the rights of their sponsors (which means they're protecting themselves, by the way) from these no-good gyro shop owners who have apparently been harming McDonald's and Coca-Cola for the <i>past thirty damned years</i>, but with some kind of stealth cloaking device that keeps any such harm from being realized.
<br /><br />
Oh, and just for fun, let's look at a few names of the governors of the organizations involved in this story. The USOC is headed up by Larry Probst (not Greek). Coca-Cola is run by Muhtar Kent (not Greek). McDonalds' CEO is James Skinner (not Greek). And the gyro stand formely known as Olympic Gyro's owner is Athens Voulgaridis (more than slightly Greek). The irony of this was apparently not lost on Voulgaridis:
<blockquote>
<i>"It's been a part of my life as long as I can remember," Voulgaridis said Tuesday. "We're very Greek Orthodox, we go back [to Greece] often. For them to take something that is Greek and make it theirs for money is frustrating."</i>
</blockquote>
But he also states that he isn't going to fight the government. In total, the name change will cost his business $6000 or so, since he has to change both signage and employee uniforms. He contacted the USOC to see if they would help out with those costs, but they declined, explaining that money is valuable and they didn't want to spend any.
<br /><br />
The same Daily News article also mentions that the USOC went after a knitting group named Ravelry that was organizing something of a knitting olympics competition to coincide with The Games:
<blockquote>
<i>"We believe using the name &lsquo;Ravelympics' for a competition that involves an afghan marathon, scarf hockey and sweater triathlon, among others, tends to denigrate the true nature of the Olympic Games," the letter from USOC said. "In a sense, it is disrespectful to our country's finest athletes and fails to recognize or appreciate their hard work."</i>
</blockquote>
Yes, you read that correctly. Knitting competitions denigrate the true nature of the Olympic Games. Which I happen to agree with, assuming that this "true nature" they're talking about revolves around screwing with people for no good reason.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/06513919689/us-olympic-committee-forces-30-year-old-philidelphia-gyro-restaraunt-to-change-its-name.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>its-all-Greek-to-me</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120713/06513919689</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:51:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympics Can't Hire Enough Actual Security, But Fully Staffed With 'Brand Police'</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've talked about how the Olympics are so focused on hiding any non-sponsor brand that they had officials in Beijing during the last Olympics <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080818/1248442014.shtml">tape over bathroom fixtures</a> from non-sponsoring companies.  And it was clear that this same sort of activity was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/07562718563/london-2012-olympics-win-gold-medal-cluelessness-banning-video-photo-uploads-to-social-media-during-games.shtml">set to continue</a> this time around in London, including a specific law against <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111019/08145216413/london-2012-olympics-go-gold-extreme-ambush-marketing-law-event-guilty-until-proven-innocent-no-streaking-allowed.shtml">"ambush marketing."</a>
<br /><br />
You may have heard the reports in London about the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-33747_162-57473130/olympic-security-shortfall-called-absolute-chaos/" target="_blank">terrible security for the London Olympics</a> that has left things in "absolute chaos," due to a failure to hire enough security personnel.  In fact, there's talk of soldiers having to be called in to help.  Given all that, it's interesting to find out that the Olympics <i>do</i> have <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-flooded-with-brand-police-to-protect-sponsors-7945436.html" target="_blank">a fully-staffed "brand police" force</a>, which is heading around the city to carefully block any non-sponsor brands, and try to track down and kill off any kind of unpaid-for marketing.
<blockquote><i>
Almost 300 enforcement officers will be seen across the country checking firms to ensure they are not staging "ambush marketing" or illegally associating themselves with the Games at the expense of official sponsors such as Adidas, McDonald's, Coca-Cola and BP....
<br /><br />
Wearing purple caps and tops, the experts in trading and advertising working for the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) are heading the biggest brand protection operation staged in the UK. Under legislation specially introduced for the London Games, they have the right to enter shops and offices and bring court action with fines of up to &pound;20,000.
</i></blockquote>
So, if a terrorist attack happens to hit London over the next few weeks, at least we'll know that it wasn't sponsored by some non-paying brand.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/11465719713/olympics-cant-hire-enough-actual-security-fully-staffed-with-brand-police.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>that'll-work</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120716/11465719713</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:31:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympic Level Ridiculousness: You Can't Link To The Olympics Website If You Say Something Mean About Them</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For years, we've highlighted the overaggressive nature of the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/search.php?cx=partner-pub-4050006937094082%3Acx0qff-dnm1&#038;cof=FORID%3A9&#038;ie=ISO-8859-1&#038;q=olympics&#038;eid=&#038;tid=&#038;aid=&#038;searchin=stories">Olympics</a> in over-protecting their intellectual property -- even to the level of getting host countries to pass special IP laws that <em>only</em> apply to the Olympics.  But this sense of ultimate entitlement seems to pervade everything that the Olympics does.  It was recently noted that the <a href="http://www.london2012.com/terms-of-use/">terms of use</a> for the London 2012 website include a <a href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2012/07/13/london-2012-olympics-fails-internet/" target="_blank">restriction on how you can link to the site</a>:
<blockquote><i>
Links to the Site. You may create your own link to the Site, provided that your link is in a text-only format. You may not use any link to the Site as a method of creating an unauthorised association between an organisation, business, goods or services and London 2012, and agree that no such link shall portray us or any other official London 2012 organisations (or our or their activities, products or services) in a false, misleading, derogatory or otherwise objectionable manner. The use of our logo or any other Olympic or London 2012 Mark(s) as a link to the Site is not permitted. View our guidelines on Use of the Games&#8217; Marks.
</i></blockquote>
There are other insane statements in the terms, including that you automatically agree to be "legally bound" by the terms simply by using the site.  That's not how a contract works, guys.
<br /><br />
Either way, this claim that you can't link to their site in a "derogatory or otherwise objectionable manner" has inspired the creativity of the internet, it appears.  Specifically, lots of folks have taken to Twitter to share their own derogatory or otherwise objectionable statements along with links to the website.  <a href="https://twitter.com/Asher_Wolf" target="_blank">Asher Wolf</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/maradydd" target="_blank">Meredith Patterson</a> have done a really nice job curating some of the insults that are currently raining down on the Olympics for their linking policy.  We've included a couple of screenshots (below the fold).
<br /><br />
I recognize that there are some other sites who have used this kind of language in the past, and that some overcharging lawyer was probably just trying to set up a "cover their ass" policy for the Olympics, but it's amazing that any competent individual lets those kinds of things out into the world these days without realizing that it's clearly going to create the exact opposite incentives.
<br /><br />
And, hell, just for fun, check out this link to an <a href="http://www.london2012.com/" target="_blank">obnoxious organization that loves censorship and doesn't respect free speech</a>.  And I say that in a derogatory and objectionable manner.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120713/12025919694/olympic-level-ridiculousness-you-cant-link-to-olympics-website-if-you-say-something-mean-about-them.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>watch-me</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120713/12025919694</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Prosthetics To Be Proud Of</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100801/10483910437/dailydirt-prosthetics-to-be-proud.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100801/10483910437/dailydirt-prosthetics-to-be-proud.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few years ago, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080117/174851.shtml">Oscar Pistorius</a> was not allowed to participate in the Olympics because, as a double amputee, his prosthetic legs might have given him an advantage over athletes who weren't using prosthetic legs. Prosthetic technology doesn't stand still, so it's understandable that the Olympic committee didn't want to allow devices that could give future athletes extremely unfair mechanical advantages. Here are just a few interesting prosthetic developments that might change the perception of "disabled" persons.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.bespokeinnovations.com/content/gallery" href="http://bit.ly/MpoQ1I">Prosthetic limbs don't have to look like medical devices or dead body parts.</a> Artificial legs can be made with a variety of different designs, and the manufacturer of these bespoke legs occasionally requests help from <a href="http://www.bespokeinnovations.com/content/for-the-prosthetist">volunteers</a> who can "donate" their legs as a scanned template for prosthetic designs. [<a href="http://www.bespokeinnovations.com/content/gallery">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://m.gizmodo.com/5908524/badass-paralyzed-english-woman-finishes-london-marathon-in-a-bionic-suit?" href="http://bit.ly/Lu1QV0">Last May, Claire Lomas finished a marathon in a $70,000 bionic suit -- after being paralyzed from the chest down in 2007.</a> She walked about 2 miles per day, so it took her about two weeks to complete the London Marathon. [<a href="http://m.gizmodo.com/5908524/badass-paralyzed-english-woman-finishes-london-marathon-in-a-bionic-suit?">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/glucose-fuel-cell-0612.html" href="http://bit.ly/Lu1XA0">MIT researchers have created a glucose fuel cell that could be used to power brain implants or other implantable electronics that could control prosthetic devices.</a> This device could get all the sugar it needs from cerebrospinal fluid, so it wouldn't need batteries (although external prosthetics would still need to be powered separately). [<a href="http://www.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/glucose-fuel-cell-0612.html">url</a>]</li>

</ul> 

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100801/10483910437/dailydirt-prosthetics-to-be-proud.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100801/10483910437/dailydirt-prosthetics-to-be-proud.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100801/10483910437/dailydirt-prosthetics-to-be-proud.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100801/10483910437</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:40:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Temporary Paywall Removals Only Highlight The Fundamental Paradox Of Paywalls</title>
<dc:creator>Leigh Beadon</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11380219225/temporary-paywall-removals-only-highlight-fundamental-paradox-paywalls.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11380219225/temporary-paywall-removals-only-highlight-fundamental-paradox-paywalls.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>While there's room for debate on whether Rupert Murdoch's paywall strategy for the UK Times and Sunday Times has been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100903/16545310903.shtml">disastrous</a> or just <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110330/03151513693/news-corp-claims-79000-subscribers-to-its-paywall-times.shtml">mediocre</a>, it certainly hasn't been a massive success or reinvented any online news business models. Now we're beginning to see some telling cracks in the facade: the Times paywall recently <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/31/times-paywall-down-jubilee" target="_blank">came down</a> during the Queen's jubilee weekend, and now TNW reports that <a href="http://thenextweb.com/media/2012/06/06/news-international-considers-olympics-downtime-for-times-and-sunday-times-paywall/" target="_blank">a similar free-access period is being considered for the 2012 Olympics</a>.</p>

<p>Now, promotional giveaways are hardly a new or crazy idea, and they don't typically say anything bad about a business model&mdash;but I don't think that's <em>really</em> what's happening here. Certainly the Times hopes to convert some of those free readers into paid online subscribers, but there's also a clear pattern in the items they choose to make these exceptions for: huge social events that are attended and discussed by lots of people. In other words,  precisely the sort of thing where blogs and social media offer the <em>most</em> competition to a newspaper. Why would anybody pay for Olympic reporting when the web is going to be absolutely flooded with constant updates on every little thing that happens, supplied for free by the fans and hangers-on? If the Times content is behind a paywall, it will be all but ignored.</p>

<p>And this really goes to show why, in the long run, paywalls are unsustainable. If the biggest, most popular topics are the hardest to control&mdash;and the ones that lose value the most when controlled successfully&mdash;while at the same, time social media and citizen reporting output is growing and expanding to new areas constantly, then the inevitable conclusion seems clear: paywalls are, at best, a temporary way of extracting a little bit of cash at the expense of long-term relevance. If your goal is to directly sell news as a product, but you discover that you have to <em>eliminate</em> your prices whenever product demand is <em>highest</em>, something is clearly wrong&mdash;you're trying to apply an old model where it doesn't actually fit, and getting kooky results. The solution is not to keep compromising the broken model, but to embrace the underlying realities (infinite content, no barrier to publishing, the huge value of share-ability) that broke it, and build new models around them.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11380219225/temporary-paywall-removals-only-highlight-fundamental-paradox-paywalls.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11380219225/temporary-paywall-removals-only-highlight-fundamental-paradox-paywalls.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11380219225/temporary-paywall-removals-only-highlight-fundamental-paradox-paywalls.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>backwards-economics</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120606/11380219225</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:55:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Don't You Dare Show Olympic Spirit In The UK</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/02524019096/dont-you-dare-show-olympic-spirit-uk.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/02524019096/dont-you-dare-show-olympic-spirit-uk.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've spent plenty of time over the years highlighting the ridiculousness surrounding <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/07562718563/london-2012-olympics-win-gold-medal-cluelessness-banning-video-photo-uploads-to-social-media-during-games.shtml">the Olympics</a> and their over-aggressive enforcement of IP laws (and even getting host nations to pass special trademark laws that only apply to the Olympics in some cases).  But it's really reaching positively ludicrous excesses in the UK.  First up, a story of a flower shop <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2151093/Florist-told-sued-Coca-Cola-unless-takes-Olympic-rings-window-display.html" target="_blank">being threatened</a> for making a version of the Olympic logo out of tissue paper and hanging it in the shop window.  You see, that kind of Olympic pride is only allowed if you've paid for the permission.
<br /><br />
That story led us to an even crazier one.  Apparently an 81-year old woman tried to sell a &pound;1 doll at a church sale... but had it shut down because she'd dared to clothe the doll in a home made knit sweater that had a mini-Olympic logo on it.
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/g28SM"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/g28SM.png" width=250 /></a>
</center>
<br />
It appears that they've turned this 81-year-old into someone who has realized the absurdity of over aggressive intellectual property protection:
<blockquote><i>
The 81-year-old grandmother of six from King&#8217;s Lynn said the last thing she wanted to do was cause a crisis but attacked the rules as 'absolutely ridiculous.
<br /><br />
'I thought that the hoops symbol was universal and I think it is disgusting that they can make rules about such little things, she said. 
</i></blockquote>
It seems that the Olympics would prefer that no one actually show any sort of pride or support for the Olympics unless it's an official sponsor who paid for the privilege.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/02524019096/dont-you-dare-show-olympic-spirit-uk.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/02524019096/dont-you-dare-show-olympic-spirit-uk.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/02524019096/dont-you-dare-show-olympic-spirit-uk.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>from-pistil-to-pulpit</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120529/02524019096</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:01:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Olympics Can't Handle An Official Parody Twitter Account, So Twitter Takes It Down</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120524/03442719059/olympics-cant-handle-official-parody-twitter-account-so-twitter-takes-it-down.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120524/03442719059/olympics-cant-handle-official-parody-twitter-account-so-twitter-takes-it-down.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've discussed a number of times how ridiculously over-aggressive the Olympics can be when it comes to anything close to an IP issue -- even to the point where it gets host cities to agree to pass exceptional IP laws that only apply to issues that the Olympics chooses.  The Olympics are <i>especially</i> concerned with any non-sponsor brand <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/07562718563/london-2012-olympics-win-gold-medal-cluelessness-banning-video-photo-uploads-to-social-media-during-games.shtml">even being seen</a>.  That means that non-sponsor brands, even if they're the brand of a toilet, will get "taped over."  So you can guess at just how insanely over aggressive the Olympics can be to anyone who comes near its own marks.  
<br /><br />
And that results in situations like the one where the London Olympics complained about a parody Twitter account, billed as the "official protesters of the London 2012 Olympic Games."  This is <i>obviously</i> a joke.  It's a parody on the fact that the Olympics seems to find an "official" sponsor of everything, so why not mock it using parody, which is widely seen as protected speech.  But, not here.  Apparently after the Games complained to Twitter, Twitter <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/may/23/twitter-london-2012-olympic-logo?CMP=twt_gu" target="_blank">suspended the entire account</a> and said it needs to no longer rely on trademarks, like the Olympics' logo.
<br /><br />
Except, that defeats the whole purpose.  How can you parody something when you're not even allowed to show what it is that you're parodying?  Twitter is good on a bunch of issues, but on this one, it looks like it may have rushed ahead and shut down an account too quickly.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120524/03442719059/olympics-cant-handle-official-parody-twitter-account-so-twitter-takes-it-down.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120524/03442719059/olympics-cant-handle-official-parody-twitter-account-so-twitter-takes-it-down.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120524/03442719059/olympics-cant-handle-official-parody-twitter-account-so-twitter-takes-it-down.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>the-official-department-of-the-2012-london-olympics</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120524/03442719059</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>