<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;nipples&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Joke's On You, Facebook - That's A Testicle Tree</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120913/10023820372/jokes-you-facebook-thats-testicle-tree.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120913/10023820372/jokes-you-facebook-thats-testicle-tree.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few years back, we wrote about the brouhaha concerning Facebook <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081230/0049033243.shtml">banning photos</a> of women breast feeding their babies, under a strict "no female boobs" rule.  Rather than learn from that mess, and realize that not all images of breasts are created equal, Facebook seems to have become even more ridiculous over time.  Witness the hilarity of the situation that The New Yorker's cartoonists were put in -- when Facebook <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/cartoonists/2012/09/nipplegate-why-the-new-yorker-cartoon-department-is-about-to-be-banned-from-facebook.html" target="_blank">blocked one of their cartoons</a> by Mick Stevens:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/9vJFO"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/9vJFO.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
As a joke (though some people took it seriously), they had Stevens "redraw" the cartoon with clothing.  I won't post it here and ruin the joke (or, non-joke, which makes it a joke) but go check it out.  In trying to figure out why the original got blocked, they were eventually directed to some "rules" concerning images, noting that on the forbidden (fruit) list where:
<blockquote><i>
Naked 'private parts' including female nipple bulges and naked butt cracks; male nipples are ok.
</i></blockquote>
Yeah.  So, as the folks at The New Yorker pointed out, it appears that this (zoomed in) part of their image (according to Facebook, NSFW, but according to pretty much everyone else, probably fine) is "the problem":
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/SiV3j"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/SiV3j.jpg" /></a>
</center>
Meanwhile, this other part meets Facebook's okay-o-meter:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/3DIDF"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/3DIDF.jpg" /></a>
</center>
The good folks at The New Yorker argue that they really don't think the first pair of dots above legitimately fit the criteria for being banned, but they've chosen not to fight it:
<blockquote><i>
Now, we could have fought the ruling on technical grounds, because, let&#8217;s face it, these female nips, by any stretch of the imagination, no matter how prurient, are just not bulging...
<br /><br />
But rather than fight the battle of the bulge, let&#8217;s point out, that while female nipple bulging, or F.N.B. for short, is a potentially serious problem, with as yet no known cure, it also has no known victims. That is, unless you count freedom of expression, common sense, and humor.
</i></blockquote>
Now, this is all just a bit of a humorous reaction* to silly overblocking by Facebook, but it does actually raise some legitimate concerns, considering how central Facebook has become in our lives.  For many people it is a <i>key platform for expression</i>, and as such, it takes on greater meaning and importance.  Yes, as a private company, they have every right to set the rules that they want to set, no matter how arbitrary or asinine.  But, you begin to worry about so many people relying on Facebook as the most important way in which they communicate, when they can run afoul of such obviously ridiculous "rules."
<br /><br />
<i>* Random aside: a few months back I got to see three New Yorker cartoonists host a discussion/speed drawing contest, in which they talked about what life was like as a New Yorker cartoonist, and it may have been one of the funniest things I've ever seen -- by far beating most, if not all, of the stand up comedy acts I've seen over the years.  If you ever have a chance to see these guys speak, do not miss it.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120913/10023820372/jokes-you-facebook-thats-testicle-tree.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120913/10023820372/jokes-you-facebook-thats-testicle-tree.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120913/10023820372/jokes-you-facebook-thats-testicle-tree.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>nipple-bulge</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120913/10023820372</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>