<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;microblog&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 03:25:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Critic Of Chinese Censorship Censored: Microblog With 1.1 Million Followers Deleted</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10145123081/critic-chinese-censorship-censored-microblog-with-11-million-followers-deleted.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10145123081/critic-chinese-censorship-censored-microblog-with-11-million-followers-deleted.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>
It will hardly come as a surprise to anyone to learn that a popular writer and well-known critic of China's pervasive <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130404/11591722581/apple-bows-to-chinese-censorship-demands.shtml">censorship</a> system has run into trouble for his views.  Fortunately, in this case that doesn't mean getting arrested, but <a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2013/05/13/popular-chinese-writers-microblog-scrubbed-from-sina-weibo/">nonetheless involves quite a dramatic slapdown</a>:

<i><blockquote>The online Sina Weibo microblogging account of Murong Xuecun, one of China's most popular writers and one of the country's foremost critics of censorship, has been deleted from the site, suspected to be part of the government's efforts to crack down on online rumors by targeting high-profile users.
<br /><br />
Murong's account, which had more than 1.1 million followers, was taken down from the Twitter-link website on May 11, 2013. His writing as well as his microblogging discusses social issues in contemporary China such as corruption and media censorship.</blockquote></i>

The Global Voices story quoted above goes on to describe the ways in which some of those 1.1 million followers have reacted, and how many feel that Sina Weibo is diminished by Murong's absence.  It also points out that all of his posts have been preserved and are available -- but on the other side of the Great Firewall of China (<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080220/231528311.shtml">GFW</a>).  Although only those with the requisite technical know-how to tunnel under the GFW using VPNs will be able to access the now-deleted messages, that doesn't mean the Chinese authorities have really won here.  After all, using censorship to silence a critic of censorship means that his 1.1 million (ex-)followers now have definitive proof of what he was warning them about.
</p>
<p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a>
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10145123081/critic-chinese-censorship-censored-microblog-with-11-million-followers-deleted.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10145123081/critic-chinese-censorship-censored-microblog-with-11-million-followers-deleted.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10145123081/critic-chinese-censorship-censored-microblog-with-11-million-followers-deleted.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>maybe-they-won't-notice</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130514/10145123081</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:23:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Chinese Microblog Service Introduces Five-Strike Program To Block 'Rumors' And 'Evil Teachings'</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/03132419161/chinese-microblog-service-introduces-five-strike-program-to-block-rumors-evil-teachings.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/03132419161/chinese-microblog-service-introduces-five-strike-program-to-block-rumors-evil-teachings.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>In a country where the mainstream media is tightly controlled, Chinese microblogs have provided an invaluable way for millions of people to find and share unofficial information.  That's obviously problematic for the Chinese authorities, who have been gradually clamping down on what they term "rumors".  
</p><p>
Things came to a head recently when posts about an alleged political coup in the country appeared on leading microblog services Sina Weibo and Tencent Weibo, resulting in <a href="http://thenextweb.com/asia/2012/03/31/chinas-latest-crackdown-on-microblogs-sees-comment-feature-ban-after-coup-speculation/">both of them being punished</a> for failing to pull the rumors fast enough.  Now Sina, whose <a href="http://thenextweb.com/asia/2012/05/16/chinas-sina-weibo-passes-300m-registered-users-reveals-mobile-usage-is-higher-than-pc/">microblog service passed the 300-million user mark</a> recently, has instituted strict rules for users, presumably in an attempt to placate the Chinese government and head off future punishments.
</p><p>
Interestingly, <a href="http://cmp.hku.hk/2012/05/29/23624/">it is bringing in a variant of the "three-strikes" system</a> that has been so controversial in the West, as China Media Project explains:

<i><blockquote>According to the regulations, users logging more than 5 posts of "sensitive information" would be prevented from posting for 48 hours and have the relevant content deleted. Further, those users posting "sensitive content" with "malicious intent" would be prevented from posting for more than 48 hours and face the possibility of having their account terminated.</blockquote></i>

As The Next Web reports, <a href="http://thenextweb.com/asia/2012/05/28/chinese-microblog-service-sina-weibos-new-rules-and-punishment-system-go-live/">"sensitive information" covers a wide range of subjects</a>:

<i><blockquote>Users have the right to publish information, but may not publish any information that:
<br /><br />
1. Opposes the basic principles established by the constitution<br />
2. Harms the unity, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of the nation<br />
3. Reveals national secrets, endangers national security, or threatens the the honor or interests of the nation<br />
4. Incites ethnic hatred or ethnic discrimination, undermines ethnic unity, or harms ethnic traditions and customs<br />
5. Promotes evil teachings and superstitions<br />
6. Spreads rumors, disrupts social order, and destroys societal stability<br />
7. Promotes illicit activity, gambling, violence, or calls for the committing of crimes<br />
8. Calls for disruption of social order through illegal gatherings, formation of organizations, protests, demonstrations, mass gatherings and assemblies<br />
9. Has other content which is forbidden by laws, administrative regulations and national regulations.</blockquote></i>

Users of China's microblogging services have proved surprisingly adept at avoiding previous attempts to censor their messages.  For example, the blind Chinese human rights activist <a href="http://mashable.com/2012/04/30/china-dissident-search/">Chen Guangcheng was variously referred to as "blind man", "embassy", and "going into the light"</a> as Chinese authorities noticed and then blocked each coded reference in turn.  <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WG7TfsQLE6DiCSO2PCaSAdZc19xiojGRyZ2ORgU1oPE/edit?pli=1">The new regulations specifically forbid this kind of approach</a>:

<i><blockquote>It is not permitted to use oblique expression or other methods to get around the aforementioned restrictions</blockquote></i>

However, this probably just means that microblog users will become even more "oblique" in their techniques to route around the new forms of censorship.  Short of shutting down such services completely -- a move that would probably be dangerously unpopular now that so many people use them -- it's hard to see how the Chinese authorities can ever completely stamp out this kind of inventiveness.
</p><p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a></p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/03132419161/chinese-microblog-service-introduces-five-strike-program-to-block-rumors-evil-teachings.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/03132419161/chinese-microblog-service-introduces-five-strike-program-to-block-rumors-evil-teachings.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120601/03132419161/chinese-microblog-service-introduces-five-strike-program-to-block-rumors-evil-teachings.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>Whac-A-Mole</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120601/03132419161</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>