Techdirt. Stories filed under "mechanics" Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us Techdirt. Stories filed under "mechanics"http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:50:29 PST Copyright Boss: 'It's Great Mechanics Now Need To Know About Copyright' Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130210/02562721936/copyright-boss-its-great-mechanics-now-need-to-know-about-copyright.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130210/02562721936/copyright-boss-its-great-mechanics-now-need-to-know-about-copyright.shtml lock up diagnostic codes and information concerning onboard computers. The end result is that car owners are often forced to go to dealers (who are expensive) over independent car repair shops. Independent repair shops who circumvent the digital locks on car computers may be found to be violating the DMCA's anti-circumvention clause. As we've noted, this seems like a clear abuse of the DMCA, as it was clearly not designed for such a purpose. Attempts to fix this with "right to repair" legislation have mostly gone nowhere (automakers are powerful lobbyists, and the entertainment industry also doesn't want anything that weakens the anti-circumvention clause).

It would be difficult to look on this turn of events in a positive way no matter what angle you might take. It's clearly abusing copyright law beyond its intended purpose. It's limiting competition. It's making life worse for the public and for small businesses. So how could this possibly be spun as a good thing? Leave that to Copyright Office boss Maria Pallante. At a recent conference all about Section 108 of the Copyright Act, she apparently declared (via Copycense, who was in attendance):
"I think it's really great your car mechanic knows about copyright"
She similarly argued that a big challenge of copyright law is making it more accessible and suggested it was a good thing that it's "no longer" reserved to experts to deal with copyright law. All of that should actually be seen as a pretty massive problem with the system. As a government-granted monopoly privilege that also has free speech implications, we should want copyright to be very carefully limited and calibrated in a manner that it is not something that enters people's everyday lives, and that it's not an issue that a mechanic should ever need to know about. Those are signs of a completely broken system. They're signs that copyright has expanded massively beyond its basic structure, into a monstrosity, often driven by the nature of technology. When your mechanic needs to be an expert in copyright law just to know if he or she can fix your car it may make Maria Pallante happier, because it seems to validate her job, but it should be seen as a huge problem for the system. A copyright system that is working is one that doesn't trouble totally unrelated professions like mechanics. It's only a broken system that would create serious friction in jobs like that. That the head of the Copyright Office does not realize this is pretty frightening.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> no,-actually,-it's-not http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130210/02562721936 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:11:00 PST A Modest Proposal: ISPs Should Stop Any Activity That Hurts A Business Model Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080125/09042572.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080125/09042572.shtml push to force ISPs to somehow filter or block the transfer of any kind of copyrighted material, Charles Arthur is wondering why other industries facing massive business model challenges can't do the same thing? Newspapers, as has been well documented, are facing challenges from the likes of Craigslist and Google -- so why not have ISPs block those sites? And plenty of people are discussing news articles, even to the point of copying-and-pasting articles. Clearly, ISPs should be protecting the newspaper industry. But that's not all. Arthur points to some other industries that ISPs should help protect, such as auto mechanics and needlepoint pattern makers -- both of whom have faced market changes thanks to the internet. If only ISPs would block the sharing of information on how to fix your own car or how to create needlepoints -- both of those important industries could be protected. Or, as Arthur concludes, perhaps all of these industries could adapt to the changing market. But what are the chances of that happening?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> it's-their-responsibility-after-all http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080125/09042572