<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;maori&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 07:13:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Maori Angry About Mike Tyson's Tattoo Artist Claiming To Own Maori-Inspired Design</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110525/23052014438/maori-angry-about-mike-tysons-tattoo-artist-claiming-to-own-maori-inspired-design.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110525/23052014438/maori-angry-about-mike-tysons-tattoo-artist-claiming-to-own-maori-inspired-design.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Well, here's an interesting twist on the lawsuit from Victor Whitmill over the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16000214087/guy-who-did-mike-tysons-tattoo-sues-warner-bros-copyright-infringement.shtml">copyright on Mike Tyson's face tattoo</a>.  Many people have pointed out that the design appears to be inspired by the Maori, and it appears that Maori tattoo experts think Whitmill <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&#038;objectid=10727836" target="_blank">doesn't deserve anything at all</a>:
<blockquote><i>
Professor Ngahuia Te Awekotuku, author of Mau Moko: The World of Maori Tattoo, described Mr Whitmill's claims of ownership as insufferable arrogance. "It is astounding that a Pakeha tattooist who inscribes an African American's flesh with what he considers to be a Maori design has the gall to claim that design as his intellectual property," she said.
<br /><br />
"The tattooist has never consulted with Maori, has never had experience of Maori and originally and obviously stole the design that he put on Tyson.
<br /><br />
"The tattooist has an incredible arrogance to assume he has the intellectual right to claim the design form of an indigenous culture that is not his."
</i></blockquote>
That article notes that a local Parliament member said that it was a "bit rich" for Whitmill to be "moaning about the breach of copyright copied off Maori."  Seems like bringing in a Maori tattoo expert would make for an interesting witness if this ever actually goes to trial...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110525/23052014438/maori-angry-about-mike-tysons-tattoo-artist-claiming-to-own-maori-inspired-design.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110525/23052014438/maori-angry-about-mike-tysons-tattoo-artist-claiming-to-own-maori-inspired-design.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110525/23052014438/maori-angry-about-mike-tysons-tattoo-artist-claiming-to-own-maori-inspired-design.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ownership-society</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110525/23052014438</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:21 PST</pubDate>
<title>Traditional Tribal Dance... Now Covered By Intellectual Property</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090212/1029103746.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090212/1029103746.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Remember a few years back when the "inventor" of the electric slide claimed to own the intellectual property on the dance and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070204/105948.shtml">sent takedown notices</a> to those who were using it without paying up?  Well, let's take that even further.  A whole bunch of folks have been sending in the story that the New Zealand government has agreed to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/feb/12/new-zealand-haka-maoris" target="_new">give intellectual property rights on an ancient tribal dance</a> back to that tribal group.  The group says they're trying to defend the dance from being exploited commercially, which "undermines" the "significance" of the dance.
<br /><br />
I can certainly understand why they might be upset from a traditional angle, but it seems fairly ridiculous that you can tell people how they can and cannot dance.  And, in fact, my guess is that eventually this tribal group will regret this decision.  If you cannot easily spread and share an ancient culture, you are pretty much guaranteeing that it will die out.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090212/1029103746.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090212/1029103746.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090212/1029103746.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>don't-dance-it!</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090212/1029103746</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>