<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;maine&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:57:51 PST</pubDate>
<title>Apparently Attacking A Candidate For Being A World Of Warcraft Player Is Not An Effective Campaign Strategy</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121107/11240420964/apparently-attacking-candidate-being-world-warcraft-player-is-not-effective-campaign-strategy.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121107/11240420964/apparently-attacking-candidate-being-world-warcraft-player-is-not-effective-campaign-strategy.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last month, we were among those who reported on an absolutely bizarre strategy by a candidate for the Maine state Senate to demonize his opponent, Colleen Lachowicz, by <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml">highlighting</a> her enjoyment of <i>World of Warcraft</i> and then taking some of her statements about the game completely out of context, to imply they were political statements that had relevance beyond inside the game.  Even after this was widely mocked, the folks behind the mailer defended it.
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/v07F8"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/v07F8.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
In the end, it appears that this was not an effective campaign strategy.  As <a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/12/11/07/1740212/world-of-warcraft-candidate-for-maine-state-senate-wins-election?utm_source=slashdot&#038;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">highlighted by Slashdot</a>, Lachowicz <a href="http://bangordailynews.com/2012/11/07/politics/elections/world-of-warcraft-candidate-vanquishes-opponent-in-waterville/" target="_blank">won her campaign<a /> and was elected.  The article notes that the attention from the bizarre attacks resulted in support from "gamers from around the world," who helped raise an additional $6,300 in contributions for her campaign.  Not knowing when to back down and go away, her opponents claimed that the money raised was done so </a><a href="http://bangordailynews.com/2012/11/01/politics/ethics-commission-clears-world-of-warcraft-candidate-of-wrongdoing/" target="_blank">illegally</a>, though an ethics board cleared her of any wrongdoing.
<br /><br />
Perhaps, next time, politicians will recognize that mocking a candidate for doing something millions of people enjoy is not a particularly smart campaign strategy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121107/11240420964/apparently-attacking-candidate-being-world-warcraft-player-is-not-effective-campaign-strategy.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121107/11240420964/apparently-attacking-candidate-being-world-warcraft-player-is-not-effective-campaign-strategy.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121107/11240420964/apparently-attacking-candidate-being-world-warcraft-player-is-not-effective-campaign-strategy.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>vanquished</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121107/11240420964</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2012 05:22:32 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Maine GOP Apparently Believes That Playing World Of Warcraft Makes You Unfit For Office</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The Republican Party often has trouble attracting younger voters.  Perhaps they should try not attacking one of the most popular pastimes for those voters.  According to an entertaining report at Ars Technica, the Maine Republican Party has gone after a Democratic candidate for State Senate, Colleen Lachowicz, by <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/candidate-for-maine-state-senate-attacked-for-warcraft-character/" target="_blank">attacking the fact that she played World of Warcraft</a>, pulling a bunch of forum quotes she made a few years ago, and taking them out of context -- such as her statement that "I love poisoning and stabbing.  It is fun."
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/v07F8"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/v07F8.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
Tim Lee's writeup at Ars hits on exactly the right response:
<blockquote><i>
Lachowicz uses salty language in some of the comments, but <b>someone needs to sit the Maine GOP down and explain the difference between fantasy and reality</b>. Every day, millions of people engage in simulated video game violence without committing any real-world violence. By suggesting a World of Warcraft hobby should disqualify someone for office&#8212;and implying that voters are too dumb to tell the difference between virtual and real violence&#8212;the party is only embarrassing itself.
</i></blockquote>
Later, a spokesman tried to defend the flier, arguing that it raised questions about her work ethic.  How?  Well, state GOP spokesperson David Sorenson used "the number of hours most World of Warcraft gamers spend playing the game (22.7 per week, on average) and the number it must have taken her to reach such a high level" as some sort of proof that her work ethic is problematic.  First of all, using the average amount of time someone plays WoW is meaningless in looking at how much any individual plays.  Also, isn't achieving a high level a sign of a <i>strong</i> work ethic?
<br /><br />
Once again, Lee's response is perfect:
<blockquote><i>
It's worth noting that the average American watches more than 30 hours of television per week. Many other Americans spend their evenings and weekends at the golf course. Yet it's hard to imagine anyone suggesting that devoting 22 hours per week to those hobbies made a candidate too lazy to hold elected office.
</i></blockquote>
I realize it's election season, and with that comes really, really dumb campaign ideas from nearly every political party and/or candidate, but it's difficult to see how this particular strategy is good for anyone -- especially if you want younger people to vote for you.  The younger generation tends to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120111/14540217379/online-gamer-congressional-rep-jared-polis-discusses-problems-sopa-gaming-forum.shtml">respect and look up to gamer politicians</a>.  Attacking them for doing something that millions of people enjoy just doesn't seem particularly smart.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121004/15110720598/maine-gop-apparently-believes-that-playing-world-warcraft-makes-you-unfit-office.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>youth-vote?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121004/15110720598</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:28:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Maine Demands That The US Be More Open And Transparent In TPP &#038; Other International Trade Negotiations</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120316/09345818138/maine-demands-that-us-be-more-open-transparent-tpp-other-international-trade-negotiations.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120316/09345818138/maine-demands-that-us-be-more-open-transparent-tpp-other-international-trade-negotiations.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As the administration continues to be <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120307/13454918027/obama-administration-acta-is-binding-dont-worry-your-pretty-little-heads-about-tpp.shtml">ridiculously secretive</a> about negotiations on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement, it seems that even various state governments are growing concerned about the process.  The Maine state legislature issued a joint resolution demanding that the administration <a href="http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_125th/billtexts/HP139201.asp" target="_blank">be much more open in how it negotiates international trade agreements</a>.  The resolution states that it strongly supports good international agreements, but that they need to be open and transparent.  It notes that the lack of transparency has meant that trade negotiations have come to agreements against states' own interests and that the negotiators do not consult the states, despite the massive impact these agreements have on state economies.  Then it specifically calls out the TPP, and says that the administration must improve the process.  Here's just a few of the lines from the resolution, though you can read the whole thing at the link above.
<blockquote><i>
WHEREAS,  existing trade agreements have effects that extend significantly beyond the bounds of traditional trade matters, such as tariffs and quotas, and can undermine Maine's regulatory authority and constitutionally guaranteed authority to protect the public health, safety and welfare; and
<br /><br />
WHEREAS,  a succession of federal trade negotiators from both political parties over the years has failed to operate in a transparent manner and failed to meaningfully consult with states on the far-reaching impact of trade agreements on state and local laws, even when binding the State of Maine to the terms of these agreements; and
<br /><br />
WHEREAS,  the negative effect of existing trade agreements on Maine's regulatory authority and constitutionally guaranteed authority to protect the public health, safety and welfare has occurred in part because United States trade policy has been formulated and implemented in a process that lacks transparency, fails to properly recognize the principles of state sovereignty and lacks any meaningful opportunity for congressional review and acceptance; and
<br /><br />
WHEREAS,  the United States Trade Representative is currently negotiating the terms of a proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, which will have a significant effect upon the citizens and commerce of the State of Maine; and
<br /><br />
WHEREAS,  there is a current opportunity for improving the process by which significant foreign trade policy agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement are negotiated; now, therefore, be it
<br /><br />
RESOLVED: That We, your Memorialists, respectfully urge and request the President of the United States and the Congress of the United States to improve the process by which United States trade agreements are developed and implemented in order to encourage meaningful transparency and appropriately acknowledge the vital role of state sovereignty and afford more meaningful opportunity for congressional review and acceptance
</i></blockquote>
When even the state governments are complaining about the lack of transparency in trade negotiations that impact them, can the USTR really continue to pretend that there are no problems with the way it goes about these negotiations?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120316/09345818138/maine-demands-that-us-be-more-open-transparent-tpp-other-international-trade-negotiations.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120316/09345818138/maine-demands-that-us-be-more-open-transparent-tpp-other-international-trade-negotiations.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120316/09345818138/maine-demands-that-us-be-more-open-transparent-tpp-other-international-trade-negotiations.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>good-for-them</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120316/09345818138</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:58:27 PST</pubDate>
<title>Maine Wants Mobile Phones To Carry A Cancer Warning... Despite Lack Of Evidence; [Updated: SF Too]</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091222/0229487460.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091222/0229487460.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There have been ongoing arguments and conflicting studies for years over whether or not mobile phones can cause cancer.  However, we had thought that the general scientific consensus was that mobile phones have such weak radiation that it is <i>extremely unlikely</i> to have any meaningful impact on causing cancer.  Yet, that doesn't stop the worries that have long been associated with (almost always unscientific folks) when it comes to wireless signals.  The latest such situation involves a politician in Maine pushing for a law that would <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Maine-Wants-Cellphone-Cancer-Warning-Labels-106085" target="_blank">put cancer warning labels on mobile phones</a>.
<br><br>
But here's the thing: even if these warnings were put on phones, what would it do?  Would people really stop using their mobile phones or make <i>any</i> behavioral adjustment just because of these labels?  There might be a few people, but I'd imagine that those who already are sure that mobile phones cause cancer have <i>already</i> acted accordingly. <b>Update</b>: And... just like that, comes the news that San Francisco is <a href="http://bayarea.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/sf-may-require-warnings-about-cellphone-radiation/" target="_blank">considering the same thing</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091222/0229487460.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091222/0229487460.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091222/0229487460.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>yeah-that'll-help</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091222/0229487460</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:55:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Campgrounds In Maine Can't Compete Against Free... So Want It Outlawed</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090511/0118214830.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090511/0118214830.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Chris was the first of a few of you to send in the news of a proposed law in Maine that would <a href="http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=255609&#038;ac=PHnws" target="_new">outlaw the ability of any company to let RVs park overnight for free</a>.  The battle basically pits campgrounds, which charge fees, against Wal-Mart, which has always allowed RVs to park in their parking lots for free, recognizing that many who stay overnight in their parking lots will likely pick up supplies at Wal-Mart as well.  There doesn't seem to be any actual rationale for the "no free overnight parking" law, other than that the campgrounds are upset that they're losing business.  The whole thing seems rather silly, though.  A Wal-Mart parking lot is hardly a scenic location.  Are these campgrounds offering so little that they can't compete against a giant empty concrete parking lot?  Of course, if this law does pass, the end result is pretty predictable.  Rather than driving more RVs to campsites, RV owners may just start avoiding Maine altogether.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090511/0118214830.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090511/0118214830.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090511/0118214830.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ain't-that-great</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090511/0118214830</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>