<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;listings&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:13:08 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Canadian Real Estate Agents: Without Us, Poor Homeowners Would Be Getting Attacked And Killed</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120320/03083718166/canadian-real-estate-agents-without-us-poor-homeowners-would-be-getting-attacked-killed.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120320/03083718166/canadian-real-estate-agents-without-us-poor-homeowners-would-be-getting-attacked-killed.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's often amazing how legacy industry organizations come up with the most far-fetched and ridiculous reasons to insist that giving the public more information isn't actually in the public interest.  Rob Hyndman points us to an effort by real estate agents in Canada who are fighting back against a plan to put house listing information online by claiming that <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/housing/online-house-listings-expose-sellers-to-assault-break-ins-treb-says/article2368525/" target="_blank">this will expose home sellers to crime</a>, as suddenly criminals will break into their homes.  This is based on... absolutely nothing.  Well, actually, it's based on a <i>false claim</i> that realtors are getting attacked and killed already.  The Globe and Mail report on this story could have done a better job calling the realtors on their crazy claims, but goes with a more understated approach:
<blockquote><i>
&#8220;Easy access to information online is a huge safety issue,&#8221; said Von Palmer, the real estate board&#8217;s chief privacy officer. &#8220;There is a real possibility of break-ins and assaults; you only have to read the headlines to imagine what might happen. You hear stories about realtors getting attacked and killed. Can you imagine if we put that information out there about consumers? You can only imagine the headlines.&#8221;
<br /><br />
A spokesman for the Toronto Police Service said he wasn&#8217;t aware violence against real estate agents was a problem in the city.
</i></blockquote>
Also, they could just look south of the border.  The information that the Canadians are now discussing putting online is, for the most part, already available online here in the US.  And while I'm sure if they tried hard enough, somewhere, somehow, someone might be able to connect a real estate listing to crime, it's certainly not a common occurrence.
<br /><br />
It's pretty clear that the real issue is just one of control.  The real estate agents benefit from being the <i>gatekeepers</i> to that information, and they fear what happens when people can start to route around them.  A few months back, I did a talk at a real estate conference, where I compared the music industry to the real estate industry, and it was amazing just how many similarities there were between the two.  They were two big legacy industries trying to hold back the tide of what the internet allows, and they were able to come up with all sorts of ridiculous scenarios to explain how horrible the world would be if the information they used to control was allowed to go free online.  But it's tough to stop the free flow of information, and real estate agents will learn soon enough that a strategy of spreading FUD isn't a way to future-proof your business.  Learning to adapt, and to take advantage of the spread of information by becoming an <i>enabler</i> rather than a gatekeeper, really is the key.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120320/03083718166/canadian-real-estate-agents-without-us-poor-homeowners-would-be-getting-attacked-killed.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120320/03083718166/canadian-real-estate-agents-without-us-poor-homeowners-would-be-getting-attacked-killed.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120320/03083718166/canadian-real-estate-agents-without-us-poor-homeowners-would-be-getting-attacked-killed.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>oh-really-now?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120320/03083718166</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:01:56 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Now Companies Suing eBay For Giving Others Better Listings</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0059121646.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0059121646.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Remember all those lawsuits against Google by people who <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070320/165930.shtml">didn't like how Google listed them</a> (i.e., they felt that Google had them too far down the rankings)?  Well, it appears that some similar lawsuits are being filed against eBay.  One jewelry sales company, Windsor Auctions, felt that it should have been making more money via eBay and <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/07/ebay_not_bound.htm" target="_new">sued the company after realizing that a competitor was using tools eBay provided it to get better listings</a>.  Windsor mostly relied on a depression-era law that tried to stop big companies from engaging in predatory sales practices (using its marketing muscle to force suppliers to give it better deals).  As Eric Goldman points out in the link above, the law makes almost no sense today (and it's questionable if it ever did).  It certainly doesn't seem to apply to this case -- and the court has agreed, tossing out those charges, though leaving some others dealing with a implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  It's difficult to see how eBay can be at fault here for offering up tools that will help sellers, but as we've seen with all those Google cases, companies always look for someone to blame when someone beats them in the market -- and the company with the big pockets is always an easy target.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0059121646.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0059121646.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0059121646.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>give-it-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080711/0059121646</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>