<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;investigative&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:21:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>But How Could Wikileaks Break A Story Without Traditional Newspaper Backing?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100405/1857418890.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100405/1857418890.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ By now you've likely seen the rather horrifying <a href="http://collateralmurder.com/" target="_blank">Collateral Murder</a> website, put together from the video leaked to <a href="http://wikileaks.org/" target="_blank">Wikileaks</a> (for which, apparently, US intelligence officials <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/26/wikileaks-asks-cia-to-stop-spying-on-it/" target="_blank">investigated</a> some of the Wikileaks folks).  While there's a lot of ongoing back-and-forth over what the video really shows, there's no doubt that the release of the video is a journalistic scoop.
<br /><br />
And yet, we keep being told that if newspapers fail, no one will be left to do investigative journalism?
<br /><br />
So what were the traditional journalists doing to get this story?  Rob Hyndman <a href="http://twitter.com/rhh/status/11663947612" target="_blank">points</a> to a story from a year ago about the mad dash of traditional DC reporters to <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=CE2C3511-18FE-70B2-A8D7CC38A6EC7231" target="_blank">butter up sources</a>.  And what great stories have been broken by the White House Press Corp. over the past year?
<br /><br />
There's nothing inherent in newspapers that says that only they can do investigative reporting.  As we've seen <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090317/0312314149.shtml">over</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090810/1742115829.shtml">over</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090405/2125504401.shtml">over</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090701/1529595425.shtml">over</a> again, investigative reporting comes in many forms, and it need not come directly from newspapers.
<br /><br />
Perhaps the <i>real</i> question is why the traditional press never set up anything like Wikileaks itself.  I guess they're too busy trying to butter up some source in the White House who they hope will feed them a story for political purposes, rather than breaking any real news.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100405/1857418890.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100405/1857418890.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100405/1857418890.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>welcome-to-the-new-world</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100405/1857418890</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>