Techdirt. Stories filed under "insurance" Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us Techdirt. Stories filed under "insurance"http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:00:00 PDT DailyDirt: Save Yourself From The Zombies, If You Can... Michael Ho http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101011/11393511367/dailydirt-save-yourself-zombies-if-you-can.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101011/11393511367/dailydirt-save-yourself-zombies-if-you-can.shtml
  • Some zombies aren't the undead, they're just unthinking folks who might be "in the zone" and focused on other things. Aren't we all zombies in a way? [url]
  • ZAICO is the Zombie Apocalypse Insurance Company for all your post-apocalyptic needs. Don't get caught unprepared -- but maybe choose a low deductible plan because cash might be a bit tight after the zombies take over. [url]
  • A mathematical model of how zombies spread tells us that we need to deal with the zombie apocalypse quickly or else things will get out hand rapidly and bring the end of civilization as we know it. But how would different kinds of international relations policies deal with a zombie threat? [url]
    • If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     urls-we-dig-up http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101011/11393511367     Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:59:00 PDT Data Mining Exec Pays For Burgers In Cash To Keep His Insurance Company From Knowing His Bad Diet Habits Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml increasingly using data mining to "analyze risk." That is, they look through the data which was originally collected for the purpose of better marketing, and use it as a tool to see if you lead an unhealthy life. However, the really interesting point is highlighted by Kashmir Hill, where an exec at a datamining company admits that he's changed his habits because of this. Not his eating habits, mind you. But how he purchases food:
    Insurers' interest in data mining will only grow, says Kevin Pledge, the boss of Insight Decision Solutions, an underwriting-technology consultancy based near Toronto.... Insurance firms will also analyse grocery purchases for clues about policyholders, he predicts. But that raises some sticky questions about privacy. Mr Pledge himself has begun to forgo his supermarket loyalty-card discount on junk food and pay for his burgers in cash. Promising as data mining is, much will depend on how regulators, and consumers, react.
    He also notes that he's working on a system that will go through your social media profiles to see if you provide any info insurers may want to know about. This, of course, is the natural extension of our data explosion. But, in my experience, all of these companies who collect data seem to do an incredibly bad job at getting it right. And... as long as there's that "cash hole" for data, it's hard to see how accurate such information would really be.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     privacy?-what's-that? http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120619/04094319383     Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:29:55 PST UMG Finds Perfect Biz Model: Cheat Artists, Then, If Caught, Demand Insurance Company Pay Instead Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111113/01050116753/umg-finds-perfect-biz-model-cheat-artists-then-if-caught-demand-insurance-company-pay-instead.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111113/01050116753/umg-finds-perfect-biz-model-cheat-artists-then-if-caught-demand-insurance-company-pay-instead.shtml "exploit now, pay later if at all." The way it worked was that labels would put old works on compilations without getting artists' permission, then put the artists' names on a "pending" list, which was supposed to mean that payment to those artists was "pending." Except the pending lists were never touched and the royalties were never paid. Labels not paying artists royalties is a pretty common issue, but here they weren't even getting any credit at all. Pretty sneaky. Realizing they had been caught red handed, the labels "settled" by agreeing to pay the $45 million in royalties owed.

    However, it turns out that Universal Music Group actually seems to think that its insurance company should be paying the $14.4 million it owes (UMG's share of the $45 million). It's now suing its insurance company for refusing to pay. If you think about it for a second, you realize just how insane this claim is. Basically, Universal Music is claiming that it can simply not pay any royalties at all, then wait to get sued... and if it loses and has to pay, it believes its insurance company has to foot the bill. Now there's a business model!

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     wow http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111113/01050116753     Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:28:00 PDT Sony's Insurer Says It Shouldn't Have To Pay For Cost Of PlayStation Network Hack Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110722/11264215206/sonys-insurer-says-it-shouldnt-have-to-pay-cost-playstation-network-hack.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110722/11264215206/sonys-insurer-says-it-shouldnt-have-to-pay-cost-playstation-network-hack.shtml Butcherer79 points to even more problems for Sony in the aftermath of the massive hacking of the PlayStation Network. It seems that Sony was expecting its insurance provider, Zurich American Insurance, to cover any costs. Zurich American Insurance apparently has other ideas:
    Zurich American Insurance has now gone to court in New York seeking a declaration that it does not have to help Sony with current or future legal action related to the data breach.

    Legal papers filed by Zurich reveal that 55 separate class action lawsuits are pending in the US because of the breach.
    Sony has indicated that it expected Zurich to cover any such fees, but Zurich is saying no way, no how. Apparently, Zurich says that its contract with Sony doesn't even cover the parts of the business that were hacked, and other clauses in the deal show that this isn't Zurich's problem at all.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     sony-swims-alone http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110722/11264215206     Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:22:00 PST Will Your Home Insurance Provider Jack Up Your Rates If Your Tweet Appears On PleaseRobMe? Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100301/0245348338.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100301/0245348338.shtml moral panic. It seemed unlikely that any burglars were seriously using such sites as a way to pick homes to rob. But do insurance companies agree? Michael Scott points us to the news that at least some insurance providers are exploring social media usage in figuring out insurance rates. Right now, it appears that they're mostly looking at social networking info in doing claims investigations, but it may soon go beyond that. The author of the linked article suggests that at least some insurance companies are looking to take it further, in looking at your social media usage to determine your risk level (and, eventually, your premiums).

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     welcome-to-social-media http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100301/0245348338     Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:08:00 PST Facebook Photos Coming Back To Haunt Users In Surprising Ways Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091125/1253147091.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091125/1253147091.shtml ticketed him for underage drinking because of a photo on Facebook of Bauer holding a drink. This reminds me of a case we wrote about six years ago, involving a woman who posted some naked photos of herself at some locations around Lincoln, Nebraska -- leading the police to charge her with violating local no-nudity laws.

    The other story that a bunch of folks have submitted was the case of a woman who who lost her disability insurance benefits because of photos on Facebook. She was on sick-leave due to a diagnosis of depression. Yet, somehow the insurance company got access to her Facebook photos that showed her out having fun -- at a birthday party, on vacation and the beach and at a Chippendale's show. Now it's entirely possible that there was insurance fraud going on. Or, it's also possible that someone who had been diagnosed with depression was trying to put her life back together. It's a bit difficult to think that an insurance agent looking at photos online is better at diagnosing the situation than a trained doctor.

    In both of these cases, the issue is that photos might not tell the whole story. Making major decisions based just on some photos uploaded to social networks seems fraught with potential problems. I could certainly see using them as part of a larger investigation, but it doesn't seem like that was the case in either situation. But, in the meantime, it's a reminder that your privacy is increasingly disappearing -- and you may be surprised about decisions that others make about you based on what you assumed was perfectly innocent activities.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     privacy-is-an-illusion? http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091125/1253147091     Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:45:00 PDT Insurance Company Sues Website Offering Claim Advice... Saying It's Infringing Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090811/0255025840.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090811/0255025840.shtml suing a website that offers advice on how not to get your insurance claim denied. Obviously, for policy holders, this is useful information. But, to ICBC, it's copyright infringement. Well, at least that's what the article linked above says. I have a hard time seeing how there's a copyright claim here -- especially since the ICBC spokesperson states that they don't have a problem with the content, and that they just have to protect their trademark. So... let's give ICBC the benefit of the doubt and assume the newspaper reporter screwed up, and this is actually a trademark claim rather than a copyright claim (professional reporters for the win, again!). Even so, this would seem like a typical "gripes site" type discussion where, as long as it's clear that the site in question is not run by the company, there shouldn't be any problem. In fact, given that the site provides useful information for ICBC customers, it's difficult to see what the problem is, other than that the insurance company doesn't like its policy holders to learn how to stand up for their rights.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     entitlement-culture http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090811/0255025840     Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:59:00 PDT Spammer Discovers His Insurance Policy Doesn't Cover $6 Million Spam Fines Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090731/0349435729.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090731/0349435729.shtml "Spamking" clothing (seriously). In 2005, though, he filed for bankruptcy (even though it appeared his spamming operations were still rolling in cash. That same year, there were reports that Richter had actually gone legit and he was actually removed from the infamous ROKSO list of known spammers (not an easy list to get removed from). Except... sometimes it's just difficult to stay away. MySpace sued Richter in 2007 and won a $6 million award against him (though, Richter claimed victory since MySpace wanted much more).

    Now, Michael Scott alerts us to the news that Richter tried to have his insurance company pay the fines, but a court has now said that these fines were excluded from the policies, and thus Richter is on the hook for the fines instead. That seems like a good thing. It would be pretty troubling if spammers were able to buy insurance against getting fined.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     just-so-you-know... http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090731/0349435729     Mon, 18 May 2009 04:51:43 PDT Canadian Insurance Company Snooped On Jurors Insurance Claims During Trial Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090515/0233034895.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090515/0233034895.shtml Michael Scott, who points us to the news that the Insurance Corporation of B.C. (ICBC) was caught checking its own database to examine the claim histories of potential jurors in a trial in which the company was involved. Not surprisingly, this is a massive breach of Canadian privacy laws and also raises questions about the jury itself. The judge in the case is now trying to find out if ICBC has done this in other cases as well. ICBC seems to be bending over backwards to say this won't happen again and that it's put in place safeguards, but it's not clear why it happened in the first place.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     that-seems-bad http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090515/0233034895     Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:36:00 PST Anti-Driving-While-Yakking Tech Made Even Better By Adding Big Brother Insurance Carlo Longino http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081212/1121373106.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081212/1121373106.shtml ban-yakking-while-driving research center -- have come up with a new device they say can stop teens from using their phones while driving (via Phone Scoop). The device envelops a car key, and releasing the key to operate the car activates a radio in the device, which the researchers say forces the driver's phone into "driving mode," which only allows calls to 911 and pre-approved numbers, such as the driver's parents. Like earlier, similar ideas, there are a few bugbears: we're unaware of any phone that features such a mode, and it's unclear exactly why it's okay to be distracted by a phone call to one's parents while driving, but not by calls to other people. Singling out teens, when plenty of adults talk on their phones while driving, doesn't seem totally right, but never fear: the company commercializing the technology wants to hook up with insurance companies to use the device as a tool for Big Brother-style surveillance insurance that collects all sorts of data about drivers' behavior, then using the data to calculate insurance rates. While some insurance companies have shown interest in the anti-chatting technology, consumers have shown zero interest in Big Brother insurance, likely relegating this latest idea to the dustbin.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     two-for-one-special-on-things-you-don't-need-or-want http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081212/1121373106     Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:56:00 PDT Turns Out Drivers Not So Interested In Big Brother Style Car Insurance Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080701/0256111563.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080701/0256111563.shtml "Big Brother-style car insurance," where drivers would agree to have special black boxes attached to their cars which would transmit all sorts of info to the insurance company about their driving habits, including how much, when and how fast they drove. Those drivers who drove safer (or at safer "times") were offered better rates. We were actually quite surprised in 2005 to hear the company behind the most intrusive of these programs, Norwich Union in the UK, claim that the early tests were going so well that it was expanding the program. Three years later, we now learn that the "going so well" part may have only been on the insurers' side, rather than the customers' side. In a post talking about why such surveillance insurance plans are a bad, bad idea, the EFF also points out that Norwich Union has just ditched its offering, noting that... well... almost no one signed up. Turns out that people aren't so keen to sign up for Big Brother Brand car insurance after all. The "going well" part was actually all just wishful thinking, as the company says that it thought people would sign up only to discover that they didn't.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     please-don't-spy-on-me http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080701/0256111563     Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:22:53 PDT IBM Patents Real-Time Auto Insurance Surcharges Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080313/221036.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080313/221036.shtml theodp writes "Better think twice before volunteering to tutor underprivileged kids or delivering Christmas gifts to homeless children. Thanks to IBM, you could be rewarded with a hefty car insurance premium increase for your efforts. A new patent was issued to Big Blue last Tuesday for its 'invention' of the Location-Based Vehicle Risk Assessment System, which describes how surcharges will be added to your auto insurance premium when a GPS device reports that you drove into an area in IBM's bad neighborhood database (stay too long and your car is disabled). It's all about assigning insurance costs more appropriately, explains Big Blue, which used the same argument to justify punishing employees for having fat kids."

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     fair's-fair http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080313/221036     Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:02:07 PDT Yet Another Study Shows Red Light Cameras Cause More Accidents And Aren't Needed Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080313/231629539.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080313/231629539.shtml increase, not decrease auto accidents, and certainly don't do much to improve safety. The Agitator points us to yet another study, this time from researchers at the University of South Florida, who again point out that red light cameras tend to increase the number of accidents. The research also points out that accidents from running red lights are rather rare, and it's hardly a problem that requires automation. As for the few studies that have shown better safety from red light cameras, every single one came from a group poised to make money off of the cameras -- and they certainly do make money. It's just unfortunate that it seems to come at the expense of more car accidents, all in the bogus name of public safety. Update: Of course, just after publishing this, I see a story on Engadget about how Dallas has found that red light cameras are effective in preventing red light violations (no word on rear end collisions from people slamming on the brakes however). Yet, here's the irony: because of that, the city gov't doesn't want to install any more, as it's cutting into revenue.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     it's-all-about-the-money http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080313/231629539