<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;insults&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:06:49 PST</pubDate>
<title>'Cocky' Defendant Gets A Web Redemption</title>
<dc:creator>Above The Law</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/16373522161/cocky-defendant-gets-web-redemption.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/16373522161/cocky-defendant-gets-web-redemption.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <div style="text-align:center;padding:8px;margin:0 0 7px 15px;border:2px solid #bbb;float:right;line-height:1.2;">
<i style="font-weight:bold;color:#666;font-size:90%;">Cross-posted from</i><br />
<a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/02/tosh-0-gives-a-rather-cocky-defendant-a-web-redemption/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RvpZD0T.jpg" width="110" title="Above The Law" style="margin:6px 0 0 0;" /></a></div>
<br /><br />
A few weeks ago, a young woman named Penelope Soto became an internet legend after she was caught on camera flipping a Florida judge the bird and telling him to <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/02/punk-defendant-potpourri-punching-and-cursing-in-court-will-get-you-held-in-contempt/">go f**k himself</a> during a court proceeding. Soto&#8217;s behavior earned her a 30-day stint in jail for contempt of court, but she apparently changed her ways at a later hearing and convinced the judge to vacate the month-long sentence.
<p>
But not all mouthy defendants are so lucky. Some of them <em>do</em> go to jail. Take, for example, the case of Brian Noval, a Florida man who in 2009 called a judge a c*ck &#8212; twice. Why do all of these things happen in Florida? Anyway, Noval&#8217;s antics were captured on film, and he earned himself 120 days in the pokey for his indiscretions. Noval only served four days of that sentence before the judge decided that this cocky defendant had learned his lesson.
</p>
<p>
As we all know, the internet is for porn, but it&#8217;s also for wonderful videos like these. And thanks to Daniel Tosh of Comedy Central&#8217;s Tosh.0, sometimes the stars of embarrassing viral videos are given the chance to redeem themselves on cable television. Ms. Soto hasn&#8217;t been given the opportunity to participate in one of these yet, but Noval was featured on the show last night.
</p>
<p>
For reasons that escape me, we never covered Noval&#8217;s incident in 2009, but now that he&#8217;s been brought back into the pop culture limelight, we&#8217;ve got some funny videos to entertain you with&#8230;.
</p>
<p>
<span id="more-227513"></span>
</p>
<p>
We&#8217;ll give you some info on the judge who heard Brian Noval&#8217;s case before you watch the video. Apparently Judge <a href="http://www.17th.flcourts.org/index.php/judges/county-court">John Hurley</a> of the Broward County Court presides over its first appearance division, and is <a href="http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-11-26/news/fl-hurley-profile-20111125_1_judge-john-jay-hurley-eric-linder-bond">known for</a> his &#8220;spunk, one-liners and, on Fridays, bow ties.&#8221; To put it differently, this man is not to be f**ked with.
</p>
<p>
But Noval didn&#8217;t know that, so he called Judge Hurley a c*ck, like any man with common decency and respect for the judicial system would. And plus, it&#8217;s Florida &#8212; of course someone would think it&#8217;s acceptable to call a judge a c*ck in Florida. And without further ado, here&#8217;s the entertaining segment from Tosh.0:
</p>
<p>
</p>
<center>
<div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;">
<div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:tosh.comedycentral.com:424162" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>
<p>
</p>
</div></center>
<p>
</p>
<p>
Well, you don&#8217;t have to be wearing a seersucker suit to acknowledge that Daniel Tosh is correct when he says that &#8220;judges are basically parents for people who have sh*tty ones.&#8221; And we now know that Andrew Dice Clay could have a promising career ahead of himself as a criminal defense attorney. Because with a closing like, &#8220;Hickory dickory dock, my client has the right to call that judge a c*ck,&#8221; how can you possibly go wrong?
</p>
<p>
<a href=" http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-11-26/news/fl-hurley-profile-20111125_1_judge-john-jay-hurley-eric-linder-bond">Broward judge sets high bar</a> [Sun Sentinel]<br />
<a href="http://tosh.comedycentral.com/video-clips/web-redemption---courtroom-cock-guy---uncensored">Web Redemption &#8211; Courtroom C*ck Guy</a> [Tosh.0]
<br /><br />
<b>More stories from <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/" target="_blank">Above The Law</a>:</b>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/02/house-rules-is-yahoo-serious/" target="_blank">Is Yahoo Serious?</a>
</li><li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/02/i-need-a-contract-attorney-an-ivy-league-contract-attorney/" target="_blank">I Need A Contract Attorney: An &#8216;Ivy League&#8217; Contract Attorney</a>
</li><li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/02/avast-ye-maties-kozinski-benchslap-ho/" target="_blank">Avast Ye Maties! Kozinski Benchslap Ho!</a></li></ul>
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/16373522161/cocky-defendant-gets-web-redemption.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/16373522161/cocky-defendant-gets-web-redemption.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/16373522161/cocky-defendant-gets-web-redemption.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>video-solves-all</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130228/16373522161</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Mr. Bean: We Must Be Allowed To Insult Each Other</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/02463220784/mr-bean-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/02463220784/mr-bean-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've been documenting a rather troubling trend in the UK of <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121010/03520020672/uk-continues-to-criminalize-bad-taste-stupidity-online-postings.shtml">criminalizing</a> comments that are insulting or in bad taste.  Thankfully, some people are speaking out against such things, including comedian Rowan Atkinson -- best-known internationally as Mr. Bean, but famous in the UK for characters (especially Edmund Blackadder) built on caustic wit and elaborate insults. Atkinson has stepped up and <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9616750/Rowan-Atkinson-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.html" target="_blank">argued for the freedom to insult each other</a> in the UK.
<blockquote><i>
He criticised the "new intolerance" as he called for part of it the Public Order Act to be repealed, saying it was having a "chilling effect on free expression and free protest".
<br /><br />
Mr Atkinson said: "The clear problem of the outlawing of insult is that too many things can be interpreted as such. Criticism, ridicule, sarcasm, merely stating an alternative point of view to the orthodoxy, can be interpreted as insult." 
</i></blockquote>
These statements came as part of a campaign to roll back laws that have allowed this to happen, with a former government official, David Davis, pointing out the key thing -- you have no right not to be offended:
<blockquote><i>
"The simple truth is that in a free society, there is no right not to be offended. For centuries, freedom of speech has been a vital part of British life, and repealing this law will reinstate that right." 
</i></blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/02463220784/mr-bean-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/02463220784/mr-bean-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/02463220784/mr-bean-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>yes,-that</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121022/02463220784</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:32:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>State Government In Australia Seeks To Issue $12k Fines If You Insult Its Gaming Minister Michael O'Brien</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12115016403/state-government-australia-seeks-to-issue-12k-fines-if-you-insult-its-gaming-minister-michael-obrien.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12115016403/state-government-australia-seeks-to-issue-12k-fines-if-you-insult-its-gaming-minister-michael-obrien.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=picklemonger">Pickle Monger</a> alerts us to an effort in Victoria, Australia, by the current government to pass a law that could lead to fines up to $11,945 if you dare to <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/surely-this-is-a-joke/story-fn7x8me2-1226167552466" target="_blank">insult gaming minister Michael O'Brien</a>.  The law claims that it is "reasonably necessary to respect the rights and reputation of the minister and authorised persons" which includes a ban on any attempt to "assault, obstruct, hinder, threaten, abuse, <b>insult</b> or intimidate" gaming minister Michael O'Brien.  His political opponents are using the opportunity (before the bill passes, only, of course!) to mock O'Brien and the bill.  But, his office is actually trying to defend the bill:
<blockquote><i>
Asked why the new "offence" law was necessary and what its intention was, a spokeswoman for Mr O'Brien, Emily Broadbent, tried to deflect attention away from the minister, despite his title being clearly attached to the legislation.
<br /><br />
"This provision protects officers of the gambling regulator from bullying or intimidation when exercising powers at the direction of the Minister for Gaming," she said.
<br /><br />
"The minister can look after himself, but does not believe that those working on his behalf should have to put up with harassment."
</i></blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12115016403/state-government-australia-seeks-to-issue-12k-fines-if-you-insult-its-gaming-minister-michael-obrien.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12115016403/state-government-australia-seeks-to-issue-12k-fines-if-you-insult-its-gaming-minister-michael-obrien.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111018/12115016403/state-government-australia-seeks-to-issue-12k-fines-if-you-insult-its-gaming-minister-michael-obrien.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>please-don't-be-insulted-by-this-article</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111018/12115016403</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>How Does Offering Free Content Insult Those Who Pay?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090702/0326105436.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090702/0326105436.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's interesting to see the logical pretzels that certain business execs will twist themselves into to defend a poor business model against one that customers enjoy much more.  Take for example, the claim from cable firm Rainbow Media's CEO, Josh Sapan, that <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Rainbow-Media-CEO-Free-Video-Insulting-103187" target="_new">free video online somehow "insults" people who pay for cable</a>:
<blockquote><i>
"I do think it's important to be technologically progressive and responsive to what consumers want. But that's a different thing, in my mind, from creating bad habits," Sapan said in an interview. "To offer these shows for free ... It's almost insulting to the consumer who's paying money for it, because it says to that consumer, 'What are you doing?'"
</i></blockquote>
Of course you could make the identical argument for <i>any</i> obsolete product.  The telephone apparently "insulted" telegraphy purchasers.  The airplane apparently "insulted" those who traveled by boat across the ocean.  The printing press?  Man, did that ever insult those monks who wrote out bibles by hand.
<br /><br />
Honestly, it's yet another sign of the entitlement culture, where some seem to assume they're entitled to keep their business model, and it's somehow "insulting" to show their customers that there are better/cheaper/more efficient ways to get what they need.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090702/0326105436.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090702/0326105436.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090702/0326105436.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>help-me-out-here</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090702/0326105436</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:17:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Bank Changes Man's Password After They Realize It Insults Them</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080828/0938222122.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080828/0938222122.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Usually, when you're dealing with a bank, they encrypt your passwords so that no one else can read them.  However, apparently that isn't always the case -- and this allowed an employee at Lloyds TSB to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hereford/worcs/7585098.stm" target="_new">change the password of one member from "Lloyds is pants" to "no it's not"</a>.  The customer actually found the story to be amusing -- but it does seem slightly troubling that the bank, for whatever reason, was reviewing and changing a customer's password.  They also forbade him from switching the password to "Barclays is better" and "censorship."  Lloyds has apologized, and said the employee in question no longer works for the firm.  It also explains why the guy was able to see the password in the first place by noting that on certain business accounts with multiple users, account reps can read the password.  This seems pretty weak, though.  If it's a business account with multiple users, why not let each user set up their own username and encrypted password?  Also, it's still not explained why the guy was looking at users' passwords in the first place.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080828/0938222122.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080828/0938222122.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080828/0938222122.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>encrypted-passwords?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080828/0938222122</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>