Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:17:38 PST Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02251212036/oddities-apple-doesnt-use-dmca-safe-harbors-response-to-ibird-copyright-lawsuit.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02251212036/oddities-apple-doesnt-use-dmca-safe-harbors-response-to-ibird-copyright-lawsuit.shtml the guy sued both the developer of iBird and Apple. Of course, he also had only just filed for a copyright on the recordings, which would make it impossible to get any statutory damages. With the initial lawsuit, I noted that it wasn't clear that recordings of birds chirping could even qualify for copyright, but more importantly there was the question of why he was suing Apple, which would appear to be protected by the DMCA's safe harbors, since it wasn't the one who created the app.

Venkat Balasubramani has an update on the case, noting that the late timing of the copyright registration has indeed backfired on the guy, but what's odd is that Apple has not raised the DMCA's safe harbors in its own defense. This seems really strange, and Venkat is also at a loss as to why Apple would not raise such a defense. I'd be curious if anyone here has any ideas why Apple would avoid such an easy "get out of lawsuit" card?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> doesn't-make-much-sense http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101129/02251212036 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:02:25 PDT Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100624/1740509955.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100624/1740509955.shtml Eric Goldman points us to a copyright infringement lawsuit filed against Apple, because of a third party application for the iPhone called iBird (the developer of that program has also been sued). Apparently, one guy, Martyn Stewart, has gone around and recorded a bunch of different nature sounds, and the developer of iBird used them in his program. Stewart has an application in to register the copyrights, which seems pretty iffy to me: what "originality" did he actually add to the recording?

The developer of iBird seemingly admits to using Stewart's sounds. If you actually accept the idea of the copyrights on those sounds, then it seems like it should be a lawsuit solely between Stewart and the iBird developer. But including Apple because it offers iBird in the iPhone app store seems pretty ridiculous. On top of that, there's some oddity on the timing as well. Stewart admits that he's been collecting these sounds for 35 years, and that the iBird developer first approached him in 2007. But he only filed an application to copyright the sounds in December of 2009, which may cause some difficulty for him (though, it's not clear when the iBird product was actually released, which could make a difference here).

Either way, I can't see how Apple has any liability here at all, unless Stewart sent a DMCA takedown that was ignored, and there's no indication of that in his lawsuit. This feels like a typical "Steve Dallas lawsuit" in that it lumps in a big company tangentially related to the lawsuit, just because it has lots of money, and the guy suing is hoping against all the odds (and common sense and the law) that it will somehow pay up or be forced to pay up.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> tweet-tweet http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100624/1740509955