<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;homework&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:43:38 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can You Copyright Homework Titles?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0330346020.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0330346020.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this summer, we wrote about how SJSU computer science student (and Techdirt reader), Kyle Brady, had <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1027095200.shtml">won</a> a fight with one of his professors, over Kyle's decision to post the code he had written for the class online.  He had only done so after the assignments were due (so as not to reveal the answers to other students), and did so to show off his coding skills and to help him get a job.  Yet, the professor threatened him, claiming he was "cheating" and that he would get a failing grade.  After taking the issue up the administrative chain, Brady was told that he had done nothing wrong and had not violated any academic policy.
<br /><br />
At the end of the post, I noted that I was a bit surprised that a separate issue hadn't come up.  The entire discussion had been about school policy, and not about copyright.  Yet, many schools these days now try to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081119/1306572890.shtml">claim the copyright</a> on code written by students.  Perhaps I spoke too soon.
<br /><br />
Kyle alerts us that, with the new school year beginning, the same professor has <a href="http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/08/26/sjsu-reporting-digital-freedoms-with-bias/" target="_blank">added a new copyright policy to his assignments</a>.  Thankfully, it doesn't sound like he's claiming copyright over the code, but over the assignments themselves.  You can see the <a href="http://cs.sjsu.edu/~beeson/courses/cs146/GreenSheetCS146Fall2009.html" target="_blank">policy</a> for yourself, where it states:
<blockquote><i>
The homework assignments in this class are copyrighted by Dr. Beeson, including the names of the assignments, and the names of all the required classes and methods, all the examples that are posted with the assignment, and the problem descriptions and programming hints that are posted. Your solutions are your own, but if you want to post them publicly, you must change the names of the classes and methods, and you cannot post the problem descriptions. This should enable you to show your work to a prospective employer, and possibly allow me to re-use the assignments without future students being able to Google your solutions.
</i></blockquote>
Now, to give Dr. Beeson credit, he appears to be trying to come up with a reasonable compromise here, allowing Kyle to do the sorts of things he wanted to do, without making it so that he would have to come up with new assignments every semester.  So, I can respect that.  But, I'm not sure that he's got a legal right for all of that.  It's not entirely clear if the names of the assignments are enough "creative expression" to warrant a copyright.  Ditto for the names of required classes and methods.  Even if they were, I would imagine any student would have a pretty strong fair use argument in reposting them.
<br /><br />
I think it's fair for Dr. Beeson to request students not post info that makes it so easy for future students to Google the answers from former students (though, let's face it, students will always find ways to get similar info anyway), but claiming it's due to copyright seems like a stretch.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0330346020.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0330346020.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0330346020.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>that-may-be-difficult</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090827/0330346020</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:29:31 PDT</pubDate>
<title>High School Student Sues Amazon For Deleting His Summer Homework?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/1821245720.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/1821245720.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Well, you just knew that there were going to be class action lawsuits filed over Amazon's decision to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090717/1559425587.shtml">delete</a> unauthorized George Orwell ebooks that had been sold for the Kindle, but it appears that the class action lawyers have found the most headline-worthy story to get the word out.  As we mentioned in the original post on this story, at least one kid lost the notes he had been taking on one of the books.  So, we get a story about how <a href="http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolutenm/templates/?a=1524&#038;z=4" target="_new">a high school student is suing Amazon for deleting his summer homework</a>, and the lawyers are hoping to turn it into a class action.
<br /><br />
As bad as Amazon's actions were, I can't see this lawsuit getting very far.  For most Kindle users, they're going to have a hard time showing any sort of real "harm."  The kid with the lost homework might be able to show some (small) amount of harm, but I have to imagine that Amazon is mostly protected from liability in such cases.  Still, with Amazon being quick to apologize and swear it would never ever ever delete an ebook again, you have to wonder if Amazon will step up and just try to appease the kid (and get the lawyers to go away).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/1821245720.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/1821245720.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/1821245720.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>pr-nightmare</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090730/1821245720</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:26:32 PDT</pubDate>
<title>New Service Lets You Use 'The Computer Ate My Homework' As An Excuse</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090612/1511335216.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090612/1511335216.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The old standby for unfinished homework, "the dog ate my homework" has long since gone out of style.  It certainly has become popular to claim that one's computer was the problem, with people saying that files got lost or corrupted or the computer died.  However, <a href="http://twitter.com/mathewi/statuses/2122212596" target="_new">Mathew Ingram</a> points us to a new service that tries to help bad students get away with this, by <a href="http://www.globecampus.ca/in-the-news/article/the-computer-ate-my-homework/" target="_new"><i>selling students corrupted files</i></a> that they can turn in.  Yes.  They will sell you a corrupted Word document, Excel spreadsheet or PowerPoint presentation for just $3.95 (a bargain!).  The service claims that this can be useful as a diversionary tactic to "buy time" since it may be days before the teacher/professor tries to open the bogus file -- at which point you may have completed the actual assignment.  Or, you know, you can just do the work on time.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090612/1511335216.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090612/1511335216.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090612/1511335216.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>wow</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090612/1511335216</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:48:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Turnitin Found Not To Violate Student Copyrights</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/005954642.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/005954642.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last year, we noted that some students were <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070329/205059.shtml">suing iParadigms</a>, the makers of "Turnitin" the excessively popular plagiarism checker used by many colleges and high schools.  The professors feed student papers into the system, and it returns a "score" judging how likely the paper is to be plagiarized.  However, it also takes a copy of each paper and includes it in its database for future plagiarism checks.  This annoyed quite a few students who felt that this was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20021217/087222_F.shtml">copyright infringement</a> -- using their papers in a commercial database.
<br /><br />
However, <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/03/clickthrough_ag.htm" target="_new">a court has now rejected the students' arguments</a> and found that Turnitin does not violate the copyright of the students for a variety of reasons.  First there is the fact that students had to agree to the terms of the service to use it -- even if they were forced to by their schools.  However, the court finds that this is a problem for the schools, not Turnitin.  But, much more interesting is the rationale for why storing those papers is considered "fair use."  Among other things, the court found that Turnitin isn't using the papers for their creative meaning and even though it stores the entire document, it doesn't really publish a full copy of it for others to see.
<br /><br />
That becomes especially interesting given the current <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050921/025222.shtml">lawsuit</a> concerning Google's scanning of books from various university libraries, as it may be able to note the similarities in this situation to Turnitin's.  There are some differences -- and clearly, the publishers will claim that the impact on the commercial value is quite different (despite evidence to the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061006/085949.shtml">contrary</a> -- but this ruling is likely to help Google's position at least somewhat.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/005954642.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/005954642.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080325/005954642.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>might-be-a-good-thing-for-Google...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080325/005954642</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:37:48 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Teachers' Union Debating Ending Homework For Students</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ In the past few years, we've seen quite a few reports suggesting that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061009/083625.shtml">homework doesn't help kids learn</a> along with some other reports questioning <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060123/0337213.shtml">traditional learning techniques</a>.  However, it's still a bit surprising for it reach the level where a teachers' union in the UK is already considering a proposal to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/11/nschool111.xml" target="_new">ditch homework for most younger students</a> and drastically scale back how much there is for older students (found via <a href="http://digg.com/educational/Union_Calls_for_Homework_to_be_Banned">Digg</a>).  The reasoning is a bit different.  The older reports we saw pointed out that homework wasn't particularly effective at helping kids learn.  The reasoning for this new proposal is that homework makes kids "unhappy and anxious" and that leads to stressed out kids and potential disciplinary problems.  It would be interesting to see any actual research supporting one side or the other here.  I think it's great that teachers aren't just assuming that homework must be good, since that's how it's always been done, but that doesn't necessarily mean it should be done away with completely.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ah,-if-only-I-were-a-kid-again...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080312/024459514</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>