<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;hold&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:33:33 PST</pubDate>
<title>Negotiations Continue Over Extension Of Feds Ability To Spy On Americans; But No Debate On The Issues</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121213/07555621374/negotiations-continue-over-extension-feds-ability-to-spy-americans-no-debate-issues.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121213/07555621374/negotiations-continue-over-extension-feds-ability-to-spy-americans-no-debate-issues.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ With the end of the year approaching, Senator Ron Wyden has admitted that he's <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/12/fisa-act-reauthorization/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A wired%2Findex %28Wired%3A Top Stories%29" target="_blank">willing to drop the hold</a> on the renewal for the FISA Amendments Act in exchange for allowing some key amendments to be voted on.  As summarized by David Kravetz at Wired:
<blockquote><i>
Wyden said he would lift his hold in exchange for a Senate floor vote on an amendment requiring the government to account for how many times Americans&#8217; communications have been accepted, and another amendment prohibiting U.S. spy agencies from reviewing the communications of Americans ensnared in the program.
<br /><br />
If that doesn&#8217;t go over, he&#8217;d lift the hold so the Senate could vote on brief extension of the act so his amendments and others could be fully debated next year.
<br /><br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m willing to go along with a short-term extension as long as we have a chance in the early future, in 2013, to have a debate,&#8221; Wyden said.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, we've seen this <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111219/00494117120/senate-approves-intelligence-bill-extension-secret-law-allowing-spying-americans-cut-back.shtml">before</a>.  Just last year we had a "short-term extension" on these things for the sake of debate, but the "debate" never came.  Instead, everyone waits until now, when the rules are about to expire, and then demand that it be renewed, sans debate, or else "terrorism!"  The whole process is really kind of unfortunate.  There should have been a debate <i>years ago</i>, before the FISA Amendments Act was rushed into law.  But, unfortunately, actually considering the implications of these laws -- and how they're used and interpreted -- just doesn't seem to be a major issue for Congress.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121213/07555621374/negotiations-continue-over-extension-feds-ability-to-spy-americans-no-debate-issues.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121213/07555621374/negotiations-continue-over-extension-feds-ability-to-spy-americans-no-debate-issues.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121213/07555621374/negotiations-continue-over-extension-feds-ability-to-spy-americans-no-debate-issues.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>of-course-not</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121213/07555621374</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:25:24 PST</pubDate>
<title>Senator Wyden Puts Hold On Intelligence Authorization Act Over Free Speech Concerns</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121114/16415821049/senator-wyden-puts-hold-intelligence-authorization-act-over-free-speech-concerns.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121114/16415821049/senator-wyden-puts-hold-intelligence-authorization-act-over-free-speech-concerns.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Once again, Senator Ron Wyden seems like one of a very small number of people in Congress actually willing to stand up against bad bills that are pushed forward with fear mongering.  Earlier this year, we noted just how absolutely ridiculous it was that Senator Dianne Feinstein seemed a hell of a lot more concerned about punishing whoever <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120606/11024319223/sen-feinstein-more-worried-about-reaction-to-leak-about-stuxnet-rather-than-reaction-to-stuxnet-itself.shtml">blew the whistle</a> on questionable US activities like Stuxnet, then about the questionable activities themselves.  In response, she put forth some legislation that was designed to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120726/12342419845/senate-intelligence-committee-lot-more-interested-punishing-whistleblowers-than-investigating-why-theyre-blowing-whistle.shtml">punish government whistleblowers</a>, rather than understand why they were blowing the whistle.  This bill got dumped into a key appropriations bill, the <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3454/text" target="_blank">Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013</a>.  In other words, Feinstein basically said that if we are to fund intelligence activities we have to crack down on whistleblowers.  Shameful stuff.
<br /><br />
Thankfully, Senator Wyden has now <a href="http://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-places-hold-on-intelligence-authorization-bill-" target="_blank">put a hold on the bill</a>, noting his concern about how it would impact free speech issues, especially as it pertained to the media reporting on national security:
<blockquote><i>
"I think Congress should be extremely skeptical of any anti-leaks bills that threaten to encroach upon the freedom of the press, or that would reduce access to information that the public has a right to know," Wyden said in a floor statement publicly announcing his hold. "Without transparent and informed public debate on foreign policy and national security topics, American voters would be ill-equipped to elect the policymakers who make important decisions in these areas."
</i></blockquote>
Of course, part of the issue here is that Feinstein sees any form of whistleblowing or commentary as "leaks," while Wyden properly recognizes that a functioning democracy means allowing the press to report on questionable behavior by the government.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121114/16415821049/senator-wyden-puts-hold-intelligence-authorization-act-over-free-speech-concerns.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121114/16415821049/senator-wyden-puts-hold-intelligence-authorization-act-over-free-speech-concerns.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121114/16415821049/senator-wyden-puts-hold-intelligence-authorization-act-over-free-speech-concerns.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>good-for-him</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121114/16415821049</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>