<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;hockey&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Chicago Blackhawks Fire Reporter Over Silly Old YouTube Videos</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>
When we typically discuss companies coming to blows with content control (aka censorship), the stories tend to be about what would otherwise be obscure wrong-doings going viral on a national or international level. Major <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130503/07291422934/hyundai-tries-fails-to-make-its-awful-suicide-ad-disappear-internet.shtml">automakers</a> concocting horrible advertising around suicide, for instance. Or <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130429/07194422871/bus-company-threatens-redditor-with-lawsuit-meets-ken-white-runs-away.shtml">multi-state bus</a> companies learning that bathroom-ing on their customers isn't the best practice and catching the resulting backlash. But the practice of shining the light on yourself by being overly protective of your brand doesn't only happen at the macro level, it can have a local effect as well.
<br /><br />
That's the lesson the Chicago Blackhawks are learning right this very minute. If you're not in Chicago, you probably haven't heard of Susannah Collins, who reports for Comcast Sports Net on the Blackhawks. In fact, if you know who she is at all, it's probably from this line of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-E5vi5jJ-s">low-brow comedy videos</a> that she produced on YouTube. While some of those videos are likely NSFW, there is nothing more racy in them than a bit of colorful language and suggestive talk. It's about as harmless as it gets. That is, of course, unless you're the Chicago Blackhawks who, for reasons that make absolutely zero sense, decided that those videos surfacing were cause to <a href="http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/05/05/bernstein-blackhawks-now-must-fire-bobby-hull/">five-hole Collins' career and have her fired</a>.
<blockquote>
<i>In a <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-05-04/business/ct-biz-0504-comcast-collins-20130504_1_youtube-videos-phil-bedella-showtime-sports">letter</a> to the Vice President/General Manager of Comcast Sports Net Chicago, team chairman Rocky Wirtz demanded that reporter Susannah Collins be removed immediately, citing his awareness of comedy videos made years earlier that he found &ldquo;incredibly offensive to a number of audiences, going well beyond professional athletes.&rdquo;</i></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i>He only learned of them after her innocent, unfortunate slip of the tongue last week brought them back to the fore, but it didn&rsquo;t matter to Wirtz. Although they had been a fully disclosed non-issue upon her hiring, they became instant, retroactive reason for a swift dismissal.</i></blockquote>
The locals in Chicago were immediately upset over the firing. Certainly part of the reason for the animosity is the silliness of firing a reporter over sketch comedy videos she did on YouTube <i>years ago</i>. But, in true bad PR fashion, the real anger comes over the team's almost epic level of hypocrisy. You see, Wirtz cited the video's offensiveness as the reason for asking CSN (which is owned by several local Chicago teams, including the Blackhawks) to fire Collins. This, from the same team that has young women in tiny outfits shoveling up ice shavings between periods during games. This from a team that plays a sport in which fans will cheer on two grown men committing assault upon one another and then have the nerve to call it "part of the game."
<br /><br />
But the real fun comes with the magnifying glass now being placed squarely on the team's official "ambassador," Bobby Hull. The article linked above is one of several that makes the point nicely.
<blockquote>
<i>Hull&rsquo;s second wife, Joanne, whom he wed in 1960 and divorced in 1980, told an ESPN documentary in 2002 that she &ldquo;took a real beating&rdquo; at his hands. She described an incident during which Hull &ldquo;threw me in the room, and just proceeded to knock the heck out of me. He took my shoe &ndash; with a steel heel &ndash; and proceeded to hit me in the head. I was covered with blood. And I can remember him holding me over the balcony, and I thought this is the end, I&rsquo;m going.&rdquo; She filed to end the marriage in 1970 after several more incidents, but they reconciled until Hull threatened her with a loaded shotgun in 1978. Their daughter, Michelle, also described his pattern of behavior to &ldquo;Sports Century,&rdquo; and she now works as an attorney specializing in domestic violence.</i></blockquote>
Should you think this was a one-time minor indiscretion of old-fashioned domestic abuse, Hull's second wife complained of similar treatment, Hull was later convicted for trying to punch a police officer, oh, and there was that <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-08-26/news/9808270083_1_worthy-idea-nhl-players-nhl-star-bobby-hull">one time he was all warm and fuzzy</a> about freaking <i>Hitler</i>.
<br /><br />
But, hey, I guess if there aren't any YouTube videos, it never happened, amirite? That is, until your unreasonableness turns the magnifying glass back on you and now you have an entire city calling for the head of your so-called "ambassador."
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>oops</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130507/06201422976</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:47:45 PST</pubDate>
<title>The NHL Comeback And The Opportunity In Streaming</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130108/10073721607/nhl-comeback-opportunity-streaming.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130108/10073721607/nhl-comeback-opportunity-streaming.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I have long been a proponent of more <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120104/06070417275/dear-pro-sports-leagues-can-i-watch-game-please.shtml">widely available</a> sports league streaming options as a method for building revenue. While I firmly believe in the concept of blackout-less and minimal cost streaming for anyone who wants to watch a game on the computer, tablet, or phone instead of on their television, I do understand that there are some hurdles to consider. Chief amongst those hurdles is the&nbsp;<i>enormous</i> contracts many of these leagues have with broadcasting partners, particularly network TV partners, which can present a great deal of friction to streaming services that aren&#39;t their own.<br />
<br />
With all that said, if ever there was an opportunity to jump that hurdle, one embattled league would have it easier than the others, and that&#39;s the NHL. For anyone who isn&#39;t a hockey fan, the NHL lockout is essentially over and there will be a season this year. Like any league that has a work stoppage, however, one major concern is <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2013/01/07/nhl-lockout-is-over-but-will-the-fans-come-back/">whether or not fans will come back to the sport </a>after being denied the product for so long.
<blockquote>
<i>The pact is expected to last 10 years and split revenues 50-50 between owners and players, similar to the CBAs in the NFL and NBA. The players are set to return to the ice, but will NHL fans come back as well? The 2004-05 NHL lockout that wiped out an entire season did not keep fans away when hockey returned in October 2005. In fact, it was the exact opposite in many cases. Attendance increased for the majority of teams with nine teams experiencing a bump of at least 5% compared to the 2003-04 season. The Pittsburgh Penguins led the way with a 33% gain, as recent top draft picks Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin made their Pens&rsquo; debut. Attendance for the Carolina Hurricanes rose 26% thanks to the team&rsquo;s Southeast Division crown and first Stanley Cup title.</i></blockquote>
All of that is absolutely true, but there are a couple of things to keep in mind. First, other leagues that have had work stoppages haven&#39;t faired nearly as well. The best modern era example of a post-stoppage negative effect is the MLB player&#39;s strike of 1995, after which there was a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994%E2%80%9395_Major_League_Baseball_strike#Consequences">nearly 20% decline in attendance</a> and TV revenues fell sharply.<br />
<br />
Secondly, not all NHL teams felt the post-stoppage bump described above. Those that did not tended to be the teams with limited television exposure in 2005. The best example of this is the Chicago Blackhawks, which blacked out all home games before and after the strike, with home attendance numbers falling in &#39;04 from 13k fans per game to just under that number by &#39;07. However, something magical happened in 2008: owner and blackout proponent Bill Wirtz died and his son immediately lifted the blackout restrictions. Attendance immediately rose as fans had a way to embrace the team regularly and then bought tickets, climbing to a peak of over 22k fans per game in &#39;09.<br />
<br />
Finally, note that the NHL is in the&nbsp;<i>weakest&nbsp;</i>position in terms bargaining power over TV contracts, because it receives so relatively little in revenue percentage from their main contract with NBC (who does offer limited streaming of one game per week or so).
<blockquote>
<i>NHL teams derived 47% of their revenues last season from arena revenues controlled by the fan. These include gate receipts, concessions and parking. The other half of revenues hail from media contracts, luxury suites, sponsors and non-hockey events. Of the major U.S. sports, baseball is the next highest at 46%, but that figure is set to drop with the explosion of local media deals in the sport like the impending Los Angeles Dodgers deal worth more than $6 billion. The corresponding percentages in the NBA and NFL are 34% and 24% respectively. The NHL simply does not have the media rights fee millions (or billions) the other sports possess.</i>
</blockquote>
This lockout presents the&nbsp;<i>perfect opportunity&nbsp;</i>for the NHL to embrace wide streaming of their games as a method for building current and future revenue through an expanded fanbase. We know that stoppages can and have hurt attendance. We know that the more options there are for fans to watch their teams play games, without restrictions, the better attendance comes back after stoppages. Finally we know that the NHL does not get the kind of broadcast fees the other leagues do, so they have the least to lose by going the non-traditional route. 
<br /><br />
The time for the NHL to embrace internet streams is now. Not with some NHL package that blacks out all the games of someone&#39;s home team. Real streaming, real exposure, real broadening of the NHL fanbase, leading to better attendance, more options for ad revenue, and ultimately more lucrative broadcast contracts.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130108/10073721607/nhl-comeback-opportunity-streaming.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130108/10073721607/nhl-comeback-opportunity-streaming.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130108/10073721607/nhl-comeback-opportunity-streaming.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>the-league-with-the-least-to-lose</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130108/10073721607</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2011 08:45:42 PDT</pubDate>
<title>NHL Seems To Think Cheering On Your Favorite Team Is Infringement</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16591714090/nhl-seems-to-think-cheering-your-favorite-team-is-infringement.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16591714090/nhl-seems-to-think-cheering-your-favorite-team-is-infringement.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Of the "major" sports leagues, generally the NHL has been the most reasonable, compared to the MLB, NFL and NBA, on intellectual property issues.  However, it apparently still has moments of insanity.  The NHL's legal department has apparently <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/04/29/bc-canuck-honda-sign.html" target="_blank">threatened a car dealership</a> for having posted decals on its window saying "Go Canucks Go," in cheering on the Canucks in the NHL playoffs.
<blockquote><i>
"Consumers are likely to be misled that the Vancouver Canucks have an official relationship with your dealership," NHL legal counsel Kelley Lynch wrote in the letter.
</i></blockquote>
Plainly speaking, that's ridiculous.  How long until fans will have to pay a team just to cheer them on?  The dealership's manager points out the particular irony in this, since the team's slogan is apparently "We're all Canucks."  Except when the lawyers get involved.
<br><br>
Ah, but that's not all.  A radio station in Vancouver has <a href="http://www.cknw.com/Channels/Reg/NewsLocal/Story.aspx?ID=1410288&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">also received a cease and desist letter</a> from the NHL, claiming that a contest it was airing violated the NHL's intellectual property.  The problem?  The radio station was letting fans of the Canucks take a sledge hammer to a van that was painted with logos of the opposing teams that the Canucks were facing, and of course they're saying that the use of the logos is infringing.  That is, once again, ridiculous.  No one is going to think that's an "officially sponsored" contest by the NHL.  It's just some fans cheering on their team.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16591714090/nhl-seems-to-think-cheering-your-favorite-team-is-infringement.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16591714090/nhl-seems-to-think-cheering-your-favorite-team-is-infringement.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110429/16591714090/nhl-seems-to-think-cheering-your-favorite-team-is-infringement.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>insanity</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110429/16591714090</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:31:26 PST</pubDate>
<title>Guy Fined For Posting Links To Official Broadcast Of Hockey Games</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/05244111816/guy-fined-for-posting-links-to-official-broadcast-of-hockey-games.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/05244111816/guy-fined-for-posting-links-to-official-broadcast-of-hockey-games.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Over in Sweden, it appears that a guy <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/man-fined-for-publishing-links-to-legal-sports-broadcast-101111/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A Torrentfreak %28Torrentfreak%29" target="_blank">has been fined for linking to an online broadcast of a hockey game</a>.  We've heard stories of people getting in trouble merely for linking to unauthorized content, but this story is even more ridiculous.  The guy wasn't linking to <i>unauthorized</i> content.  He was linking to an online video feed from the official broadcaster, Canal Plus.  The issue was that Canal Plus was apparently technically incompetent in how they set up the feeds, and never intended to make the feeds public.  But the way they set up the offering, it was easy for anyone to quickly figure out what the full public feed was and this guy then linked to it.  In other words, he was fined not for any actual infringement.  And he was not fined for linking to infringing content, but for pointing to a publicly available stream that was only public due to Canal Plus' poor engineering choices.   And rather than admit that it was its own poor technical skills that were the problem, Canal Plus blamed the guy:
<blockquote><i>
In the summons against the man, Canal Plus called his actions &ldquo;an assault on the entire operations of pay TV services on the Internet&rdquo; and that by publishing links to the streams broadcast openly from the Canal Plus website he had illegally made them available to the public.
</i></blockquote>
And the court agreed.  That's the really scary part.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/05244111816/guy-fined-for-posting-links-to-official-broadcast-of-hockey-games.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/05244111816/guy-fined-for-posting-links-to-official-broadcast-of-hockey-games.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/05244111816/guy-fined-for-posting-links-to-official-broadcast-of-hockey-games.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>say-what-now?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101111/05244111816</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 04:00:06 PDT</pubDate>
<title>NHL Team Offers 'Bid On Your Own Price' Season Tickets</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100811/17092010595.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100811/17092010595.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The whole "name your own price" thing has been getting a lot of attention lately.  Lots of people, of course, mention <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070930/214524.shtml">Radiohead's</a> use of it, but others have been using it as well, including <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091021/0130456617.shtml">video game companies</a>, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090804/0146015764.shtml">taxi drivers</a> and even <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/entrepreneurs/articles/20100518/1505489473.shtml">Panera Bread</a>.  There's even been some research about <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/entrepreneurs/articles/20100716/17423610253.shtml">the best way</a> to set up such a "pay what you want" offering.
<br /><br />
Apparently, one NHL franchise is willing to test some of this out as well.  The Florida Panthers are letting fans <a href="http://www.wired.com/playbook/2010/08/florida-panthers-perfect-plan/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A wired%2Findex %28Wired%3A Index 3 %28Top Stories 2%29%29" target="_blank"><i>bid</i> on their own price</a> for season tickets.  It's not name your own price, but more of a bidding system.  You pick the seats you want, and then propose what you think those seats should cost on a per-game basis.  Within 24-hours someone from the team will get back to you and let you know whether you got the seats.
<br /><br />
If anything, the setup sounds a bit more like Priceline's system for flights and hotels -- which actually makes me wonder if Priceline might get a bit upset.  If I remember correctly, Priceline used to brag about its patents on such auction-like name-your-own-price setups, and threaten to sue anyone who did anything similar.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100811/17092010595.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100811/17092010595.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100811/17092010595.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>modified-name-your-own-price</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100811/17092010595</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:49:19 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The Los Angeles Kings Hires A Reporter To Cover... Themselves</title>
<dc:creator>Dennis Yang</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090928/1057236337.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090928/1057236337.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As we've discussed here <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090629/2334105408.shtml">before</a>, the biggest beneficiaries of sports reporting are probably the teams themselves.   The more news &#038; analysis that is published about a team, the more relevant they remain in the public eye -- no stories, and the teams risk falling into oblivion.  So, it's interesting to see that the hockey team, Los Angeles Kings, 
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28kings.html?_r=1&#038;partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all">has recently hired its own full time reporter to cover the team</a>.  Rich Hammond once covered the Kings for the Los Angeles Daily News, and has been given complete autonomy to post commentary and stories on the Kings' web site, <a href="http://kings.nhl.com/">kings.nhl.com</a>.  Sure, some are wary of how "impartial" this news will be if the reporter is on the Kings' payroll; but really, that contention really plays a bit moot nowadays.  In an era where the audience is no longer beholden to a few media outlets, the supposed guise of impartiality is less important, replaced by the more useful quality of transparency and accountability.  If Hammond reports with genuine, well thought-out coverage, then his audience will reward him with their trust and readership, regardless of where his paycheck comes from.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090928/1057236337.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090928/1057236337.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090928/1057236337.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>changing-models-of-journalism</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090928/1057236337</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>