<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;health&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 May 2013 00:22:35 PDT</pubDate>
<title>European Court Puts Release Of Drug Safety Data On Hold</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130501/03592622904/european-court-puts-release-drug-safety-data-hold.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130501/03592622904/european-court-puts-release-drug-safety-data-hold.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>
Last month Techdirt wrote about the case of the giant pharma company AbbVie seeking to <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/04370222337/giant-pharma-company-claims-releasing-data-drug-safety-is-illegal-as-its-confidential-commercially-sensitive.shtml">prevent</a> the European Medicines Agency from releasing basic health safety data that AbbVie claims contains commercially sensitive information.  Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2013/04/news_detail_001779.jsp">an interim injunction has just been granted to that effect</a>:

<i><blockquote>The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has been ordered by the General Court of the European Union not to provide documents as part of two access-to-documents requests until a final ruling is given by the Court. These interim rulings were made as part of court cases brought by two pharmaceutical companies, AbbVie and InterMune. The companies are challenging the Agency's decisions to grant access to non-clinical and clinical information (including clinical study reports) submitted by companies as part of marketing-authorisation applications in accordance with its 2010 access-to-documents policy.</blockquote></i>

As the EMA notes, it's not as if the release of this data is unprecedented:

<i><blockquote>Since November 2010, the Agency has released over 1.9 million pages in response to such requests. This is the first time that the policy has been legally challenged.</blockquote></i>

That obviously raises the question of why AbbVie and InterMune have problems with drug safety data being released when other companies don't.  Fortunately, there is very broad support for the EMA's attempt to make this important information available for other researchers to check and analyze:

<i><blockquote>Since the two pharmaceutical companies filed these legal actions, the EMA has received more than 30 statements of support from various stakeholders, including the European Ombudsman, national competent authorities, members of the Agency's Management Board, Members of the European Parliament, academic institutions, non-governmental organisations, citizens' initiatives and scientific journals, some of whom have also applied to formally intervene in defence of the EMA at the Court.</blockquote></i>

There's a crucially important principle here, that public safety must outweigh any claims of commercial confidentiality.  Let's hope that the  General Court of the European Union recognizes that in its final judgment, which will have a major impact on health and safety not just in Europe but, as a knock-on effect, around the world too.
</p>
<p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a>
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130501/03592622904/european-court-puts-release-drug-safety-data-hold.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130501/03592622904/european-court-puts-release-drug-safety-data-hold.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130501/03592622904/european-court-puts-release-drug-safety-data-hold.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>regrettable</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130501/03592622904</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: The Progress Of Treating HIV</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1405019806/dailydirt-progress-treating-hiv.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1405019806/dailydirt-progress-treating-hiv.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The US Center for Disease Control reported on its first case of AIDS (though it wasn't called AIDS at the time) in 1981. Some HIV-positive patients have since gained access to anti-viral drugs that hold off the fatal complications for many more years than it was previously thought possible. There are over 34 million people in the world who are HIV-positive, and there are some optimistic reports that the treatments are becoming more effective. Here are just a few fascinating stories on the development of HIV treatments.


<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.technologyreview.com/view/512131/a-toddler-may-have-been-cured-of-hiv-infection/" href="http://bit.ly/YMkGY3">A baby born in Mississippi with HIV has been "functionally cured" after receiving an aggressive regimen of anti-retroviral drugs.. a discovery that occurred when the treatment was inadvertently stopped after 18 months.</a> There have been some scattered reports of other babies who have been cleared of HIV, but this is the first case that will be rigorously studied with highly sensitive genetic tests. [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/view/512131/a-toddler-may-have-been-cured-of-hiv-infection/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120723-generation-hiv" href="http://bit.ly/YztsLW">A generation of HIV-positive youngsters are beginning to live into adulthood, but the long-term effects of HIV (and the medicines to treat it) are completely unexplored territory.</a> Studying these kids for many decades could determine optimal medical regimes and shape how society handles patients who need indefinite treatment. [<a href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120723-generation-hiv">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/07/18/156988650/hiv-cure-is-closer-as-patients-full-recovery-inspires-new-research" href="http://n.pr/10c8QgM">The "Berlin Patient" (aka Timothy Ray Brown) is the first known person to defeat HIV.</a> After a bone marrow transplant to treat (unrelated) leukemia, Brown recovered, and doctors found that his HIV levels were at undetectable amounts.. and remained so without anti-viral drugs. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/07/18/156988650/hiv-cure-is-closer-as-patients-full-recovery-inspires-new-research">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/10/4/l_104_05.html" href="http://to.pbs.org/YZaTA3">Some people have a genetic mutation that prevents HIV from infecting their white blood cells, making them immune to the virus.</a> The specific mutation was identified in 1996, but the discovery hasn't (yet) lead to a universal vaccine. [<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/10/4/l_104_05.html">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a> via StumbleUpon.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1405019806/dailydirt-progress-treating-hiv.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1405019806/dailydirt-progress-treating-hiv.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1405019806/dailydirt-progress-treating-hiv.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100614/1405019806</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:33:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Canadian Schools Ban WiFi Based On Bad Science</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130205/03222421885/canadian-schools-ban-wifi-based-bad-science.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130205/03222421885/canadian-schools-ban-wifi-based-bad-science.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A decade ago, we first wrote about some freaked out, clueless parents <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20031006/130509.shtml">suing</a> a school district for wanting to install a WiFi network.  The parents believed -- based on absolutely no evidence whatsoever -- that WiFi networks emitted "harmful" electro-magnetic radiation.  Since then, we've heard of many such stories of people fearing the health impacts of WiFi, despite a near total lack of evidence of any harm at all.  Studies have found that an entire year sitting next to a WiFi access point gives you the equivalent radiation of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061212/080748.shtml">20 minutes</a> on a mobile phone.  And yet, every few years, we hear about <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061121/213052.shtml">parents</a> or <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20110519/00442614333/european-politicians-look-to-ban-wifi-school-children.shtml">politicians</a> freaking out about the issue and trying to get WiFi banned in schools.
<br /><br />
Amazingly, they've succeeded in some places, including 12 elementary and middle schools up in Canada, which are now being called out by a group called "Bad Science Watch" for <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Report-Canada-Schools-Banning-WiFi-Based-on-Bogus-Science-123005" target="_blank">making decisions based on absolutely and totally bogus science</a>.  You can read <a href="http://www.badsciencewatch.ca/projects/investigation-of-anti-wifi-activism-in-canada/" target="_blank">the full report here</a>, in which they call out "anti-WiFi activists" who are "spreading misinformation."  It seems they ought to call out schools as well.  You would think that places of learning would investigate the actual science.
<blockquote><i>
These claims are not substantiated by the scientific literature and have little acceptance from medical professionals and the scientific community. This activism therefore amounts to nothing more than fear-mongering by misguided special interest groups who are attempting to have these networks removed.
<br /><br />
Nevertheless, the media has been all too willing to fan the flames of controversy and has contributed to a growing false uncertainty over the safety of WiFi. As a result many school boards, libraries, and town councils across Canada have been called on by concerned citizens to limit or remove WiFi networks.
</i></blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130205/03222421885/canadian-schools-ban-wifi-based-bad-science.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130205/03222421885/canadian-schools-ban-wifi-based-bad-science.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130205/03222421885/canadian-schools-ban-wifi-based-bad-science.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>and-what-are-they-teaching-our-kids</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130205/03222421885</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: The Flu Season Is Here...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101116/11074311893/dailydirt-flu-season-is-here.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101116/11074311893/dailydirt-flu-season-is-here.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ This year's flu season seems to be unusually miserable and widespread. One of the flu strains getting passed around this year hasn't been seen for a few years, so people's immune system resistance to it may be weak. If you haven't caught the bug yet, here are just a few links that could help you avoid it -- or just tell you more about what the flu actually is. 

<ul>

<li> <a title="https://www.khanacademy.org/science/healthcare-and-medicine/influenza/v/what-is-the-flu" href="http://bit.ly/Wbdrtq">The Khan academy has a lesson on what the flu is, making sure everyone knows the difference between the flu and a cold.</a> It'd be cool to see online classes for all kinds of medical information -- and maybe even medical degree badges....? [<a href="https://www.khanacademy.org/science/healthcare-and-medicine/influenza/v/what-is-the-flu">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/10/flu-nation-sick-elderly-flu-deaths-workplace/1823425/" href="http://usat.ly/11CCkUF">The 2013 flu vaccine wards against three strains: H3N2, H1N1 and Influenza B.</a> However, the vaccine this year has been labeled only "moderately effective" by the CDC. [<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/10/flu-nation-sick-elderly-flu-deaths-workplace/1823425/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324235104578241632319689490.html?mod=health_newsreel" href="http://on.wsj.com/102B5ZT">Flu season comes around during the winter generally and not spring, summer or fall. But why?</a> It could be the humidity; the flu virus survives well in warm, low-humidity air -- just like the conditions in most homes in the winter. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324235104578241632319689490.html?mod=health_newsreel">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101116/11074311893/dailydirt-flu-season-is-here.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101116/11074311893/dailydirt-flu-season-is-here.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101116/11074311893/dailydirt-flu-season-is-here.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101116/11074311893</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Push Button, Rub Hands, Wipe Hands On Jeans...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23421311868/dailydirt-push-button-rub-hands-wipe-hands-jeans.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23421311868/dailydirt-push-button-rub-hands-wipe-hands-jeans.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Just the idea of touching anything in a public bathroom grosses some people out. Germaphobes may have some reasonable things to fear (eg. MRSA and other superbugs), but for the most part, people are pretty safe from the germs in public restrooms (and maybe computer <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Germs/story?id=4774746&#038;page=1">keyboards</a> are just as dirty as toilets). Handwashing is generally the best defense, but here are a few links for the ultra-paranoid.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324705104578151751460513268.html?mod=WSJ_article_MoreIn_Health%26Wellness" href="http://on.wsj.com/WoFy6h">The Mayo Clinic reviewed several hand washing studies and concluded that paper towels are better than air-blowing hand driers.</a> Plus, you can use that paper towel to open the door on your way out.... [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324705104578151751460513268.html?mod=WSJ_article_MoreIn_Health%26Wellness">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.icbe.org/2011/02/15/toepener-vs-stepnpull-battle/" href="http://bit.ly/13dTSol">If you're really worried about germs on bathroom doorknobs, there's an <s>app for that</s> way to open doors with your feet.</a> If fact, there are TWO products on the market: the Toepener and the StepNpull. [<a href="http://www.icbe.org/2011/02/15/toepener-vs-stepnpull-battle/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXWJA8Ka2lI" href="http://bit.ly/13buYqr">Wristpull is yet another ingenious device that allows you to open a bathroom door without touching a doorknob with your hands.</a> Watch this video of how it works -- and then begin to worry about the germs on your sleeve/wrist.... [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXWJA8Ka2lI">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23421311868/dailydirt-push-button-rub-hands-wipe-hands-jeans.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23421311868/dailydirt-push-button-rub-hands-wipe-hands-jeans.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23421311868/dailydirt-push-button-rub-hands-wipe-hands-jeans.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101114/23421311868</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:49:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Cat Power Gets Sick, Atlantic Wire Declares Indie Music Dead</title>
<dc:creator>Leigh Beadon</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/10415420934/cat-power-gets-sick-atlantic-wire-declares-indie-music-dead.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/10415420934/cat-power-gets-sick-atlantic-wire-declares-indie-music-dead.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A story from Atlantic Wire has been making the rounds recently, with a headline forcefully declaring that <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/10/theres-no-money-indie-music-cat-power-broke/58552/" target="_blank">There's No Money in Indie Music</a>. Why? Because one particular indie sensation is broke:</p>
<blockquote><em>You know times are tough for indie musicians when even Chan Marshall&#8212;who released a Top 10 Billboard album and played sold-out concerts this year&#8212;is bankrupt. The singer known as Cat Power has announced a likely cancellation of her upcoming European tour because of financial and health problems.</em></blockquote>
<p>Now, there are a lot of things I could say about this. I could point out that the financial troubles of <em>one musician</em>, no matter how popular she is, are not a barometer for the entire industry. I could point out that "bankruptcy" says nothing about revenue or earning potential, and is almost always caused by bad money management&mdash;or that plenty of highly successful people have gone bankrupt one or more times throughout their careers. But those points would just lend credence to an idea that is fanciful speculation at best, and total bunk at worst. Why? Because the source of this sad news about Cat Power's bankruptcy is nothing more than a <a href="http://instagram.com/p/Rbc7c3m3b1/" target="_blank">single message</a> posted to Instagram (which appears to have been since removed from the photo it was attached to, but Pitchfork has <a href="http://pitchfork.com/news/48414-cat-power-may-cancel-european-tour/" target="_blank">the full text</a>):</p>
<blockquote><em>I MAY HAVE TO CANCEL MY EUROPEAN TOUR DUE TO BANKRUPTCY &#038; MY HEALTH STRUGGLE WITH ANGIOEDEMA. I HAVE NOT THROWN IN ANY TOWEL, I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT BEST I CAN DO. HEART BROKEN. WORKED SO HARD. GOT SICK DAY AFTER "SUN" CAME OUT &#038; BEEN STRUGGLING TO KEEP ALL POINTS OF ME IN EQUILIBRIUM : MIND, SPIRIT, BODY HEALTHY CENTERED &#038; GROUNDED. I AM DOING THE BEST I CAN. I FUCKING LOVE THIS PLANET. I REFUSE TO GIVE UP. THOUGH I MAY NEED TO RESTRATAGIZE FOR MY SECURITY &#038; HEALTH.</em></blockquote>
<p>Marshall is obviously struggling with her health problems, and her fans reacted by offering lots of support&mdash;but what does this message really tell us about her finances? She used the word "bankruptcy" once, off-hand, and it doesn't even look like she meant it literally. Even if she did, it takes a <em>huge</em> leap to get from there to "there's no money in indie music"&mdash;statistically about as sensible as concluding that indie music causes angioedema. But, it's almost certain now that she <em>didn't</em> mean literal bankruptcy, just unforeseen expenses. A more recent <a href="http://instagram.com/p/Rf1aT0m3Vl/" target="_blank">Instagram post</a> announced:</p>
<blockquote><em>EUROPEAN TOUR IS ON. WITHOUT STAGE PRESENTATION. HARD MONEY WASTED.</em></blockquote>
<p>Then, a few days later, another post announced that the European tour would be <a href="http://instagram.com/p/Rf1aT0m3Vl/" target="_blank">postponed until early next year</a>&mdash;primarily for health reasons, and to get some more time to potentially find a way to bring the full production to Europe.</p>
<p>The stage presentation in question is a huge gorilla-themed light show that, one imagines, would be quite expensive to ship overseas. Whether the "money wasted" refers to the sunk costs on the display that now may be staying behind, or to her new medical expenses, is not clear, and neither her nor her label offered <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/02/cat-power-announces-possible-tour-cancellation-bankruptcy.html" target="_blank">any additional information</a>.  But what is clear is that this is a pretty unsensational story that says nothing about the indie music world as a whole: international tours are big, complicated operations, and sometimes money runs low and plans have to change; our bodily health is a ticking time-bomb that can derail anyone's career in any walk of life. It's sad to see the naysayers brigade exploiting her personal struggle to spread doom and gloom about the modern music industry and the huge variety of opportunities that exist for the independent artist.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/10415420934/cat-power-gets-sick-atlantic-wire-declares-indie-music-dead.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/10415420934/cat-power-gets-sick-atlantic-wire-declares-indie-music-dead.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/10415420934/cat-power-gets-sick-atlantic-wire-declares-indie-music-dead.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>misdiagnosis</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121105/10415420934</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Uses For Wine (Besides Drinking It)</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100922/04310911114/dailydirt-uses-wine-besides-drinking-it.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100922/04310911114/dailydirt-uses-wine-besides-drinking-it.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Drinking wine on special occasions is a popular tradition all over the world, but it seems like more people would like some other excuses for drinking wine, too. Red wine had gotten a lot of publicity for various health benefits, but if you want to drink some wine, maybe you should be asking yourself why you need so many different reasons. Here are just a few interesting links about wine to go with your favorite beverage.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://discovermagazine.com/2012/jul-aug/06-algorithm-finds-connections-scientists-never-see" href="http://bit.ly/OoAyBw">There's a persistent statistic that wine drinkers tend to live longer than teetotalers or people who drink other forms of alcohol.</a> But according to a recent study, those wine drinkers also correlate highly with people who possess healthier habits in general. So wine could merely be the drink of the healthier -- and not some magic elixir for longer life. [<a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2012/jul-aug/06-algorithm-finds-connections-scientists-never-see">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://shine.yahoo.com/fashion/dress-made-wine-181300537.html" href="http://yhoo.it/Q0F6Kh">Some Australian researchers have developed a process to turn wine into clothing -- and it also works with other forms of alcohol.</a> Bacteria are used to ferment the alcohol into a formable fabric, and the garments retain characteristic odors of their original beverage. So if you really like the smell of beer, there's a perfect shirt for you.... [<a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/fashion/dress-made-wine-181300537.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&#038;_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&#038;node_id=222&#038;content_id=CNBP_030524&#038;use_sec=true&#038;sec_url_var=region1&#038;__uuid=8ae32438-1930-4579-96a9-d7e14224e56e" href="http://bit.ly/U6QHZs">There's a possible "miracle molecule" in red wine called resveratrol -- and it seems to give older mice some improved mobility.</a> Consuming more red wine might seem like the easy answer for older <i>people</i> to gain mobility improvements, but the study also suggested that a 150lb human would have to drink 700 4-ounce glasses of red wine a day to see an effect. Good luck with that! [<a href="http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&#038;_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&#038;node_id=222&#038;content_id=CNBP_030524&#038;use_sec=true&#038;sec_url_var=region1&#038;__uuid=8ae32438-1930-4579-96a9-d7e14224e56e">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100922/04310911114/dailydirt-uses-wine-besides-drinking-it.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100922/04310911114/dailydirt-uses-wine-besides-drinking-it.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100922/04310911114/dailydirt-uses-wine-besides-drinking-it.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100922/04310911114</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Kids Don't Just Eat Anything You Give Them...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/04270610103/dailydirt-kids-dont-just-eat-anything-you-give-them.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/04270610103/dailydirt-kids-dont-just-eat-anything-you-give-them.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Kids are notoriously picky eaters when it comes to anything that isn't a dessert. Parents aren't helped when their kids are bombarded by ads on TV for all kinds of junk food. But here are a few food efforts that might divert kids' attentions back to healthier foods.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-news/press-releases/2012/06/walt-disney-company-sets-new-standards-food-advertising-kids" href="http://bit.ly/LyCkaT">Disney is adopting new standards for food advertising on its shows targeting kids and families -- to promote fruit and vegetable consumption and meet healthy nutritional guidelines.</a> Awesome, now all healthy food will be approved by Mickey! [<a href="http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-news/press-releases/2012/06/walt-disney-company-sets-new-standards-food-advertising-kids">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/May12/BatmanFood.html" href="http://bit.ly/MjLVas">Mickey Mouse isn't the only fictional character who can influence what kids eat. Superheroes can, too.</a> What would Batman eat? [<a href="http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/May12/BatmanFood.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/05/29/153931434/food-trucks-draw-hungry-kids-for-free-summer-meals? " href="http://n.pr/LyCNtQ">Food trucks are trendy now, so what better way to bring free meals to kids?</a> Sounds better than an ice cream truck... [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/05/29/153931434/food-trucks-draw-hungry-kids-for-free-summer-meals? ">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577422761220716518.html?mod=WSJ_LifeStyle_Lifestyle_6" href="http://on.wsj.com/NkJINv">Exercise your palate and try new foods that are bitter.</a> Instead of sticking with salty and sweet (which are generally associated with junk food), a more bitter-flavored diet might provide a healthier range of food. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304840904577422761220716518.html?mod=WSJ_LifeStyle_Lifestyle_6">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more food-related links, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102" href="http://bit.ly/iaJVJd">check out what's floating around in StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/04270610103/dailydirt-kids-dont-just-eat-anything-you-give-them.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/04270610103/dailydirt-kids-dont-just-eat-anything-you-give-them.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/04270610103/dailydirt-kids-dont-just-eat-anything-you-give-them.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100707/04270610103</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:59:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Data Mining Exec Pays For Burgers In Cash To Keep His Insurance Company From Knowing His Bad Diet Habits</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The Economist recently had an interesting article on how insurance companies are <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21556263" target="_blank">increasingly using data mining</a> to "analyze risk."  That is, they look through the data which was originally collected for the purpose of better marketing, and use it as a tool to see if you lead an unhealthy life.  However, the really interesting point is <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/06/15/data-mining-ceo-says-he-pays-for-burgers-in-cash-to-avoid-junk-food-purchases-being-tracked/" target="_blank">highlighted by Kashmir Hill</a>, where an exec at a datamining company admits that he's changed his habits because of this.  Not his eating habits, mind you.  But <i>how</i> he purchases food:
<blockquote><i>
Insurers' interest in data mining will only grow, says Kevin Pledge, the boss of Insight Decision Solutions, an underwriting-technology consultancy based near Toronto.... Insurance firms will also analyse grocery purchases for clues about policyholders, he predicts. But that raises some sticky questions about privacy. <b>Mr Pledge himself has begun to forgo his supermarket loyalty-card discount on junk food and pay for his burgers in cash</b>. Promising as data mining is, much will depend on how regulators, and consumers, react.
</i></blockquote>
He also notes that he's working on a system that will go through your social media profiles to see if you provide any info insurers may want to know about.  This, of course, is the natural extension of our data explosion.  But, in my experience, all of these companies who collect data seem to do an incredibly bad job at getting it right.  And... as long as there's that "cash hole" for data, it's hard to see how accurate such information would really be.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120619/04094319383/data-mining-exec-pays-burgers-cash-to-keep-his-insurance-company-knowing-his-bad-diet-habits.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>privacy?-what's-that?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120619/04094319383</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Piece Of Cake</title>
<dc:creator>Joyce Hung</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For people who are trying to watch their waistline, cake is generally off-limits. Sure, there are ways to make cake "healthier" -- for example, by using less sugar and substituting oil and butter with things like pureed fruit and vegetables or yogurt -- but that cake just won't be as satisfying as a rich and decadent piece of cake made the traditional way. Here's some good news and a few examples of decadence taken to the next level. 

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-breakfast-chocolate-cake.html" href="http://bit.ly/JqHsAc">According to researchers from Tel Aviv University, you can lose weight by topping off a 600-calorie balanced breakfast with a piece of cake.</a> Apparently, the key is to have sweets in the morning when the body's metabolism is at its peak, then work off the extra calories during the rest of the day. Over 32 weeks, people who followed this diet actually lost 40 pounds more (and kept the weight off longer) than those who avoided eating sweets altogether. [<a href="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-breakfast-chocolate-cake.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/11/22/a-cherry-pie-an-apple-pie-and-a-pumpkin-pie-each-cooked-inside-a-separate-cake-and-then-all-cooked-together-inside-another-cake/" href="http://bit.ly/Jrnsds">A pastry chef in Wisconsin made a dessert version of a turducken and called it a "cherpumple."</a> The cherpumple consisted of a cherry pie, an apple pie, and a pumpkin pie -- each baked within a cake. Then the cakes were stacked together and covered with frosting to form a giant 21-pound monster of a cake. [<a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/11/22/a-cherry-pie-an-apple-pie-and-a-pumpkin-pie-each-cooked-inside-a-separate-cake-and-then-all-cooked-together-inside-another-cake/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://adage.com/article/creativity-pick-of-the-day/u-k-brand-mr-kipling-dispenses-cakes-a-poster/233312/" href="http://bit.ly/KW9nFO">Mr. Kipling, a British baked-goods brand, is promoting its snap-pack "on-the-go" cake products with cake-dispensing posters.</a> Specially converted poster sites will dispense free cake to the public, and some posters will also be sprayed with a special scent to emit the smell of cake. [<a href="http://adage.com/article/creativity-pick-of-the-day/u-k-brand-mr-kipling-dispenses-cakes-a-poster/233312/">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more food-related links, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102" href="http://bit.ly/iaJVJd">check out what's floating around in StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120502/19393018749</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:48:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Putting Lives Before Patents: India Says Pricey Patented Cancer Drug Can Be Copied</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120312/02424818071/putting-lives-before-patents-india-says-pricey-patented-cancer-drug-can-be-copied.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120312/02424818071/putting-lives-before-patents-india-says-pricey-patented-cancer-drug-can-be-copied.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ India has an interesting relationship with pharmaceutical patents.  In 1970, India <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090530/1620345062.shtml">did away</a> with drug patents entirely, believing it would <i>help</i> create a domestic drug industry.  And it worked.  As we discussed in the past:
<blockquote><i>
2,237 licensed drug manufacturers in 1969-1970 grew to 16,000 by 1991-1993, production of drugs grew at an average rate of 14.4% per year from 1980 to 1993, India became a net exporter of pharmaceutical products, and the market share of foreign multinational corporations (MNCs) dropped from 80-90% to 40% (Fink 2005). In 1995, six of the top ten pharmaceutical firms in India were domestic, and employment in the sector had reached half a million people
</i></blockquote>
Now, remember how people say that without intellectual property, industries protected by those monopolies collapse?  Yeah, the opposite happened in India.  And yes, many were producing generic versions, but not all of them were.  Either way, despite all of this success, the international community, pressured by the big pharmaceutical firms, cracked down on such practices, and demanded that if anyone wanted to join the WTO -- an important organization for large countries to be a part of -- they had to recognize pharmaceutical patents as per the TRIPS agreement. India finally did so in 2005.
<br /><br />
However, one key point in TRIPS that developing countries such as India and Brazil have paid close attention to is the fact that they can <i>force</i> a compulsory license on a drug patent holder in the interest of public health. 
<br /><br />
For the first time since re-instating patents on pharmaceuticals, India <a href="http://keionline.org/node/1384" target="_blank">has granted just such a compulsory license</a>, covering a kidney and liver cancer drug marketed under the name Nexavar.  Indian generic drug company Natco requested a license, noting that Nexavar was in short supply in India and exceptionally expensive.  A typical dosage costs around $70,000 <i>per year</i> in India -- something Bayer says is necessary to recoup the drug's R&#038;D costs.  However, reports show that it cost less than $300 million to develop this drug (not to mention that the US government subsidized the process) and Bayer has already made billions selling the drug around the world.  In a <a href="http://keionline.org/sites/default/files/sorafenib_nexavar_compulsory_License_12032012.pdf" target="_blank">detailed ruling</a> (pdf and embedded below), India's Controller of Patents (nice title) granted Natco the right to make the same drug, requiring it to sell it at a significantly lower price than Bayer sells Nexavar for, and then pay back to Bayer a 6% royalty rate (which is actually at the high end of what the UN recommends).  Natco has to make the drug itself and can't name it Nexavar, make it look the same or even state that it's the same as Nexavar -- but it can make its own version of the drug and sell it, and the license lasts the life of the patent.  Bayer can and almost certainly will appeal, but this is going to be interesting to watch for a few reasons.
<br /><br />
The real question here is how the US will react to this.  The Obama administration has been trying to exempt <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110916/02325715976/obama-administration-trying-to-move-away-allowing-countries-to-ignore-patents-to-save-lives.shtml">drugs that treat non-communicable diseases</a> (such as cancer medication!) from such compulsory license rights.  In the meantime, the big (non-Indian) drug companies have been working hard to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100407/1902268925.shtml">lock up</a> the Indian drug market with patents. Not surprisingly, the Obama administration and the big drug companies have a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100306/1804328453.shtml">cozy relationship</a> when it comes to dealing with patents in India.
<br /><br />
It's likely that you'll start to hear some rumblings from the US government about how this kind of ruling is a "problem" and how India isn't "respecting" international patent law. Expect to see diplomatic pressure placed on India to put limits on its compulsory licensing program, and potentially even noises about how India has to change its patent laws to "update" them and "harmonize" them with the world.  Also don't be surprised if stuff like this leads India to jump up the charts on next year's Special 301 reports from the USTR, which list "naughty" countries.  It's probably too late to make it into this year's list for this particular move.  Is it really any wonder that India is <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100601/0354539639.shtml">so worried about ACTA</a>?  It knows that ACTA is entirely about ratcheting up enforcement, without any exceptions for things like this where something as important as saving lives comes into play.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120312/02424818071/putting-lives-before-patents-india-says-pricey-patented-cancer-drug-can-be-copied.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120312/02424818071/putting-lives-before-patents-india-says-pricey-patented-cancer-drug-can-be-copied.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120312/02424818071/putting-lives-before-patents-india-says-pricey-patented-cancer-drug-can-be-copied.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>hello-compulsory-licenses</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120312/02424818071</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2011 07:41:44 PST</pubDate>
<title>Tobacco Companies Think Their Trademarks Are More Important Than Your Health</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11560516864/tobacco-companies-think-their-trademarks-are-more-important-than-your-health.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11560516864/tobacco-companies-think-their-trademarks-are-more-important-than-your-health.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in January of this year, Techdirt reported on tobacco companies <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110106/03022612548/tobacco-companies-using-trademark-claims-to-try-to-avoid-putting-warning-labels-cigarrettes-cigars.shtml">suing</a> a local Australian importer of their products for covering up part of their logos with a mandatory health warning.  At the time, a spokeswoman for the company involved, British American Tobacco, <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/tobacco-giant-fuming-over-packets/story-fn6bfkm6-1225980626294">said</a>:
<blockquote><i>
As the matter is currently before the Court, BAT is unable to comment other than to say that this is a further demonstration that we will take all necessary steps to protect our valuable intellectual property.
</i></blockquote>
Given that stance, it will come as no surprise to learn that <a href="http://www.euractiv.com/health/tobacco-lobby-threatens-eu-plain-packaging-news-508891">tobacco companies are now threatening to take on the European Commission</a> as well:
<blockquote><i>
EU Health Commissioner John Dalli will face legal action if he tries to reproduce Australia's plain-packaging proposals for cigarettes in Europe, a tobacco industry representative warned this week.
</i></blockquote>
The approach is the same as in Australia:
<blockquote><i>
One likely focus of attack is intellectual property rights, since plain packaging has a smothering effect on companies' logos and trademarks.
</i></blockquote>
I'd like to think that the word "smothering" was taken verbatim from some tobacco company representative, because it sums up nicely the industry's attitude: that any breathing difficulties or respiratory diseases that you may develop as the result of smoking pale into insignificance compared with the outrageous "smothering" of their logos and trademarks.
<br /><br />
That's a particularly callous attitude, because those logos and trademarks are only valuable to the degree they have been attached to products that have caused death and disease: the "best" brands are those with a track record of selling &ndash; and hence killing &ndash; more people than rival products.  In effect, the tobacco companies are complaining that all their hard work getting people addicted and smoking themselves to death will be wasted if the plain-packaging proposals for cigarettes are implemented.
<br /><br />
The cynical posturing of tobacco firms as the victims in these continuing attempts to undo and avoid the social harm they cause underlines once more how easily intellectual monopolies can be twisted for purposes far from any original justification they may once have had.  <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/18030712173/nih-wont-let-others-supply-life-saving-drug-even-though-genzyme-cant-make-enough.shtml">Patents can kill</a>: so, it seems will trademarks, if tobacco companies get their way.
<br /><br />
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11560516864/tobacco-companies-think-their-trademarks-are-more-important-than-your-health.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11560516864/tobacco-companies-think-their-trademarks-are-more-important-than-your-health.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/11560516864/tobacco-companies-think-their-trademarks-are-more-important-than-your-health.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>who-needs-lungs-anyway?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111121/11560516864</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:41:12 PST</pubDate>
<title>SOPA Will Have Grave Effects On The Health Of Hundreds Of Thousands Of Americans</title>
<dc:creator>Lee Graczyk</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111115/15345616781/sopa-will-have-grave-effects-health-hundreds-thousands-americans.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111115/15345616781/sopa-will-have-grave-effects-health-hundreds-thousands-americans.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <i>This is a guest post from Lee Graczyk, lead organizer of <a href="http://www.rxrights.org/" target="_blank">RxRights</a>, a national coalition of individuals and organizations concerned about the high cost of U.S. pharmaceuticals.</i>
<br /><br />
The House Judiciary Committee today is holding a hearing to examine the <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3261ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr3261ih.pdf" target="_blank">Stop Online Piracy Act</a> (SOPA), a bill that proposes to address online copyright and trademark infringement by denying services to registrants, owners or operators of Internet sites. There has been much discussion on the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/00553216676/why-protect-ipsopa-is-exact-wrong-approach-to-dealing-with-infringement-online.shtml">technological implications</a> of this bill, but Congress and the media have overlooked SOPA's major health implications--it would take away Americans' access to safe, affordable prescription medications from licensed, legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies.
<br /><br />
No one would disagree that websites illegally distributing "knock-off" goods, which include rogue online pharmacies, are a public menace. However, SOPA's definition of an Internet site that endangers public health (even worse than in its Senate counterpart, the <a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s968rs/pdf/BILLS-112s968rs.pdf" target="_blank">PROTECT IP Act</a>) is so vague and broad that safe, legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies could be shut-down "in the dark of night."
<br /><br />
This is because SOPA inappropriately groups together real pharmacies--licensed, legitimate pharmacies that require a doctor's prescription and sell brand-name medications--and the rogues, who sell everything from diluted or counterfeit medicine to narcotics without a prescription.
<br /><br />
This oversight is extremely dangerous for Americans (I am one of them) who rely on legitimate Canadian and other international pharmacies to import safe, affordable prescription medications they need to survive. For example, 90,000 people in Florida alone would lose access to safe, affordable prescription medications because of SOPA.
<br /><br />
Each year, hundreds of thousands of Americans import safe, affordable prescription drugs because they cannot afford the same brand-name medications that are sold in the U.S., which cost at least twice as much. Others refuse to pay the exorbitant costs of prescription medications when there is a more economical way that is just as safe. 
<br /><br />
The bottom line is that pharmacies accredited through organizations such as the <a href="http://www.cipa.com/" target="_blank">Canadian International Pharmacy Association</a>, <a href="http://www.pharmacy-accreditation-services.org/" target="_blank">Pharmacy Accreditation Services</a> and <a href="http://www.pharmacychecker.com/" target="_blank">Pharmacy Checker</a> are the "real deal." They sell brand-name prescription medications made by top manufacturers.
<br /><br /> 
A recent study by the <a href="http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Surveys/2011/Mar/2010-Biennial-Health-Insurance-Survey.aspx" target="_blank">Commonwealth Fund</a> highlights the <a href="http://www.rxrights.org/resources/the-real-story-about-legitimate-online-pharmacies" target="_blank">need for drug importation</a>. According to the survey on health insurance coverage, a staggering 48 million Americans ages 19-64 did not fill a prescription due to cost in 2010, which represents a 66 percent increase since 2001.
<br /><br />
Americans, especially those without insurance and seniors living on fixed incomes, should not have to make choices like whether to fill their prescriptions or buy groceries for the week. Everyone, including those in the tech community with whom we agree on the overall negative impact of SOPA, should bear in mind the severe health implications of this bill, which would affect the well-being of patients across the U.S.
<br /><br />
If Americans don't take action to protect their right to safe and affordable medications, they could lose their access to safe, legitimate pharmacies and, therefore, vital medications they need to stay alive.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111115/15345616781/sopa-will-have-grave-effects-health-hundreds-thousands-americans.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111115/15345616781/sopa-will-have-grave-effects-health-hundreds-thousands-americans.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111115/15345616781/sopa-will-have-grave-effects-health-hundreds-thousands-americans.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>conflating-legal-and-rogue-foreign-pharamacies</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111115/15345616781</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:51:57 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Report Commissioned By EU Parliament Members Shows ACTA Will Increase Health Risks Worldwide</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/16364615689/report-commissioned-eu-parliament-members-shows-acta-will-increase-health-risks-worldwide.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/16364615689/report-commissioned-eu-parliament-members-shows-acta-will-increase-health-risks-worldwide.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The members of the Green Party in the EU Parliament commissioned a report to look at the public health impact of ACTA.  A <a href="http://rfc.act-on-acta.eu/rfc.fcgi/text/iahdl3EwEy3/view/" target="_blank">draft of that report has been released and it warns of potentially severe negative impacts on public health</a>.  At issue: it will force member countries, including developing nations (which even WIPO has admitted are better off with more lax patent rules in order to deal with public health issues) to ratchet up enforcement of patents.  Thus it is likely to "negatively impact public health worldwide."  The report also points out that part of the problem is the secretive nature in which ACTA was negotiated, in which those who would have warned them of these public health problems were excluded from the negotiations.  Furthermore, the report notes that the process ignored nine specific demands from the EU Parliament for transparency.  The whole thing is a condemnation of ACTA, and should raise serious questions about why any country would sign on.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/16364615689/report-commissioned-eu-parliament-members-shows-acta-will-increase-health-risks-worldwide.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/16364615689/report-commissioned-eu-parliament-members-shows-acta-will-increase-health-risks-worldwide.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110825/16364615689/report-commissioned-eu-parliament-members-shows-acta-will-increase-health-risks-worldwide.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>signing-on-to-kill-people</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110825/16364615689</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:23:54 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Public Health Official Forced To Shut Up On Twitter, Blog For Daring To Speak Honestly</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/02594015608/public-health-official-forced-to-shut-up-twitter-blog-daring-to-speak-honestly.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/02594015608/public-health-official-forced-to-shut-up-twitter-blog-daring-to-speak-honestly.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've been discussing lately the importance of allowing for <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110805/14103715409/whats-name-importance-pseudonymity-dangers-requiring-real-names.shtml">pseudonymity</a>, rather than requiring real names, and <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/Todd_McDermid/statuses/105415823870541824" target="_blank">Todd McDermid</a> points us to another reason why pseudonyms can be useful online.  Apparently a guy named Rene Najera has been blogging and tweeting about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology" target="_blank">epidemiology</a> while at the same time being employed by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.  Apparently, he was quite good at it, and many folks found his posts and tweets to be useful and informative.
<br /><br />
However, he recently got into a Twitter discussion in which he defended vaccinations.  I recognize this is a touchy subject to some, but only to those who don't pay attention to what the science actually says (or those who ignore that the main report anti-vaccination folks use was later found to be <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110106/01591712546/report-claims-discredited-study-that-linked-vaccines-to-autism-wasnt-just-mistake-outright-fraud.shtml">fraudulent</a>).  Given the serious health problems created by parents now refusing to vaccinate their children due to clueless anti-scientific fear-mongering, you would think that a government Department of Health would be <i>thrilled</i> that one of its employees was defending vaccinations and talking back to someone who was arguing against vaccines.
<br /><br />
Instead, however, it appears that after the guy he was arguing with sent a barrage of emails to higher ups at the agency, <a href="http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2011/08/a-public-servant-blogging-and-twitter-under-his-own-name-is-silenced-by-his-employers.html" target="_blank">Najera was told to stop "all social networking activity related to public health."</a>
<center>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/AaVpf.jpg" />
<br />
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/qS6QF.jpg" />
</center>
Now, it seems there are two issues here.  One, as the article points out, this shows yet another situation where the ability to blog/tweet/etc. pseudonymously might help.  If Najera was doing that, the person he was debating with wouldn't have been able to bombard his employer.  That said, neither platfrom that Najera seemed to mainly use (Twitter and Blogger) does require real names, so he could have gotten away with being pseudonymous on those platforms (and perhaps will come back some other time doing so).
<br /><br />
I think the bigger issue is that a Department of <i>Health</i> would reprimand him for such actions and tell him to stop speaking about public health issues.  Does the Department of Health really prefer that the actual experts stay out of these discussions, leaving them to those who aren't informed?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/02594015608/public-health-official-forced-to-shut-up-twitter-blog-daring-to-speak-honestly.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/02594015608/public-health-official-forced-to-shut-up-twitter-blog-daring-to-speak-honestly.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/02594015608/public-health-official-forced-to-shut-up-twitter-blog-daring-to-speak-honestly.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>real-names?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110822/02594015608</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2011 06:44:07 PST</pubDate>
<title>'War' On Fake Drugs Really An Excuse To Boost Big Pharma; Putting The Poor At Risk</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110207/01453712987/war-fake-drugs-really-excuse-to-boost-big-pharma-putting-poor-risk.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110207/01453712987/war-fake-drugs-really-excuse-to-boost-big-pharma-putting-poor-risk.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've pointed out similar things before, but Oxfam has come out with a new report, claiming that the claims from developed nations about the need to fight "fake drugs," is quite frequently really <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/sarah-boseley-global-health/2011/feb/02/pharmaceuticals-industry-drugs" target="_blank">just an excuse to protect big pharma firms</a> from generic competition.  No one is denying that actual <i>fake</i> drugs can potentially be harmful.  But, the problem is that the various efforts, including ACTA, to deal with the issue often lump together actual dangerous fake pharmaceuticals with drugs that are simply cheaper but perfectly safe.  Oxfam would like to see a <i>legitimate</i> strategy for getting the real fake drugs out of the market, but says the current strategies are all about boosting patent protections, increasing prices for the poor and developing nations and better protecting big pharma against upstart competitors.
<blockquote><i>
    The European Union and the United States continue to focus almost exclusively on eliminating counterfeit medicines which form only a small part of this public health problem -- but which are a serious concern for their multinational companies. They have used the crisis in medicine quality in developing countries as an excuse to push for new intellectual property rules that will boost the profits of pharmaceutical giants at the expense of affordable medicines for the poor.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, this becomes important when you realize that ACTA was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110203/16214712957/leaked-state-department-cables-confirm-that-acta-was-designed-to-pressure-developing-nations.shtml">specifically designed</a> to pressure developing nations into adopting these types of new, more stringent patent and copyright laws.  Oxfam is hoping that those countries <a href="http://uk.oneworld.net/article/view/166732/1/5795" target="_blank">won't be bullied</a>:
<blockquote><i>
At a time when poor countries struggle to ensure that their populations can get affordable, quality medicines it is outrageous that rich countries and drug companies are pushing 'solutions' that will do more harm than good to patients and public health. It is critical that poor countries ignore rich-country pressure, and focus instead on solutions that will ensure both quality and affordability of medicines.
</i></blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110207/01453712987/war-fake-drugs-really-excuse-to-boost-big-pharma-putting-poor-risk.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110207/01453712987/war-fake-drugs-really-excuse-to-boost-big-pharma-putting-poor-risk.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110207/01453712987/war-fake-drugs-really-excuse-to-boost-big-pharma-putting-poor-risk.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>realities-of-patents</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110207/01453712987</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:18:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Doctors Against Patients Having Direct Access To Test Results</title>
<dc:creator>Greg Fenton</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100423/1316339157.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100423/1316339157.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The title of this article is a tad melodramatic, claiming "<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/028630_medical_imaging_test_results.html" target="_blank">Big Brother doctors say patients don't need to see their imaging test results,</a>" but the conclusion from a study of a small sample set of radiologists and referring physicians is that these medical professionals are against empowering their patients with their own information. </p><p>This isn't too surprising knowing that the entire healthcare system is wrought with <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20090624%2F0317105346">ill-conceived ideas</a> against efficient and ready access to patient health records. </p><blockquote><p><em>Physicians with a &quot;Big Brother&quot; mindset apparently think people  having imaging tests are incapable of dealing with the outcomes without  suffering from so much anxiety they must be protected from seeing the  results.</em></p></blockquote><p>It's not clear exactly that this attitude is akin to an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_%28Nineteen_Eighty-Four%29">Orwellian</a> state, rather than simply an elitist mindset.&nbsp; Many &quot;experts&quot; feel that people outside of their field have no business reviewing their work (look at the commenters on Techdirt who claim others should not comment on music/patents/laws/newspapers if they aren't a musician/inventor/lawyer/journalist).</p><p>The attitude of these physicians is just one reason of a whole host as to why the healthcare system is one of the last industries holding out against the IT revolution.&nbsp; The argument that patients will freak out being exposed to the core information that leads to diagnoses is ridiculous.&nbsp; If someone is going to be overly anxious, it isn't because they have information; they'll be anxious because they have symptoms and a diagnosis, but little-to-no information.&nbsp; They'll be anxious because the medical industry is unwilling to have a two-way conversation with the patient themselves. </p><p>There are many <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080415/013346850.shtml">examples of this elitism</a> when it comes to sourcing and analysis of information. Why is it that experts fail to recognize that more points of view have a greater opportunity for catching errors and bringing different perspectives to the forefront?&nbsp; In addition, bringing the patients into the conversation gets them involved in their own health stories, leading to many long term benefits and ultimately lower healthcare costs.&nbsp; But maybe this is another one of the reasons the healthcare industry is unwilling to change? </p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100423/1316339157.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100423/1316339157.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100423/1316339157.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>too-much-information-access-makes-the-gatekeepers-angry</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100423/1316339157</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:47:57 PDT</pubDate>
<title>More Bands Look To Give Reasons To Buy</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090814/1651065887.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090814/1651065887.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I have to admit, it's been really fun to watch various bands experiment with neat new ways to give people real reasons to buy -- each one different than the last, but each one equally as creative.  What's really cool, too, is how many different musicians (both well-known and not so well-known) have been reaching out to us lately, to share their own experiences, and to talk about how this site and the various talks I've given have inspired them to experiment further.  It's really humbling to see so much creativity in action.  Here are two more examples.
<br /><br />
The first is that the band the Flaming Lips are <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13526_3-10309659-27.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_new">offering both free studio downloads with any concert tickets</a>, but also a promise that they'll send you a link after the show you attend to download that recording as well.  The band is clearly recognizing that it's the concert ticket that matters, and the actual music just makes that ticket more valuable (infinite goods increasing the value of scarce goods... where have we heard that before...).
<br /><br />
Then there's the band Health, who has a new album coming out, and in order to convince people that <a href="http://pitchfork.com/news/36231-health-give-away-totally-insane-stuff/">it's worth buying the actual album</a>, they've put special prize tickets in 66 of the albums.  The tickets grants the buyers certain unique prizes, including the grand prize of a weekend in LA to hang out with the band (including round-trip flight, and hanging out with the band at an amusement park and the zoo).  Other prizes will get you (among other things):
<blockquote><i>
personal gifts, t-shirts, locks of a band member's hair, fur from a band member's cat, and posters or records signed by the band in their own blood.
</i></blockquote>
After that, there are a bunch of other oddities:
<ul>
<li>We will get steadily inebriated with you over i-chat while working on a project together
</li><li>A historical themed phone call from the band
</li><li>A recording of BJ (band member) covering a 90's song of your choice
</li><li>A recording of a short story read by a band member
</li><li>We'll personalize your voicemail greeting
</li><li>A bouquet of flowers from the band
</li><li>An astrological consultation with Jupiter's mother
</li><li>A copy of John Famiglietti's student film
</li><li>An uplifting phone call from Health's manager
</li><li>A personality test hand completed by a band member
</li><li>A bag of Jupiter's cat hair, plus a photo of her
</li><li>BJ's old little league jacket
</li><li>A childhood toy
</li><li>Knitted scarf made by Jake's Mother
</li><li>Band member fingerprints
</li><li>Mixed tape/cd hand decorated by the band
</li><li>Health's high school band's cd mixtape
</li><li>A painting by John's mother
</li><li>Learn a magic trick from our manager via video chat
</li><li>We conference crank call a prominent indie musician together
</li></ul>
In many ways, this is like Josh Freese's <a href="http://ww.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1552334345.shtml">unique</a> offering, but rather than getting people to buy the big prizes, you just buy the album with a chance to win those packages.  Yet again, another band having fun, connecting with fans and giving them a reason to buy.  Hmm... I wonder if these ideas can inspire more options for our own little <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/rtb.php">CwF + RtB experiment</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090814/1651065887.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090814/1651065887.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090814/1651065887.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>fun-to-see</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090814/1651065887</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:11:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Online Gamers More Physically Fit Than Average?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/1205502308.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/1205502308.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's been a good week for video gamers and a bad week for stereotypes of video gamers, apparently.  Earlier we wrote about a study talking about how video gamers were actually <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080916/1934422288.shtml">quite social</a>, and now a new study suggests that online gamers are <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mg19926746.400-online-gamers-are-fit--physically-if-not-mentally.html?feedId=health_rss20" target="_new">more physically fit than your average American</a> (perhaps not saying much).  No one seems to think that there's a causal relationship here, as it may just be that video gamers tend to be wealthier and more educated -- who also tend to be in better shape.  There's also the issue that this appears to be based on self-reported stats, which may not be that accurate.  Still, it appears that studies are starting to chip away at the stereotype of the overweight, social loner video gamer.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/1205502308.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/1205502308.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/1205502308.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>wonders-never-cease</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080918/1205502308</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:45:43 PDT</pubDate>
<title>ER Doctors Warn About Walking While Texting; When Will We Start Seeing Laws?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080730/1816441840.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080730/1816441840.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Anyone want to take a guess on when we'll see the first laws proposed to ban the practice of walking-while-texting?  We've already seen a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070207/064102.shtml">few</a> proposals that would ban walking and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080403/144230741.shtml">talking</a> in a crosswalk.  And, to add some fuel to the fire, some ER doctors are <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/wireless/phones/2008-07-30-oblivious-texters-danger_N.htm?csp=34" target="_new">warning people who walk and text at the same time that it's risky behavior</a>.  The doctors say they're seeing a rise in reports of people walking and texting at the same time, leading to some sort of injury, including two people who were hit by a car after paying more attention to their phone than oncoming traffic.  Since <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0218421649.shtml">technopanics</a> always seem to start with a news article, just wait for someone to propose a law against this -- rather than insisting that perhaps it's time to institute a little common sense. <b>Update</b>: Apparently, I'm too late.  At least one state has <a href="http://abajournal.com/news/proposed_illinois_bill_would_ban_street_crossers_from_text_messaging/">already</a> proposed just such a law.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080730/1816441840.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080730/1816441840.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080730/1816441840.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>they're-coming</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080730/1816441840</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>