<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;haptics&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Tools For The Blind</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100908/16203510945/dailydirt-tools-blind.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100908/16203510945/dailydirt-tools-blind.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Visually impaired folks have access to more technology than ever before. Despite various <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120613/01511919297/apple-steps-into-patent-fight-to-unnecessarily-silence-little-girl.shtml">setbacks</a> that prevent some ingenious innovations, plenty of developers are still working on hardware and software tools to help out people with disabilities. Here are just a few examples of some interesting projects for the blind.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/05/12/crowdsourcing-iphone-app-lets-sighted-people-lend-their-eyes-to-the-blind/" href="http://bit.ly/Rv4j22">An iPhone app called VizWiz helps blind users by letting them take a picture of something that is confusing -- and then crowdsourcing a helpful description to make things clear.</a> This app uses Amazon's Mechanical Turk service to obtain helpful people, and the average turnaround time for a description is 27 seconds. [<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/05/12/crowdsourcing-iphone-app-lets-sighted-people-lend-their-eyes-to-the-blind/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://diagramcenter.org/development/poet.html" href="http://bit.ly/Nr0syR">The Poet image description tool is open source software that helps to crowdsource image descriptions for digital books.</a> This tool is aimed at textbook illustrations that aren't too helpful for people who can't see them. [<a href="http://diagramcenter.org/development/poet.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://grathio.com/2011/08/meet-the-tacit-project-its-sonar-for-the-blind/" href="http://bit.ly/qUG9uy">The Tacit project is developing a hand-held sonar device with haptic feedback -- a technological take on the white cane.</a> It's still just a prototype device, but so far, users seem to be able to use it fairly quickly without much training. [<a href="http://grathio.com/2011/08/meet-the-tacit-project-its-sonar-for-the-blind/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/haptic-shoes-could-help-blind-navigate-cane-free-223947138.html" href="http://yhoo.it/Od3ADz">Haptic shoes could help people navigate by vibrating different parts of the shoe to tell the wearer if there are obstacles ahead.</a> These shoes, like the Tacit project's handheld, are based on open Arduino hardware -- allowing other developers to contribute improvements and build upon existing tools. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/haptic-shoes-could-help-blind-navigate-cane-free-223947138.html">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100908/16203510945/dailydirt-tools-blind.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100908/16203510945/dailydirt-tools-blind.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100908/16203510945/dailydirt-tools-blind.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100908/16203510945</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:07:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Immersion Settles Lawsuit Over Teledildonics Patent Royalties</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080825/0856022082.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080825/0856022082.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The Associated Press has a short blurb about how haptics company and aggressive patent holder Immersion has <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/08/25/ap5353965.html" target="_new">settled its lawsuit with Internet Services LLC</a>.  Oddly, the AP report leaves out the details of the case -- which were pretty interesting -- preferring to make it sound like a generic patent lawsuit.  The case, which we <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml">wrote about</a> a few months back, involved questions over whether or not Immersion owed Internet Services money from Immersion's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050328/010239.shtml">patent settlement</a> with Sony.
<br /><br />
You see, Immersion licenses "haptics" technology, which may be better known as "force feedback" technology -- the stuff that makes your video game controller vibrate when you drive your virtual car off the track in that racing game, for example.  Immersion realized that such force feedback technology would also have a market in the porn world -- but apparently didn't want to sully its own name by associating with that world.  So, instead, it licensed the right to enforce its patents in the "cybersex" and "teledildonics" to Internet Services.  Then Immersion still gets the money but doesn't have to be seen as shaking down porn purveyors.  The problem, though, was that Internet Services believed that the Sony PlayStation could be used for "cybersex" purposes as well as for straight gaming -- and thus, it felt cut out of Immersion's settlement with Sony.
<br /><br />
And, from there, the fight was on -- and it got even more interesting earlier this year when the famed patent lawyer that Internet Services had hired to represent it against Immersion tried to quit -- and Internet Services went to court to <i>require</i> him to stay on the case.  There's no word on the details of the settlement, but it's rather surprising that the AP would take this case and leave out most of the more interesting details.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080825/0856022082.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080825/0856022082.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080825/0856022082.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>left-out-the-interesting-part</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080825/0856022082</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Microsoft Demanding Some Of Immersion's Patent Booty From Sony</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080527/1619231238.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080527/1619231238.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few weeks back, we wrote about how Immersion was involved in a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml">bizarre lawsuit</a> involving a firm focused on the "teledildonics" market (look it up -- or, actually, you're probably better off not).  Immersion, of course, is well known in the tech world for holding a bunch of patents on "haptic" technology, which many people are more familiar with as "force feedback" in devices like video game controllers.  Immersion is not afraid to use its patents and has been involved in numerous lawsuits -- with the big one yielding $130 million from Sony for the force feedback controllers used in the PlayStation.  The case mentioned a few weeks ago involved a shell firm that Immersion had done a deal with.  Since Immersion didn't want to smear its own name by suing companies involved in force feedback sex devices, it basically licensed the legal rights out to this shell company.  However, that shell company felt that Immersion owed it some of the $130 million Sony booty.
<br /><br />
While the case with the shell company has now been dismissed, Joe Mullin notes an even more interesting case: <a href="http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2008/05/guess-who-else-wants-some-of-immersions-patent-victory-cash-microsoft.html" target="_new">Microsoft is also demanding a large cut of the Sony settlement money</a>.  Here's where things get tricky.  Basically, Immersion had sued Microsoft as well for violating the patents.  But, as we've seen <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080108/022724.shtml">other companies do</a>, part of the settlement terms between Immersion and Microsoft are that Microsoft would join the patent battle against Sony and get a cut of any settlement money that came out of that lawsuit.  In effect, rather than just paying up to license the patent, Microsoft switched sides in the lawsuit.
<br /><br />
However, Immersion used some sneaky tricks to skirt around its agreement with Microsoft -- most specifically never referring to its deal with Sony as a "settlement."  Thus, it claimed that it doesn't owe a dime to Microsoft (some thanks Microsoft got for paying up, huh?).  So now Microsoft has sued, though muddling the whole case is the fact that in filing the lawsuit, Microsoft released some confidential info, which caused Immersion to sue Microsoft as well.  And just think, folks, all this money being spent on lawyers could actually have gone into <i>making better game controllers</i>.  But who wants to do that when there are more lawyers to pay?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080527/1619231238.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080527/1619231238.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080527/1619231238.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ah,-patent-law</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080527/1619231238</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 01:11:11 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Who Says Patent Lawsuits Aren't Sexy?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Joe Mullin has the details of a rather bizarre patent dispute <a href="http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2008/05/keker-van-nest.html" target="_new">involving a patent covering the user interface of force feedback technology used in "cybersex" or "teledildonics."</a>  You may have heard of the company Immersion, which, for years, has claimed to hold pretty much all patents on "haptic" technology, which most people are familiar with in the form of "force feedback" game controllers for console games.  Some feel that Immersion's patents are overly broad, but that's beside the point on this one.  Apparently, at some point, Immersion realized that there was going to be (or already was) a decent sized market in using such haptic technology for virtual sex.  Yet, at the same time, the company felt uncomfortable about filing infringement lawsuits on such uses, recognizing that it could lead to negative publicity.  So, instead, it licensed out the patents and the right to sue for infringement to a company called Internet Services, LLC (ISLLC), which (from the description in Mullin's article) sounds like a shell company just for this purpose.
<br /><br />
However, when Immersion <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050328/010239.shtml">won</a> its patent infringement lawsuit against Sony for its use of force feedback controllers on Sony gaming consoles, ISLLC apparently felt that Immersion owed it some of the proceeds.  It hired famed patent attorney (and patent system expert) Mark Lemley to represent it.  However, for somewhat unclear reasons, Lemley now appears to want nothing whatsoever to do with ISLLC and has asked to withdraw from the case.  ISLLC has now hired other lawyers <i>just</i> to force Lemley to still represent it in its lawsuit against Immersion.  It's like a patent battle soap opera -- complete with sex toys.   See, just because stories are about patents, doesn't mean that they're not sexy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080504/0006061024.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>cybersex-it-is</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080504/0006061024</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>