<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;handwriting&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Handwriting Analysis For Secretaries Of The US Treasury</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Everyone is supposed to have a unique signature for signing all kinds of important documents. Your signature represents how you would like to be viewed by the world, according to some signature-analysis theories. For most people, a signature isn't worth much and doesn't get much attention, but celebrities and public officials get a bit more scrutiny. Here are some signature examples that have been immortalized (or will soon be) on US currency.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/jack-lews-terrible-signature-may-grace-bills.html" href="http://nym.ag/VMVH7u">Jack Lew's distinctive signature has been described as a stretched-out Slinky -- which would look <s>awesome</s> <s>unbecoming</s></a> <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/save-lewpty-lew/XLGNBBJs?">AWESOME</a> on a dollar bill. A ton of FOIA requests are probably being filed now to see all the documents that have Lew's signature on them.... [<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/jack-lews-terrible-signature-may-grace-bills.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.uspapermoney.info/sign/" href="http://bit.ly/TNqLpb">Here's a list of 47 signatures that have graced US currency since 1928.</a> Anna Escobedo Cabral wins for the most legibly stylish. [<a href="http://www.uspapermoney.info/sign/">url</a>]</li>
 
<li> <a title="http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/geithner-interviews/timothy-geithners-signature-not-fit-print" href="http://bit.ly/Xo1MZ5">Timothy Geithner also had a unintelligible signature, but he changed it to make it more readable for the US Treasury.</a> From now on, I'm sure some people will refer to Geithner as the former Treasury Secretary known as <a href="http://www.marketplace.org/sites/marketplace.org/files/179px-Timothy_Geithner_signature.svg_.png">[insert sig here]</a>. [<a href="http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/geithner-interviews/timothy-geithners-signature-not-fit-print">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101111/18050711822</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 09:14:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Why Do Doctors Still Write Prescriptions (Illegibly) When They Can Type Them?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080505/1204011034.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080505/1204011034.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Reuters is running an article talking about how folks in India are <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSPAR54727320080505?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews" target="_new">urging doctors to stop writing prescriptions so illegibly</a>, as it all too often leads to filling the wrong prescription (even to the point of putting someone's life at risk).  However, this is hardly just an Indian issue, as the same thing happens in the US as well.  In an age where more and more doctors' offices are computerized, it simply doesn't make any sense not to offer computerized prescriptions that accurately display the drug in question (including, perhaps, questions or warnings about possible conflicts or side effects).  The fact that it may save a few seconds for a doctor to scribble hardly seems like a reasonable excuse when people's lives are on the line and it's part of the doctor's job to do whatever possible to keep them healthy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080505/1204011034.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080505/1204011034.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080505/1204011034.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>seems-simple-enough</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080505/1204011034</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>