<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;hall & oates&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:34:39 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Hall &#038; Oates Convince Super PAC Named After Them To Shut Down</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120828/08091820180/hall-oates-convince-super-pac-named-after-them-to-shut-down.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120828/08091820180/hall-oates-convince-super-pac-named-after-them-to-shut-down.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's been plenty of talk this election season about the rise of PACs and SuperPACs -- and the ease of creating them.  Of course, that can lead to some bizarre situations.  Take, for example the <a href="http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00527499" target="_blank">creation of the Hall and Oates Fans for America</a> SuperPAC, which was recently approved by the Federal Election Commission (found via <a href="https://twitter.com/onthemedia/statuses/240461627739209728" target="_blank">On the Media</a>).  The <a href="http://politicker.com/2012/08/how-hall-oates-got-their-very-own-super-pac/" target="_blank">thinking behind it might not surprise you very much</a>:
<blockquote><i>
&#8220;It was really just kind of a joke a couple of us came up with drunk one night. I wish I could say there was more to it, but that&#8217;s about it,&#8221; said [William] Hansmann.
</i></blockquote> 
Hansmann stated that the goal of the SuperPAC was "to create parody videos on YouTube."  Seems like as good a use of a SuperPAC as any.  As for why they chose famed rock duo Hall &#038; Oates?  Well, that was easy:
<blockquote><i>
&#8220;When we hit on Hall &#038; Oates, we were just like, who doesn&#8217;t love Hall &#038; Oates?&#8221; Mr. Hansmann explained.
</i></blockquote>
That may be true... but while everyone may love Hall &#038; Oates... it turns out that Hall &#038; Oates don't really love being associated with a SuperPAC.  They had their people "get in touch" with Hansmann and convince him <a href="http://politicker.com/2012/08/hall-oates-got-rid-of-the-super-pac-that-was-named-for-them/" target="_blank">to shut down the SuperPAC</a>, which had raised all of $0.  According to Hall &#038; Oates' manager, the duo was wary of any political connection whatsoever, even one involving parody videos:
<blockquote><i>
"Daryl Hall and John Oates recognize that the personal view points of their fans cross all political spectrums and are honored to be supported by their fans everywhere regardless of political affiliation... The PAC's founders recognize that the use of the &#8216;Hall&#8217; and &#8216;Oates&#8217; names for the purpose of raising funds is not an appropriate fan activity no matter what the goal of the fund raising activities might be.&#8221;
</i></blockquote>
Thankfully, it appears that the dynamic duo and their manager resolved this in a friendly manner, rather than the all-too-typical reaction of some to immediately rush to legal nastygramming.
<blockquote><i>
"Daryl Hall and John Oates are pleased that the amicable dialog with the founders of the Super Pac have brought an expedient resolution to this matter and achieved a result both sides are pleased with."
</i></blockquote>
Of course, what's unclear is if the SuperPAC has just been shut down, or is being renamed.  Any suggestions on what else it might be called?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120828/08091820180/hall-oates-convince-super-pac-named-after-them-to-shut-down.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120828/08091820180/hall-oates-convince-super-pac-named-after-them-to-shut-down.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120828/08091820180/hall-oates-convince-super-pac-named-after-them-to-shut-down.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-now-where-will-the-hall-&#038;-oates-fans-put-their-money?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120828/08091820180</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:43:26 PST</pubDate>
<title>Michael Jackson, Pirate Remixer</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111214/01555317077/michael-jackson-pirate-remixer.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111214/01555317077/michael-jackson-pirate-remixer.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We always hear stories about how copyright has to be protected to "protect the artists," and yet time and time again we learn that some of the biggest name artists will often copy directly from each other without credit or payment.  It's the way music is made.  In James Boyle's excellent book, <a href="http://www.thepublicdomain.org/download/" target="_blank"><i>The Public Domain</i></a>, there's a really <a href="http://yupnet.org/boyle/archives/130" target="_blank">fantastic chapter</a> giving plenty of examples of this in practice.  However, <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/rhh" target="_blank">Rob Hyndman</a> recently pointed us to another such example, found via Wikipedia, but backed up via its sources of course.  The discussion?  It's about where Michael Jackson's famous song <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billie_Jean#Composition" target="_blank"><i>Billie Jean</i></a> came from.  Turns out, Jackson himself admitted to copying the bass line directly from a Hall and Oates song:
<blockquote><i>
According to Daryl Hall, when Jackson was recording &ldquo;We Are the World,&rdquo; Jackson approached him and admitted to lifting the bass line for "Billie Jean" from a Hall and Oates song (apparently referring to Hall&rsquo;s "I Can't Go For That (No Can Do)" from the 1981 album Private Eyes): "Michael Jackson once said directly to me that he hoped I didn't mind that he copped that groove."
</i></blockquote>
Of course, the really amusing part?  Hall responded to Jackson... by telling him he had done the same thing himself to get that bassline in the first place!  "It's something we all do," Hall later explained.
<br /><br />
Indeed.  And yet, under today's laws, it's still considered infringement, and we still hear people looking down on "remixing" or people who create works in this manner, by building on the works of others.  And yet, this is one of the most successful pop songs of all time.  And the bass was a big part of that.  Elsewhere in the Wikipedia article, there's a discussion of how the producer of the song, Quincy Jones, hated the song, and specifically the bass line.  Yet Jackson insisted that the bass line was the key to the song, and the two of them fought over it until Jackson won.  And the bassline was completely copied.
<br /><br />
It's stories like this that make us wonder how people can say with a straight face that copying something can't help to create something new.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111214/01555317077/michael-jackson-pirate-remixer.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111214/01555317077/michael-jackson-pirate-remixer.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111214/01555317077/michael-jackson-pirate-remixer.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-of-course</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111214/01555317077</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>