<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;graffiti&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Toronto Mayor Wants Residents To Report Graffiti Via iPhone, And Pay For The Privilege</title>
<dc:creator>Leigh Beadon</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120419/06372518562/toronto-mayor-wants-residents-to-report-graffiti-via-iphone-pay-privilege.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120419/06372518562/toronto-mayor-wants-residents-to-report-graffiti-via-iphone-pay-privilege.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>As our Canadian readers surely know, Toronto has a weird relationship with its current mayor, Rob Ford. I won't get into all the details, but basically he's a bit of a clown, elected by outlying semi-suburban neighbourhoods and roundly hated by most people downtown (except the city press, for whom he is an endless source of mockable quotes and photos). Among his many, many controversial initiatives as mayor is an anti-graffiti push that has come under fire for indiscriminately targeting authorized street art alongside actual vandalism (including the removal of one mural that was actually commissioned and paid for <em><a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/article/1000475--artist-says-city-erased-mural-it-paid-him-to-paint" target="_blank">by the city itself</a></em>). Apparently he's just as clueless about technology as he is about art, because as reader <b>abc gum</b> sends in, <a href="http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/04/will_anyone_use_torontos_new_anti-graffiti_app/" target="_blank">he's now asking people to report graffiti with an iPhone app&mdash;which costs money</a>.

<blockquote><em>Taking the city's battle to clean up Toronto digital, Rob Ford visited a lane way near St. Clair and Lansdowne to unveil a new mobile app that lets citizens report unwanted graffiti instantly. Instead of coughing up for a phone call, smart phone users can now snap a picture and whisk it off to 311 for processing.
<br /><br />
"This is as efficient as it gets," remarked Ford at press conference earlier today. "This will make it easier than ever to report graffiti vandalism and help keep the city spotless.
<br /><br /> ... <br /><br />
The app, which costs $1.99 (and is currently only available for iPhone), lets Apple smartphone users send photographs directly to the city with a request to remove of the offending material. If the property owner fails to clean up the tag, the city will - so they say - step in and bill the owner for the work.
</em></blockquote>

</p><p>Uh-huh. So instead of "coughing up" a phone call to the city information line, Rob Ford is hoping people will cough up two bucks (not even 99 cents?). And not just any people&mdash;the iPhone wielding, app downloading demographic that is his biggest enemy and the least interested in fighting graffiti. Whether it's pitched as a useful service for citizens or a request that they do their civic duty, slapping a price tag on it makes it little more than a joke.</p>

<p>Perhaps the most telling thing is that the app is built on the Open311 API that Toronto (among other cities) uses to provide access to city services&mdash;and yet nobody else seems to be bothering to try to build a graffiti reporting app. If there was a demand for it, there would be a swarm of developers working on it, and they probably would have beaten the city to the punch. Somehow I doubt that a two-dollar app is going to make people suddenly realize they've wanted this all along.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120419/06372518562/toronto-mayor-wants-residents-to-report-graffiti-via-iphone-pay-privilege.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120419/06372518562/toronto-mayor-wants-residents-to-report-graffiti-via-iphone-pay-privilege.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120419/06372518562/toronto-mayor-wants-residents-to-report-graffiti-via-iphone-pay-privilege.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>good-luck-with-that</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120419/06372518562</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Robot Scientists</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/1540038513/dailydirt-robot-scientists.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/1540038513/dailydirt-robot-scientists.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ People are usually pretty quick to admit that artificial intelligence programs are better than most humans at solving a lot of math problems. Human scientists have generally been needed to interpret data and make conclusions, but AI software could be catching up with scientists by coming up with their own hypotheses and conclusions. Here are just a few examples of programs that might be writing up their own PhD dissertations someday.  
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/18/weekinreview/ideas-trends-mathematicians-meet-computerized-ideas.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm" href="http://nyti.ms/yae1WJ">Robot mathematicians like Graffiti have been around for a very long time, generating far more interesting conjectures than any human could.</a> Interesting mathematical conjectures should be surprising, not too closely related to an existing conjecture, and not too specific. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/18/weekinreview/ideas-trends-mathematicians-meet-computerized-ideas.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2011/10/robot-biologist/" href="http://bit.ly/y1Z6w8">Software dubbed Eureqa is analyzing (without help from humans) experimental data from biological systems to derive mathematical models for processes like glycolysis -- and could potentially find new biological discoveries.</a> And I'm sure we'll see stories of robots found cheating by plagiarizing from Wikipedia soon. [<a href="http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2011/10/robot-biologist/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/robotscientist/" href="http://bit.ly/xnffVn">Adam is the first automated scientist -- successfully developing a hypothesis, performing experiments, refining its hypothesis into a novel discovery.</a> Adam found three yeast genes that coded for an orphan enzyme. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/robotscientist/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/04/robot-scientist-language/" href="http://bit.ly/zRlF9H">A newer version of Adam, called Eve, is sifting through some of Adam's data and looking to find her own discoveries about yeast genetics.</a> Unfortunately, some intellectual property issues are delaying some of Adam and Eve's latest publications. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/04/robot-scientist-language/">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting robot-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29" href="http://bit.ly/h0iGmR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul>

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/1540038513/dailydirt-robot-scientists.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/1540038513/dailydirt-robot-scientists.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/1540038513/dailydirt-robot-scientists.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100310/1540038513</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>