<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;gitmo&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:10:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>What If A Court Gave An Important Ruling, But We Were Not Allowed To Know What It Was?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/10325216386/what-if-court-gave-important-ruling-we-were-not-allowed-to-know-what-it-was.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/10325216386/what-if-court-gave-important-ruling-we-were-not-allowed-to-know-what-it-was.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=jdoe668">That Anonymous Coward</a> alerts us to the news that DC federal appeals court has <a href="http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/6FD54E592115F0AB85257929004E5B70/$file/10-5319OPCN.pdf" target="_blank">issued a ruling</a> (pdf) in the case of Gitmo detainee Adnan Farhan Abd Al Latif, but <a href="http://boingboing.net/2011/10/16/court-verdict-on-adnan-farhan-abd-al-latif-not-for-you-to-know.html" target="_blank">the entire ruling is classified</a>, so the public has no idea what it says.
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/OVfGN"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/OVfGN.png" width=560 /></a>
</center>
A ruling last year at the district court had ordered the administration to <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2010-08-16/us/dc.gitmo.release.order_1_qaeda-evidence-detainee?_s=PM:US" target="_blank">release Latif for lack of evidence</a> that he had anything to do with Al Qaeda.  And now... we have no idea what the government is ordered to do or not do.  So what do we do in a time when the federal government gets to come up with <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111010/04043716279/nytimes-sues-federal-government-refusing-to-reveal-its-secret-interpretation-patriot-act.shtml">secret interpretations of law</a> and then can have court rulings on related issues entirely hidden from the public?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/10325216386/what-if-court-gave-important-ruling-we-were-not-allowed-to-know-what-it-was.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/10325216386/what-if-court-gave-important-ruling-we-were-not-allowed-to-know-what-it-was.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/10325216386/what-if-court-gave-important-ruling-we-were-not-allowed-to-know-what-it-was.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>sign-of-the-times</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111017/10325216386</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>