<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;funds&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:55:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Congress Wants To Cut Funds To The TSA For Naked Scanners</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110517/00521114293/congress-wants-to-cut-funds-to-tsa-naked-scanners.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110517/00521114293/congress-wants-to-cut-funds-to-tsa-naked-scanners.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/05/16/1922259/US-Congress-Tries-To-Cut-Body-Scanner-Funding" target="_blank">Slashdot</a> we learned that the House Appropriations Committee's latest plan <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&#038;PressRelease_id=300&#038;Month=5&#038;Year=2011" target="_blank">specifically cuts funding for the TSA's naked body scanners</a>.  In the section about the TSA, it notes:
<blockquote><i>
The bill includes $7.8 billion for the TSA, an increase of $125 million over last year&rsquo;s level, and $293 million below the President&rsquo;s request. These funds will be used to sustain the current cap level of 46,000 full time screening personnel, and for explosive detection systems, security enforcement, cargo inspections, Federal Air Marshals, and other TSA activities. The bill also includes an additional $10 million to address air cargo threats. <b>However, the bill does not provide $76 million requested by the President for 275 additional advanced inspection technology (AIT) scanners nor the 535 staff requested to operate them.</b>
</i></blockquote>
This won't stop the many such machines already in service, but could potentially slow the expansion of the use of such machines.  Of course, I'm sure one carefully placed "soft on terrorists!" fear mongering report will ensure such machines get funded soon enough anyway.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110517/00521114293/congress-wants-to-cut-funds-to-tsa-naked-scanners.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110517/00521114293/congress-wants-to-cut-funds-to-tsa-naked-scanners.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110517/00521114293/congress-wants-to-cut-funds-to-tsa-naked-scanners.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>looks-like-someone's-paying-attention</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110517/00521114293</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:41:43 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Feds Show Their Cards On Online Poker: Freeze Funds</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090609/1816315181.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090609/1816315181.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For years, the federal government has insisted that online poker in the US is illegal, and reinforced it by tacking on punishment for payment processors who process gambling payments onto a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061002/124356.shtml">totally unrelated</a> bill about harbor safety.  Poker players, on the other hand, have insisted for years that there are no laws against online poker -- in part because the laws are all against games of chance, whereas poker is a game of skill.  This position received a small boost recently when a judge <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090220/1744023851.shtml">agreed</a> that poker was a game of skill rather than chance.  On top of this, there's been an ongoing effort underway (led by Barney Frank) to specifically make it clear that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0229432304.shtml">online poker is legal</a>.  However, until that bill goes anywhere, the feds apparently still believe it's very much illegal and have now <a href="http://www.newonlinecasinos.org/casinoarticles/389/1/548/Online-Gambling-Accounts-Frozen-By-Federal-Government-In-US.html" target="_new">started going after the payment processors</a>, freezing the funds of payment processors who work with a variety of online poker sites.  Expect quite a legal battle to follow.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090609/1816315181.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090609/1816315181.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090609/1816315181.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>whoops</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090609/1816315181</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>