<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;don't mess with texas&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:06:18 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Don't Mess With Texas... Or, Well, Don't Use That Slogan As A Book Title Or Texas Will Sue</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110826/01170315697/dont-mess-with-texas-well-dont-use-that-slogan-as-book-title-texas-will-sue.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110826/01170315697/dont-mess-with-texas-well-dont-use-that-slogan-as-book-title-texas-will-sue.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ You've probably heard the phrase "don't mess with texas."  It's pretty widely known in general, but what you might not know is that the phrase is actually <i>trademarked</i> by the Texas Department of Transportation as a part of an anti-litter campaign.  I had no idea.  Anyway, the state is quite upset that anyone might think of the phrase in any context other than combating litter. Stephen S. Power alerts us to the news that the state has <a href="http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2011/08/txdot_romance_novel_porn.php" target="_blank">sued over a romance novel with the phrase as its title</a>.  And they're going all in.  They've sued the publisher of the book, Hachette Book Group, and the author, Christie Craig, and they're even going after Barnes &#038; Noble for daring to stock the book. 
<center>
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/Iycur.jpg" />
</center>
Amazingly, the state doesn't even seem to want to hide the fact that it's flat out abusing trademark law.  Remember, trademark law is only supposed to prevent confusion and no "moron in a hurry" is going to think that the Texas Department of Transportation has put out a bodice ripper novel.  And rather than allege that, the state seems to just be saying that <i>it doesn't like sex</i>:
<blockquote><i>
"The book," TxDOT's suit says, "contains numerous graphic references to sexual acts, states of sexual arousal, etc." 
</i></blockquote>
They're afraid that this will harm their ability to keep the streets clean of litter.  I'm not quite sure how.  Of course, if you look, it appears that TxDOT does, in fact, have a number of federal registered trademarks on the phrase.  I went through them all and not a single one appears to be for books, however.  There are things like clothing, signs, luggage tags, beverage holders, garbage bags, "plastic squeeze flashlights," etc.  But nothing about books.  
<br /><br />
Here's hoping the defendants do decide to "mess with Texas" and teach them a little something about trademark law.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110826/01170315697/dont-mess-with-texas-well-dont-use-that-slogan-as-book-title-texas-will-sue.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110826/01170315697/dont-mess-with-texas-well-dont-use-that-slogan-as-book-title-texas-will-sue.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110826/01170315697/dont-mess-with-texas-well-dont-use-that-slogan-as-book-title-texas-will-sue.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>moron-in-a-hurry</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110826/01170315697</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>