<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;dogs&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>'Don't Shoot My Dog' Laws Proposed</title>
<dc:creator>Above The Law</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/12115922601/dont-shoot-my-dog-laws-proposed.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/12115922601/dont-shoot-my-dog-laws-proposed.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <div style="text-align:center;padding:8px;margin:0 0 7px 15px;border:2px solid #bbb;float:right;line-height:1.2;">
<i style="font-weight:bold;color:#666;font-size:90%;">Cross-posted from</i><br />
<a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/04/dont-shoot-my-dog-law/" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/RvpZD0T.jpg" width="110" title="Above The Law" style="margin:6px 0 0 0;" /></a></div>

Animals are cool. People are a-holes. Any bill that prevents people from <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2012/10/in-defense-of-the-alleged-berkeley-bird-murderers/">senselessly harming animals</a> is a good thing.
<p>
The natural enemy of the family dog is the local cop. Some of the stories we hear about cops shooting dogs, man, it&#8217;s like they don&#8217;t even try to deal with the animal reasonably. They shoot first and put the leash on later. I get that some people are just irrationally afraid of dogs, but cops are armed and in stressful situations. And since &#8220;dog <em>murder</em>&#8221; isn&#8217;t really a thing, there&#8217;s no incentive for cops to hold their fire.
</p>
<p>
We&#8217;ve reported in the past about how <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2012/04/more-evidence-that-shooting-dogs-is-a-way-bigger-deal-than-shooting-black-people/">jury awards are going up</a> when cops are found to recklessly kill family pets. But money cannot replace the companionship of a best friend.
</p>
<p>
Now, one state is trying to take more decisive action by requiring cops to learn how to deal with &#8220;short, hairy children&#8221;&#8230;.
</p>
<p>
The <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22938136/coloradans-cheer-bill-aimed-at-preventing-dog-deaths">Denver Post</a> (gavel bang: <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/bipartisan_dont_shoot_my_dog_bill_moves_forward_would_require_more_police/">ABA Journal</a>) reports that a bill called the &#8220;Don&#8217;t Shoot My Dog&#8221; law is making its way through the Colorado State Senate.
</p>
<p>
The bill would require police officers to undergo training on how to deal with dogs. And it has bipartisan support:
</p>
<blockquote><i>
<p>
&#8220;The reason I think it is important is dogs are not just property to most people, they are their short, hairy children,&#8221; [said Jennifer Edwards of The Animal Law Center]. &#8220;They are a part of the family, and it is absolutely devastating to lose an animal and to lose an animal so wrongfully when it could be solved by better training and better understanding of dog behavior.&#8221;
</p>
</i>
</blockquote>
<p>
The bill&#8217;s sponsors, Democrat Lucia Guzman and Republican David Balmer, point out that &#8220;landscaping companies [and] delivery companies&#8221; deal with dogs all the time, without shooting them.
</p>
<p>
Some of the stories about police brutality to dogs are disgusting:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<i>
Among those expected to testify in favor of their bill is Gary Branson of Pueblo, whose 4-year-old labrador mix was shot multiple times by a Commerce City police officer after the pet escaped a relative&#8217;s home.
</i>
</p>
<p>
In Branson&#8217;s case, the 58-year-old left Chloe with a relative while visiting his brother in California last November. The dog got out through an open garage door and was running around the neighborhood.
</p>
<p>
Commerce City police said the dog was aggressive and continued to behave that way after being restrained with an animal-control noose. Chloe was shocked with a Taser and then shot multiple times.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
What kind of sick person Tasers and shoots a family lab that has already been restrained?
</p>
<p>
Dogs are not people and shouldn&#8217;t be treated as such under the law. But they&#8217;re not mere property either. We need to carve out a legal space for our furry companions that at least respects our rights to keep them alive.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22938136/coloradans-cheer-bill-aimed-at-preventing-dog-deaths">Senate panel OKs &#8220;Don&#8217;t Shoot My Dog&#8221; bill after emotional testimony</a> [Denver Post]<br />
<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/bipartisan_dont_shoot_my_dog_bill_moves_forward_would_require_more_police/">&#8216;Don&#8217;t Shoot My Dog&#8217; bill moves forward, would require more police training</a> [ABA Journal]
<br /><br />
<b>More stories from Above The Law</b>
<ul><li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/04/administration-freaks-out-students-with-reports-of-possible-death-threat-before-realizing-it-was-just-homework/" target="_blank">Administration FREAKS OUT Students With Reports Of Possible Death Threat Before Realizing It Was Just Homework</a>
</li><li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/04/this-is-perhaps-the-wittiest-response-to-a-pissy-law-student-email-ever/" target="_blank">This Is Perhaps the Wittiest Response to a Pissy Law Student Email Ever</a>
</li><li><a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/04/beware-greek-organizations-bearing-insurance-coverage/" target="_blank">Beware Greek Organizations Bearing Insurance Coverage</a>
</li></ul>
</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/12115922601/dont-shoot-my-dog-laws-proposed.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/12115922601/dont-shoot-my-dog-laws-proposed.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/12115922601/dont-shoot-my-dog-laws-proposed.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>seems-like-common-sense</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130405/12115922601</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Looking For Smarter Animals</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101022/09280311544/dailydirt-looking-smarter-animals.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101022/09280311544/dailydirt-looking-smarter-animals.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The search for intelligent life might be more fruitful if we started looking more closely at other animals right here on Earth. The progress of artificial intelligence in computers might also be surpassed by breeding a few hyper-intelligent pets someday. Some zoo animals are already playing around with iPads, so maybe we'll have some super smart cyborgs... In any case, here are just a few examples of projects that are studying how smart our fellow vertebrates might be.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/01/dog-brains/" href="http://bit.ly/113aSQY">DARPA is scanning dog brains with MRI machines to figure out which dogs are best suited for military dog training.</a> The FIDOS (Functional Imaging to Develop Outstanding Service-Dogs) project could help train dogs more effectively for all kinds of tasks -- from detecting drugs to being better therapy companions. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/01/dog-brains/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/raccoon-nation/full-episode/7558/" href="http://to.pbs.org/TOxUAM">PBS has a great documentary that follows how raccoons are adapting to urban living.</a> Anyone who has tried to protect their garbage cans knows how wily raccoons are. [<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/raccoon-nation/full-episode/7558/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/26/piglets-substitute-for-babies" href="http://bit.ly/TOAw1A">What animal would you use to model the cognitive development of human babies?</a> If you said piglets, then maybe you should try being a neuroscientist at the Beckman Institute at the University of Illinois. [<a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-07/26/piglets-substitute-for-babies">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/captive-hyenas-outfox-wild-relatives/" href="http://bit.ly/ViKMU9">The problem-solving capabilities of captive hyenas appear to be a bit better than their wild cousins.</a> The tests administered to these hyenas were admittedly a bit biased.... [<a href="http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/captive-hyenas-outfox-wild-relatives/">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101022/09280311544/dailydirt-looking-smarter-animals.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101022/09280311544/dailydirt-looking-smarter-animals.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101022/09280311544/dailydirt-looking-smarter-animals.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101022/09280311544</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Caring For Our Pets</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101104/03571611721/dailydirt-caring-our-pets.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101104/03571611721/dailydirt-caring-our-pets.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ People with pets sometimes go a bit overboard when it comes to spoiling their animals. There's nothing really wrong with that, but non-pet people might question how the treatment of animals can trump the treatment of people. Here are just a few pet-related stories to ponder.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20614593" href="http://bbc.in/QUxdue">An organization in New Zealand is teaching dogs how to drive cars.</a> Imagine the traffic problems if someone shouts, "Squirrel!" [<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20614593">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/04/28/dogs-are-manipulable-cats-are-manipulative-and-both-act-like-babies/#.UMfj0xRGJ5Q" href="http://bit.ly/T6wwwk">Cats and dogs are training their owners to respond to their wishes, just like human babies do.</a> Can you resist a cat's <a href="http://www.improbable.com/2012/04/26/are-humans-hardwired-for-feline-servitude/">solicitation purr</a>? [<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/04/28/dogs-are-manipulable-cats-are-manipulative-and-both-act-like-babies/#.UMfj0xRGJ5Q">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324020804578149662961901842.html" href="http://on.wsj.com/UgJFBM">The technology for turning departed loved ones (humans) into diamonds has been around for several years, but pet diamondification is where the synthetic diamond memorialization market is heading.</a> A diamond really isn't forever, but nobody wants to hear about the actual thermodynamic stability of diamonds. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324020804578149662961901842.html">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101104/03571611721/dailydirt-caring-our-pets.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101104/03571611721/dailydirt-caring-our-pets.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101104/03571611721/dailydirt-caring-our-pets.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101104/03571611721</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:27:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Disney Sued For Copyright Infringement</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/17554921119/disney-sued-copyright-infringement.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/17554921119/disney-sued-copyright-infringement.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few folks sent over the following story of how <a href="http://www.king5.com/news/local/Seattle-designers-sue-Disney-claims-copyright-infringement-179754381.html" target="_blank">Disney is being sued for copyright infringement</a>.  Seems a bit ironic, given just how strict Disney has been over the years in enforcing its copyright and being at the forefront of efforts to expand copyright law -- even as it tend to build some of its greatest works by copying works in the public domain.  In this case, a design company produced a graphic that consists of drawings of dozens of dogs, each with a little signature under their names:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/iXiQg"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/iXiQg.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
Disney then introduced a teen fashion line called "D-Signed."  However, some noticed that one of the t-shirts had a design quite reminiscent of the original dog artwork.
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/e1j9q"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/e1j9q.jpg" width=560 /></a>
</center>
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see where those particular images were directly copied from the original.  As fun as it would be to catch Disney in a clear copyright violation, the dogs on the t-shirt don't appear to be the same.  And, we're always told that there's an "idea/expression" dichotomy in copyright law, which is supposed to mean that you only protect the specific and defined expression -- not the general idea.  So I'm just not sure I see how this is infringing, even if the idea was taken from their poster.  Obviously I can understand the creators' <i>frustration</i>, but that hardly means there's a legal claim. <strong>Update:</strong> On closer inspection, as pointed out in the comments with a <a href="http://i.imgur.com/oOQaQ.jpg">handy illustration</a>, it turns out the copying was more direct than we thought.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/17554921119/disney-sued-copyright-infringement.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/17554921119/disney-sued-copyright-infringement.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/17554921119/disney-sued-copyright-infringement.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-is-it?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121121/17554921119</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Man's Best Friends</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10290211154/dailydirt-mans-best-friends.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10290211154/dailydirt-mans-best-friends.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Dogs have been domesticated for thousands of years, and there's been some speculation that humans and dogs have co-evolved to some extent. So it would be nice to understand our domesticated friends a bit better, and technology could help us out. We've seen products like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20020930/0146246.shtml">Bowlingual</a> for translating dog barks into human languages, and here are just a few more interesting links on human-dog relationships.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/eu-wiy050412.php" href="http://bit.ly/VgnIZn">Researchers are using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to try to understand what dogs are thinking.</a> Two dogs have been trained to stand completely still while their brains are scanned, and one of the dogs is a squirrel-hunting dog -- so maybe these neuroscientists will be able to see what part of a dog's brain activates when someone says, "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBWrMQVsuak">Squirrel!</a>" [<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/eu-wiy050412.php">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.doggelganger.co.nz/" href="http://bit.ly/VgnCRo">Doggelganger is a fun way to match up people and dogs that are up for adoption.</a> Dogs and their owners are supposed to grow to look like each other, but what if facial recognition software made it possible for you to adopt a dog that already looked like you from the start? [<a href="http://www.doggelganger.co.nz/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/10/10/do-neutering-and-spaying-cause-depression-in-pets-no-word-yet-but-an-interesting-question/" href="http://bit.ly/T3LDYz">Does neutering pets cause any kind of depression for our beloved domesticated animals?</a> Vets may want to change the way they make pets sterile if enough pet owners are convinced that there's even a possibility of post-neutering depression. [<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/10/10/do-neutering-and-spaying-cause-depression-in-pets-no-word-yet-but-an-interesting-question/">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10290211154/dailydirt-mans-best-friends.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10290211154/dailydirt-mans-best-friends.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10290211154/dailydirt-mans-best-friends.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100924/10290211154</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Learning About Our Pets</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10295511156/dailydirt-learning-about-our-pets.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10295511156/dailydirt-learning-about-our-pets.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ People love their pets, but sometimes pet behavior is hard to understand. Sure, there are technologies like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030818/0054249.shtml">Bowlingual</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20030716/1626206.shtml">Meowlingual</a> to help us understand cats and dogs, but automated translations are notoriously imperfect. So here are just a few interesting links on studying domesticated animals.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/08/kitty-cams-shocking-truth" href="http://bit.ly/NBA2KE">A study from the University of Georgia tracked the behavior of 60 outdoor cats with video cameras.</a> Over 2,000 hours of video show how cats <s>eat lasagna and make snide remarks about their owners</s> hunt for neighborhood rodents and birds. [<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/08/kitty-cams-shocking-truth">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.cornell.edu/video/?videoID=2259" href="http://bit.ly/RRDI0X">An expert on canine genetics discusses how the dog genome has affected research since its first publication 6 years ago.</a> Researchers can compare different dog breeds on a genetic level and show that man's best friends are all descendants of grey wolves. [<a href="http://www.cornell.edu/video/?videoID=2259">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/self-domestication/" href="http://bit.ly/RRE6wg">Domestication is usually a human-lead process of taming wild animals, but some animals seem to be getting kinder and gentler all on their own.</a> Aggression is somewhat costly behavior in nature, and under certain conditions, more peaceful species can evolve. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/self-domestication/">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10295511156/dailydirt-learning-about-our-pets.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10295511156/dailydirt-learning-about-our-pets.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100924/10295511156/dailydirt-learning-about-our-pets.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100924/10295511156</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:11 PST</pubDate>
<title>Park Ranger Tases Guy Walking Dogs Without A Leash</title>
<dc:creator>Joyce Hung</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120201/00075917609/park-ranger-tases-guy-walking-dogs-without-leash.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120201/00075917609/park-ranger-tases-guy-walking-dogs-without-leash.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ In the latest example of questionable taser use, a man walking his two dogs off-leash at the Golden Gate National Recreation Area was <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/30/MN921N0LQT.DTL#ixzz1l50NYinH">tased in the back by a park ranger</a>, who was apparently trying to make an example of him. The problem was that the guy, Gary Hesterberg, was walking the dogs at Rancho Corral de Tierra, which <i>used</i> to be an off-leash walking area until it was just recently incorporated into the National Park. When the park ranger confronted Hesterberg and asked for his identification, for reasons unknown, Hesterberg gave her a fake name, and then tried repeatedly to leave. Finally, when he started to walk away, the ranger shot him in the back... because she was trying to "educate residents of the rule." <i>Then</i>, he was arrested "on suspicion of failing to obey a lawful order, having dogs off-leash and knowingly providing false information."
<br /><br />
It seems that the use of a taser in this situation was excessive and unwarranted. The guy wasn't threatening the ranger in any way, and even if he had lied about his name (not that lying should be a reason to tase someone), the ranger wouldn't have known that at the time, since Hesterberg only gave his real name to the authorities <i>after</i> he got tased. Did the ranger accomplish her goal of "educating" visitors of the park rules? Yes, if educating means "scaring into submission." As Eric Cartman would say, "Respect my authoritah!"<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120201/00075917609/park-ranger-tases-guy-walking-dogs-without-leash.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120201/00075917609/park-ranger-tases-guy-walking-dogs-without-leash.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120201/00075917609/park-ranger-tases-guy-walking-dogs-without-leash.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>watch-your-back</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120201/00075917609</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Animals Are Getting Smarter...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101229/04102912449/dailydirt-animals-are-getting-smarter.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101229/04102912449/dailydirt-animals-are-getting-smarter.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The more we study animals, the more we find out about their impressive cognitive abilities. And as we learn more about how other animal brains work, we might learn more about how our own minds think. Or perhaps someone will just figure out how to train parrots to pass CAPTCHA tests. In any case, here are a few interesting examples of animal intelligence.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/chimp-throwing/#more-87828?" href="http://bit.ly/vvET9W">Chimps are the only other species, besides humans, that regularly throws things.</a> It's presumably a pre-cursor to speech and communication. Chimps in captivity even throw things without any training, as the researchers say, "I've never in my life seen a chimp be given a banana for throwing shit at someone." [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/11/chimp-throwing/#more-87828?">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/2011/05/26/136497064/the-new-science-of-understanding-dog-behavior?" href="http://n.pr/ulNZ2L">Until someone actually invents a dog collar that can translate dog barks into English, we'll have to study dog behavior and guess at how dogs think.</a> Animal behaviorist John Bradshaw discusses his behavior guidebook for dogs and tips for training dogs. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/05/26/136497064/the-new-science-of-understanding-dog-behavior?">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ravens-use-hand-gestures" href="http://bit.ly/vstuzV">Researchers have observed ravens in the wild using pointing gestures.</a> "It's over there!" quoth the Raven. [<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ravens-use-hand-gestures">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting articles on the mind, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:315" href="http://bit.ly/hkDPKq">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:315">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 
By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101229/04102912449/dailydirt-animals-are-getting-smarter.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101229/04102912449/dailydirt-animals-are-getting-smarter.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101229/04102912449/dailydirt-animals-are-getting-smarter.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101229/04102912449</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:21:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>If At First You Fail In Suing A Blogger For Defamation Over His Description Of You Shooting Two Dogs, Try, Try Again</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/02462916852/if-first-you-fail-suing-blogger-defamation-over-his-description-you-shooting-two-dogs-try-try-again.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/02462916852/if-first-you-fail-suing-blogger-defamation-over-his-description-you-shooting-two-dogs-try-try-again.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I have to admit that I was pretty sure I've written about this case before, but in searching through the archives, I can't find it.  So, here's the quick summary of <a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/threats/comins-v-vanvoorhis" target="_blank">Comins v. VanVoorhis</a>.  Christopher Comins, a wealthy Florida businessman, found out about some dogs running around some cows in a field owned by a business associate.  Comins, apparently believing the dogs were wolves, went to the field (with permission of the owner) with some guns and shot the two dogs over and over again.  Originally, he claimed self-defense, but after <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhNOO0e1Kqw" target="_blank">the following video appeared on YouTube</a> showing the whole incident, that story didn't quite hold:
<center>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nhNOO0e1Kqw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</center>
The story made the national press.  It was also picked up on many blogs, including <a href="http://publicintellectual.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/barbarian-hillbilly-dog-shooter-christopher-comins/" target="_blank">this blog post</a> by University of Florida student Matthew Frederick VanVoorhis.  VanVoorhis' description of the events is certainly "almost novelistic," as the CitMedia link above suggests.  As such it does assume a few things, such as emotions, and may not be perfectly accurate in the timeline.  But does it rise to the level of defamation?  That seems extraordinarily unlikely, at best, but Comins chose to sue him for defamation.  Seeing as the story was covered widely by the media, and there's a video of the events in question, you might think that it's a bit strange to sue a random blogger who very few people read.  Perhaps he really is "<a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2010/02/10/suing-the-blogger-low-hanging-fruit.aspx" target="_blank">the easiest target,</a>" as some suggest.  If anything, it had all the hallmarks of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation" target="_blank">SLAPP suit</a>, especially since VanVoorhis' post also questioned Cumin's connections to politically powerful figures, and how that might impact any lawsuit concerning the shootings.
<br /><br />
Either way, despite the video, Comins ended up <a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/01/17/florida-man-acquitted-in-shooting-of-two-huskies-who-were-harassing-cows/" target="_blank">being acquitted</a> of the shooting, with the judge claiming that shooting a couple dogs at extremely close range was not torturing an animal.  As the link in this paragraph notes, it seems like that's the kind of question a jury should answer, rather than a judge.
<br /><br />
As for VanVoorhis, it turns out that the case against him <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/dog-shooter-slapp-suit-shot-down/" target="_blank">was also shot down</a>, but on specific procedural grounds.  Basically, under Florida law, you have to provide specific notice before suing for defamation.  VanVoorhis insists no such notification was given.  Cumins insists that it was but there was a procedural mistake in letting the court know.  Either way, the court granted summary judgment, <i>solely</i> on that issue, rather than discussing any of the free speech issues.
<br /><br />
VanVoorhis, represented by Randazza Legal Group (whose cases we seem to write about a lot around here...), followed up by pushing for sanctions, claiming that Comins' lawyer falsely told the court that VanVoorhis had been notified under the law.  That motion was denied, though apparently the <a href="http://cominsvvanvoorhis.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/appeal-augus/" target"_blank">court called it</a> "a very, very close call."
<br /><br />
Comins... in response, appears to have simply <i>filed a new defamation lawsuit</i> against VanVoorhis, using statements from <a href="http://cominsvvanvoorhis.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">the blog</a> that VanVoorhis set up to cover stories related to the lawsuit itself.  I have no idea if the statements in question are actually libelous (though, the bar for defaming a public person, like Comins, is substantially higher than someone else).  But, either way, I do question the wisdom of suing yet again, especially suing someone to whom he already lost a lawsuit.  It certainly feels like just another attempt to effectively retry the same lawsuit, which still has the feel of a SLAPP.  It's just that Comins and his lawyer found different quotes to use.
<br /><br />
Of course, every time Comins takes action like this, it just brings the original video and the original story back into the spotlight.  I can't see how that helps his image at all.  One of the things in defamation cases is that you're supposed to try to take actions to minimize the damages.  Suing yet again doesn't seem likely to do that.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/02462916852/if-first-you-fail-suing-blogger-defamation-over-his-description-you-shooting-two-dogs-try-try-again.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/02462916852/if-first-you-fail-suing-blogger-defamation-over-his-description-you-shooting-two-dogs-try-try-again.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111121/02462916852/if-first-you-fail-suing-blogger-defamation-over-his-description-you-shooting-two-dogs-try-try-again.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>double-jeopardy</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111121/02462916852</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:20:53 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Vague Law + Vindictive Law Enforcement?  Hide Your Veggies!</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110716/01290815117/vague-law-vindictive-law-enforcement-hide-your-veggies.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110716/01290815117/vague-law-vindictive-law-enforcement-hide-your-veggies.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ You may have heard the recent story about Julie Bass, a woman in Oak Park, Michigan, who <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/08/julie-bass-jail-vegetable-garden_n_893436.html" target="_blank">was facing 93 days in jail</a>... for daring to plant a nice vegetable garden in her front yard.  Apparently, the city has a rule that says you can have "decorative planting" in your front yard, but some city officials deemed that the vegetable garden was not decorative.  The specific law, of course, is vague.  It says: "all unpaved portions of the site shall be planted with grass or ground cover or shrubbery or other suitable live plant material."  The problem is in the word "suitable."  Many folks, including Bass, believe vegetables are suitable.  The city disagrees, and was threatening her with 93 days in jail for not removing the garden.
<br><br>
On Friday, the charges were apparently dismissed.  While most reports suggested that officials dropped the case, Bass's own blog claims that <a href="http://oakparkhatesveggies.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/trying-to-be-clear/" target="_blank">a judge dismissed them</a>, though the details were hazy (at best).  But, here's where it gets ridiculous.  First, the dismissal was "without prejudice," so the charges can be brought again.  But... even more crazy is that now <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20110714/METRO02/107140475/1361/Charges-dropped-against-Oak-Park-woman-over-veggie-garden" target="_blank">the city is going after her for not having licenses for her two dogs</a>, an issue that was brought up earlier, and which she quickly fixed.
<br><br>
As lots of people are saying, it appears that the city is just being vindictive to Bass.
<br><br>
This is why broadly worded laws scare me.  This is why the broadly worded definition of what counts as an "infringing site" in PROTECT IP scares me.  This is why the vagueness of S.978, the felony streaming bill, scares me.  They can easily be abused to put people in jail <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110713/01252315075/feds-response-to-rojadirecta-demonstrates-how-s978-can-be-abused-to-put-people-jail.shtml">just for embedding videos</a>.  What the Julie Bass story shows is that when law enforcement feels vindictive, there's no law they won't try to twist against people.  And we shouldn't be handing law enforcement more ammo by giving them vaguely worded laws that potentially make huge segments of the population into felons.
<br><br>
Jail time for veggie gardens is nothing if they can put you away for embedding a video on your website.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110716/01290815117/vague-law-vindictive-law-enforcement-hide-your-veggies.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110716/01290815117/vague-law-vindictive-law-enforcement-hide-your-veggies.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110716/01290815117/vague-law-vindictive-law-enforcement-hide-your-veggies.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>this-is-not-how-things-are-supposed-to-work</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110716/01290815117</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Big Bugs And Old Dogs</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/13213612732/dailydirt-big-bugs-old-dogs.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/13213612732/dailydirt-big-bugs-old-dogs.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ People sometimes have a strange fascination with huge bugs -- whether it's for "biggest cockroach" contests or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Wild_West#Development">giant (mechanical) spiders</a>  (see also: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Peters#Peters_and_Superman">Jon Peters</a>).   There are also a whole lot of dog lovers... so we've put these two tastes together with a couple random links about both.  Maybe it's not quite as good together as peanut butter and chocolate, but there's no accounting for taste.  Enjoy!

<blockquote>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2011/01/largest-landdwelling-bug-of-al.html" href="http://bit.ly/e13RCh">A really long, millipede-like invertebrate could hold the record for largest land-dwelling bug of all time.</a>  A complete fossil of the <i>Arthropleura</i> hasn't been found yet, but its species could have been over 6 feet long and 1.5 feet wide. Yeeee!  [<a href="http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2011/01/largest-landdwelling-bug-of-al.html
">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/01/20/133088733/new-giant-species-of-crayfish-found-in-tennessee-creek?" href="http://bit.ly/hqPJtg">A giant crayfish from Tennessee was recently spotted.</a>  It looks like a lobster and is about twice the size of a normal crayfish -- and it might be tasty with a bit of butter. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/01/20/133088733/new-giant-species-of-crayfish-found-in-tennessee-creek?">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://www.physorg.com/news199964650.html" href="http://bit.ly/gwwIPh">The remains of a 14,000-year-old dog might be one of man's oldest best friends.</a>  There could be an older domesticated dog from about 30,000 years ago, but that pet's teeth look a little too much like a wolf's. [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news199964650.html">url</a>]
</li><li> <a title="http://www.aolnews.com/2011/01/20/9-400-year-old-domesticated-dog-may-have-been-dinner-research-s/" href="http://bit.ly/dGwJOG">Based on an orange-colored bone, a Texan man might have eaten his dog about 9,000 years ago.</a>  The orange color wasn't BBQ sauce -- but evidence that it had passed through a human digestive tract.... [<a href="http://www.aolnews.com/2011/01/20/9-400-year-old-domesticated-dog-may-have-been-dinner-research-s/">url</a>]
</li> 
</blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/13213612732/dailydirt-big-bugs-old-dogs.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/13213612732/dailydirt-big-bugs-old-dogs.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/13213612732/dailydirt-big-bugs-old-dogs.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110119/13213612732</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>