Techdirt. Stories filed under "disorders" Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us Techdirt. Stories filed under "disorders"http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:00:00 PDT DailyDirt: Curious Behavior Michael Ho http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101001/01414511249/dailydirt-curious-behavior.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101001/01414511249/dailydirt-curious-behavior.shtml
  • There have been only about 100 cases of Foreign Accent Syndrome documented since its discovery in the 1940s -- people with it usually have some form of brain injury, but not always. One woman went to the dentist to have some teeth pulled and when she woke up from the anesthesia, she started talking in a strange accent. [url]
  • Capgras' Syndrome is a persistent delusion that a person's closest friends and relatives have been replaced by imposters -- sometimes the person with Capgras even thinks he himself (or she herself) is some kind of duplicate. This sounds like an old Steven Wright joke, but it's probably not that funny to be inexplicably paranoid about everyone you know. [url]
  • Williams Syndrome is a congenital condition in which people are ultra-friendly and empathetic -- and lack any kind of suspicion or fear. Kids without a fear of strangers can get into a lot of trouble -- if only strangers weren't so horrible people.... [url]
    • If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     urls-we-dig-up http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101001/01414511249     Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:43:19 PDT Newspaper Publishes Totally Made Up List Of 'Disorders' Associated With Text Messaging Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100630/03410110016.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100630/03410110016.shtml presenting a list of totally made up "texting disorders" put together by a "technology researcher" as if they were real and serious issues. The list is almost comical:
    • Textaphrenia: thinking you've heard or felt a new text message vibration when there is no message.
    • Textiety: a feeling of anxiety from not receiving or sending any text messages.
    • Post-traumatic text disorder: injuries related to texting, such as walking into objects by not paying attention to your surroundings.
    • Binge texting: sending massive amounts of texts to build self-esteem among peers.
    Those aren't disorders. That's a joke list that someone put together for fun, right?

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     credibility? http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100630/03410110016     Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:10:00 PST Internet Addiction Might Actually Get Recognized By The Official Book Of Mental Disorders? Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100223/1927238281.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100223/1927238281.shtml email addiction, web addiction, online porn addiction, video game addiction, internet addiction, and mobile phones or other gadget addictions among other things. More often than not, it seems that the calls to label these things as an addiction isn't fueled by any actual addiction, but by psychologists or psychiatrists looking to build a practice treating people who play too much World of Warcraft, rather than drug addicts. When you dig deeper, nearly all of these "technological addictions" don't really appear to be addictions to the technology, but rather a symptom of some other issue (such as depression) that manifests itself by focusing an inordinate amount of time on some technology. Focusing too much on the symptom, by falsely labeling it an addiction, could lead to poor treatment, as the focus is on treating the symptom, rather than the actual problem.

    Yet, some psychiatrists have been pushing hard to have internet addiction officially classified in the psychiatrist's bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). We had thought that these silly ideas had been shot down, but apparently not. The American Psychiatric Association recently proposed its new changes for DSM-5, the first update since 1994. And, unfortunately, internet addiction is being considered -- though almost no one thinks it will make it in (gambling addiction, on the other hand...). What's troubling is that the door is being opened to classifying such behavioral issues as addictions.

    Thankfully, at least some in the profession are quite worried about this. An opinion piece at Psychology Today worries about this decision to append the addiction label, noting that even though it offers an opportunity for him to make more money, it may make it harder to actually help people:
    As someone who makes his living as a psychotherapist I know I should shout, "Bravo DSM-5 addiction workgroup!" After all, if "behavioral addictions" makes it through field trials into the eventual manual it will open a a whole new market. Maybe I could even franchise "Internet addiction" clinics to funnel tons of insurance money into my pocket--after all, once "Internet addiction" is in the DSM insurance companies will pay to "treat" and I am sure there are lots of panicked well-insured parents out there who don't like that junior spends so much time playing World of Warcraft.

    But I can't bring myself to come close to anything like that. Making "Internet addiction" an official diagnostic category is just wrong on so many levels, including, I believe, making it more difficult to get the right kind of help to those who have actually become painfully stuck online. Many people are turning from life lived to life online and they need help, but real help for real problems, not newly-minted addictions.

    By sanctioning behavioral addictions the new DSM opens the diagnostic door to the full menu of confessional daytime TV problems: gambling, shopping, eating, playing World of Warcraft, visiting porn sites, chatting online, having sex with dozens of women with teased blonde hair (hello Tiger), getting too many tattoos, hoarding newspapers (addicted to print!), or whatever else comes along. Who knows, should the political tide turn Republican Senators might successfully plead they were not ruining the country, they were just suffering from "Anti-American Filibuster Addiction Disorder."

    Medically sanctioning the category of "behavioral addictions" also changes how we will think about freedom and responsibility. Making bad choices, developing destructive habits, and attempting solutions to problems in living that then become serious problems themselves will all become less important as the locus of responsibility shifts from the person doing something to the something being done.
    Let's hope common sense like the above prevail...

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
    ]]>     ugh http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100223/1927238281