<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;dating&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:51:53 PST</pubDate>
<title>New Book About Data Mining To Find Love Online Has Author Admit To Possible CFAA Violations</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's a new book out called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0525953809/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0525953809&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;tag=techdirtcom-20" target="_blank"><i>Data, A Love Story</i></a> by Amy Webb, in which she talks about how she gamed online dating sites.  If you look at an account from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/online-love-isnt-a-battlefield-its-a-marketplace/2013/02/07/0801ba26-6ed7-11e2-8b8d-e0b59a1b8e2a_story.html" target="_blank">the Washington Post</a>, an <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-webb/online-dating-success_b_2581565.html" target="_blank">excerpt at the Huffington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/01/amy_webb_s_data_a_love_story_using_algorithms_and_charts_to_game_online.html" target="_blank">another excerpt at Slate</a>, Webb discusses openly how she set up a ton of fake profiles on the online dating site JDate.  Here's an example:
<blockquote><i>
After figuring out just who she's seeking, Webb rejoins JDate, the Jewish dating site, as a man &#8212; creating 10 profiles for men she would want to date, with stock images and character sketches so elaborate you'd think she were outlining a novel. For example, we learn from the spreadsheet she makes for LawMan2346 that he and his younger brother, Mark, "didn't get along great as kids, but they're best friends now. Mark is the total opposite of him &#8212; plays sports, drinks beer. Typical man's man kind of guy."
<br /><br />
But she's not Catfishing, she's doing opposition research. For a month, she corresponds with 96 female JDaters through these fake profiles, never meeting these women but interacting just enough to collect data (more spreadsheets!) on how they present themselves. Then, she can mimic her competitors and hopefully snag a better catch.
</i></blockquote>
Interesting approach, I guess.  Having met my wife through more traditional means at a time when online dating was in its infancy, I can only imagine the difficulty in successfully using those tools today.  So, the appeal of "opposition research" and fake accounts for testing certainly must seem appealing. At the very least, it probably makes good fodder for a book... as it obviously did in this case.
<br /><br />
But here's the problem.  As we've been discussing, under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), it's possible that she committed multiple felonies, and could face jail time.  Now, let's be clear: no one has charged her with this and it's doubtful that anyone will.  But in an age where we're finally starting to realize that perhaps we need to <i>change</i> and fix the CFAA, it's helpful to point out examples of how the law could easily be twisted.
<br /><br />
Let's start with <a href="http://m.jdate.com/home/termsandconditions/" target="_blank">JDate's terms and conditions of service</a>.  There are a few clauses I want to call out.  The first is in the "Registration and Subscription" section, in which it notes:
<blockquote><i>
You agree to provide <b>accurate, current and complete information</b> about Yourself as prompted by Our registration form ("Registration Data"), and to maintain and update Your information to keep it accurate, current and complete."
</i></blockquote>
In the "Proprietary Rights" section, it notes:
<blockquote><i>
You represent and warrant to Us that the information posted in Your profile, <b>including Your photograph</b>, is posted by You and that You are the exclusive author of Your profile and <b>the exclusive owner of Your photographs</b>. You assign to Us, with full title guarantee, all copyright in Your profile, Your photographs posted, and any additional information sent to Us at any time in connection with Your use of the Service.
</i></blockquote>
In the section "Your use of the service" it notes:
<blockquote><i>
You will not post on the Service, or transmit to other members or to Us or Our employees, any defamatory, <b>inaccurate</b>, abusive, obscene, profane, offensive, sexually oriented, threatening, harassing, racially offensive, or illegal material, or any material that infringes or violates another party's rights
</i></blockquote>
And also the following:
<blockquote><i>
You will not harass or <b>impersonate any person</b> or entity. You will not use any manual or automatic device or process to retrieve, index, <b>data mine</b>, or, in any way reproduce or circumvent the navigational structure or presentation of the Service or its contents. 
</i></blockquote>
Now, you could make a case that in setting up ten completely fake profiles, including stock images, and then data mining the results of the women who communicated with those profiles, that she violated at least some, and possibly all of the clauses called out above.
<br /><br />
Courts are <a href="http://www.volokh.com/2012/07/30/recent-developments-both-in-the-courts-and-in-congress-on-the-scope-of-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/" target="_blank">not</a> entirely in agreement on this, but certainly some courts have said that violating the terms of service of a website can potentially violate the CFAA (there are other factors that matter too).  Even if we just look at the clauses of the CFAA that were used against Aaron Swartz, you could see how some (though not all) might apply to Webb as well.  There's (a)(2)(c): intentionally accessing a computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access and thereby obtains information from any protected computer.  There's (a)(4): knowingly and with intent to defraud, accessed a protected computer without authorization or by exceeding authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value (as long as the thing of value is more than $5,000).  Obviously, much of this is open to interpretation, but would you put it past a federal prosecutor arguing that Webb "knowingly and with intent to defraud" by "exceeding authorized access" obtained information and then obtained something of value more than $5,000?  As the book reveals, Webb used these methods to meet her eventual husband.  Is a husband something of value worth more than $5,000?  Yes, perhaps it's a stretch, but... is it so much of a stretch that you couldn't see someone making the argument?
<br /><br />
If you wanted to take it to even more ridiculous and extreme levels, you could argue that her "opposition research" may have enabled her to find a husband faster, thereby "cheating" JDate out of possible profits from keeping her as a paying customer for longer.  Again, a long shot, but not a completely implausible reading.
<br /><br />
And, again, if we can make the case that the value of the information she obtained by data mining these fake profiles exceeded $5,000 in value, then she has possibly set herself up for felony charges -- with maximum imprisonment of five years.
<br /><br />
Would a court ever go that far?  Almost certainly not.  But given the lack of prosecutorial discretion we've seen in other cases, including many CFAA cases, is that something that really should be left to the prosecutors' and judges' discretion?  Hopefully not.
<br /><br />
Of course, no reasonable person thinks that Webb should be charged with anything for her activities, and it's not going to happen.  But shouldn't we take a seriously look at fixing the law that makes it so that it's even possible she <i>could</i> have faced such charges?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130211/00562121942/new-book-about-data-mining-to-find-love-online-has-author-admit-to-possible-cfaa-violations.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>seems-like-that's-a-problem</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130211/00562121942</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Modern Computer Dating</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There are search engines for just about everything. Computers help people find all sorts of things faster and easier, so it's not surprising that computer dating is decades old (and <a href="http://www.damninteresting.com/forty-years-of-computer-dating/">started</a> out with punch cards). Technology has gotten a lot better, but has online dating really improved that much?

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/14/419-why-dating-sites-are-broken/" href="http://bit.ly/JXICGj">Online dating sites claim to be able to find soul mates, but studies suggest they can only provide introductions -- and more often than not, they instill a "shopping mindset" which is not conducive to building lasting relationships.</a> Some psychologists even doubt the possibility of creating algorithms that could successfully match people for real romance. (But experts also scoffed at the first chess-playing computers, too.) [<a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/14/419-why-dating-sites-are-broken/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1726" href="http://bit.ly/Ni7YQe">In 2005, Steven Carter, the director of research at eHarmony, described how his work to create predictive models for compatibility became the basis of his dream job.</a> Carter is probably a bit biased, so where is some peer review for eHarmony's research? [<a href="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1726">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/30/151550273/to-predict-dating-success-the-secrets-in-the-pronouns?" href="http://n.pr/KiNGBS">Perhaps some intense linguistic analysis can predict dating success.</a> Apparently, people who have similar speech patterns are more likely to date each other. Watch your use of pronouns, folks.... [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/30/151550273/to-predict-dating-success-the-secrets-in-the-pronouns?">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more interesting tech-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:Technology" href="http://bit.ly/ewIrx5">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:Technology">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 


By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100610/1702589775</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:07:47 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Match.com Plans To Ask Users If They're Sexual Predators</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/02041414034/matchcom-plans-to-ask-users-if-theyre-sexual-predators.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/02041414034/matchcom-plans-to-ask-users-if-theyre-sexual-predators.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We noted recently an odd <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110415/17592913916/woman-sues-matchcom-because-she-was-assaulted-someone-she-met-site.shtml">lawsuit</a> against Match.com from a woman who was sexually assaulted by a man she met via the service.  The company is almost certainly protected via Section 230 from liability, but with a bit of interesting timing, Match.com <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/04/18/in-lawsuits-wake-match-com-to-screen-predator-databases/" target="_blank">announced plans</a> to start screening users' names against a sexual predator database.  This seems like the sort of quickly slapped together ideas that <i>sound good</i> until you think through the details.  And, thankfully, the folks over at the EFF have thought through the details and are pointing out <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/04/sexual-predators-please-check-here-match-com-s" target="_blank">how deeply flawed Match.com's idea is</a>:
<blockquote><i>
There are several glaring flaws with Match.com's plan. For one, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42667308/ns/technology_and_science-science/">Match.com can't prevent sexual assault by screening for sex offenders</a>.  But even if Match.com's goal is merely to check whether users are on a registered sex offender list, rather than to actually prevent assault, Match.com runs into the difficulty that many people who use the site may not use their real names.  And while a portion of Match.com's services require a form of payment, a user looking to conceal her identity might simply use someone else's credit card to purchase a Match.com subscription.  For this plan to work, Match.com will likely need to move to a real name policy, similar to <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/09/facebook_real_name_policy_unfair">Facebook's</a>. And often a legal name may not be enough to establish one's identity --  Match.com could well need to collect other data points, like address or phone number, to truly figure out which "John Smith" has registered for their site. (Of note: a quick search through the sex offender registries for the name "John Smith" returns dozens of results.) This will be a change for Match.com: you can currently sign up for an account without providing your real name and there's nothing in the <a href="https://www.match.com/registration/membagr.aspx?lid=4">terms of service</a> that requires an individual to provide her real name.
<br /><br />
And the real flaw in Match.com&rsquo;s plan is the most obvious: criminals who want to use Match.com for nefarious purposes could use a false identity to set up service.  So while law abiding citizens searching for love are handing over loads of personal data to Match.com, those with criminal intent are unlikely to provide real information about themselves when signing up for the site.
</i></blockquote>
The post goes on to highlight numerous other problems, and note that Match.com "doesn't promise to safeguard user data," in the company's privacy policy -- so with any verification process almost certainly involving handing over a lot more data, the whole plan seems dangerous from a privacy perspective:
<blockquote><i>
It's an affront to privacy masquerading as a safety feature.
</i></blockquote>
This sort of thing, by the way, is exactly the kind of thing we'll be discussing at the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110414/02244413889/announcing-our-first-insight-dinner-salon.shtml">Techdirt Insight Dinner salon</a> on May 18th, where one of the key points is to better figure out how companies can and should deal with the data they're collecting, without trampling on privacy issues.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/02041414034/matchcom-plans-to-ask-users-if-theyre-sexual-predators.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/02041414034/matchcom-plans-to-ask-users-if-theyre-sexual-predators.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110426/02041414034/matchcom-plans-to-ask-users-if-theyre-sexual-predators.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>yeah,-that'll-work</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110426/02041414034</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 04:37:19 PST</pubDate>
<title>Libyans Using Coded Dating Site Messages To Avoid Government Monitoring</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110226/18330013292/libyans-using-coded-dating-site-messages-to-avoid-government-monitoring.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110226/18330013292/libyans-using-coded-dating-site-messages-to-avoid-government-monitoring.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few different people have sent over this fascinating story of how Libyans have been <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/muslim-dating-site-madawi-seeds-libyan-revolution/story?id=12981938" target="_blank">using a popular muslim dating site to communicate</a> about the protests in that country.  It's been widely covered how various protesters around the middle east have been using tools like Facebook and Twitter to organize and communicate, and governments have been responding to that fact, often shutting off access to those sites, or at least monitoring them very, very closely.  In order to avoid that, apparently some of the conversations in Libya have migrated to this dating site.  The article at ABC News includes plenty of details about how people are communicating on the site, and it's worth a read.  Here's a snippet:
<blockquote><i>
The phrase "May your day be full of Jasmine," for example, is a coded reference to what's been called the Jasmine Revolution sweeping the region, Mahmoudi told ABC News.
<br /><br />
He said the response, "And the same to you. I hope you will call me" meant they were ready to begin.
<br /><br />
If the undercover "lovers" wrote "I want love," it meant "I want liberty," Mahmoudi said.
<br /><br />
They also communicated in code the number of their comrades supporting the revolution. The five Ls in the phrase "I LLLLLove you," for example, meant they had five people with them. 
</i></blockquote>
Yet another reminder that no matter how hard governments try to suppress certain forms of communication, people always seek out alternative means.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110226/18330013292/libyans-using-coded-dating-site-messages-to-avoid-government-monitoring.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110226/18330013292/libyans-using-coded-dating-site-messages-to-avoid-government-monitoring.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110226/18330013292/libyans-using-coded-dating-site-messages-to-avoid-government-monitoring.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>can't-stop-technology</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110226/18330013292</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:06:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Dating Site's Plans To Create Profiles By Scraping Social Networks: Publicity Stunt Or Just Dumb?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/04141612721/dating-sites-plans-to-create-profiles-scraping-social-networks-publicity-stunt-just-dumb.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/04141612721/dating-sites-plans-to-create-profiles-scraping-social-networks-publicity-stunt-just-dumb.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ If you thought Match.com was in legal trouble due to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml">dead or fake profiles</a>, just imagine the legal issues facing an Australian dating site that claims it's going to <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/244737,dating-site-creates-profiles-from-public-records.aspx" target="_blank">scrape social networking profiles and turn them into dating site profiles</a>.  I'm not even going to mention the name of the company, because I'm pretty sure this was just a publicity stunt to get its name in the press, before "backing away" from the plan.  If it's an actual plan, it's stupid.  Not just because of the potential privacy concerns and lawsuits, and not just because some of the social networks from which they scrape the info may find ways to sue them as well, but because this seems like a <i>terrible</i> strategy for a dating site.  I mean, if you're looking to find a dating site where you're likely to actually meet someone, are you going to use the site where the vast majority of the "members" <i>don't even know they're members</i>?  It's hard to see how that makes for a compelling pitch.  And I'm not even getting into what will happen when it starts creating profiles of people who are married or in long term relationships...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/04141612721/dating-sites-plans-to-create-profiles-scraping-social-networks-publicity-stunt-just-dumb.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/04141612721/dating-sites-plans-to-create-profiles-scraping-social-networks-publicity-stunt-just-dumb.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110119/04141612721/dating-sites-plans-to-create-profiles-scraping-social-networks-publicity-stunt-just-dumb.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>lawsuit-waiting-to-happen</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110119/04141612721</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:53:39 PST</pubDate>
<title>Match.com Sued Over Dead/Fake Profiles</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last year, dating site Match.com <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100428/1719009230.shtml">threatened some rivals</a>, saying that the numbers they put out concerning marketing probably couldn't be supported, and ordering them to cease and desist with misleading claims.  Of course, all that really did was make a lot of people turn around and look more closely at Match.com's own claims, which seemed only fair.  I have no idea if this latest story is a result of some of that scrutiny, but a <a href="http://www.cio.com/article/651514/Match.Com_Sued_By_Sour_Love_Seekers" target="_blank">class action lawsuit has been filed against Match.com</a> by users of the service who claimed that the company was quite misleading with its own stats.  Of specific concern is the actual number of users touted by Match, who (the plaintiffs claim) leaves "dead" accounts on the system just so it can boost its numbers.  Also, there are claims that many of the profiles are fakes, using images of porn actresses, models, or people from other dating sites (though, if accurate, this could just be the work of spammers, rather than Match itself). Separately, there are claims that just as accounts are about to expire, members get a notice that someone wants to contact them -- but they have to renew their subscription to respond.  Except, when they do renew, it turns out that the person who wanted to contact them has disappeared.  All that does seem a bit sneaky, if true.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110114/09203212668/matchcom-sued-over-deadfake-profiles.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>you-only-need-to-find-one</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110114/09203212668</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:29:56 PST</pubDate>
<title>Revealed: The Mysterious Cleavage-To-Age Effectiveness Ratio For Dating Sites</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/18065911800/revealed-the-mysterious-cleavage-to-age-effectiveness-ratio-for-dating-sites.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/18065911800/revealed-the-mysterious-cleavage-to-age-effectiveness-ratio-for-dating-sites.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/sinned/statuses/2493312170721280" target="_blank">Dennis</a> points us to dating site OKCupid's Sam Yagan <a href="http://bigthink.com/ideas/24873" target="_blank">revealing some of the data crunching results they've done</a> on what works and what doesn't work on dating sites.  It's actually pretty impressive just how much data the site has to work with, so there are some interesting (and some amusing) findings. Of course, some of it is blindingly obvious: women showing cleavage get a greater response.  But did you know that said cleavage is apparently much more effective for women who are 32 than women who are 18?  Apparently, at 18, "revealing" shots get 24% more interest, but at 32 such photos get 79% more interest.  Not quite sure what to make of that.  On the flip side, apparently guys showing their abs actually works... though, as Yagan rightly points out, there's a self-selection issue here, where it's pretty much only guys who have good abs who choose to reveal them in their profile photos.
<br /><br />
Yagan also points out some differences about whether or not your profile picture should involve you staring into the camera.  Turns out it depends on your gender:
<blockquote><i>
So on the photos we've learned a bunch of things.  We've learned that you should be doing something interesting.  We've learned that if you are a man, you shouldn't look straight into the camera because that's intimidating to women.  If you are a woman, you should be looking into the camera because men don't want to imagine you looking at some other guy.  They want you looking straight at them.  So we've learned that if you take a photo in your bathroom or a photo taken with your cell phone, those have a more authentic, more intimate appeal and those actually do very, very well. 
</i></blockquote>
I find this kind of stuff fascinating (not because I'm interested in online dating -- happily married and all that) but because suddenly all sorts of bizarre data is now available that opens up a window into the human brain that just wasn't there before.  The obvious stuff is no surprise, clearly, but some of the specifics and other oddities really are fascinating, and give you a data-based look into human psychology.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/18065911800/revealed-the-mysterious-cleavage-to-age-effectiveness-ratio-for-dating-sites.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/18065911800/revealed-the-mysterious-cleavage-to-age-effectiveness-ratio-for-dating-sites.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101110/18065911800/revealed-the-mysterious-cleavage-to-age-effectiveness-ratio-for-dating-sites.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>abs-it-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101110/18065911800</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Mar 2010 07:28:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>People Who Exaggerate Themselves On Online Dating Sites Do So Just As Much In Real Life As Well</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1515348397.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1515348397.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's this generally accepted wisdom out there that on the internet, people lie about themselves freely.  Recently, we pointed to a study that found, actually, people are <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100219/0330438238.shtml">pretty honest</a> about themselves when creating social networking profiles.  At the time, we noted that this might just be because on social networking sites people know they're connecting (mostly) with friends who already know them -- and then there are social mores against lying about yourself.  However, we wondered if the same would be true on dating sites.  We don't quite have the answer to that yet, but <a href="http://twitter.com/nancybaym/statuses/9935732995" target="_blank">Nancy Baym</a> points us to a study that says that daters who exaggerate about themselves <a href="http://www.news.ku.edu/2010/march/3/onlinedating.shtml" target="_blank">are equally likely to exaggerate about themselves in real life as well</a>.  That is, the exaggeration has nothing to do with it being online, and everything to do with what kind of person they are.
<br /><br />
Furthermore, the study found that those who lie online aren't doing it to necessarily be manipulative -- but because they want to better "fit in."  So, it's more about appearing "normal," rather than appearing exceptional in some way.
<br /><br />
Oh, and as for the overall amount of lying?  It was actually "quite small," because the online daters hope to actually meet in person with the people they meet online, they know that lying in the dating profile will also quickly be discovered.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1515348397.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1515348397.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1515348397.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>hate-the-player,-not-the-game</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100303/1515348397</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:12:03 PST</pubDate>
<title>Your Dating Profile Not Exciting Enough?  Just Borrow Someone Else's</title>
<dc:creator>Dennis Yang</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080221/133302315.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080221/133302315.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Now that online dating has become commonplace, would-be suitors are having a hard time making themselves seem interesting in an increasingly large dating pool.  So, what to do if your own interests and achievements are boring and average?  Well, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120303234117369959.html?mod=blog">just borrow the good bits of the exciting profiles that you find, and add them to your own</a>.  Apparently, these acts of profile plagiarism are fairly commonplace now amongst the online dating set.  When people find well-written, exciting descriptions, they grab them for their own profiles.  Unfortunately for the daters, eventually, a real-world meeting delivers a product that the marketing has misrepresented, and disappointment usually results.  Although in some cases, it's possible to track down the "original" author, most origins are fairly difficult to trace -- surely more than one person enjoys "long walks on the beach."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080221/133302315.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080221/133302315.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080221/133302315.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>nobody-knows-you're-a-dog</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080221/133302315</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:23:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Is It Still Considered PDA If The Affection Is Shown On Facebook?</title>
<dc:creator>Dennis Yang</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071211/220404.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071211/220404.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ From giving a girlfriend your letter jacket to public displays of affection, some relationship rituals are meant for more than just the two people involved -- they exist to let everyone know that you are both, indeed, taken.  It's no surprise that these acts have found online equivalents.  <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140310-pg,1/article.html">For relationships in the online generation, Facebook has become the de facto place to announce one's relationship status to the world</a>.  Sure, MySpace and Friendster had relationship statuses, but any changes to your relationship status remained in relative obscurity unless someone was actively monitoring it every day.  Short-lived <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/15/myspace-nukes-singlestatus/">SingleStat.us</a> was created to help to solve just that problem for pining MySpace Romeos.  On Facebook, however, change your status to "In A Relationship" and a little heart appears in your personal news feed, which then immediately spreads the good news to all of your Facebook friends.  Having trouble finding time to have that "Relationship Defining Talk?"  Just change your status with the object of your affection, and if they consent, then, Voila!  No messy "talking" needed.  But beware, breakups also happen in this brave new world.  Whereas before the Internet, a public breakup may have involved a heated yelling match at a local diner, today, breaking up over Facebook <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/breakups/digg-users-take-revenge-on-girl-who-dumped-beau-via-facebook-330354.php">draw the collective ire</a> of thousands.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071211/220404.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071211/220404.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071211/220404.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>poke-this</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20071211/220404</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>