<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;currency&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 May 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Funny Money</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1545515202/dailydirt-funny-money.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1545515202/dailydirt-funny-money.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Just about every denomination of US currency has been counterfeited at some point. But there are some really good copies out there (aka <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/09/office-39-200909">supernotes</a>) that are extremely difficult to detect. In response, every few years, the government has to issue new bill designs that are harder and harder to duplicate. Here are just a few interesting links on detecting fake money and issuing new currency.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100668881" href="http://bit.ly/11YGSBX">The US Federal Reserve will introduce a new $100 bill with added security features on October 8, 2013.</a> The new <a href="http://newmoney.gov/newmoney/default.aspx">bill</a> will be confusing and complicated, so counterfeiters will have a small window where they'll likely be able to pass off a slightly different (but equally confusing) new-looking C-note. [<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100668881">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/apr/11/irish-bank-james-joyce-coin" href="http://bit.ly/11YGEuv">Ireland's Central Bank says it's offering refunds for a commemorative coin that misquotes a phrase from Ulysses.</a> It was an unintentional error on a coin meant to honor James Joyce, but the bank is still planning to sell the coins -- explaining that the text was "an artistic representation of the author and text and not intended as a literal representation". [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/apr/11/irish-bank-james-joyce-coin">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.secretservice.gov/press/pub0903.pdf" href="http://1.usa.gov/YpLoMB">The US secret service has trained counterfeit detection canines to help sniff out fake money.</a> The dogs and their handlers went through a 12-week training program and were deployed in Colombia to find counterfeit currency. [<a href="http://www.secretservice.gov/press/pub0903.pdf">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a> via StumbleUpon.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1545515202/dailydirt-funny-money.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1545515202/dailydirt-funny-money.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090611/1545515202/dailydirt-funny-money.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090611/1545515202</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Do You Trust Digital Currencies?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110126/14520212846/dailydirt-digital-currency.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110126/14520212846/dailydirt-digital-currency.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Global financial markets have shown that respectable currencies can be threatened by the actions of relatively small economies. The basis of modern money is trust, not the value of gold or of any particular physical goods. Perhaps digital currencies could provide some alternatives for small countries (who shall remain nameless, cough, Cyprus, cough, Luxembourg...), but there's still a problem of trust to resolve. It's not always easy to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml">just switch to a new currency</a>. Here are just a few forms of digital money that might be floating around.

<ul>

<li> <a title="https://developer.amazon.com/sdk/coins/landing.html" href="http://bit.ly/1219D2R">Amazon Coins are yet another virtual currency -- specifically for buying virtual goods on Amazon's Kindle tablet.</a> One Amazon Coin is equal to the value of a US penny, and everyone will soon be collecting them, so get them before they're all gone.... [<a href="https://developer.amazon.com/sdk/coins/landing.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/27/business/e-commerce-report-seller-of-online-currency-may-have-been-victim-of-fraud.html" href="http://nyti.ms/1219OLv">Flooz.com officially shut down in 2001, putting an end to its digital currency that was used on the internet as an early kind of electronic gift certificate.</a> Thousands of people had bought Flooz (at an exchange rate of 1 USD to 1 Flooz), but the company had also sold ~$300,000 worth of Flooz via fraudulent credit card transactions, which ultimately doomed the company. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/27/business/e-commerce-report-seller-of-online-currency-may-have-been-victim-of-fraud.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/the-future-of-bitcoin.html" href="http://nyr.kr/XG75ry">Bitcoins are still getting attention, even after some serious missteps, but the market for Bitcoins isn't quite trustworthy yet.</a> If Bitcoins do succeed in gaining mainstream use, will there be a flood of digital currencies based on a variety of different cryptographic rules? [<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/the-future-of-bitcoin.html">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a> via StumbleUpon.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110126/14520212846/dailydirt-digital-currency.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110126/14520212846/dailydirt-digital-currency.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110126/14520212846/dailydirt-digital-currency.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110126/14520212846</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: How Much Are Coins Worth?</title>
<dc:creator>Joyce Hung</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/10162811651/dailydirt-how-much-are-coins-worth.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/10162811651/dailydirt-how-much-are-coins-worth.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While early coins represented the value of the metal they were made of, modern day coins are issued by the government and their value is determined by free market currency exchange rates. Ideally the value of a coin should be higher than the cost of the metals used to make it, but when the price of metals, like copper, increases, pennies can end up being worth more for their metal. For example, the Canadian government has officially <a href="http://www.fin.gc.ca/n13/13-015-eng.asp">stopped distributing pennies</a> because not only do they cost almost 1.6 cents per penny to produce, but most people think pennies are worthless. But are they? Here are a few more interesting coin-related stories.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2011/0606/2-500-pennies-Is-it-legal-to-pay-a-bill-in-pennies" href="http://bit.ly/12Q8D3m">Pennies aren't worthless. They're legal tender and carry a value of 1 cent. That's why a Utah man tried to pay a disputed $25 doctor's bill in pennies.</a> After he presented the clinic with almost 14 lbs of pennies and demanded that they count them, he was <a href="http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&#038;sid=22230106">found guilty</a> of disorderly conduct and fined $140. Hopefully he didn't try to pay the fine in pennies as well. [<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2011/0606/2-500-pennies-Is-it-legal-to-pay-a-bill-in-pennies">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/08/06/158197529/why-are-there-100-cents-in-a-dollar-ask-thomas-jefferson" href="http://n.pr/Y5SIdv">Have you ever wondered why there are 100 cents in a dollar?</a> In 1784, Thomas Jefferson suggested that the U.S. dollar should be decimalized, and being the influential guy that he was, he managed to convince the government to follow the suggestions he proposed in his <a href="http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&#038;staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=756&#038;chapter=86330&#038;layout=html&#038;Itemid=27">essay</a>, "Notes on the Establishment of a Money Unit, and of a Coinage for the United States." [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/08/06/158197529/why-are-there-100-cents-in-a-dollar-ask-thomas-jefferson">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2013/feb/20/trillion-dollar-coin-yours-995/" href="http://bit.ly/11WLm0j">Coin collectors can now get their very own platinum-plated "trillion dollar coin" for just $9.95</a>. The coins commemorate the idea that the U.S. Treasury could simply mint a $1 trillion platinum coin to get around the debt ceiling. Apparently, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/this-is-the-greatest-and-best-trillion-dollar-coin-in-the-world-tribute/">U.S. law</a> allows the Treasury to produce platinum coins in any denomination. [<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2013/feb/20/trillion-dollar-coin-yours-995/">url</a>]</li>


<li> <a title="http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/04/royal-canadian-mints-mintchip-looks-to-officially-digitize-cash/" href="http://tcrn.ch/VI7sRA">The Royal Canadian Mint wants to create a secure digital alternative to cash in the form of MintChip.</a> The MintChip smart card chip could be installed in a number of devices, and value would be transferred onto the chip by a MintChip broker, allowing users to securely exchange Canadian dollars both online and offline. [<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/04/royal-canadian-mints-mintchip-looks-to-officially-digitize-cash/">url</a>]</li>


</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/10162811651/dailydirt-how-much-are-coins-worth.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/10162811651/dailydirt-how-much-are-coins-worth.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/10162811651/dailydirt-how-much-are-coins-worth.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101029/10162811651</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Handwriting Analysis For Secretaries Of The US Treasury</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Everyone is supposed to have a unique signature for signing all kinds of important documents. Your signature represents how you would like to be viewed by the world, according to some signature-analysis theories. For most people, a signature isn't worth much and doesn't get much attention, but celebrities and public officials get a bit more scrutiny. Here are some signature examples that have been immortalized (or will soon be) on US currency.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/jack-lews-terrible-signature-may-grace-bills.html" href="http://nym.ag/VMVH7u">Jack Lew's distinctive signature has been described as a stretched-out Slinky -- which would look <s>awesome</s> <s>unbecoming</s></a> <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/save-lewpty-lew/XLGNBBJs?">AWESOME</a> on a dollar bill. A ton of FOIA requests are probably being filed now to see all the documents that have Lew's signature on them.... [<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/01/jack-lews-terrible-signature-may-grace-bills.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.uspapermoney.info/sign/" href="http://bit.ly/TNqLpb">Here's a list of 47 signatures that have graced US currency since 1928.</a> Anna Escobedo Cabral wins for the most legibly stylish. [<a href="http://www.uspapermoney.info/sign/">url</a>]</li>
 
<li> <a title="http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/geithner-interviews/timothy-geithners-signature-not-fit-print" href="http://bit.ly/Xo1MZ5">Timothy Geithner also had a unintelligible signature, but he changed it to make it more readable for the US Treasury.</a> From now on, I'm sure some people will refer to Geithner as the former Treasury Secretary known as <a href="http://www.marketplace.org/sites/marketplace.org/files/179px-Timothy_Geithner_signature.svg_.png">[insert sig here]</a>. [<a href="http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/geithner-interviews/timothy-geithners-signature-not-fit-print">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18050711822/dailydirt-handwriting-analysis-secretaries-us-treasury.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101111/18050711822</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Big Money, Small Change</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23415511867/dailydirt-big-money-small-change.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23415511867/dailydirt-big-money-small-change.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've discussed the possibility of killing off the US penny <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml">before</a>, as well as Canada's plans to actually put an end to its penny. Some folks really hate these small denomination coins, but really large denominations aren't too popular, either. Here are just a few links on some money that won't see circulation.

<ul>

<li> <a title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/01/07/lawmaker-wants-to-ban-trillion-dollar-coins/" href="http://wapo.st/Wro5un">The US Treasury is technically allowed to mint platinum coins of any denomination -- but at least one lawmaker wants to prevent the possibility of a trillion dollar coin.</a> TL;DR -- does this bill prevent the minting of a half-trillion coin? [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/01/07/lawmaker-wants-to-ban-trillion-dollar-coins/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.mint.ca/store/mint/learn/eliminating-the-penny-6900002" href="http://bit.ly/XhYlTL">There's less than a month left for folks to hoard Canadian pennies because starting February 4th, the Royal Canadian mint will no longer distribute 1-cent coins.</a> Only cash transactions will be affected, requiring people to round to the nearest nickel. [<a href="http://www.mint.ca/store/mint/learn/eliminating-the-penny-6900002">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31763263/page/6" href="http://bit.ly/TJmvH9">Hungary once produced currency with a denomination of 100 million billion Pengos.</a> That's 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 Pengos -- worth about 20 cents in the US. [<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31763263/page/6">url</a>]</li>

</ul>

If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23415511867/dailydirt-big-money-small-change.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23415511867/dailydirt-big-money-small-change.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101114/23415511867/dailydirt-big-money-small-change.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101114/23415511867</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:01:54 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Sweden Failed To License Photographs On New Currency</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/02341020444/sweden-failed-to-license-photographs-new-currency.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/02341020444/sweden-failed-to-license-photographs-new-currency.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Ah, copyright.  Back in April, the Swedish central bank announced and showed off its new banknotes, including portraits of "important Swedish personalities."  There's just one problem: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=no&#038;tl=en&#038;js=n&#038;prev=_t&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;layout=2&#038;eotf=1&#038;u=http://www.nrk.no/kultur-og-underholdning/1.8327755" target="_blank">it failed to license the images before announcing the notes</a>.  The bank insists that it wants to license the photos, but by showing off the new bills with the images prior to licensing them, it's put itself in a not-so-great bargaining position, and it appears the photographers are using that to demand much higher prices than the bank was expecting.  So far, only two images have been cleared -- even though it's been five months since the new bills were announced and shown off.  Yes, the bank can (and most likely will) find other photos, but it's going to involve redesigning many of the bills in question.  Of course, this is the same Sweden where the government has been trying hard to crack down on infringement (at the urging of the US).  Yet it's own central bank is going with a "use first, license later" approach?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/02341020444/sweden-failed-to-license-photographs-new-currency.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/02341020444/sweden-failed-to-license-photographs-new-currency.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120920/02341020444/sweden-failed-to-license-photographs-new-currency.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>oops</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120920/02341020444</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Spare Some Change?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There have been proposals to stop minting the US penny for decades, but the little copper-colored coins are simply too beloved to remove from circulation. Rounding to the nearest nickel also probably rubs people the wrong way, but it seems like Canadians are going to find out how that works. Here are just a few other interesting articles on coins.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57407213-1/so-long-canadian-penny-i-wont-miss-you/" href="http://cnet.co/HXTdyg">Recently, Canada has killed its penny -- which cost more to mint than it was actually worth.</a> In the US, it costs more to mint both pennies AND nickels, but it doesn't look like we're going to stop making them. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57407213-1/so-long-canadian-penny-i-wont-miss-you/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-defense-of-the-dollar-coin/2012/03/16/gIQATw7FHS_story.html" href="http://wapo.st/Hg3mbf">It's been difficult to get Americans to use dollar coins over paper bills.</a> Dollar coins last longer and are cheaper to produce in the long run, but the Fed has just accumulated a collection of about 1.4 billion unused dollar coins that it's just storing in a vault. [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-defense-of-the-dollar-coin/2012/03/16/gIQATw7FHS_story.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/07/so-crazy-it-just-might-work" href="http://econ.st/Hn5U5M">Canada currently mints a $100,000 gold coin that weighs 10kg, but that's nothing compared to the proposal that the US treasury could mint a trillion dollar coin.</a> A coin worth a trillion bucks was a crazy idea for solving the US debt crisis last year because there's no statutory limit on the amount of coinage the Fed can produce (while there is a limit on paper currency). [<a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/07/so-crazy-it-just-might-work">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more stuff on economics, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137" href="http://bit.ly/mPvUHR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

As always, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100412/2347048989/dailydirt-spare-some-change.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100412/2347048989</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:58:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>If You Want To Compete With Free, This Is What You Need To Know</title>
<dc:creator>Zachary Knight</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120223/20250117858/if-you-want-to-compete-with-free-this-is-what-you-need-to-know.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120223/20250117858/if-you-want-to-compete-with-free-this-is-what-you-need-to-know.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ When it comes to competing with piracy, one of the talking points of copyright maximalists is that content creators "can't compete with free." These people complain that because pirates don't have to cover production costs, competing with them is a losing venture. What these people have not learned, despite our many attempts to teach them, is that price is not the only cost considered when consumers choose between buying legally and pirating. Over at Gamasutra, one expert blogger, Lars Doucet, has shared  <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/LarsDoucet/20120222/91144/Piracy_and_the_four_currencies.php">a very profound look at four "currencies" people consider when making such a choice</a>.
<blockquote>
<i>The problem with most piracy debates is that the only "cost" they discuss is money-dollars.</i> <br /><br /> <i>This is wrong because there are at least </i>four<i> currencies involved here, not just one (money-dollars).</i> <br /><br /> <i>I propose the following:&nbsp;</i> <ol> <li><i>($M) Money-dollars</i></li> <li><i>($T) Time-dollars</i></li> <li><i>($P) Pain-in-the-butt-dollars</i></li> <li><i>($I) Integrity-dollars</i></li> </ol>
</blockquote>
Lars explains what these are as follows:
<blockquote>
<i>For the purpose of this article Money-dollars will be denominated in USD, Time-dollars will be denominated in hours, and Pain-in-the-butt-dollars will be denominated in SI standard units of "amount-of-aspirin-I-have-to-take-after-beating-my-head-against-the-wall-for-an-hour." Feel free to measure Integrity-dollars in Hail-Marys, or hours spent lying awake at night.</i>
</blockquote>
Using these new variables in the consumer decision-making process, we can see quite clearly that even though the pirates have content creators beaten on the money-dollars aspect, there are still three other currencies through which <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120202/01473517632/hollywood-wants-to-kill-piracy-no-problem-just-offer-something-better.shtml">content creators can compete</a>. So let's take a look at these other currencies and see exactly how content creators can leverage them. <br /><br /> First, we have Time-dollars. This is how long it takes the consumer to get from deciding he wants the product to enjoying it. Any road block in this process increases this cost. So the goal as a content creator is to reduce that time. The easiest way to reduce the time cost is to take your content to the consumer. The internet is an amazing tool to do just that. People spend a lot of time online and use a variety of tools on it. For movie and television, people are spending their time on Netflix, Hulu and Youtube. For music, they are spending their time on Pandora, Spotify and Grooveshark. For games they spend their time on Steam, Kongregate and Impulse. These and many other places online are where the customers are. If the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111201/04085816941/how-labels-pulling-out-spotify-are-doing-massive-harm-to-themselves.shtml">content is not there</a>, they have to spend time looking for it elsewhere, thus driving up the cost in Time-dollars. If they can't find the content they want quickly and legally, they will be more inclined to find it quickly and illegally. <br /><br /> Next, we have Pain-in-the-butt-dollars. This is how hard it is to get from wanting the content to enjoying the content. When most content creators attempt to compete with pirates, they often choose to battle through this currency. This is where laws like the DMCA and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111122/04254316872/definitive-post-why-sopa-protect-ip-are-bad-bad-ideas.shtml">SOPA</a> come in. These laws are conceived as a way to increase the $P cost of piracy. Unfortunately, by creating these laws, the $P cost of legal content has also risen. With the DMCA came the anti-circumvention clause, which prevents owners of legal content from bypassing DRM which increases the $P cost of content. We have learned repeatedly over the years that the $P <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120203/07550617650/ubisoft-cuts-off-legit-players-with-drm-server-migration-pirates-play.shtml">cost of DRM</a> is often far too high for legal customers and pirates have been able to bypass it, thus dropping the $P cost of the illegal offerings. If content creators truly want to compete through the $P cost, then they need to offer convenience for their paying customers. The more barriers put between the paying customer and the content, the less likely they will value the legal offering. <br /><br /> Finally, we have Integrity-dollars. This cost is probably the most ethereal of the four. This is based on how the consumer feels when either buying the content or pirating it. If content creators want to compete through this currency, then they need to learn how to be more <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120210/02273417726/how-being-more-open-human-awesome-can-save-anyone-worried-about-making-money-entertainment.shtml">human and open</a> with fans. If the consumers would rather support pirates than the content creators themselves, then those content creators certainly have a $I cost problem. Along with being the most ethereal of the four currencies, this is also one of the easiest to be swayed by the costs in the other three currencies. For example, if the fans like a content creator, but they feel he charges too much and it takes too long to get the content legally, the $I cost of the content has just gone up.  Even worse, if the content creator lashes out at fans and treats fans as criminals, the $I cost of the authorized content goes way, way up, because people <i>don't want</i> to support the artist.<br /><br /> While this is definitely not an exhaustive look at the currencies used by consumers when making their purchase decisions, it is one of the most spot on analyses of the topic. So when we ask content creators to compete with piracy, this is what we mean. To leverage the non-money currencies at their disposal. After all, the content creators are the ones who actually control these costs.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120223/20250117858/if-you-want-to-compete-with-free-this-is-what-you-need-to-know.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120223/20250117858/if-you-want-to-compete-with-free-this-is-what-you-need-to-know.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20120223/20250117858/if-you-want-to-compete-with-free-this-is-what-you-need-to-know.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-just-cash-money</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120223/20250117858</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: In Money, We Trust (Sometimes)</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Money is an interesting concept. Government institutions create a supply of money and try to control the value of it within some acceptable ranges. But when the value of money goes out of control, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plano_Real">solutions</a> for getting it stabilized seem a bit illogical. Still, if you can get enough people to switch their faith from one money to another, it seems to work. Here are a few more stories on the topic of money and currency. 
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/11/10/142217235/leaving-the-euro-is-hard-to-do" href="http://n.pr/w8Kuxf">It's intriguingly difficult for any country that currently uses the euro to try to stop using it and switch to some other form of currency.</a> So difficult, in fact, there's a $400,000 prize for anyone who can figure out a process that would actually work and not create monetary chaos. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/11/10/142217235/leaving-the-euro-is-hard-to-do">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576542851688284590.html" href="http://on.wsj.com/yhkUOk">Some Brazilians are using locally-printed currencies instead of its national reais -- such as the capivari, which is just one of the 63 local kinds of money.</a> The capivari is a printed bill (with a picture of a rodent on it!), equal in value to the reai, but retailers give customers discounts for using capivaris (making these local bills into fancy coupons, essentially). [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904583204576542851688284590.html">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency" href="http://bit.ly/wy24wM">Last year, the IMF's Dominique Strauss-Kahn proposed an alternative to the dollar in central banks' foreign currency reserves.</a> A system of special drawing rights (SDRs) for central banks would be priced according to international trade instead of any single nation's currency. (It's not an entirely new idea, but it's never caught on.) [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/01/03/vietnamese-use-dollar-at-their-peril/#axzz1iQfxQoLT" href="http://on.ft.com/A5sxbt">In Vietnam, there's a penalty for posting prices in dollars instead of the local currency.</a> The local currency suffers from high inflation rates, so they might want to look into Brazil's monetary history for some lessons.... [<a href="http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/01/03/vietnamese-use-dollar-at-their-peril/#axzz1iQfxQoLT">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more stuff on economics, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137" href="http://bit.ly/mPvUHR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:137">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

As always, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101102/10463011687/dailydirt-money-we-trust-sometimes.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101102/10463011687</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:56:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>The Rise And Fall Of Bitcoin... But Is It Really Over  Yet?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111128/03295016910/rise-fall-bitcoin-is-it-really-over-yet.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111128/03295016910/rise-fall-bitcoin-is-it-really-over-yet.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in April, just as Bitcoin was starting to get some mainstream attention, I <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml">questioned</a> its ability to succeed long term.  Too much about it felt like a fad, and there seemed to be significant questions about it.  However, over the next few months, as the price of Bitcoins rose quickly, and there was more and more interest in it, I wondered if perhaps my natural skepticism got the best of me.  Of course, since then, the Bitcoin market has come way back down, and the concept has definitely lost a lot of its "shiny new thing" appeal.
<br /><br />
Wired is running a <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/1" target="_blank">detailed article on "The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin,"</a> which is a worthwhile read.  Of course, it seems to be premised on the idea that Bitcoin is more or less dead -- a fad that came and went.  Indeed, my initial post on Bitcoin questioned whether it would just be a fad.  I still think it's likely... but I'm wondering if the big flare up over the past few months might be <i>good</i> for Bitcoin in the long run.  Lots of speculators came and went, and Bitcoin gets to be ignored once more.  Might that create a space to allow for a more sustainable ecosystem to be built, while the speculators and swindlers have moved on?  Maybe.  I'm still thinking that Bitcoin is most likely a fad that will die out.  But sometimes a big flame out early on is a good way to obscure work that comes out of the ashes.
<br /><br />
If I had to guess (and it's purely a guess), I'd say that the real legacy of Bitcoin may be in how it paved a path.  The more interesting area to watch might not be what happens to Bitcoin specifically, but what <i>the next</i> attempt at such a currency brings around.  There are lots of smart people looking at what happened to Bitcoin, and someone's going to come up with a better mousetrap.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111128/03295016910/rise-fall-bitcoin-is-it-really-over-yet.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111128/03295016910/rise-fall-bitcoin-is-it-really-over-yet.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111128/03295016910/rise-fall-bitcoin-is-it-really-over-yet.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>not-quite</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111128/03295016910</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Oct 2011 02:20:43 PDT</pubDate>
<title>New UK Banknote Celebrates James Watt, Patent Bully and Monopolist</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111001/03172516171/new-uk-banknote-celebrates-james-watt-patent-bully-monopolist.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111001/03172516171/new-uk-banknote-celebrates-james-watt-patent-bully-monopolist.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As do many nations, England likes to put images of its great and good on banknotes. In a somewhat quixotic attempt to stem the decline of what little manufacturing remains in the country, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/sep/30/50-pound-reward-industrial-revolution">the governor of the Bank of England has come up with the following idea</a>:
<blockquote><i>Sir Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, has often voiced his yearning for a "rebalancing" of the economy towards neglected manufacturing, and he will put the nation's money where his mouth is next month when the Bank produces a new &pound;50 note celebrating two pioneers of the industrial revolution.
<br /><br />
The Bank will evoke the memory of the inventor James Watt and his Birmingham business partner, Matthew Boulton on the new note.</i></blockquote>
Here's the orthodoxy regarding Watt and Boulton's contribution to innovation and the industrial revolution, as retold by the Guardian piece about the new banknotes:
<blockquote><i>[Boulton] later went into partnership with James Watt, who took the Newcomen steam engine, then the latest design, and made a series of crucial improvements, improving its efficiency and making it more commercial.
<br /><br />
By 1800, Watt's version [of the Newcomen steam engine] was outselling its predecessor, and they were shipping it across the world. Boulton and Watt worked together to pioneer the use of the steam engine in the cotton spinning industry; and Boulton also used Watt's engine to power minting machines, pressing coins at his Soho Mint in Birmingham, to boost the supply provided by the Royal Mint.</i></blockquote>
What's missing from this rosy picture of jolly engineers and entrepreneurs working together to apply technology for the benefit of humanity is that <a href="http://mises.org/daily/3280">Watt was one of the first to exploit the monopoly power of patents to stymie innovation by others</a>:
<blockquote><i>Once Watt's patents were secured and production started, a substantial portion of his energy was devoted to fending off rival inventors. In 1782, Watt secured an additional patent, made "necessary in consequence of ... having been so unfairly anticipated, by [Matthew] Wasborough in the crank motion". More dramatically, in the 1790s, when the superior Hornblower engine was put into production, Boulton and Watt went after him with the full force of the legal system.
<br /><br />
During the period of Watt's patents the United Kingdom added about 750 horsepower of steam engines per year. In the thirty years following Watt's patents, additional horsepower was added at a rate of more than 4,000 per year. Moreover, the fuel efficiency of steam engines changed little during the period of Watt's patent; while between 1810 and 1835 it is estimated to have increased by a factor of five.
<br /><br />
After the expiration of Watt's patents, not only was there an explosion in the production and efficiency of engines, but steam power came into its own as the driving force of the Industrial Revolution. Over a thirty year period steam engines were modified and improved as crucial innovations such as the steam train, the steamboat and the steam jenny came into wide usage. The key innovation was the high-pressure steam engine &mdash; development of which had been blocked by Watt's strategic use of his patent. Many new improvements to the steam engine, such as those of William Bull, Richard Trevithick, and Arthur Woolf, became available by 1804: although developed earlier these innovations were kept idle until the Boulton and Watt patent expired.</i></blockquote>
So rather than representing all that is best about invention and industrial innovation, the story of Watt and Boulton turns out to be one of how the nascent patent system was abused to prevent progress in this field. Indeed, it offers one of the best demonstrations that patents often harm everyone &ndash; even patent-holders:
<blockquote><i>Ironically, not only did Watt use the patent system as a legal cudgel with which to smash competition, but his own efforts at developing a superior steam engine were hindered by the very same patent system he used to keep competitors at bay. An important limitation of the original Newcomen engine was its inability to deliver a steady rotary motion. The most convenient solution, involving the combined use of the crank and a flywheel, relied on a method patented by James Pickard, which prevented Watt from using it. Watt also made various attempts at efficiently transforming reciprocating into rotary motion, reaching, apparently, the same solution as Pickard. But the existence of a patent forced him to contrive an alternative less-efficient mechanical device, the "sun and planet" gear. It was only in 1794, after the expiration of Pickard's patent that Boulton and Watt adopted the economically and technically superior crank.</i></blockquote>
As such, Watt and Boulton's appearance on the new &pound;50 banknote is not so much a celebration of engineering excellence, as a timely reminder of the harm that patents and their thickets continue to wreak on true innovators today.
<br /><br />
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href=http://twitter.com/glynmoody>Twitter</a> or <a href=http://identi.ca/glynmoody>identi.ca</a>, and on <a href=https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533>Google+</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111001/03172516171/new-uk-banknote-celebrates-james-watt-patent-bully-monopolist.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111001/03172516171/new-uk-banknote-celebrates-james-watt-patent-bully-monopolist.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111001/03172516171/new-uk-banknote-celebrates-james-watt-patent-bully-monopolist.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>litigation-is-easier-than-innovation</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111001/03172516171</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2011 06:38:33 PDT</pubDate>
<title>New Yorker Reporter May Have Uncovered Secretive Bitcoin Creator</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/17560716191/new-yorker-reporter-may-have-uncovered-secretive-bitcoin-creator.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/17560716191/new-yorker-reporter-may-have-uncovered-secretive-bitcoin-creator.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's been plenty of press attention on Bitcoin over the last six to eight months, and many talk about how Bitcoin came about in a rather secretive manner by someone going by the name "Satoshi Nakamoto," who then basically disappeared.  No one seems to know who Nakamoto is.  However, in a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/10/111010fa_fact_davis" target="_blank">new New Yorker article</a> (mostly hidden behind a paywall), reporter Joshua Davis may have tracked down Nakamoto.  While the New Yorker is going to lose traffic and interest in this story by not putting it online, it's opened up the opportunity for others, such as the folks at <i>Planet Money</i>, who have the key details: including the <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/10/03/141011155/did-a-reporter-just-solve-the-bitcoin-mystery" target="_blank">belief that "Nakamoto" is likely a guy named Michael Clear</a>.
<blockquote><i>
So Davis, the author of the New Yorker story, emails Clear.                           <p>"I like to keep a low profile," Clear replies. "I'm curious to know how you found me."</p>                           <p>Davis eventually cuts to the chase:</p>                           <blockquote class="edTag">                           <p>Finally, I asked, "Are you Satoshi?"</p>                           <p>He laughed, but didn't respond. There was an awkward silence.</p>                           <p>"If you like, I'd be happy to review the design for you," he offered instead. "I could let you know what I think."</p>                           <p>"Sure," I said hesitantly. "Do you need me to send you a link to the code?"</p>                           <p>"I think I can find it," he said.</p>                           </blockquote>                           <p>In the end, Clear says he's not the guy &mdash; but his denial leaves the door open just a crack:</p>                           <blockquote class="edTag">                           <p>"I'm not Satoshi," Clear said. "But even if I was I wouldn't tell you."</p>
</blockquote></i></blockquote>
The other key point is that Clear points out a weakness in the Bitcoin code: encryption for wallets.  When <i>Planet Money's</i> Jacob Goldstein asks another Bitcoin expert about what's new in Bitcoin, the guy points out that the latest version... has wallet encryption.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/17560716191/new-yorker-reporter-may-have-uncovered-secretive-bitcoin-creator.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/17560716191/new-yorker-reporter-may-have-uncovered-secretive-bitcoin-creator.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/17560716191/new-yorker-reporter-may-have-uncovered-secretive-bitcoin-creator.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>in-the-clear</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111003/17560716191</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:58:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>South Pacific Island To Use Star Wars Coins As Currency? Or Just As A Publicity Stunt?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110818/17202915594/south-pacific-island-to-use-star-wars-coins-as-currency-just-as-publicity-stunt.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110818/17202915594/south-pacific-island-to-use-star-wars-coins-as-currency-just-as-publicity-stunt.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The islands of the South Pacific have some odd views on currency.  In the past, we've discussed how the Island of Yap famously used <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml">massive immovable stones</a> as its currency.  And now the island of Niue is prepared to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/08/star-wars-coins-niue.html" target="_blank">recognize collectible <i>Star Wars</i> coins as official currency</a>.  Of course, the whole thing seems more like a publicity stunt by the New Zealand Mint, which is making these coins.  They're still being sold at collectible prices -- meaning coins with a face value of $1 (New Zealand) will actually sell for $23.50 NZ.  So even as they'll be recognized as legal currency in Niue (but not New Zealand), it seems unlikely that anyone will use them as such, as their face value will be significantly below their market value.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110818/17202915594/south-pacific-island-to-use-star-wars-coins-as-currency-just-as-publicity-stunt.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110818/17202915594/south-pacific-island-to-use-star-wars-coins-as-currency-just-as-publicity-stunt.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110818/17202915594/south-pacific-island-to-use-star-wars-coins-as-currency-just-as-publicity-stunt.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>does-george-lucas-get-a-cut?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110818/17202915594</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:02:15 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can Bitcoin Really Succeed Long Term?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For quite some time, I've been interested in the general concept of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml">currencies</a> and how money works in general.  I remember an early episode of NPR's <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/" target="_blank">Planet Money</a> podcast, in which they tried to answer the simple question: 
what is money?  They quickly discovered it's not an easy question to answer (and, in fact, those working on the podcast have revisited the question many times in many interesting ways -- including a fascinating episode a few months back looking at <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/02/15/131934618/the-island-of-stone-money" target"_blank">the Island of Stone Money</a>.  That episode discussed the island of Yap in the South Pacific, that for many years used massive limestone discs as money.  And, by massive, I mean sometimes weighing upwards of a ton.  In other words, it didn't have one of the key features that many normally associate with "money," which is that it's a "currency of exchange."  In theory, you can't easily "exchange" a giant rock.
<br /><br />
But the clever islanders on Yap came up with a solution.  It was made clear who actually owned which stones, and then you could effectively transfer "title" to the stones, even if you didn't move the stones themselves.  There was even the story of boat that was bringing in a new giant limestone disc (the limestone all came from another island), and due to a storm, the boat capsized and the stone sunk to the bottom of the ocean.  However, it still counted as money, just so long as everyone knew whose it was.  Now, when you hear that at first, it sounds ridiculous, but as the Planet Money folks pointed out, is it really all that different than your bank account?  The only reason you have "money" in your bank account is because the bank marks it in its database.  The bank isn't literally holding a stack of cash for you.  In fact, as soon as you give it your money, it's probably handing it out to someone else.
<br /><br />
All that brings me around to the question of Bitcoin.  In various techie circles, there's been a fair amount of buzz about Bitcoin lately. Especially following efforts by other payment companies like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101204/16050612129/paypal-latest-to-cut-off-wikileaks.shtml">Paypal</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/00300612152/freedom-expression-is-priceless-everything-else-theres-mastercard.shtml">Mastercard</a> to cut off contributions to Wikileaks, there's been a lot more interest in figuring out what infrastructure pieces in today's world <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101215/02391012281/how-wikileaks-operation-payback-have-exposed-infrastructure-that-should-be-decentralized-isnt.shtml">should be more decentralized</a>, and an obvious target is "money."
<br /><br />
And that's where many point to Bitcoin.  Jerry Brito has a <a href="http://techland.time.com/2011/04/16/online-cash-bitcoin-could-challenge-governments/" target="_blank">nice writeup on Bitcoin</a> about how it's a decentralized digital currency that is growing in popularity, and, in theory can resist attacks and problems of previous attempts at various digital currencies, while providing significant anonymity.  Tim Lee quickly responded with skepticism about whether or not Bitcoin can really work, looking both at the <a href="http://timothyblee.com/2011/04/18/the-bitcoin-bubble/" target="_blank">demand side</a> of the question and <a href="http://timothyblee.com/2011/04/19/bitcoins-collusion-problem/" target="_blank">the supply side</a>.  I'm not sure Lee's <i>specific</i> arguments are entirely accurate, but I think his <i>general</i> arguments may be.  
<br /><br />
This doesn't mean Bitcoin (or something like it) can't be successful.  It's just that it has an uphill battle.  I think it's already useful in certain areas, but that's a big step away from getting to where it really needs to be to succeed in the long run -- and those steps can be much bigger than most people imagine.  However, I could certainly envision scenarios that lead to rapid Bitcoin (or similar offering) adoption.  I just wonder how sustainable it would really be vs. how much would just be a fad.  In the end, I have to admit that I'm torn on this one.  While I appreciate the concept of Bitcoin, and think that it might be nice if something like it was really popular, I do wonder if it really has the legs to reach such a level of success.  One thing I do know for sure, however: I'd certainly like to hear the folks at Planet Money examine Bitcoin and how it plays into their sporadic explorations of money itself.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110420/02412713972/can-bitcoin-really-succeed-long-term.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>questions-to-ponder</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110420/02412713972</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:30:21 PST</pubDate>
<title>GAO Suggests It's Time To Ditch Dollar Bills For Coins</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/04030313382/gao-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-dollar-bills-coins.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/04030313382/gao-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-dollar-bills-coins.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While not the first time it's done so, the GAO has once again <a href="http://consumerist.com/2011/03/gao-to-treasury-replace-dollar-bills-with-coins.html" target="_blank">urged the federal government to get rid of dollar bills</a> and replace them with dollar coins.  It says that this single move could save the government $5.5 billion over 30 years.  That's chump change to the government, but it's still $5.5 billion.  The report notes that Canada and the UK have done similar moves, and it has worked despite initial public resistance.  Still, I'd imagine that US public resistance can be stronger than elsewhere on issues that are fundamentally meaningless, but to which people apply a sentimental value.  And let's not even get started on the question of whether or not it's finally time to ditch the penny...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/04030313382/gao-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-dollar-bills-coins.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/04030313382/gao-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-dollar-bills-coins.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/04030313382/gao-suggests-its-time-to-ditch-dollar-bills-coins.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>that'll-upset-some-folks</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110307/04030313382</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:27:32 PST</pubDate>
<title>Rethinking Money: Breaking Up Currencies</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/04005911963/rethinking-money-breaking-up-currencies.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/04005911963/rethinking-money-breaking-up-currencies.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I remember when I was quite young, my father predicted to me that we'd probably see the end of cash within our lifetimes, as all money would move to electronic money in the form of credit cards (or credit card-like interfaces).  Every so often this idea has been discussed, but it usually gets shot down by those who like the anonymity of cash (which is one reason why some governments <i>don't</i> like it).  So it's interesting to hear <a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/11/21/0112252/Estonian-Economist-Suggests-Abandoning-Cash?from=twitter" target="_blank">via Slashdot</a> that an Estonian economist is recommending that the country go completely electronic <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&#038;prev=_t&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;layout=2&#038;eotf=1&#038;sl=et&#038;tl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fuudised.err.ee%2Findex.php%3F06219581&#038;act=url" target="_blank">as it adopts the Euro</a>.  I would imagine there are some issues with doing so (including the fact that cash and coins from other Eurozone countries would inevitably bleed in).
<br /><br />
That said, there have been a few other stories lately that have me thinking about the future of money, and I actually could see a way that countries could move in this general direction without actually getting rid of cash entirely.  Last year, we wrote about the question of whether or not the world would move to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml">a single world currency</a>, while simultaneously considering whether or not we'd actually start to see growth in very localized currencies, which are increasingly common in various cities to encourage people to shop locally.  Again, neither situation seemed ideal, but were definitely interesting to think about.
<br /><br />
Recently, however, Umair Haque wrote up an interesting post, positing that money could be <a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2010/11/institutional-innovation-unbundling.html" target="_blank">split into three types of currencies</a> which serve three separate functions.  The idea is not to break them up by region -- as described above -- but by function.  Umair's writeup is a bit opaque, but he notes that currency is used as a store of value, as a medium of exchange and as a unit of account, but those functions can be separated.  The end result, would be as follows:
<blockquote><i>
You have three kinds of notes in your wallet. The first you use at the grocery store. The second, at the bank and in the financial markets. The third, between your employer, the state, and public services. Each has very different volatilities and trajectories, because each has very different levels of supply, demand which are, crucially, independent from one another--but interdependent on real wealth, long-run productivity, etc.
</i></blockquote>
Now, this may be difficult to comprehend in the abstract.  How would that actually work and why would each have different volatilities and trajectories?  Well, the <i>good news</i> is that we actually have a real world example of this.  A few weeks back the always excellent Planet Money team at NPR did a wonderful episode on <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/10/04/130329523/how-fake-money-saved-brazil" target="_blank">how "fake money" saved Brazil from rampant inflation</a>.  The story is fascinating, and I highly recommend listening to it.  But, it was basically a simplified version of what Haque is suggesting.  Brazil had crazy inflation, so crazy that every day, stores had to remark their entire stock to raise prices, and people would rush ahead of the clerk with the price stickers to get "yesterday's" prices.
<br /><br />
The way Brazil "solved" the issue was to effectively issue a made up new currency to handle some functions of money: mainly the unit of account.  You couldn't actually get paid in it, or pay with it, but all the goods in all the stores were suddenly priced with it.  Then, rather than having to change the prices every day, each day, the government would put out a rate card with the exchange rate, and people would work off of that.  Now, you might say this shouldn't make a difference, but it actually did.  It got people thinking in terms of the new "stable" rates, and got them past their general distrust of monetary value.  (One side note: this upset some of the wealthy, who were simply making a ton in interest -- and they complained about how this new system meant they actually had to innovate and invest to make money -- which reminded me of certain industries in the US who like to avoid innovating and investing themselves...).
<br /><br />
Either way, you had a situation where the currency for prices was perfectly stable at the same time the other currency was still dealing with massive inflation.  As Haque points out, you have different currencies with different volatility.  Eventually, Brazil switched entirely over to this new currency and made the fake currency a real currency, but there's no reason why you couldn't keep multiple currencies, and break them up into a third bucket as well, as Haque suggests.
<br /><br />
I can definitely see how there could be some value in doing so, providing a lot more flexibility, and removing certain risk elements.  However, I do wonder if the greater level of confusion might be a problem for many, and lead to huge potential arbitrage opportunities, where the more financially sophisticated folks took advantage of much less financially sophisticated individuals, to swap these different levels of currency around.  I'm not convinced either way on this, but it does seem fun to think about the possibilities...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/04005911963/rethinking-money-breaking-up-currencies.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/04005911963/rethinking-money-breaking-up-currencies.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/04005911963/rethinking-money-breaking-up-currencies.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>different-purposes</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101122/04005911963</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:21:46 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Vodo Sets Up Currency To Encourage More Promotion</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101003/23372411262/vodo-sets-up-currency-to-encourage-more-promotion.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101003/23372411262/vodo-sets-up-currency-to-encourage-more-promotion.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ In the debate over business models that embrace file sharing networks, one of the more interesting projects to watch has been Vodo, which is a platform for filmmakers who wish to release their works via file sharing setups, and to enjoy a promotional boost for doing so.  Movies released via Vodo have done quite well, both in getting attention <i>and</i> in getting monetary support.  The company has now updated its system and has added an interesting element: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/p2p-backed-film-platform-to-reward-influencers-101003/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A Torrentfreak %28Torrentfreak%29" target="_blank">an internal currency, called "Do," to encourage people to promote</a> the works.
<br /><br />
That is, if you point people to a download -- you can earn some "Do" every time someone visits an artist's website or downloads the work or even agrees to give money to a content creator.  This could be interesting to watch, though I do wonder how well it will work.  On the positive side, as we were just discussing in our <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100927/22032911187/our-own-dark-helmet-shares-lessons-from-crowdfunding-experiment.shtml">Dark Helmet case study</a>, one of the most important things in getting modern business models to work is to get your biggest fans to help promote you.  However, at the same time, we've also warned about the risks of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100707/17410510116.shtml">artificial incentives</a> to promote some content, you run the risk of people <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100831/02183710830.shtml">questioning the motives</a> for the promotion.  If Vodo can balance this, it could be quite nice, but that balance is very much an open question.  I agree that it's important to make people comfortable promoting you, but I worry that creating such incentives leaves it very much open to gaming, rather than legitimate advocacy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101003/23372411262/vodo-sets-up-currency-to-encourage-more-promotion.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101003/23372411262/vodo-sets-up-currency-to-encourage-more-promotion.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101003/23372411262/vodo-sets-up-currency-to-encourage-more-promotion.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>alternative-economies</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101003/23372411262</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 May 2010 21:37:11 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Costa Rican Money Might Infringe On Artist's Copyright?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100503/0220599272.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100503/0220599272.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've pointed out in the past the oddity that some countries <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml">copyright</a> the design of their currency, though we can't quite figure out why.  There are already anti-counterfeiting laws for copying money, so why add copyright on top of that?  However, down in Costa Rica, there may be a slightly different issue brewing.  <a href="http://twitter.com/CopyrightLaw/statuses/13266967244" target="_blank">Michael Scott</a> points us to the news that an artist is <a href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-money" target="_blank">upset that a painting he did of educator Mauro Fernandez is to be included on new currency</a>, being issued by the government, without his permission.  The article is a bit unclear on who owns the copyright, but does note that the painting itself is owned by the Costa Rican National Museum, and the government had received permission from the museum.  However, it also notes that Costa Rica has "moral rights" as well, which could allow the artist to demand his name be associated with his work.  It appears to deal with this, the Costa Rican Central Bank is calling a press conference to "recognize" the painter as the creator of the image.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100503/0220599272.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100503/0220599272.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100503/0220599272.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>or-just-moral-rights...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100503/0220599272</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:54:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Why Do Canada And Europe Copyright Money?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've discussed in the past the odd idea that any government should be able to copyright anything it produces, but plenty of governments still do maintain things like "crown copyright" or other similar concepts for content they create.  Yet, it looks like some countries have gone one step further.  They <b>copyright</b> their  <i>money</i>.  Yes, <a href="http://twitter.com/CopyrightLaw/statuses/5326698846" target="_blank">Michael Scott</a> points us to a blog post from an American law professor, Eric E. Johnson, who was on a trip to Canada and was surprised to <a href="http://www.pixelization.org/2009/10/respect-copyright-law-dont-print-your-own-canadian-money.html" target="_blank">discover that they have copyright notices on their paper currency</a>.  Of course, this should make you wonder: if you counterfeit some Canadian money are you also on the hook for copyright infringement violations?  Or is there some other reason for the copyright notice.  Are they afraid other nations might copy the design without compensation?
<br /><br />
Finding the whole thing bizarre, but remembering that I have some Canadian currency from my last trip there, I checked -- and, indeed, in tiny print in the lower right-hand corner, there is a copyright notice.  And then... bonus.  Tucked in with my Canadian cash was a 5 euro bill as well... and it <i>also</i> appears to have a copyright notice on it right at the top in the center (though, it's <i>tiny</i>).  I did a quick search, and indeed, it appears that the design of the euro is <a href="http://www.dnb.nl/en/payments/euro-banknotes-and-coins/euro-banknotes/reproduction-and-copyright/" target="_blank">also covered by copyright</a> with specific limitations on copying.  Of course, I thought that was what <i>counterfeiting laws were for -- so why even bother with copyright?</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091102/0418556762.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>questions,-questions,-questions?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091102/0418556762</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:17:06 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Moving To A Single Currency... Or Lots Of Local Currencies?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few days ago, Kyle Brady sent over his blog post wondering if the world would eventually <a href="http://www.kyle-brady.com/2009/08/17/moving-beyond-currency/" target="_new">move to a single currency</a>.  His suggestion would be that it would be based on the Euro, though can you just imagine the political uproar in the US if <i>anyone</i> actually took a step in that direction?  Politically, it's a total non-starter.  If you think that people are freaking out over health care reform, just wait until anyone in power suggested something like this.  It simply won't happen.  Brady's post goes on to suggest that this could help us move to a more digital currency, though I think we're already pretty much there.  Actual paper money is a tiny fraction of the real money supply these days.  Money is digital for all intents and purposes right now.
<br /><br />
However, just after reading that... I came across an article suggesting pretty much the exact opposite: that we're perhaps <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2009/08/we_dont_need_no_stinking_dolla.html" target="_blank">more likely to move to more splintered currencies</a> as local regions start creating their own currencies.  The article, in particular, talks about Brooklyn trying to create a Brooklyn-specific currency.  Such things are hardly new.  Having spent five years of my life in Ithaca, NY, I was quite familiar with <a href="http://www.ithacahours.org/" target="_blank">Ithaca Hours</a>, the local currency that is often held up as the model on which such local currencies can work.  Of course, we've seen other <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040726/012247.shtml">attempts</a> to do this in the past, and I'm not sure any can really get big enough to matter.  But I can see how they are appealing to some during economic downturns, as they look for better ways to try to get people to focus on local businesses.  Designing a currency that encourages you to spend locally might seem like a good idea, and it can work in small doses.  In the end, though, I doubt either movement (single world currency, splintering local currencies) is likely to become that big of a deal in the near future.  The system we have now actually works pretty well (despite the economic mess faced today).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090820/0230575943.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>or-a-combination-of-both?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090820/0230575943</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>