<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;coolness&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>UK Judge: Samsung Wins Over Apple In Patent Dispute Because Its Tablet Isn't As Cool As iPad</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/11502919632/uk-judge-samsung-wins-over-apple-patent-dispute-because-its-tablet-isnt-as-cool-as-ipad.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/11502919632/uk-judge-samsung-wins-over-apple-patent-dispute-because-its-tablet-isnt-as-cool-as-ipad.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ While the judge in the US <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120626/21205319498/round-two-apple-succeeds-getting-samsung-tablet-banned-us.shtml">banned</a> Samsung's devices claiming it was likely that Samsung violated Apple's patents, there was a different result in the UK... where a judge has decided that Samsung didn't violate Apple's design patent, because it's obvious that <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-18773690" target="_blank">Samsung's Galaxy Tab is just not as cool as Apple's iPad</a>.
<blockquote><i>
"They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design," said Judge Birss.
<br /><br />
"They are not as cool," he said. "The overall impression produced is different."
</i></blockquote>
Amusingly, of course, this puts Samsung in the position of celebrating its lack of coolness.
<br /><br />
In the end, this is the right result, but the reasoning is a bit odd, frankly.  When patent disputes are being determined based on a judge's determination of "coolness," it seems like perhaps something is wrong with the system itself.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/11502919632/uk-judge-samsung-wins-over-apple-patent-dispute-because-its-tablet-isnt-as-cool-as-ipad.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/11502919632/uk-judge-samsung-wins-over-apple-patent-dispute-because-its-tablet-isnt-as-cool-as-ipad.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/11502919632/uk-judge-samsung-wins-over-apple-patent-dispute-because-its-tablet-isnt-as-cool-as-ipad.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>that's-one-way-to-do-it</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120709/11502919632</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>