<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;conservatives&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:35:28 PST</pubDate>
<title>New Book Makes The Case For Why Copyright Needs To Be Reformed</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/07554721091/new-book-makes-case-why-copyright-needs-to-be-reformed.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/07554721091/new-book-makes-case-why-copyright-needs-to-be-reformed.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I've argued in the past that copyright is a <i>non-partisan</i> issue, in that the concepts behind fixing a broken copyright system shouldn't be specific to either major political party.  Unfortunately, historically, that's meant that there's been bi-partisan interest in helping Hollywood expand the system over and over and over and over again (<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120215/04241517766/how-much-is-enough-weve-passed-15-anti-piracy-laws-last-30-years.shtml">15 expansions</a> in the last 30 years).  However, as we saw over the weekend with the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121118/23364521085/dont-let-retraction-distract-simple-fact-gop-copyright-policy-brief-was-brilliant.shtml">wonderful</a> RSC brief that was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml">released</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml">retracted</a> in a day, there is significant interest in some circles to explore the idea of substantial copyright reform, which includes recognizing that the existing system is not functioning up to the standards set forth in the Constitution.
<br /><br />
Along those lines, it's interesting timing to see that the Mercatus Center at George Mason University is <a href="http://techliberation.com/2012/11/19/forthcoming-book-on-conservative-and-libertarian-skepticism-about-our-copyright-system/" target="_blank">about to publish a book on why conservatives and libertarians should support copyright  reform</a> called <i>Copyright Unbalanced: From Incentive to Excess</i>.  The book was put together by Jerry Brito, and he describes some of what's in the book as follows:
<ul><i>
<li>Yours truly [Jerry Brito] making the Hayekian and public choice case for reform</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda"><strong>Reihan Salam</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.patrickruffini.com/"><strong>Patrick Ruffini</strong></a> arguing that the GOP should take up the cause of reforming what is now a crony capitalist system</li>
<li><a href="http://www.volokh.com/author/davidp/"><strong>David Post</strong></a> explaining why SOPA was so dangerous</li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/author/timothy-b-lee/"><strong>Tim Lee</strong></a> on the criminalization of copyright and the a use of asset forfeiture in enforcing copyright</li>
<li><a href="http://cmmulligan.com/"><strong>Christina Mulligan</strong></a> explaining that the DMCA harms competition and free expression</li>
<li><a href="http://elidourado.com/"><strong>Eli Dourado</strong></a> calculating that the system we have today likely far exceeds what we need in order to offer authors an incentive to create</li>
<li><a href="http://www.tomwbell.com/"><strong>Tom Bell</strong></a> suggesting five reforms for copyright, including returning to the Founders&#8217; vision of what copyright should be</li>
</i></ul>
It's good to see more analysis of why the copyright system is in dire need of reform.  While I still think this should be a non-partisan issue, rather than a strictly partisan one, it's interesting to see one side of the political spectrum popping up at this time to make the argument.  Over the past few years, it's seemed like many of the arguments in favor of copyright reform came from the more liberal/progressive side of the spectrum anyway, so hopefully this "balances" out the calls for reform a bit and makes it clear: the time to fix the copyright system is now, no matter what your political persuasion might be.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/07554721091/new-book-makes-case-why-copyright-needs-to-be-reformed.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/07554721091/new-book-makes-case-why-copyright-needs-to-be-reformed.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/07554721091/new-book-makes-case-why-copyright-needs-to-be-reformed.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>time-for-a-change</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121119/07554721091</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:54:07 PDT</pubDate>
<title>What Can Bring Together Opposites On The Traditional Political Spectrum? A Fear Of Censorship Due To PROTECT IP</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110831/02230115748/what-can-bring-together-opposites-traditional-political-spectrum-fear-censorship-due-to-protect-ip.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110831/02230115748/what-can-bring-together-opposites-traditional-political-spectrum-fear-censorship-due-to-protect-ip.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ If you follow the political world these days, you'd think that there was nothing out there that a "bleeding-heart liberal" and a "Tea Party conservative" might agree on.  But it appears that the hugely problematic PROTECT IP Act is bringing together such diverse interests.  David Segal and Patrick Ruffini -- who probably don't agree on very much at all politically -- teamed up to <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2011/08/protect_ip.html" target="_blank">write an editorial about the problems of PROTECT IP</a>, for OregonLive.  The editorial notes the massive unintended consequences likely to come from the bill, and highlights how this is an issue outside of any standard political spectrum.  This isn't an issue about political viewpoints. It's an issue about fundamental values and the belief that censorship is wrong.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110831/02230115748/what-can-bring-together-opposites-traditional-political-spectrum-fear-censorship-due-to-protect-ip.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110831/02230115748/what-can-bring-together-opposites-traditional-political-spectrum-fear-censorship-due-to-protect-ip.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110831/02230115748/what-can-bring-together-opposites-traditional-political-spectrum-fear-censorship-due-to-protect-ip.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>speaking-out</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110831/02230115748</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>