<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;comeptition&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:52:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Google Maps Charged With Unfair Competition In France For Daring To Be Free</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/0130025706.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/0130025706.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Once again, we get to see the entitlement culture at work -- this time over in France.  JohnForDummies points us to the news that a French company, Bottin Cartographes, is <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/afp/20090729/tc_afp/franceusinternetgooglecourt" target="_new">suing Google over its Google Maps offering</a>, because Google lets companies use its web mapping services for free (how dare they!).  Bottin Cartographes, on the other hand, offers a similar service that it charges for.  Apparently, it seems to think that "competition" itself is "unfair competition."  Why should Google have to charge just because this other company has a bad business model?  We're back to companies declaring <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071004/163314.shtml">felony interference with a business model</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/0130025706.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/0130025706.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090730/0130025706.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>how-dare-you!</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090730/0130025706</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:58:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>OLPC Finally Decides to Open Source Its Hardware</title>
<dc:creator>Kevin Donovan</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090129/0647243569.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090129/0647243569.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The many travails of the One Laptop Per Child program have been widely chronicled - after developing a robust, innovative laptop for the developing world, Nicholas Negroponte's educational project failed to garner the reception he expected. One of the main reasons for this was OLPC's belief that the market could not do better than their small project: instead of seeking the best products for the children of the developing world, <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080811/0250111940.shtml">competition was anathema to the OLPC group</a>.
<br><br>
But news that <a href="http://manypossibilities.net/2009/01/olpc-xo-2-goes-open-hardware/">the hardware from OLPC's second version, XO-2, will be open sourced</a>, gives hope that things are starting to change. Speaking to the Guardian, Negroponte says, "The XO-1 was really designed as if we were Apple. The XO-2 will be designed as if we were Google - we'll want people to copy it. We'll make the constituent parts available. We'll try and get it out there using the exact opposite approach that we did with the XO-1." Open hardware is an exciting new arena for innovative designs and, by embracing it, OLPC will create a new opportunity for entrepreneurs to create the best laptop for the developing world (or even the developed world). Also, instead of picking an established manufacturer from East Asia, open sourced hardware specifications will allow the developing world's emergent technology industries to compete, strengthening the communities OLPC seeks to assist.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090129/0647243569.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090129/0647243569.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090129/0647243569.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>it's-about-time</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090129/0647243569</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:25:54 PDT</pubDate>
<title>OLPC Is A Cathedral But OLPC Tech Is Fleeing Into The Bazaar</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Lee</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080523/1320151213.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080523/1320151213.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>From the outset, one of the oddities of the One Laptop Per Child project has been the tension between its organizational philosophy and its software platform. In his famous essay, <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/">"The Cathedral and the Bazaar,"</a> Eric Raymond contrasted two organizational philosophies for developing software. In the Cathedral, software projects are organized in a top-down fashion, with the development process following a plan carefully developed by the project's leaders. In contrast, the philosophy of the Bazaar is to "release early and often, delegate everything you can, be open to the point of promiscuity." The OLPC project was a strange beast because it was clearly organized on the "Cathedral" model, yet it was developed around Linux, the open source project that Raymond used as the poster child for the "Bazaar" style of development. And its broader vision of empowering third-world kids to use the laptops without a lot of central support, is clearly more Bazaar than Cathedral.</p>

<p>I think many of the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071108/134959.shtml">problems</a> we've <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080104/164319.shtml">noted</a> with the project stemmed from this fundamental conflict of visions. Nicholas Negroponte's vision for the OLPC organization has always been the model of the Cathedral: produce a perfect laptop on the first try and sell it in batches of a hundred thousand to the world's governments. Negroponte's plan left little room for the kind of development growth, bottom-up participation, and trial-and error that characterizes the Bazaar. Indeed, even when customers were <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071126/133154.shtml">beating down the door</a> to try out Negroponte's product, he resisted selling it to them because it conflicted with his vision. And of course, he <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070521/083050.shtml">absolutely hated the idea</a> of his customers having other options to choose from.</p>

<p>This tension was never sustainable, and indeed there are increasing signs that OLPC's innovative technologies are being steadily liberated from the Cathedral. In January, we noted that one OLPC alum was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080102/100732.shtml">starting a new firm</a> to commercialize the OLPC's display technology. Now CNet notes that another OLPC alum, Walter Bender, is <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9950876-7.html?part=rss&#038;tag=feed&#038;subj=NewsBlog">starting a new software spinoff</a> to <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Linux_startup_Sugar_Labs_in_informal_talks_with_four_laptop_makers/1211467857">license OLPC technology</a> to a variety of laptop manufacturers. Bender's decision to start a new company was presumably sparked by Negroponte's decision to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/114658614.shtml">run OLPC more like Microsoft,</a> which one engineer claims involved demoting Bender in favor of someone with less technical expertise.</p>

<p>It seems that the folks who have left OLPC have a more Bazaar-like vision for their companies, licensing their technologies to a variety of companies. In contrast, Negroponte seems to be doubling down on the "Cathedral" model. He's reportedly considering a switch from Linux to Windows. That would be oddly appropriate given the apparent similarities between Negroponte's management philosophy and Steve Ballmer's.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080523/1320151213.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080523/1320151213.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080523/1320151213.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>top-down-or-bottom-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080523/1320151213</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>