<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;classroom&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:02:21 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Ontario Premier Says Cellphones In Class Could Be Useful</title>
<dc:creator>Blaise Alleyne</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100916/16480211047/ontario-premier-says-cellphones-in-class-could-be-useful.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100916/16480211047/ontario-premier-says-cellphones-in-class-could-be-useful.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>With schools, cell phones and a politician in the same headline, you'd think the story would be about another attempt to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1835443768.shtml">ban</a> technology, but in Ontario, <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2010/09/15/ontario-mcguinty-cellphones-classroom.html">Premier Dalton McGuinty is telling schools to be open to uses for cellphones in the classroom</a>.</p>

<blockquote><em>McGuinty, who won't even let his ministers keep the devices during cabinet meetings, said he understands they can be a major distraction, but there is a "right way" to use them in class.
<br /><br />
"Telephones and BlackBerrys and the like are conduits for information today, and one of the things we want to do is to be well-informed," he said. "And it's something that we should be looking at in our schools.</em></blockquote>

<p>The issue came up in light of the Toronto District School Board rethinking its blanket ban, and "exploring ways to make [mobile devices] more acceptable."</p>

<p>Political opponents are already <a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/16/national-post-editorial-board-hang-up-on-mcguintys-cellphones-in-schools-plan/">mocking</a> McGuinty, and his government does have a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081030/0233062687.shtm">really</a> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070504/012738.shtml">mixed</a> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081127/1002222968.shtml">track</a> <a href="http://save.pickuppal.com/2008/11/12/ohtb-takes-the-side-of-the-bus-company/">record</a> on technology... but the comments here are actually quite reasonable. There's room between the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100718/23410310261.shtml">"discipline theater"</a> approach of a total ban and the teacher's nightmare scenario of a total free-for-all. A <em>good acceptable use policy</em> would attempt to reduce distractions while not precluding ways in which mobile technology can be <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090226/0118533909.shtml">helpful</a> in the classroom.</p>

<p>I attended a strict private high school in Toronto from 2001-2005, and we had a blanket ban on electronic devices... but teachers were smart enough to know when it made sense to ignore the ban. I used my PDA to take notes and manage homework in every class, and another student in my year often used a tablet computer. The ban was eventually lifted after I graduated, acknowledging the fact that more and more students were using laptops and mobile devices in ways that <em>helped</em> them learn, while I'm sure they still have a no nonsense policy for students goofing off or distracting others. Rules are needed to minimize bad uses, but that shouldn't prevent people from exploring good uses.</p>

<p>So, good for McGuinty for recognizing that we're better off exploring applications for mobile technology in the classroom than simply trying to ban it.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100916/16480211047/ontario-premier-says-cellphones-in-class-could-be-useful.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100916/16480211047/ontario-premier-says-cellphones-in-class-could-be-useful.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20100916/16480211047/ontario-premier-says-cellphones-in-class-could-be-useful.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>smart-comments-from-politicians?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100916/16480211047</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:20:37 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Should You Live Blog/Twitter A College Class?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0244482305.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0244482305.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's quite common these days for people to "live blog" or "live Twitter" different conferences or events they're attending, filling in others what's happening in near real time.  However, what happens when someone does that in a college class?  Already, there are some professors struggling with the fact that students <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080418/170854893.shtml">use the internet</a> during class, but they're not at all happy about the idea that they might not just be using the internet to surf around -- but to report to others what's happening inside the classroom.  The issue is discussed in detail by Mark Glaser in his latest MediaShift column after an <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/09/digging_deepernyu_professor_st_1.html" target="_new">NYU professor told her students to stop blogging or Twittering things about her class</a>.
<br /><br />
The controversy apparently began when a student in the class actually wrote a guest "embedded" column for MediaShift a few weeks ago, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2008/09/embedded_at_nyuold_thinking_pe.html">complaining that NYU's journalism school wasn't up-to-date</a> on teaching students about social media and the new tools of journalism.  The professor in the class she talked about wasn't particularly happy about the article, which was then discussed in the class itself (very meta).  According to students in the class (and the author of the original piece), the professor made it clear that they were no longer to blog, text or Twitter about the class, or to quote the professor without permission.  Considering the class itself is called “Reporting Gen Y," that seemed like an odd restriction.
<br /><br />
The professor differs on what she told the students, saying that she only meant they couldn't blog or Twitter <i>during</i> the class, but were free to afterwards.  However, she stood by the comment that she shouldn't be quoted without permission.  Glaser investigates the legality of this, and how it fits with NYU's journalism standards.  That said, it is a little odd that it's perfectly fine to quote or blog about conferences or other events, but once you're in the classroom, a cloak of silence is expected.  To some extent, this sounds like it may just be a generational issue.  Perhaps it's the actual Gen Y'ers who should be teaching the class on Reporting Gen Y.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0244482305.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0244482305.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080918/0244482305.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>questions-of-a-new-age</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080918/0244482305</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>